{"id":68673,"date":"2008-10-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008"},"modified":"2015-07-03T14:39:25","modified_gmt":"2015-07-03T09:09:25","slug":"sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial … vs The District Registrar And … on 14 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial … vs The District Registrar And … on 14 October, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
 '' ''v;2gG1Ls*rR;aTI0N OWICER,\n\n:1\n\nw? 288412006\n\n1\nIN THE men coum' or? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nBATED THIS THE 14TH DAY 0:? ocroam, 2003 \nBEFORE % .\n\nTHE HOIWBLE MRJUSTICE B.s.PA'r1L\"1: \" \n\nwnrr pmrrxon 1to.&zguo6* 23 gr_.,xs;gj  9  V\nBETWEEN:  i  T' A'\n\nSIR M.V\u00a7SHWESHWARAIAH\nMEMORIAL EDUCATION SOCIETY,  \u00bb\nCHIKKABALLAPUR, KOLAR DI__S'1'RIC'I',_..._  \n\nBY rrs SECRETARY,   \n\nSR1 NNARAYANASWAMY,\n\ns\/0 NARAYANAPPA,   A\n\nAGES 44 YEARS, ADVO_CATE,_...  _  '\nc1~\u00a7:1<KABAL1\u00a2AP1JR,,..\u00ab    _ \nKOLAR DISTRICT.      "  "-"'.'.P.\u00a7='.'I'I'I'IONER\n\n(BY SR] T.hi';RAGI~!'l;} l5A.?H}*','__ - '\nAND: ' 4' ' H  \n\n1. THE n:aTRIc'f'REG1sTRAR \nassoczlmmss, "\n\nV_ K01-AR BI'-'7\u00abTRIC'T..\n NEAR P.RABHA'T,Ti1LKI ES,\n\nTHE"-n1REvc'*:'t\u00a7'R\u00a7\n' . V DEPARTMENT OF PRE~UNIVI3RSI'"I'Y\nEDUCEATIQN, PALACE ROAD,\n\n "  V.f\u00bbBANC'\u00bb;\u00a2.LORE ~-- 560 001. ..RESPONDEN'I'S\n\n   ;'~m"r."i<.sARoJ1N1 MUTTANNA, AGA)\n\n' THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER' ARWCLES 226 8; 227 OF\n\n CONS'I'I'I'U'?ION OF' INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE\n" ORDER AT ANN-Q ST. 8.2.2006, PASSED BY THE R1 18 ILLEGAL\n\nAN!) SEX!' ASIDE THE SAME 85 ETC.\n\n\n\nWP 2334 \/2006\n\n2\nTHIS PE'I'IT'ION COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE\n\nCOURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
1. In this writ petition, petitioner-\u00abSociety is  H<\/p>\n
order dated 08.02.2006 passmi by the 1″‘   <\/p>\n
Regbtrar and Socienles RcgistIation:”(\u00a7Eti1:-at-,:’ <\/p>\n
Kolar. The inlpllgned order is p!1D”v311ceti 5?3  n I ‘” \u00a7;Q… : ~  <\/p>\n
2. By the said order, the applic\ufb02\ufb01xan    V<\/p>\n
stteki\ufb02 g condemnation of delay   i\ufb01inute\ufb01 dVf’i}1′<\u00a7 gencrai<\/p>\n
body and the audited bazanc\u00e9 \u00ab.~.:i"  re}:-C' ma.<\/p>\n
3. Th:   disposal of the case stated in
\nnutshell  <.ti1at 'B5?   datcd 15.10.2005, the 1\u00bb:<\/p>\n
xespondfgnt  of registration of the petitioner\u00bb-<\/p>\n
 fori\u00e9issolu\ufb01on of the same with a further<\/p>\n
  for taking over the assets and properties<\/p>\n
 th\u00e9  Seem)" 1.1 22 of the Kaxnataka Societies<\/p>\n
"  1960 (hereinafter refer-md to as 'the Act', for<\/p>\n
   said order was passed on the gonad that the<\/p>\n
 "',*'.\ufb01!;;ftk3ner-Society had failed to comply with the provisions of<\/p>\n
 \u00bb.s;.\u00bb;-mans 11 & 13 ofthc Act, in that, me: its registration, it did<\/p>\n
 not conduct any general body mee\ufb01ng nor did the society<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
WP 2884 xzooe
\n3<\/span><\/p>\n
\ufb01nnish the details of the members of the elected body or of the.
\naudited accounts of the sochaty. This order was  by<\/p>\n
the pctiiioner-Society before this Court in w.P.No.2483a,t;b_c5.<\/p>\n
This Court by order dated 19.12.2005 dimcteci  ‘-<\/p>\n
Society to \ufb01k: an application for     “‘ 2<\/p>\n
con};-1y1ng’ with the pmV1s’ ‘Ems of  n;f13:’ <\/p>\n
Court further dinzcted that if suctg ‘ax; a;$\u00a71i\u00a2\u00e9Lti;on=i\u00a7 \ufb01xed’ pyf the  =<\/p>\n
petitioncr-Society, the District  shfsi\ufb01 . 1t:\u00a2on\ufb01ider the
\nmatter in the light of the pra\ufb01abnis  u\ufb01dcr Section 13.
\nWhile issuing such a_ mind that the
\npetitionaer-Society ~\ufb0112;1.nv En’    \u00e9\u00e9riixsai\ufb01onal institutions.
\nTwo Week$’.. tiII.’3.\u20ac -.th\u00a32′ petitioner to makc such an<\/p>\n
application  the  seeking condonation of<\/p>\n
fielay in   requirements of submitting audited<\/p>\n
V.   requirements. A direction was issued to the<\/p>\n
1″ to consider the said application within a<\/p>\n
V  1’r;ason\u00a3i”‘.9lc \u00a3a_:i1’11e.:’ Until oonsidcratison of the said application, the<\/p>\n
 V7.. 15.10.2005 passed by the Distr\u00e9ct Registrar<\/p>\n
 the society and canceling the m\ufb01snanlon was kept in<\/p>\n
  Copy of the ozder passed by this Court is produced<\/p>\n
1 LL * ” ‘~.*:Lf An11e1a1:rc—M.\n<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
WP 2884\/’.2\u00ae6<\/p>\n
4. Pursuant to this onier, the peti\ufb01aoner herein has <\/p>\n
application making condonation of delay in \ufb01ling  nf<\/p>\n
the general ‘body and the audited balance sheet  _  <\/p>\n
supported by the a\ufb01davit of the Sccziztarylllll  ‘f’}.f:~l3jl(“;’ in’:<\/p>\n
\npnph 6 of the a\ufb01davit, the   <\/p>\n
by the previous     not
\navailable despite search. He   that after 2002,
\nboth the mj11utes.vO\u00a7’jth\u00a2   ‘audited balance
\nsheet have    that if the delay
\nwas not    -‘of the students who were<\/p>\n
studying in  irrepambly a\ufb02ected whereas<\/p>\n
no pmjtggdics. or   be caused to anyone if the delay<\/p>\n
   annlma\ufb01on has been dismissed by me 1\u00bb<\/p>\n
  order at An11exme–Q.\n<\/p>\n
  All  of the impugned order disc’ loses that the<\/p>\n
 has persuaded himself to reject the<\/p>\n
I\u00bb   on the gonad among othczs that the a\ufb02avit \ufb01led<\/p>\n
” msillppoxt of the application did not bear pmper stamp and<\/p>\n
 hlzxhcrcfoxc the contents of the sand’ a\ufb02avit cannot be taken into<\/p>\n
account for condoning the delay.\n<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
WP 2834 \/2005
\n5<\/span><\/p>\n
6. The main oontention urged by the learned Counsel for the<\/p>\n
petitioner in support of the cha\ufb02enge made is that as <\/p>\n
proviso to Section 13, the Distnhct Rcgisnar is enjoifxxetlj<\/p>\n
duty to a\ufb01ord an opportunity of personal    K  <\/p>\n
application is made seeking   <\/p>\n
audited accounts and in   of ”\n<\/p>\n
o\ufb01ce boaters founiag the   the V<\/p>\n
management of the a\ufb01hirs o\ufb01the   by the
\n1″ respondent. He subznito    of personal<\/p>\n
hearing has been to  V’  Counsel has<\/p>\n
also  out   contained under Section 13<\/p>\n
providing  of of the society and for<\/p>\n
  the society, has no application to the<\/p>\n
  nregent case, as the saiti provision has been<\/p>\n
   amendment which is brought into force<\/p>\n
M  with e1’ifecto.__’\ufb01o.ni 01.042002 and the alleged violation of the<\/p>\n
:of submitting the balance sheet and the names<\/p>\n
 the list of members of the governing body was for the<\/p>\n
   anterior to the date of amendment<\/p>\n
 In order to \ufb01m out whether the 1″ respondent had in fact<\/p>\n
given an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner before<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
WP 288412006
\n6<\/span><\/p>\n
passing the impugned order at Anncmire-Q, this Court by order
\ndated 13.10.2008 directed the Earned Add}. Government<\/p>\n
Advocate to secum the records from the 1″ mspojidont<\/p>\n
However, records are not made availahic. No  of<\/p>\n
objection is \ufb02ed refuting the mound urged by   _  <\/p>\n
stati\ufb02g that an oPP\u00b0m1m’tY ofP\u20acrson\ufb021:he&I’Iot  t””*-_,\u00a7    <\/p>\n
8. A perusal of Section 13 of     L\u00bb<\/p>\n
incorporated therein makes it   ity of
\npersonal hcaxing is to : to_the  before<\/p>\n
passing any order on the   Court had<\/p>\n
directed  1-F3′ ‘hoiam to pass orcicrs in wcordance<\/p>\n
with law, it   .. ‘gt that the order can only be<\/p>\n
    hearing to the society as<\/p>\n
   provision. As the respondent has faded’ to<\/p>\n
Show   opportunity was gven to the petit3’oner–<\/p>\n
‘  %ictA\u00a7*;\u00ab\u00ab..the.__voz:?:oi’Aundcr chalknge su\ufb02brs from serious m\ufb01nm” ‘ty,<\/p>\n
” ” ‘:”it   ‘*eriola\ufb01on of the principles of natural justice and the<\/p>\n
t  of personal hearing’ to be given.<\/p>\n
 In the result and for the foregoing, this writ petition<\/p>\n
.-,<\/p>\n
uetzucoecds in mrt. The order under challenge produced at<\/p>\n
 -Q is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the 1″<\/p>\n
WP 2334 f2006
\n7<\/span><\/p>\n
respondent with a direction to reconsider the matter in the T3111:<\/p>\n
of the observations made above. It is made clear that tiie.T1’*<\/p>\n
respondent shall take note of all the contents of  <\/p>\n
\ufb01es?! in support of the application, if necessary by   .  <\/p>\n
the petitioner to farms’ h tbs requisit=ti Etamp <\/p>\n
appropriate orders after giving an   .<\/p>\n
hearing. The District Registrar  % ‘nu.  <\/p>\n
as expeditiously as possible   ordeifs, at any
\nrate within a period. of th1t=:e ‘t1;ir\u00a7r1t}j3  of receipt of a<\/p>\n
copy of this oxtlexf,   until a \ufb02esh<\/p>\n
decision  taL\u00a3n._ ‘ .h\u00a2I’e&n’ ‘ above. tlw older at<\/p>\n
Annexume-L  It is also made dear that<\/p>\n
in vicwg\u00a7f”\u00a3he  \u00a73f.thc erstwhik: Ko}ar District and<\/p>\n
    of Chickballapur, the matter<\/p>\n
  to me magma: Registrar of seem’ ‘ ,<\/p>\n
2  shall oonsiim’ the matter afresh and pass<\/p>\n
” ” ‘T tam.’ is aimed shove.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-v
\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial … vs The District Registrar And … on 14 October, 2008 Author: B.S.Patil ” ”v;2gG1Ls*rR;aTI0N OWICER, :1 w? 288412006 1 IN THE men coum’ or? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BATED THIS THE 14TH DAY 0:? ocroam, 2003 BEFORE % . THE HOIWBLE MRJUSTICE B.s.PA’r1L”1: ” wnrr pmrrxon 1to.&zguo6* 23 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial ... vs The District Registrar And ... on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial ... vs The District Registrar And ... on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-03T09:09:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial … vs The District Registrar And … on 14 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-03T09:09:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1032,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial ... vs The District Registrar And ... on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-03T09:09:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial … vs The District Registrar And … on 14 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial ... vs The District Registrar And ... on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial ... vs The District Registrar And ... on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-03T09:09:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial … vs The District Registrar And … on 14 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-03T09:09:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008"},"wordCount":1032,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008","name":"Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial ... vs The District Registrar And ... on 14 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-03T09:09:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sir-m-vishweshwaraiah-memorial-vs-the-district-registrar-and-on-14-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sir M Vishweshwaraiah Memorial … vs The District Registrar And … on 14 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68673"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68673\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}