{"id":68878,"date":"2009-07-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-02-03T14:18:35","modified_gmt":"2016-02-03T08:48:35","slug":"the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Management Of M\/S Intergrated … vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Management Of M\/S Intergrated … vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
Bx: THE HIGH (3(‘)UR’1′()I~’K ARNA’mI< A A1' BANGALORE
\nDated this the 29"' day of July, 2609<\/p>\n
Before<\/p>\n
THE HUMBLE MR JUSHCE HULUVADI G    .. A' <\/p>\n
Writ Petitions 3154\/2305 c\/w9438, 943% 944{h'—.3a\ufb02u?_:\u00a3?5VV (ii: ._<\/p>\n
Between:<\/p>\n
In WP 8154li)5:\n<\/p>\n
Management of Mfs Integatcd Electric V<\/p>\n
Company ?vt Ltd — by its ‘u  *<\/p>\n
Managng Brirector — Sri R Vgjayataghavan  ”<\/p>\n
Plat # 497-A, 4″‘Phase V ‘  <\/p>\n
Peenya Indutriai Area = \u00bb _ x  g  _ AA ”\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore 560 058   \"    .  iifetitioner\n\n(By Sr: K R Anansza       %\nAmi: . .' .  .\n1 Sr! Seetl1\u00e9i'am appa  . 2\n\n<\/pre>\n
23 1;–s.<.:\/3, Vezhlaatagypa buigdiixg
\nNear K\u00e9iikamba Tsnmple V<\/p>\n
.. ..  _ A Tv}i):;:saf-:11ai1i,\u00abBa:agaIi)i*\u00e9'57<\/p>\n
2'    'C  VCXQ Ugrappa
\n' ._ #.1;22_;, .101? Cv\ufb01izbss Road
\n*3qiaha1ak$:tsi\u00a7\u00a7:fa P {3
\nB':mgal_i'oe – 560 086<\/p>\n
"   .% 3:13 msalatwad<\/p>\n
C29}.\/Iuddappa Building
\n V' –Adi'Chunchaz1agiri General Stores
\n Behind Check Past, T Dasarahaiji
\n Bangaior\ufb01 560 GS"? Rexpczmdcnts<\/p>\n
V' \u00bb gay Sr: K S Subramanya, Adv.)<\/p>\n
In WP 9438!2\ufb0105:\n<\/p>\n
B G Nalatwad S\/o Grangappa
\n35 yrs, (150 Ramaiah, # 103<\/p>\n
5″‘ Main, Bhuvancshwari Nagar
\nT Dasarahalli, Bmtgalore 57<\/p>\n
In W? 9439\/2085:\n<\/p>\n
Seethmmappa S\/o Shankarappa<\/p>\n
36 yrs, R\/’a Dakkalapaili<\/p>\n
Madakastra Taluk, Anantlupux District
\nAndhra Pmdesh 515 321 m<\/p>\n
In WP 9440f2i)i35:\n<\/p>\n
C Shivaram S10 Charmegbwda
\n40 yrs, R\/a # 1, 17*<\/p>\n
Bangalore 560 0825 3 <\/p>\n
(By sri K submmmi5ra;fA%  <\/p>\n
And:\n<\/p>\n
Mamgemmx: of M35 Integrated Electric
\n  Ltd, Plot #”49′)’~A, IV Phase
\n  P\u00a2\u00a3:nya ‘indusifisti mjea,  58
\n‘By its Exiamaging <\/p>\n
 ‘i<:_R ;ix:\u00a7.;%\u00a7;5, g\u00e9giivi)<\/p>\n
Croiss =:\n<\/p>\n
3CNagax, *   <\/p>\n
. }.)\u00e9fi’Ii{}1.1:Bf  4′<\/p>\n
Petmme}<\/p>\n
Petitioner<\/p>\n
Rcapondent
\nin WP 9438
\n9439,944\u00a33.f6S<\/p>\n
Thest; Fem: Petitions are mm under Art.226z’227 of the Constitution<\/p>\n
 A\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01rauyingjo quashfsci aside the award am: 1.9.2004 ‘m 11) 1631996; 2m996
\n* .._ai:c{1Z3f19f36 by the Add]. mm Court, Bamgaxm.<\/p>\n
 These Writ Petitions coming on for hearing this day, the Cmzrt made<\/p>\n
  V ‘ ~ V _ 2 T ” ~  foliowing;\n<\/p>\n
20% back wages and continuity of service. However,  to<\/p>\n
withhold three increments with cumulative e\ufb01bct.   <\/p>\n
has \ufb01led WP 3254\/2095. Subsequen\ufb02y,:}i1ixiiig’ g\u00a2ndezac$\u00e9jo\u00a7__1i;\u00a2’–ina\u00a3:e:r, A<\/p>\n
workmen also \ufb01led petitions — WP: 943s;’9439oV_$nd \u00e9\u00e9qoxzoos <\/p>\n
several documents pointing on: to the  t of  ‘nan_ ‘a=’v{go’:ai\u00e9:’if”a\u00e9;’ io lw\ufb01i V<\/p>\n
they have been ill-treated audio’ cux’b\u00ab..*:u’n\u00e9 ao\ufb01viti\u00e9s’ aadi \ufb01ieir legitimate
\ndornand and, quostioning the  management hm sought
\nfor extension of   wago\u00e9i<\/p>\n
Heard: the   \ufb01ne ipguiios.\n<\/p>\n
Courgsei ..n:axiage1ncnt submitted mat the Labour
\nCom oughfngoti   the \ufb01nding of the Inquiry D\ufb02icer and<\/p>\n
a1so._\u00a7ihiex*ibrix1g  {he order of dismissai passed by the Dsciplinary<\/p>\n
  the basis of morality is not permissible. Only in the event<\/p>\n
A  if passed is shocking to the conseienoc of the court, then<\/p>\n
 it ooixid Times charges were ievelied and are proved and<\/p>\n
  * .. Vi    izoireason for the Labour Court to substitute its order while modifying<\/p>\n
 –. ti*:o  of pusimhment. Accordingiy? in support of his argument, loaned<\/p>\n
  .. _ oomxsel has rethrre\u00e9 to the decision nfiha apex Court in 280?’ HLLJ I28 – J<\/p>\n
K Synthetic: Ltd Vs If P Agar-wd &  As regards back wages ii is<\/p>\n
submitted only from the date of the order of the Tiibsmalfiaholn” Court hack<\/p>\n
3?”\n<\/p>\n
not proved as such, teamed counsel has sought for ailowing tha   .<\/p>\n
by him and to dismiss the petition \ufb01led by the ma;}agernerst;’  ,. 4, “j p  ‘<\/p>\n
In the light of the arguments advanced, tii\ufb01 I\ufb01tlfs  *<\/p>\n
whether the \ufb01nding of the Labour Cout’t’–vp2:a.i\u00a3x\u00a7,t}1at “Gf—-thVe’ ‘V<\/p>\n
helding that the charges are  xeqaiifes  the awasd
\npassed by the Labour Court  tetpiit\ufb01s intcrferenczz.<\/p>\n
On perusal 0f.vt\u00a7\u00a5’\u00a7,.:D!:’\u20ac36f  thug-.   tvhat is noticed is on<\/p>\n
253.1995 me  -mamged is;  strike by shouting indecent
\nslogans “”t1A1Ve” wprk in the factory. However, on<\/p>\n
issue 1 as  am ‘fan-nt:\u00a7s’\u00ab.._}.;f the inquiry held Labour Court has<\/p>\n
” Vspeciti<j.'ai\u00a7\u00a7y  a t\u00a7i1ki\u00a7:Ig,__t_hat the inquiry conducted is fair and pmpcr.<\/p>\n
 Vhnspbepn  by the workmen is that they have farmed the Unier:<\/p>\n
as t}i,\u00ab3.t5e'~.tr\u00a2*as:'Viii:-fi:re:;'tz.a'i\u00e9V:1t meted cut to fellow workers by the managemexst<\/p>\n
 _ and   bene\ufb01ts like deamtws ailowance and bczncftt of unffomrt<\/p>\n
' K x '  xtatgxtetibled. In this regard, several cemespondenca made between the<\/p>\n
  and the workmen is produced which depicts the fact that all is<\/p>\n
T  \ufb01t}? well with the management and an cernmmccxncnt cf the Union activities,<\/p>\n
  tmublc has cmpped up. In so fm' as imposition of punishment is<\/p>\n
ctzmcemcd, Labour Court has relied upon the circumstances in which the<\/p>\n
W,<\/p>\n
incident has taken place and formed an opinion Ehat the order efie<\/p>\n
too harsh.\n<\/p>\n
It is the argument ofthe eoumel   ,a\u00a7 <\/p>\n
by the eeunsel for \ufb02ue management it ev’a_\u00a7’ia<;t obsewied' ingrtiae  the" V<\/p>\n
punislmment imposed was not sheekizagky–:*.ius.g)rof5e1f1ior1ate'i::3t,  manner in
\nwhich the workmen were    involved in u\ufb01ion
\nactivities and q11estig:_2ie<1_  ' to substitute same<\/p>\n
independent eoxmeeter  i\u00a7vn\u00a7?kVzV'::ieiiV'wotxid say it all. As per<\/p>\n
the evidence   feiievv worker was kept under
\nsuspension and  Vorder  when they approached the
\nmanagement, V11t;z1eees4\u00a7a:'yVValle\u00e9gati6;:sVi%x3e made against the workmen stating<\/p>\n
.i"i"1e3,\u00a7—Eeave   assembty and went on strike<\/p>\n
workmen, one Kulkmni who is the management<\/p>\n
 hirneeif  spoken to the fact that after collecting the suspension<\/p>\n
5   Went way.\n<\/p>\n
u xfhe submission of the emmsel representing the workmen appears to<\/p>\n
  that on eemmeneement clef the Union activities questioning the varieus<\/p>\n
iliegal activities ef the management, petitioners werkrnen have been<\/p>\n
.,\/<\/p>\n
ggr<\/p>\n
entiiied for back wages. Mighi be nathing has been  <\/p>\n
management that the workmen were gainfully employed.V};;ii’\u00e9;t.  fun; _& V’ <\/p>\n
taken any steps to prove that they wen:  -1′  “V ‘<\/p>\n
However, in the facts and circumstmc\u00e9s df\ufb02t\u00e9 ca\u00a7c,_\u00a3t;..mediff\u00a3:9.\u00a3i\u00a3:v\u00e93..<\/p>\n
of the award ofthe: Labour Cenrt, it is  tejsay .T5%’ix\u00a71i’tcs }<\u00a7ct came to be paid. Wages paid under<\/p>\n
 's.–1?B-':.\u00ab$i*t1:\u00a2~Actghau\u00a7\u00a7t"'b\u00e9'aasnube.d. The werkmen would be entitlad to<\/p>\n
'\u00a3,Q:xtVit7:1_1it\u00a7,*   be irrxplenaented Within two months.<\/p>\n
Sd\/-'y
\nIudg\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Management Of M\/S Intergrated … vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh Bx: THE HIGH (3(‘)UR’1′()I~’K ARNA’mI< A A1' BANGALORE Dated this the 29"' day of July, 2609 Before THE HUMBLE MR JUSHCE HULUVADI G .. A' Writ Petitions 3154\/2305 c\/w9438, 943% 944{h'—.3a\ufb02u?_:\u00a3?5VV (ii: ._ Between: In WP 8154li)5: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68878","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Management Of M\/S Intergrated ... vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Management Of M\/S Intergrated ... vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-03T08:48:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Management Of M\\\/S Intergrated … vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-03T08:48:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1015,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009\",\"name\":\"The Management Of M\\\/S Intergrated ... vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-03T08:48:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Management Of M\\\/S Intergrated … vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Management Of M\/S Intergrated ... vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Management Of M\/S Intergrated ... vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-03T08:48:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Management Of M\/S Intergrated … vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-03T08:48:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009"},"wordCount":1015,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009","name":"The Management Of M\/S Intergrated ... vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-03T08:48:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-management-of-ms-intergrated-vs-seetharamappa-on-29-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Management Of M\/S Intergrated … vs Seetharamappa on 29 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68878","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68878"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68878\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68878"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}