{"id":68587,"date":"2008-03-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008"},"modified":"2014-04-13T00:00:26","modified_gmt":"2014-04-12T18:30:26","slug":"divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre>E' 'E!\nP;-Er OI\\E\n\n'i'\"'E i1'0\"'BL\"' IviR.JUS'T'ICE SUBHASH B.A\"D1'   7i &gt; \n\nWRIT P31 ITIQN \ufb02O.18Q80[gQ:    \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nDivismm Coatmller,\n\nK.S.R.'I'.C.,\n\nBavanagem Bivision. ' ' _e \"   \n\nNow Rep. by its ChiefLaw O\ufb01cer,\" '  V _ V\n\nCentral 0f\ufb01ce,K.I-!.Road,\"    _  -  '\n   'V     A  PETITIONER\n\n&lt;BveS\ufb01~HEI%\u00a2sh Bha#1da=vT.. Adv.)\n\nSri Arjun Singh.  -  \nS&#039;\/&#039;o late Kama1Singh-3. &quot; _ \nAged about 59 years,  ._ &#039;\nR[\u00a21t&#039;House1&#039;:jN\u20aco.8O, 55*-&#039;I C1095, ---- \n1-= b;&#039;atza;ga::,\u00ab(.1&#039;a_=;;\u00bb*x1t..&#039;:ei_,&#039;t:-?.1_1=.=;-;:;.;-.,\nMysore       &quot;  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>A  Adv.)<\/p>\n<p>e e iv&#8221;v&#8221;\u00abfVI&#8217;his wxiteeu\ufb01on is \ufb01led under Articles 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n<p>the. Caonstituigion of India, praying to quash the wa..&#8217;m&#8217;|. dated<\/p>\n<p>16.5&#8242;;-2GOA&#8217;7~.,_passed by the Prl. Labour Court, Hubli, in<\/p>\n<p> F&#8217; &#8221; \u00ab    .Re:_,i&#8217;,D1Q].&#8211;11?!2DQQ vLd.c A..nx.f..&#8217;1- &#8230;&#8230;=-ml etc<\/p>\n<p>-:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;~\u00ab.Tiji\u00a7 Petition coming on for  Hearing this day. the<\/p>\n<p>111\/ \/i , &#8216;V 1 L  made the following:<\/p>\n<p>.;&#8211;__._<\/p>\n<p>An award dated 16.5.2007 in Ref.No.117]2000 is   ;. it <\/p>\n<p>question by the Corporation.<\/p>\n<p>2. The respondent was working as    iii<\/p>\n<p>Chitradurga Depot. 011 10.12.1993 iieegnductee am\u00a2oma-eggs<\/p>\n<p>at Mysore Depot under the leadershiipo__of_,.voneSri.(3o\u00a7.rrinda<br \/>\nand Sri Nagaraj and caused depot .9. this<\/p>\n<p>,__ &#8211;.-I&#8211;u&#8211;J vv new A<\/p>\n<p>regard, an e m i\ufb02r W h..ld. Thea. .Enqe&#8221;*y \u20ac\u00a3\ufb01eer&#8217; found, the<\/p>\n<p>mspondent is gnihjr _and  Diecipiinarjj\ufb02nthority passed an<\/p>\n<p>order of puma&#8217; hment :5 increments.<\/p>\n<p>on the questirn &#8216;f m*v&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;ty<\/p>\n<p>fair and proper. The<br \/>\n_.-.1 __V&#8217;-&#8216; _-.\n<\/p>\n<p>of   orn 10. mg. t&#8217;ne_e.vidence led by the Management<\/p>\n<p>. db<\/p>\n<p>and Ex.M&#8217;1&#8230;i&#8217;ound..thau.there is no reference to the name of the<\/p>\n<p>petition1eix_  This&#8217;. report submitted by the Assistant<\/p>\n<p> O\ufb01it-&#8216;er on  12. 1993 i.e. the date on which the alleged<\/p>\n<p>  toihave taken place. Even Ex.D-1 and Ex.D-1(a)<\/p>\n<p> the Enquiry Of\ufb01cer were not before the Labour<\/p>\n<p>   -the purpose of appreciation. There is no explanation by<\/p>\n<p> Corporation as to why the Seolrrity Qf\ufb01cer who su..mi..ed<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01e&#8221; initial -..port has not mferred to the we of th \ufb01t1&#8217;tio&#8221;r.<\/p>\n<p>l_.._ A. &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Dy<\/p>\n<p>.. .. ___1_-__1<br \/>\nCLEI 1 11 U<\/p>\n<p>the Corporation as per Ex.M15<\/p>\n<p>are related to subsequent to the alleged incident. The <\/p>\n<p>Court observed that. the Corporation failed to pmduee V    A<\/p>\n<p>documents. On consideration of the CVid.CI1C&#8217;J;&#8221;thC&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>found that, there is no legal evidence to  the?&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>charge and \ufb01ndings are perverse for     <\/p>\n<p>4. Learned counsel for  ltliafrtlle<br \/>\nrespondent has not entered the   is<br \/>\nheld fair and proper.   Labour Court<br \/>\nought not to have   of the Enquiry<br \/>\nO\ufb01cer. He   the&#8221;&#8216;direction issued by the<br \/>\nLabour Court ircteralicr  steps. ._..ent..l prmeedings<br \/>\nagainst<br \/>\nbeyond&#8217; \ufb01re &#8216;ofVrefe1&#8243;ence__and beyond the jurisdiction of the<\/p>\n<p>Labour <\/p>\n<p>  V  G\ufb01cer who submitted the report on<br \/>\nit   on the alleged date of incident, has not referred to<br \/>\nftlre of the petitioner. There is no material as to whether<\/p>\n<p> respondent had conducted a meeting and cause disturbance<\/p>\n<p>at the depot. In the absence of any material holding charges <\/p>\n<p>proved per se is illegal and not supported by the evidence.  f &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>6. It is not in dispute that, Ex.M 10- th_e..it1_i_tial of   <\/p>\n<p>incident and name of the respondent is not   iv&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>report. Though some of the documents, teem<br \/>\nbefore the Enquiry Of\ufb01cer were not  pefore&#8217; It Lati\u00e9our<br \/>\nCourt and it is found that, nonA..;.p&#8221;godulc\ufb01on,i&#8217;.ofthese documents<\/p>\n<p>has to be held against the Corpomttion; V._S:l:,.ce;.m;i._C;&#8217;;rpora..L..n<\/p>\n<p>7. For the.o.Aabove.Vreaso:n&#8217;s,\u00bb&#8217;I&#8221;do&#8221;not&#8221; \ufb01nd any justification to<\/p>\n<p>interfere with the  _ofVs&#8217;the&#8221;&#8221;_Labour  However, the<\/p>\n<p>|&#8211;t<br \/>\nI5&#8242;<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">9<\/span><br \/>\ni&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;)<br \/>\nI<br \/>\n;:\n<\/p>\n<p>!<br \/>\njd<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><br \/>\nii<br \/>\n69,<br \/>\nii<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\n&#8216;-0-\n<\/p>\n<p>Eu<br \/>\n:3<br \/>\n5&#8242;<br \/>\nE5&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;date deparmuentai<\/p>\n<p>i&#8217; A- 4.1.1&#8242;-\n<\/p>\n<p>cas Lu  f&#8221;vV&#8221;&#8216;t&#8217;i is not impiemented, is beyond the<\/p>\n<p> scope of&#8221;E.aESour&#8221; fu\ufb01sdic\ufb01on. The duty of the Labour Court<\/p>\n<p> pass  basis of the materials in relation to the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;issiie&#8217;&#8211;raisedL or refened and can act as executing Court, as the<\/p>\n<p> of award, the remedy is governed by the<\/p>\n<p> dieegcntosiammq provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act. The<\/p>\n<p> not implemented, claimants have nemedy in law and to<\/p>\n<p>see?\n<\/p>\n<p>this extent, the direction issued by the Labour Court at relief<\/p>\n<p>No.5 required to be quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>8. Aaaardfrqjfjj, &#8216;s&#8217;hi&#8221;- &#8216;s&#8217;r&#8217;v&#8217;\ufb01&#8217;i 3&#8242;-&#8220;iiii&#8217;0n is pariiy aifuweci.  _<\/p>\n<p>ciireciion to initiate the cieparimentai pmoee\u00a3l7ings.\ufb01i; ;, A&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>quashed and the award of interest:  prity\ufb01&#8217; No..3\u00bb&#8221;&#8216;V&#8217;f$A  V<\/p>\n<p>quashed. Except this, other part of the   &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>*AP\/&#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi E&#8217; &#8216;E! P;-Er OI\\E &#8216;i'&#8221;&#8216;E i1&#8217;0&#8243;&#8216;BL&#8221;&#8216; IviR.JUS&#8217;T&#8217;ICE SUBHASH B.A&#8221;D1&#8242; 7i &gt; WRIT P31 ITIQN \ufb02O.18Q80[gQ: BETWEEN: Divismm Coatmller, K.S.R.&#8217;I&#8217;.C., Bavanagem Bivision. &#8216; &#8216; _e &#8221; Now Rep. by its ChiefLaw O\ufb01cer,&#8221; &#8216; V _ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68587","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-12T18:30:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-12T18:30:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":703,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-12T18:30:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-12T18:30:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-12T18:30:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008"},"wordCount":703,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008","name":"Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-12T18:30:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/divisional-controller-k-s-r-t-c-vs-sri-arjun-singh-on-19-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Divisional Controller K S R T C vs Sri Arjun Singh on 19 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68587","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68587"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68587\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68587"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68587"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68587"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}