{"id":68882,"date":"2011-08-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011"},"modified":"2017-01-06T11:06:14","modified_gmt":"2017-01-06T05:36:14","slug":"global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha … on 18 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha … on 18 August, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: Kailash Gambhir<\/div>\n
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\n\n                     Judgment delivered on: 18th August, 2011\n\n\n                           W.P.(C) No.5218\/2011\n\n\nGlobal Educational & Social Trust                   ......Petitioner\n\n                     Through: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with\n                               Mr.Yashpal Rangi, Advocates\n\n                            Vs.\n\nGuru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University\n& Ors                                               ......Respondent\n\n                     Through: Mr.Mukul Talwar, Advocate\n                              for the respondent-University.\n                              Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate for the\n                              respondent-AICTE.\n                              Mr.Manjit Singh, Advocate for the\n                              respondent-State of Haryana.\n\nCORAM:\nHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR\n\n1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may        Not necessary\n   be allowed to see the judgment?\n2. To be referred to Reporter or not?               Not necessary\n3. Whether the judgment should be reported           Not necessary\n   in the Digest?\n\n\nKAILASH GAMBHIR, J.Oral:\n\n\n\n  W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                    Page 1 of 12\n 1.       By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution\n\nof India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the decision of the\n\nrespondent No.1 University not to grant affiliation to the\n\npetitioner institute.\n\n2.       Background<\/pre>\n
 of facts that has led to the filing of the present<\/p>\n
petition is that the petitioner institute which is situated in<\/p>\n
Faridabad applied for approval to AICTE for starting an MBA<\/p>\n
course, which after inspection granted the said approval on<\/p>\n
29.6.2010. That the petitioner on 16.7.2010 applied to the<\/p>\n
respondent University for affiliation for session 2010-2011 which<\/p>\n
was rejected on the ground of non-furnishing of the No-objection<\/p>\n
certificate by the State of Haryana. Feeling aggrieved with the<\/p>\n
said act of the University, the petitioner filed a writ petition WPC<\/p>\n
5331\/2010 whereby vide order dated 10.8.2010, the court<\/p>\n
directed the university to scrutinize and consider the request of<\/p>\n
the petitioner expeditiously. However, the respondent university<\/p>\n
approached the court for clarification of its order dated<\/p>\n
10.8.2010 and the court vide order dated 18.8.2010 directed the<\/p>\n
University to deal with the application of the petitioner in<\/p>\n
accordance          with      its   rules   and   regulations.   However    the<\/p>\n
     W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                          Page 2 of 12<\/span>
\n University again vide order dated 20.8.2010 rejected the<\/p>\n
application of the petitioner for non furnishing of the NOC by the<\/p>\n
State Government and the petitioner again approached the court<\/p>\n
vide WPC 5831\/2010 where vide order dated 31.8.2010 the<\/p>\n
interim       relief    of    conducting   an   inspection   and   granting<\/p>\n
provisional admission for the session 2010-11 was declined.<\/p>\n
Consequently the petitioner challenged the said order in LPA<\/p>\n
655\/2010 wherein vide order dated 15.9.2010 both AICTE and<\/p>\n
the University were to conduct a joint inspection of the<\/p>\n
petitioner Institute. That as per the joint inspection report, no<\/p>\n
deficiency was found and thus the Hon’ble Division Bench vide<\/p>\n
order dated 6.1.2011 directed the petitioner to apply for fresh<\/p>\n
approval to AICTE for the session 2011-2012 and then to the<\/p>\n
respondent university for affiliation. That the AICTE granted the<\/p>\n
approval to the petitioner Institute but the respondent university<\/p>\n
refused to grant affiliation on the ground of non furnishing of<\/p>\n
NOC by the State of Haryana. Feeling aggrieved with the same,<\/p>\n
the petitioner has preferred the present petition.<\/p>\n
3.       Thus evidently from the facts as set out above, the main<\/p>\n
grievance raised by the petitioner is that despite approval of the<\/p>\n
     W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                        Page 3 of 12<\/span>
\n petitioner institute by the AICTE, it has not been granted<\/p>\n
affiliation          by       the   Guru     Gobind      Singh    Indraprastha<\/p>\n
University\/respondent No. 1 on account of non-issuance of NOC<\/p>\n
by the State of Haryana, which as per the petitioner is not<\/p>\n
statutorily required.\n<\/p>\n
4.       Mr.Manjit         Singh,    counsel    representing     the   State     of<\/p>\n
Haryana very fairly submits that no policy decision has been<\/p>\n
taken by the State Government of Haryana till date regarding<\/p>\n
issuance        of    no       objection   certificate   in   favour   of   those<\/p>\n
institutes\/colleges which are located in the State of Haryana and<\/p>\n
seek affiliation with the University outside the State of Haryana.<\/p>\n
5.              I have heard counsel for the parties at considerable<\/p>\n
length.\n<\/p>\n
6.              In the present case, vide order dated 03.08.2011, this<\/p>\n
Court gave direction to the respondent-State of Haryana to file a<\/p>\n
short affidavit taking a categorical stand keeping in view the<\/p>\n
observations made by the Hon’ble Division Bench in the order<\/p>\n
dated 06.01.2011. It is pertinent to mention here that the said<\/p>\n
directions of the Hon’ble Division Bench were given in LPA No.<\/p>\n
655\/2010, which was filed by the present petitioner challenging<\/p>\n
     W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                             Page 4 of 12<\/span>
\n the interim order of the learned Single Judge dated 31 st August,<\/p>\n
2010 whereby the learned Single Judge had refused to grant<\/p>\n
interim stay in favour of the petitioner seeking interim directions<\/p>\n
to direct the respondent University to inspect the institute of the<\/p>\n
petitioner to satisfy itself as to whether the petitioner had<\/p>\n
complied with requirements for affiliation or not. During the<\/p>\n
pendency of the said LPA, the Hon’ble Division Bench vide order<\/p>\n
dated 22nd September, 2010 passed the following order:-<\/p>\n
                “This Court on 15th September, 2010 had constituted two
\n                committees of the respondent No.1-University as well as
\n                the AICTE and directed the committees to visit the
\n                appellant-institution along with three counsel, namely, Mr.
\n                Amitesh Kumar, Mr. Mukul Talwar and Mr. Rajiv Bansal. Be
\n                it noted, Mr. Bansal had not accompanied the team.
\n                When the matter was taken up today, Mr. Talwar submitted
\n                a report on behalf of the respondent-university and Mr.
\n                Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel, submitted a report
\n                on behalf of AICTE. If we allow ourselves to say so, that
\n                was not the intention of the order which was passed on
\n                earlier occasion. We are really at a loss as to why there is
\n                so much of cavil between the AICTE and the University on a
\n                factual position. However, let the reports be exchanged and
\n                a meeting be held by the AICTE authorities with the
\n                University authorities and a decision be taken whether the
\n                appellant-institution meets the requisite criteria as per the
\n                norms\/guidelines framed by the AICTE. Matter be listed on
\n                1st October, 2010.””\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
7.       Pursuant to the said directions given by the Hon’ble<\/p>\n
Division Bench, two committees constituted by the University as<\/p>\n
     W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                            Page 5 of 12<\/span>
\n well as AICTE carried out the necessary inspection and the said<\/p>\n
joint inspection of both the committees found that there was no<\/p>\n
deficiency in the petitioner institute. Para 5 of the said order<\/p>\n
dated 6.1.2011 in LPA No. 655\/2010 so records and the same is<\/p>\n
reproduced as under:-\n<\/p>\n
                “5. Thereafter, as evincible, various orders were passed
\n                and eventually on 25th November, 2010 this Court
\n                recorded that an inspection as directed had not taken
\n                place and granted some more time to complete the said
\n                exercise. When the matter was called today, we have
\n                been apprised that a joint inspection has been taken up
\n                by the AICTE and the respondent-University and the
\n                inspection committee of both the statutory authorities
\n                have found that there is no deficiency in the institution in
\n                praesenti.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
8.       The Hon’ble Division Bench in the said order gave further<\/p>\n
directions, mainly to the AICTE and the respondent University to<\/p>\n
take a decision on the application of the petitioner seeking grant<\/p>\n
of recognition\/approval to their institute for starting the MBA<\/p>\n
course and in the penultimate para, the Division Bench also<\/p>\n
observed that when there is concurrence by the AICTE and the<\/p>\n
University, the State Government in the case of the present<\/p>\n
nature has no role to refuse the NOC. Paras 6,7 and 8 of the said<\/p>\n
order are also reproduced as under:-\n<\/p>\n
     W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                             Page 6 of 12<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
                 “6. In view of the aforesaid, it is directed that if the
\n                appellant    files   an   application    for    grant of
\n                recognition\/approval to the course before the AICTE,
\n                the same shall be placed before the Board, which shall
\n                take a decision within three weeks from the date of
\n                submission of the application for the academic session
\n                2011-12. Regard being had to the joint committee
\n                inspection, after the AICTE takes a decision, the same
\n                shall be communicated to the respondent-University,
\n                which shall follow the same in letter and spirit.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                7. Needless to say that the respondent-University shall
\n                act promptly after getting the communication from the
\n                AICTE. Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, learned Additional Solicitor
\n                General representing the respondent-University has
\n                fairly stated that the University always acts
\n                expeditiously and would not cause any delay or
\n                hindrance. Mr. Manjit Singh, learned Additional
\n                Advocate General for the State of Haryana has stated
\n                that the State shall abide by the law. Needless to say
\n                that when there is concurrence by the AICTE and
\n                University, the State Government in a case of the
\n                present nature has no role to refuse the NOC.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                8. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is disposed of. As
\n                nothing remains to be adjudicated in the Writ Petition
\n                (Civil) No. 5831\/2010, the same also is deemed to have
\n                been disposed of. No order as to costs.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
9.       In the light of the said observations made by the Hon’ble<\/p>\n
Division Bench, the State of Haryana was directed by this court<\/p>\n
to take a categorical stand in its affidavit to explain the reasons<\/p>\n
for not issuing NOC, once the Hon’ble Division Bench clearly<\/p>\n
took a view that it has no role to refuse NOC in the background<\/p>\n
of there being concurrence between AICTE and the University to<\/p>\n
     W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                             Page 7 of 12<\/span>
\n grant approval to the institute of the petitioner for running the<\/p>\n
said MBA course. The State of Haryana in their reply filed by<\/p>\n
them has practically reiterated their stand as was taken by them<\/p>\n
in the W.P. (C) No. 3065\/2003 and this would show that the<\/p>\n
State of Haryana has not brought any legislation\/regulations on<\/p>\n
the subject nor any policy decision has been taken by the State<\/p>\n
of Haryana in this regard. This Court while deciding the interim<\/p>\n
application of the petitioner in the earlier writ petition No.<\/p>\n
5331\/2010 also took note of the stand taken by the Additional<\/p>\n
Advocate General representing the State of Haryana informing<\/p>\n
the Court that there is no policy regarding issuance of NOC as<\/p>\n
required under Statute 24 of the respondent University and<\/p>\n
decision on such matters for the grant of NOC is taken by the<\/p>\n
State on case to case basis. Para 2 of the order dated 31 st<\/p>\n
August, 2010 is reproduced as under:-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                      “The Addl. Advocate General for the State of
\n             Haryana has today informed that the Educational
\n             Institutions located in the State of Haryana, if seek
\n             affiliation with a University, also in the State of Haryana,
\n             no NOC is required. It is further clarified that there is no
\n             policy regarding issuing NOC as required under the
\n             Ordinance of the respondent no. 1 Guru Gobind Singh
\n             Indraprastha University (not situated in State of Haryana)<\/p>\n
  W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                             Page 8 of 12<\/span>
\n              and if an application for NOC is moved, decision thereon
\n             is taken by the State on a case to case basis.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
10.    In the affidavit filed by the State of Haryana in the present<\/p>\n
case also, no stand has been taken as to why the NOC was not<\/p>\n
granted in favour of the petitioner in the light of the said<\/p>\n
observations made by the Hon’ble Division Bench. It would be<\/p>\n
thus quite manifest that the State of Haryana as on this date has<\/p>\n
no policy for grant of NOC to deal with such institutes located<\/p>\n
within the territory of the State, which are seeking affiliation<\/p>\n
with the Universities of the other State.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
11.    It is not in dispute between the parties that the AICTE has<\/p>\n
already granted approval in favour of the petitioner-institute and<\/p>\n
the respondent-University has also agreed to grant affiliation to<\/p>\n
the petitioner in principle. It is only on account of non-grant of<\/p>\n
NOC by the State of Haryana that the affiliation by the<\/p>\n
University so far has not been granted in favour of the<\/p>\n
petitioner. The defence raised by Mr.Mukul Talwar, learned<\/p>\n
counsel representing the University is that under Statute 24, it is<\/p>\n
only   after     the       NOC   is   issued   by   the   concerned     State<\/p>\n
  W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                          Page 9 of 12<\/span>
\n Government, that the affiliation sought by the petitioner-institute<\/p>\n
can be granted.\n<\/p>\n
12.           It is thus quite apparent that it is only on account of<\/p>\n
non-grant of NOC by the State of Haryana in favour of the<\/p>\n
petitioner that the University has not granted affiliation to the<\/p>\n
petitioner-institute. The stand taken by the State of Haryana in<\/p>\n
its affidavit is that a conscious decision has been taken by the<\/p>\n
State    Government       not   to   give   NOC   to   any   of   those<\/p>\n
institutes\/colleges which are located in the State of Haryana but<\/p>\n
are seeking affiliation with the University outside the State of<\/p>\n
Haryana. This contention raised by counsel for the State of<\/p>\n
Haryana has been dealt much in detail in the judgment of the<\/p>\n
Hon’ble Division Bench of this court in the case of Charanjiv<\/p>\n
Charitable Trust vs. All India Council for Technical<\/p>\n
Education & Anr. WP(C) No.3065\/2003 decided on 1.9.2003,<\/p>\n
where also the State of Haryana raised a similar objection and<\/p>\n
the Hon’ble Division Bench in the said judgment had clearly<\/p>\n
observed that NOC could not be refused by the State of Haryana<\/p>\n
on the ground that such an institute did not seek affiliation with<\/p>\n
Maharshi Dayanand University, a university situated in the State<\/p>\n
 W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                      Page 10 of 12<\/span>
\n of Haryana. The Division Bench further observed that the State<\/p>\n
of Haryana cannot refuse grant of NOC merely because the<\/p>\n
University is not situated in the State of Haryana. Mr.Rakesh<\/p>\n
Tiku, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner         has<\/p>\n
also pointed out          that the said order passed by the Hon’ble<\/p>\n
Division Bench was challenged by the State of Haryana before<\/p>\n
the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide SLP No.376\/2004 and the same<\/p>\n
was dismissed vide order dated 25.4.2005.\n<\/p>\n
13.   In the background of the above position and taking into<\/p>\n
consideration the peculiar facts of the present case, more<\/p>\n
particularly in the light of the observations made by the Hon’ble<\/p>\n
Division Bench in the order dated 6.1.2011 and in the order<\/p>\n
dated 1.9.2003 and also on account of the fact that the State<\/p>\n
Government did not raise any kind of objection to the AICTE<\/p>\n
after the receipt of an application from the petitioner institute,<\/p>\n
this Court deems fit and appropriate to direct the State of<\/p>\n
Haryana to issue NOC in favour of the petitioner institute for<\/p>\n
starting the MBA course for the academic session 2011-12<\/p>\n
within a period of 10 days from the date of this order.<\/p>\n
 W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                   Page 11 of 12<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
 14.          With the above direction the present petition is<\/p>\n
disposed of. The legal questions raised by the counsel for the<\/p>\n
parties shall, however, remain open to be decided in an<\/p>\n
appropriate case. This order shall, however, not be treated as<\/p>\n
precedent in the other matters because of peculiarity of its fact-<\/p>\n
situation.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
AUGUST 18, 2011                       KAILASH GAMBHIR, J\n\n\n\n\n W.P. (C) No. 5218\/2011                                 Page 12 of 12<\/span>\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha … on 18 August, 2011 Author: Kailash Gambhir IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: 18th August, 2011 W.P.(C) No.5218\/2011 Global Educational & Social Trust ……Petitioner Through: Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Yashpal Rangi, Advocates Vs. Guru […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68882","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGlobal Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha ... on 18 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha ... on 18 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-06T05:36:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha … on 18 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-06T05:36:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":2261,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha ... on 18 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-06T05:36:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha … on 18 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha ... on 18 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha ... on 18 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-06T05:36:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha … on 18 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-06T05:36:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011"},"wordCount":2261,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011","name":"Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha ... on 18 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-06T05:36:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/global-educational-social-trust-vs-guru-gobind-singh-indraprastha-on-18-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Global Educational & Social Trust vs Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha … on 18 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68882","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68882"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68882\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68882"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}