{"id":6919,"date":"2008-03-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008"},"modified":"2018-10-08T20:59:50","modified_gmt":"2018-10-08T15:29:50","slug":"khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Supreme Court of India<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: . A Pasayat<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, P. Sathasivam<\/div>\n<pre>           CASE NO.:\nAppeal (crl.)  481 of 2008\n\nPETITIONER:\nKhilari\n\nRESPONDENT:\nState of U.P. and Anr\n\nDATE OF JUDGMENT: 13\/03\/2008\n\nBENCH:\nDr. ARIJIT PASAYAT &amp; P. SATHASIVAM\n\nJUDGMENT:\n<\/pre>\n<p>J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>CRIMINAL APPEAL NO  481 OF 2008<br \/>\n(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.960 of 2007)<\/p>\n<p>Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>1.\tLeave granted.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tChallenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a<br \/>\nDivision Bench of the Allahabad High Court allowing the<br \/>\nprayer for bail made by respondent no.2 during the pendency<br \/>\nof Criminal Appeal no.6724 of 2006.  Challenge before the<br \/>\nHigh Court was to the conviction recorded by learned Sessions<br \/>\nJudge, Bagpat, in Sessions Trial no.299 of 2000.  Respondent<br \/>\nno.2 was convicted for offences punishable under Section 302<br \/>\nand Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short &#8216;IPC&#8217;)<br \/>\nand was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and one<br \/>\nyear for the offences respectively.  He and his two sons were<br \/>\nalso convicted allegedly for committing murder of Shiv Kumar.<br \/>\nChallenging the conviction appeal has been filed and<br \/>\nsimultaneously prayer for being released on bail during the<br \/>\npendency of the appeal was filed.  By the impugned order  the<br \/>\nDivision Bench accepted the prayer and granted bail to the<br \/>\nrespondent no.2.  The High Court noted that the allegation<br \/>\nwas that the incident took place on 9.3.2000 at about 8.30<br \/>\np.m. and accused no.2 and his two sons assaulted Shiv<br \/>\nKumar (hereinafter referred to as the &#8216;deceased&#8217;) mercilessly<br \/>\nwith iron rods and he succumbed to the injuries.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tThe only stand taken was that the ante mortem injuries<br \/>\non the body of the deceased included three contusions, one<br \/>\nabraded contusion and four lacerated wounds of different<br \/>\ndimensions on various parts of the body which could not have<br \/>\nbeen caused by iron rods.  It was their stand that some<br \/>\nunknown assailants caused the injuries to the deceased.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\tThe prosecution and the present appellant opposed the<br \/>\nprayer for grant of bail and PWs 1 and 2 and the informant<br \/>\nhad seen the attacks and were eye witnesses to the occurrence<br \/>\nand PW 3 is an independent witness.  Their evidence has been<br \/>\nanalysed in great detail by the trial Court who found that<br \/>\ncredible and cogent.  So far as the possibility of injuries is<br \/>\nconcerned, that aspect was also examined by the trial Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\tAfter noticing the rival stands the High Court by the<br \/>\nimpugned order granted the bail with the following<br \/>\nconclusions:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Looking to all facts and circumstances of the<br \/>\ncase and particularly the antemortem injuries<br \/>\nand after consideration the submissions made<br \/>\non behalf of the parties we find it appropriate<br \/>\nto release appellant on bail during pendency of<br \/>\nthe appeal.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\tLearned counsel for the informant appellant submitted<br \/>\nthat the approach of the High Court is clearly erroneous.  After<br \/>\nthe conviction has been recorded by believing three eye<br \/>\nwitnesses and also discarding the stand that it was not<br \/>\npossible by iron rods, the High Court should not have by a<br \/>\ncryptic order directed grant of bail.  It was, therefore,<br \/>\nsubmitted that the impugned order is unsustainable.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\tLearned counsel for the State supported the stand of the<br \/>\ninformant.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\tLearned counsel for the appellant no.2 accused<br \/>\nsubmitted that it is common knowledge that appeals in the<br \/>\nHigh Court take long time for disposal.  The balance has to be<br \/>\nstruck between the right to speedy trial and the need for the<br \/>\naccused being in custody.  The High Court has taken note of<br \/>\nrelevant factors and has granted bail.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.\tThe parameters to be adopted while dealing with the<br \/>\napplication for bail by suspension of sentence during the<br \/>\npendency of the appeal has been examined by this Court in<br \/>\nseveral cases.  <a href=\"\/doc\/486717\/\">In Kishori Lal v. Rupa and Ors.<\/a> (2004 (7) SCC\n<\/p>\n<p>638) it was noted as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;4. Section 389 of the Code deals with<br \/>\nsuspension of execution of sentence pending<br \/>\nthe appeal and release of the appellant on bail.<br \/>\nThere is a distinction between bail and<br \/>\nsuspension of sentence. One of the essential<br \/>\ningredients of Section 389 is the requirement<br \/>\nfor the appellate court to record reasons in<br \/>\nwriting for ordering suspension of execution of<br \/>\nthe sentence or order appealed against. If he is<br \/>\nin confinement, the said court can direct that<br \/>\nhe be released on bail or on his own bond. The<br \/>\nrequirement of recording reasons in writing<br \/>\nclearly indicates that there has to be careful<br \/>\nconsideration of the relevant aspects and the<br \/>\norder directing suspension of sentence and<br \/>\ngrant of bail should not be passed as a matter<br \/>\nof routine.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. The appellate court is duty-bound to<br \/>\nobjectively assess the matter and to record<br \/>\nreasons for the conclusion that the case<br \/>\nwarrants suspension of execution of sentence<br \/>\nand grant of bail. In the instant case, the only<br \/>\nfactor which seems to have weighed with the<br \/>\nHigh Court for directing suspension of<br \/>\nsentence and grant of bail is the absence of<br \/>\nallegation of misuse of liberty during the<br \/>\nearlier period when the accused-respondents<br \/>\nwere on bail.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>10.\t<a href=\"\/doc\/500640\/\">In Anwari Begum v. Sher Mohammad and Anr.<\/a> (2005 (7)<br \/>\nSCC 326) it was, inter-alia, observed as follows:<br \/>\n&#8220;7.\tEven on a cursory perusal the High<br \/>\nCourt&#8217;s order shows complete non-application<br \/>\nof mind. Though detailed examination of the<br \/>\nevidence and elaborate documentation of the<br \/>\nmerits of the case is to be avoided by the Court<br \/>\nwhile passing orders on bail applications, yet a<br \/>\ncourt dealing with the bail application should<br \/>\nbe satisfied as to whether there is a prima facie<br \/>\ncase, but exhaustive exploration of the merits<br \/>\nof the case is not necessary.  The court dealing<br \/>\nwith the application for bail is required to<br \/>\nexercise its discretion in a judicious manner<br \/>\nand not as a matter of course.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\tThere is a need to indicate in the order,<br \/>\nreasons for prima facie concluding why bail<br \/>\nwas being granted particularly where an<br \/>\naccused was charged of having committed a<br \/>\nserious offence.  It is necessary for the courts<br \/>\ndealing with application for bail to consider<br \/>\namong other circumstances, the following<br \/>\nfactors also before granting bail, they are:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.\tThe nature of accusation and<br \/>\nthe severity of punishment in case<br \/>\nof conviction and the nature of<br \/>\nsupporting evidence;\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\tReasonable apprehension of<br \/>\ntampering of the witness or<br \/>\napprehension of threat to the<br \/>\ncomplainant;\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\tPrima facie satisfaction of the<br \/>\nCourt in support of the charge.\n<\/p>\n<p>Any order dehors of such reasons suffers from<br \/>\nnon-application of mind as was noted by this<br \/>\nCourt, in Ram Govind Upadhyay  v.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sudarshan Singh and Ors.  [(2002) 3 SCC<br \/>\n598], Puran etc. v. Rambilas and Anr. etc.<br \/>\n[(2001) 6 SCC 338)] and in <a href=\"\/doc\/1521407\/\">Kalyan Chandra<br \/>\nSarkar  v.  Rajesh Ranjan<\/a> alias Pappu Yadav &amp;<br \/>\nAnr. [JT 2004 (3) SC 442].&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>11.\tAs the extracted portion and the High Court&#8217;s order goes<br \/>\nto show there was complete non-application of mind and non-<br \/>\nconsideration of the relevant aspects.\n<\/p>\n<p>12.\tThe impugned order, therefore, is not sustainable and is<br \/>\ndismissed.  The bail granted to the respondent no.2 is<br \/>\ncancelled.  The matter is remitted to the High Court for fresh<br \/>\nconsideration in accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.\tThe appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Supreme Court of India Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008 Author: . A Pasayat Bench: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, P. Sathasivam CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 481 of 2008 PETITIONER: Khilari RESPONDENT: State of U.P. and Anr DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13\/03\/2008 BENCH: Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT &amp; P. SATHASIVAM JUDGMENT: J U D [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6919","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-08T15:29:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-08T15:29:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1142,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court of India\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-08T15:29:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-08T15:29:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-08T15:29:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008"},"wordCount":1142,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court of India"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008","name":"Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-08T15:29:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khilari-vs-state-of-u-p-and-anr-on-13-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Khilari vs State Of U.P. And Anr on 13 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6919","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6919"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6919\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6919"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6919"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6919"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}