{"id":68639,"date":"2010-01-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010"},"modified":"2017-11-18T06:09:04","modified_gmt":"2017-11-18T00:39:04","slug":"v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
 Z V  \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THES THE 13?\" DAY OF JANUARY 2010\u00bb j\n\nPRESENT\nTHE HONBLE MR.JUs1*1CE__\\z.,Q,sAB_'HAh\"    '\nAND . . . .\nTHE HONBLE MR.JUsT1c{E'~s,N.SA:IY3.NA1~\u00a7AiigxlM.AV \nREGULAR FIRST  .,1:\\_1Q._\u00bb416.\/' 1\u00ab.9:'3f7 \nBetween: . \u00ab  .\nS\/olate Boraiah,    I     \nAdult, Kothoor village' _ _   4_  ' \nSjiodagu.    '   .    Appellaat\n\n(by SI'i.S2:,_V\ufb01a,t1;1'_A Ady\ufb02)\n\nAnd:\n\n, .1. Vf\u00bbgk.fievamrna,. __\n\n . A \"AdL1it;\n\n  \n= A Atlultg   V\n\nAdiz.1 t_;$\n\nV  Respondents 1 to 4 are<\/pre>\n
V. R’\/a C\/0 Ramappa
\n? Chem1agiViliage,
\nPoiiibetta, Kodagu.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
11.<\/p>\n
12.<\/p>\n
13.<\/p>\n
14.<\/p>\n
15.<\/p>\n
16.<\/p>\n
17.<\/p>\n
18.<\/p>\n
Voli\ufb01ayaxzthi.\n<\/p>\n
W\/0 Devaraj Adult,
\nHebbale village,<\/p>\n
Kappdi, K.R.Naga1′ Taluk.\n<\/p>\n
V.K.Sannappa
\nAdult, W\/O Kempaiah,<\/p>\n
V.E.Armayya
\nAdult, S\/0 Erappa.\n<\/p>\n
V.E.Jayara1I1,
\nA\u00e9ult, s\/0 Erappa<\/p>\n
V.S.Vishwanath
\nAdult. S\/O Sannappa”.,_<\/p>\n
V.S.Vittal,<\/p>\n
S\/0 Sam1appa,ad111t ….  ‘V l<\/p>\n
8\/ 0 Sa1}nappa;’\u00bb-a\u00a3lu1t;._V-..__ <\/p>\n
V.SlSu’r\u00e9sh, V’ * -~ l<\/p>\n
S\/0 Saniaappa, A   ” =
\nRc.\u20ac\u00abDOI1d\u20acr;t,$ “to l 8 A are
\nR?\/0 Kothur Villagg, ,<\/p>\n
‘ – \u00e9 “s.Kcaag”u,<\/p>\n
= A S\/0 Joix\u00e9arappa, Adult.\n<\/p>\n
V.lJ.”\u00a3’\u00a71riSlilr1a;)pa<\/p>\n
S\/”u,__Ibwrappa, adult.\n<\/p>\n
V’ r .Saraswathi,
\nD\/0 Jewrappa, adult.\n<\/p>\n
V.J .SaVithIi,<\/p>\n
23.<\/p>\n
24.<\/p>\n
25.<\/p>\n
26.<\/p>\n
27.<\/p>\n
28.<\/p>\n
29.<\/p>\n
W\/ 0 Sannappa. adult,
\nPeriyapattana Taluk,
\nPanchavalli Post.\n<\/p>\n
V.S.Bhagirathi<\/p>\n
W\/0 late Surendra,<\/p>\n
Adult.\n<\/p>\n
V.S.Chandrashekar,<\/p>\n
S\/0 late Surendra, adult.\n<\/p>\n
V.S.Shobha,
\nD\/0 late Surendra, adult.\n<\/p>\n
V.M.Ningamma, V  -_
\nW\/0 late Madaiah, adult.” ‘
\nV.M.KeshaVa.ial1~,._  H  _  ~
\nS\/0 late   adult  ”\n<\/p>\n
V.M.Jagade+\u00e9el1, ‘ _  \u00ab_
\n8\/ olate   ad _ it,<\/p>\n
D\/0 l~.\u00a3ad1.ah, ad’ult.  ”\n<\/p>\n
Respondents 1.9,’-t0d?_..9l’2’ire r\/0<\/p>\n
K\ufb01pthur village, ‘S.K0vdagu.  Respondents<\/p>\n
V_(l:)y’S1fi.A.K.Subbajah, Adv for R2, 9, 10, 13 and 15,
\n .  V _Sri..vM.,Rai11,_Bl{;at. Adv for R12, 14, 16-18,
\n~. ” -Sri.M.U…POQ1’lacha, Adv for R27, 28
\n‘ __R4, 5., 6~,?._7,’ 19, 24, 29, 26, 1, 3, 8, 11, 25<\/p>\n
1’\\re\u00bbfserve’d by way of paper publ}.C8.t10I1
\nR20,’$d.,<\/p>\n
 A. , _.R2,”23 service held suf\ufb01cient, R22 sd.,)<\/p>\n
and late Boraiah, the father of 10th defendant and since
\nthe said wet lands are attached to the wet lands in<\/p>\n
Sy.Nos.44\/1 and 44\/2, as described in the A schedule,<\/p>\n
and in Sy.No.48, the plaintiff and defendants  <\/p>\n
for proportionate bane lands and at the   <\/p>\n
the said bane lands may be allotted A<\/p>\n
attached to Sy.No.43 and 44\/2y__ (AAvschedu1e\u00bb”‘}ands)  <\/p>\n
wherefore, the suit is filed for thVe’a_boV’e sa1d_t’:ellefs’.}
\nA schedule lands comprises .zo’f__’ty\u00a7ioy lands with the<\/p>\n
followi\ufb02g desc1’iPtion:  V<\/p>\n
“1.Sagu Wet of  l  xbotlnded
\nby: East by  “\u20acj_-.y..No.44\/ 2,
\nand 56\/1, North by,syc.No,44y\/2:}md 44\/1 and
\nsouth__by sy.y1\\fgjg5;’5s\/1.’ ”  ” V”<\/p>\n
2. Saga ‘v1r;et\u00bbSy..l:\\lo,4%l\/2__of 3.60 acres bounded<\/p>\n
 Eastl’l)y”sy;nlo_:’4_4,_ ll’\u00a7”V{7est by thodu, north by<\/p>\n
t2;\u00a7au% Sy.1\\Eo.4\u00a7”and 50\/1 and south by<\/p>\n
\\}J.\n<\/p>\n
210-\n<\/p>\n
8 Schedule Iands (kothoor Village)<\/p>\n
81. K1113. Sy. Area in Tenure  <\/p>\n
No. No. No. Acres<\/p>\n
1 23 53 \/2 100 Unpril. sedge 111119111}  ~<\/p>\n
23 50\/2 6-28
\n23 30\/25 2-00
\n23 30\/20 2-33  ” = id
\n22 53\/ 1 3-2531\/if.un.pr:1.% S:.ag_’t_:1
\n66 57\/8  2-00ffj M   <\/p>\n
76 57\/9    ”\n<\/p>\n
76 57\/ 10    _\n\n76 35155    Sign bane\n76    \"    \"\n\n71  ....   \u00ab\n\n72  L   \"\n\n1-<5'\u00a9OO\\1CDUlu\u00a7OOtO\n\n}._a\n\u00a7_.a.\n\n1--\nND\n\n<\/pre>\n
3. Defefxddamtsd -2VA’t0  had \ufb01led written statement<\/p>\n
 re1ati0i1e.h..i.p’ of plaintiff with Nirigamma and<\/p>\n
  he has succeeded to the property of<\/p>\n
L  1\\1mga:\u00a71:11a,_*3d;111ghter of Siddalingaiah and plaintiff is put<\/p>\n
 pydof of the same, but, however, the relationship<\/p>\n
  defendants 3 and 4.\u00bb and defendants 5 and 8 with<\/p>\n
 f’i’\u20ac1E1%1daI1″{S 1 and 10 is admitted. It is averred by the<\/p>\n
V”\n<\/p>\n
-11-<\/span><\/p>\n
defendants that as Erappa was known with an alias name<\/p>\n
of Doddaiah, Sannappa is also known as Ningaiah andthe<\/p>\n
plaintiff has intentionally avoided mentioning of <\/p>\n
in the piaint with ulterior motive and the reiatiohshsiphiilllolf= V’<\/p>\n
Venkatappa and Lakshmamma as stated   <\/p>\n
not admitted and the plaintiff is putllto Zlpijoof  <\/p>\n
and the plaintiff is put to st1’ict”‘p:i:*oof of ‘t=h_e’~vg\u00e9;nealllolgieal
\ntree given in para 3 of the  ftirt._her averted that
\nit is true that late Kempaiah  h.roth’et__’Venkatappa,<\/p>\n
Siddaiingaiah partitioned   to 1923, but<\/p>\n
it is clemezdlltliatiifhe bornewout by the jamabandi
\nrecords and 2 the  was oral one and is<\/p>\n
pertained’ not onlyitolthe  lands but also to the bane<\/p>\n
 Valid fnrtlier, in such division the said sharers were<\/p>\n
put ‘iii segiatate’-..-possession and enjoyment of their<\/p>\n
 lrespective s’ha-reds and as such, the jamabandi entries do<\/p>\n
if ll_:’V:’l.’fi;o.t_.”presuppose any aliotment of shares as Claimed by the<\/p>\n
 and plaintiff is put to strict proof of the same. It<\/p>\n
i isfdehied by the defendarlts that Ningarmtna was the only<\/p>\n
\\\/><\/p>\n
‘”‘\u00a7’<\/p>\n
-12-<\/span><\/p>\n
legal representative of Siddalingaiah as Thimtnanima was<\/p>\n
married out of the family and therefore,
\nbecame the sole owner of the alleged share of  .
\nlate Siddahngaiah and the plaintiff is’! putto sie\u00a2t7pr6cft_’oi’  ”<\/p>\n
the same. It is also denied that <\/p>\n
entered in the jamabandi shov.d:n~g> her
\nenjoyment of the alleged :”prope.rti’es’c_:’of “late.’Siddali:ngaiah
\nand that Ningamrna wast  of the wet
\nlands shown in  time and the
\nplaintiff is  ” same. It is averred
\nthat the  jtla  the defendants have<\/p>\n
trespasseddtipon  lands which were in<\/p>\n
possession of lithe’ and the said lands had been<\/p>\n
  Vollsiddalingaiah in the partition that<\/p>\n
  1920 and the other bane lands were<\/p>\n
V it not partiti.oned”‘ and continued to be joint family property is
\n ”   asvfalse. It is averred that though the plaintiff had
\npresented a suit in OS.No.82\/ 1991 and since the court<\/p>\n
“-tididdnot have the jurisdiction to try same was returned for<\/p>\n
\\)<\/p>\n
-14-<\/span><\/p>\n
wife Thirmnamma who had a moiety share “in<\/p>\n
S1’dda1ir1gaiah’s properties and it ought to have devol:Ve_dw.V
\non her heirs and plaintiff has conveniently bypas-sedA ~
\nand their rights in the suit, which i.s1a3y  K V’<\/p>\n
and the plaint A scheduie properties  <\/p>\n
possession of Ningamma  life  if
\ndefendants 1 and 2 were~..V_to z in’ arf1’ana’\u00e9ement
\nNingamma would not have’  aliowed to
\ncontinue their  -in  her death in
\nthe year  as set out by
\nthe plajnttfthvalleged allotment of<\/p>\n
sy.no.44\/ \\r\u00a311_age to Siddalingaiah is not<\/p>\n
true as he was”giVe’other areas in wet lands in settlement<\/p>\n
 fwhich  sold by her daughter Ningamma<\/p>\n
ajxa -sale  wet land sy.No.43 and 44\/2 as<\/p>\n
V dd described  A scheduie fell to the share of Kempaiah
\nH K  ‘@,.’V:PAor:_ra1eg’ovsvda, who along with other wet and bane lands<\/p>\n
–.WasV  possession and enjoyment in his own right<\/p>\n
K\/’<\/p>\n
-22-<\/span><\/p>\n
6. Having regard to the above said pleadixigsjtlie
\nfollowing issues were framed\u00bb l<\/p>\n
“1) Whether the plaintiff proves
\nthe sole surviving heir off; the’ ‘   <\/p>\n
Siddalingiah?\n<\/p>\n
2) Whether the
\nsy.no.43 and 44\/ Kothu1″ve_vg*efe.._give\ufb01to the
\nshare of Siddalmgaialj   was in
\nseparate posAsession”‘a;r1tl the said<\/p>\n
  proves that the
\nshare __of  thrown into hotch~<\/p>\n
potch of the .fa1i?\ufb01l_v”af:terV~’his death?<\/p>\n
 it  4) Whether the plaintiff proves that he is
\n  “to possession of plaint A schedule<\/p>\n
it  <\/p>\n
 .5)”‘Whether the plaintiff proves that he is<\/p>\n
 ..  erititled to 1\/ Std share in plaint B schedule<\/p>\n
it v  properties and also C schedule properties?<\/p>\n
24. The above said evidence adduced by the<\/p>\n
parties has to be appreciated along with the docursents<\/p>\n
got marked by the parties to \ufb01nd out as to  .<\/p>\n
\ufb01nding of the trial Court that the._plair1tifi’hha1s it” it<\/p>\n
discharge his burden of provingd-tha_t “thered  <\/p>\n
partition of wet lands prior  lands * L’<\/p>\n
continued to be joint farmly dtli-3.t..iands in
\nSy. Nos.43 and 44\/2 ask  to the
\nplaint were allott’eds1’to  which
\nwas succeeded    after the death of his
\nmother,   property and he has
\nbeen  land by the defendants<\/p>\n
and wherefore, he  entitled to possession of the said land<\/p>\n
  is entitled to possession of 1\/3111 share in<\/p>\n
  schedule properties. The question of<\/p>\n
 e consider%.1’1g-the third prayer to allot sy. No.50\/1 in Kula<\/p>\n
   LB’ schedule property would arise only if the<\/p>\n
 is able to discharge the burden cast upon-him by<\/p>\n
T  the trial Court as per the pleadings of the parties.<\/p>\n
i.\\_{:’–\\,  .\n<\/p>\n
-50-<\/span><\/p>\n
has got undivided share, which is admittediy, in<\/p>\n
possession of defendants 1 to 8. The facts e1icited..in..4’the<\/p>\n
cross–eXamination of PW.1 would further  .<\/p>\n
entries in the Jamabandi register in.\u00bbr~espec_thof  Nos..43.V ”<\/p>\n
and 44\/2 stand in the name   <\/p>\n
Siddalingaiah as contended vthe   * L’<\/p>\n
there is no material to .~shoW_.ti1atL_:’Sy-,__NosA}4fi.,\/2.V’\u00a7and 43<\/p>\n
described in ‘A’ schedule’  .\u00a7V1)w1:’aj1::n~V:%_\\?tra:’s.a11otted to the<\/p>\n
‘!<\/p>\n
share of Siddalfingaiah   record would<\/p>\n
clearly shoW\u20ac’that’ the’:”sait1.i’f,afopei’tie’sstood in the name of
\nKempaiah  defendants 1 and 2 have
\nsucceededto’-the’  PW.1 has also admitted<\/p>\n
in his :.cross–eXan1;inationVA’that Kempaiah and Venkatappa<\/p>\n
 .{iv*ereV”‘  2\/(351 dddd “share each in the joint family<\/p>\n
prop.erties}and”jth’ey were in possession and enjoyment of<\/p>\n
V dd _ the respective’ shares that were allotted to them and after<\/p>\n
  ,death: of Kempaiah and Venkatappa, suceessors~in~<\/p>\n
__’1~__tit1e”i:1ave been in possession of the said properties.<\/p>\n
‘\\;=-A3\u00bb X<\/p>\n
-54-<\/span><\/p>\n
does not suffer from any error or illegality as to  for
\ninterference in this appeal. Accordingly, we
\npoints for determination and pass the
\nThe Appeal is dismissed  cost’. in
\nand decree passed by the Civil  <\/p>\n
No.31\/1992 dated 30.01.1997 i-s3:’p:”C:\u20ac)1’1fi1*hi’11ed’.–._:   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010 Author: V.G.Sabhahit & S.N.Satyanarayana Z V IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THES THE 13?” DAY OF JANUARY 2010\u00bb j PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUs1*1CE__\\z.,Q,sAB_’HAh” ‘ AND . . . . THE HONBLE MR.JUsT1c{E’~s,N.SA:IY3.NA1~\u00a7AiigxlM.AV REGULAR FIRST .,1:\\_1Q._\u00bb416.\/’ 1\u00ab.9:’3f7 Between: . \u00ab […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nV.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-18T00:39:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-18T00:39:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1482,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010\",\"name\":\"V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-18T00:39:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-18T00:39:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-18T00:39:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010"},"wordCount":1482,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010","name":"V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-18T00:39:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/v-b-thammaiah-vs-vok-devamma-and-ors-on-19-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"V.B.Thammaiah vs Vok.Devamma And Ors. on 19 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68639"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68639\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}