{"id":69372,"date":"2009-11-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-09-10T06:40:36","modified_gmt":"2016-09-10T01:10:36","slug":"m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"M.Rajasekhar S\/O Sri. Muniswamy … vs B.V.Pramod S\/O Late B.S. … on 20 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M.Rajasekhar S\/O Sri. Muniswamy … vs B.V.Pramod S\/O Late B.S. … on 20 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n
1}? THE HIGH Ci\"_':L%RT \u20ac313' KARNATAIIQA AT BANGALORE\nDated '(ha :Z\u20ac;'\ufb01h dais? sf N{)V\u20acfI_T1\u00a73f3I' 2909\n: B E F {J R E :\nTHE HC=N'BLB2- MRJLFSTXCE : \\f..JAGANNATHf;\u00a7\u00a7\nWEI?' \u00a7\"~'E'FI'i'If>I\\3 No; 32846 I 2009 fGM--CP\"C'\u00a7\"\"--\u00ab.T\"'*,\n\nww %8sis:\/m(a%&}s%%\u00ab\u00bb~i:'E9); Me:\nBETWEEN : \"M  Am\n  a;;:~'\u00a551'\nS331 Mj\u00e9iagasekhar,     M \u00b0'-=..   V.,\u00a7\u00bbg_ \n3\/0 $371 Muniswmny Gcwda, \" ' \" ' \"   _j\nAged about 4!} years,  A\nR\/at.Khati1aNa.78?, 'F??9, : _'\nA.mn1anik\u20acre Achukattet,  _\nGamdhinzigma, K0131\" Kasaba: \" _ . A_ ,\n..  .  \"vv-..,J.\u00a7*\u20acti:itiener\n\n( By Sri M\ufb01hiufa  }\n\nA N Li;\n\n .\u00e9=rr13,xI\u00bbPraniad;  %\n_ Sjn E;.53T.f':' B.;'F';,\\:'7:2nk\"$}far:1m,\n_\u00a7 '\u00e9ged a\ufb01gggt 59 years;\n\nat\n\n3  B},A\";x*T.Ra1:11a11 Iiumar,\n_  _ Sgoi .I;&\u00a2e'-\"B.S.Veni{atarazn,\n ._  3~'\u00a7'g,=F=V\":*_-\u20ac{__\u20ac:L1;ic:\":_1'i,: 49 y\ufb01ars'\n\n~ 351:}: Rf at Lagumenahaili Village,\nEitiamhalii Habli, Bangaiom Smith Taluk.\n\n ii H Sri Iiyaxma,\n\n' S\/9.811 Ssemasandra Sl\ufb01dappa,\nAga\u00e9 3.33021: 46 years'\n\n4\u00bb; 83% Eianiunam,\n\nS\/*9 ijganna, Aged about :29 years.\n\n\n\n2\n\n(5.11\n\nSri Prasaxzrxa,\nS\/0 Iyanna, Aged about 20 years.\n\nRespondent: No.3 to 5 am\nR\/at Bcomenahaili\/Lagumcnahalli,\nBidaraha\ufb02i Hobli, Bangalore. South Talulg\n\n4 ; .Rt;';$\u00a7;1\u00a7ji1?i<:i:%:s\n\n{ By Sri K.GnSadas.'{1i\u00a5.raiah & 811% V.  * "\n\nAcivorntas for C\/\u00a5i'--V.3Mf.o I?--Er3."  = -.  ' \n\nWrit Petitiorls\ufb01led praying tt3_;;s;.--$ue Wfit \u00ab:3\u00a7.c<3ri;c;ra:'3_V\n\nand quash the i:11:3L1.<2,I1r::;'\u00a7._ :;s1j<;l\u00a7:rA'<:IV1 13313.45  5:0 \n\npassed in {)S.N0.5*-'19\/1999 dfat;\u00a2d.VV_19.9;2.(}C\u00a7':, \u00abin the \ufb01le\n0f the Civil Juclgev '.  A1m\u00e9x\u00a31rc~J and\n\nmnsequentlgr ta dismiss' 'tli e7::\u20ac;1:__.r::;ieif.~\u00bb fii\u00e9d under\n\nQrdei{_\\fI1I-- x\u00e9ziie  magtea 28.2.2003, at Axmaxure-J.\n .j:x:i:i:ix;;,;tf't_:\"'ma<:i\u00a2 the fo\ufb02owing :\n\n can for pzvslimixxarvy hearing\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
O 4: 93,2
\n C3;’13_i\u00a73\u00ab*’1wmt pe\ufb01ii0n5\u00ae by the piajnti\ufb01’ in C.>.S.Ne;<\/p>\n
  549\/ 3.999 a;;c1%\u00b0”direc:ea against the grater passad by<\/p>\n
‘  court an \u00a79.9.20<}9 in respect Qf issues\ufb01 ts \ufb01g<\/p>\n
   tbs: said erdar, the trig} mart answersz\ufb01 the aaid<\/p>\n
{brass issucs in a\ufb01irmative and timreby tha plainti\ufb01'<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\nwa\ufb01 forced {<3 apprcsarsh this cnurt in this writ petition<\/p>\n
smirking for setting asid\ufb01. the ilznpugnad Gfd\ufb01f.
\n2; Tha patitionar, being the plaintiff, filed the suit<\/p>\n
CL$.NCL 549\/ 1999 against the msponcients for <\/p>\n
miunc\ufb01on and t9 restrain the def&nd;\u00e9i1\u00a7:35_~ _<\/p>\n
intexfexing with 'Chi? plaintiffs lgwfui  = <\/p>\n
eniagzment 0:" the suit: schedule prsgiuertics.  <\/p>\n
agzticultural lands measzz\ufb01xgg \u00e9icrc  lgLa11j;a#s <\/p>\n
S.N{}. 11\/1 and 4 acrfrs and  'ii:-:$'s:.:\\Iov.v 12, along<\/p>\n
with  _h\u00bbz31;-Se and cattie shed of 5 to
\n6 ank\u00e93::aufs1$,A steji\u00e9iei-Lj.7:7l\u00a7:f\u00e9E:;%\u00a7:\u00e9i' '\u00e9vell and 3 pump heusie with<\/p>\n
eu\u20ac;ai3?@ tus; 'jag i.-*-\u00e9c\u00e9s as week! ass paddy \ufb01eld situated<\/p>\n
   Bidaraha\ufb02i E-Iobli, Bangalem<\/p>\n
  The Said suit was aanitzsted by '\u20ac:;h-.2<\/p>\n
re$\u00a70n,\u00e9en'\u20acs~defendants and they also made cnuntcr<\/p>\n
    the said szlii. The trial court, based on the<\/p>\n
 _\u00a7f.\u00e9a\u00a7;i\u00a71g$ of 'mi: par\ufb01ess framed the foilcrwirzg mm<\/p>\n
V'  'issum:\n<\/p>\n
4%
\n{ ‘1:\n<\/p>\n
.3<\/p>\n
8} Whether in a suit for perma\ufb02ent iniuxztstioia the
\nsaunter claim claimed defendants 3 to 5 for
\nd(i’–{3}.\u00a31I’\ufb02ti0\u00a71 and ether cgnsequential  is<\/p>\n
maintainablzit?\n<\/p>\n
9′; Whemer piainti\ufb01s are entitled fer–.  T  x <\/p>\n
nemnanent injunctien as ::}1\u00a7’ayedziii1  5  .’<\/p>\n
10) What ordar gr decree?\n<\/p>\n
3; The respondents-defei\u00a7t’\u00e9i1\u00a3$–3 fr\ufb01  T  f\ufb01e\u00e9 an V<\/p>\n
anp\ufb01ca\ufb01on under     CECE.\n<\/p>\n
re-m1\u00a2s::i:gT%   d\u00e9\u00e9l\u00e9fe the sale transaction
\n\u00a73et\\&*es\u00e9;1V ‘G133: \u00abanal Rajashekar (alaimziii) is<\/p>\n
rm}? .,5\u00a7”1d”:r4\u00a7i{i~V   3}:<3t ez\ufb01orcaablg 03:1 the third<\/p>\n
. V.  – \u00a2\u00e9\u00a7'=:?::j<1\u00abt:\u00a7T%31:1itte\u20ac1 them :9 \ufb01le 2; strmmtgr claim’<\/p>\n
9?, Thereafter, tha petitianar meved this cgsmt in<\/p>\n
‘W,P\u00bbE*4;’e:x 26111f2\u20ac?f}fEe Cha\ufb01emgng the ercicr ef the trial<\/p>\n
scrum, zxghich had alimxzed the amaiicatioxx far counter<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
claim. This court, while ailowing the writ pe\ufb01iipn,<\/p>\n
directed \u00a3116 trial court to take up  <\/p>\n
:;1e::1tiened above as pre3i1ni11arjs; is-sues 31$-..,.\u00a2s3nVsi\u00a7;ier this .. 2 <\/p>\n
Salliii Pursuant to the said  ‘t1’iaI<\/p>\n
C(}I1’Sid\u20acI’f32d i.ss.ues–6 t0 8 3:i1r::;1u’o1ie3.;i”‘abo1r\u00a2:’ pe\ufb01sse-*i_:”L.<\/p>\n
the irnpugned order and  .ifss1’1’\u00a2\u00e9-:;..VV’\u00a7\u00a72\u00a7re vvvanswemd
\nin the afmma\ufb01ve   court has got
\n_im’\u00a7s<:ii<:t:i<:.=:r1 to   the court fee
\npaid on the   and in a suit for
\n " claim by defendant':-3~
\n3 1:9 \ufb01fe}? 'maiIitainabl$. Aggrieved by the
\nsaid  the pxaantm" has Come up<\/p>\n
 'writ p\u00e9iifjgna A.\n<\/p>\n
    * \ufb01\ufb01ard time: laarned caunsal for ilh\ufb01 paxties.<\/p>\n
Tfz\u00e9 Tvcounsel for tha petiticncr argued that the<\/p>\n
 AAt;#ial.(:m’.31*i: ‘esza$ ix: envy in censidering i3su:3s–6 ta 8<\/p>\n
A’  3 96:13.38}. of the: \u00a73I’QCif:’\u20acdiI}\u00a7S of the trial ccurt<\/p>\n
 2 .. –i;\u20acf\u00a5\u20ac81S that 1331133-u::3 is 8 were \u00e9eiated by an Qrderr dated<\/p>\n
3 LS:,2f;\u00a5C)6 and? tilsrefare, the mtial court cauid mat have<\/p>\n
(311613 again CQ\ufb01Sid\u20ac \ufb01 gait: issue\ufb01-6 its ;% and passed<\/p>\n
“E
\n1′<\/p>\n
the inmugmtd erder, Sacondiy’, referring to the above
\n\ufb01ling of the suit, which was on 25,11.1999, anti<\/p>\n
appearance cf the defendants on 15,1;2.1999 <\/p>\n
Qf the written statement by the said def\u00a2I1da;\u00a7. t_$7 <\/p>\n
16.102000, and than makmg 3  ‘<\u00a7'1;–.\n<\/p>\n
28.22003, this suhmissio\ufb02 ma\ufb01a <\/p>\n
date: er \ufb01zmg of the. Wfiti\u20ac1TSt8;{di11\u00a73f1? :;1\u00a2jm;1\u00a2:eyj%% %<\/p>\n
claim that was made, there s%;?;’L\u00a7 a,lpn\ufb01’  3 days
\nand, therefore, the txiazi\u00e9i’    \ufb02Qf\u00a3: have permitted<\/p>\n
the defendants; to raise. :t}1e– _.c%.(\u00bb)_1′:;1’ite;:r””1\u00a2i%i’\u00a7’\u00a7.a.i111 at such a<\/p>\n
belat\u00e9rgi sf\u00abstag\u00a2”‘Vr;1t3f\u00a3:’:1″1ce of the defen\ufb01ants got
\naver withL\u00a7heVVf1iL*;1\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7f  ivritten statement;<\/p>\n
6f ~ is t\u00a71\u20acx1;vv__f.f,\u00a7’rr:tez1dr:d that the triai court alga:<\/p>\n
‘ ;g\ufb01:033.f:1:3\u00a7f’:;’i:ari.t<\u00a7._\u00e9:i2A__\u00a2:rrQI' on the aspect cf Limitatilsn in res\ufb01eci<\/p>\n
. iii" 'vclaim made by \ufb01lm dafcndants and SO aiscr<\/p>\n
  c\u00e9izffv Eeeisw czammiited tha mistake in hgyiding that<\/p>\n
V' :f_*  court fee: gait}. is $uf\ufb01Ci\u20acfi'IL and; as such, ti}:<\/p>\n
Vimgugngd arder calms: be susiiain\ufb01d fer thz: 3.b<:::'%:e<\/p>\n
rEaS{\u00a7\ufb01$3 In suyport of the above smbmigsizixns, this<\/p>\n
i\u00e9jarrmd munseti griacezd reiianae 011 the ciecisigns<\/p>\n
\\\\
\n4'<\/p>\n
8<\/span>
\nI’f:’.}3\u00a71′”\u00a3\u20acd in 1914(2) E{.as::L.J. Short Nate N0.:3Q5, page SCI,<\/p>\n
ALB 29310 Caleutta 1?, AIR. 200% B{m’iba3I 183,'”A\u00bb.TI.R.<\/p>\n
1989 \u00a3Z}ris_f-3a 5:3 and LL-.R. 1999: Kamataka <\/p>\n
si:r\u00a2:n\u00a7;;tl1 9:” the afaresaid rulings, the  _  <\/p>\n
seught for the petitien being   <\/p>\n
ordsr being set aside.\n<\/p>\n
7. On the other hand, . i:orVVR–3 ti:\n<\/p>\n
R-5 submitted that 1:23′;_5″‘~:?.rrcii” ha$–.’\u00a7;@;\u00e91~:.committ$d by the
\ntrial r:::_2urt; in passing  \u00a7.\ufb011;9jj_1;:1″1ri:i c:v;:\u00a5?,ii;.:1\u00a7’ an issues–6 to
\n8  “f:1*ii3″:.1\u00a73”;\u00a3f1  “$a}d\u00e9VVi’ssu\u00e9_$”‘h\u00e9._Ve been Shown to have:
\nbeen \u20ac’3–\u20ac1\u20act\u20ac\u00a7  by the m\u20ac:i’Cioner’-L: counsai,<\/p>\n
yatt,_ 3:33! Vf11\u00e9a:;:V”}Ci.”c-V31′ passed by this ccszzrt, the trial<\/p>\n
‘ V’  . C313}: i..A’ha<:iz to \u00e9\u00e9iisid\ufb01r issues\u00e9 to 8 as ,T_3I'ff';'}iI}C3.iI."3,I:"51.1i""_'\u00a7—*<\/p>\n
  'Vit:s$i:\u00a73;"'a:1:j'%':r;a%;;\u00a73rd a. finding an them and, therefore, 110<\/p>\n
Cf'???  cermmitted 1:23; tbs iriai couri: in passing<\/p>\n
 xths:-: z:\u00a7r-:i_\u00e9r 0:1 the aferesai\ufb01 issues;<\/p>\n
 N \ufb01g far as isha limitation is concczne\ufb01, the<\/p>\n
gubmi\ufb01\ufb01ian ma\ufb01a by this: isgaxne\u00e9 cauns\ufb01l is that, in i:h2:=+<\/p>\n
courztar ciaim itself, it is stated that the cause Qf ac\ufb01m":<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
arosae in the year 2003 and hence the Ln:-tliaf Seught far by
\nthe defendants is weli within tima; As far as the court<\/p>\n
Elite. ifs eoncemed, the: 311bmissic311 made is that <\/p>\n
court has rightly held that the court fee paidiw.’<\/p>\n
pmper and EVQII otherwise, this respondr:1::.t$ ‘:ViIl.A_Tpa3:’ {F123,  <\/p>\n
de\ufb01cit comt fee, if so directed   u.3:1t&\u00e9;’ f:: o11’e:rr:\u00a7;’::\u00e9si, ” ,<\/p>\n
the submiss\u00e9en made is thaf’ _$tag\u00e9- T\u00a3:}31;ig}1etion of
\nthe eviiience of me  ;vi72(1Z.1\u00a5l”~–!_C\u00a7’i’=.\u00bb.’,T~f'”.’.\u00a5’~1_)?.1’C, can the other<\/p>\n
hand, {ha crss_s~exa::n;;;:;\u00a7a;tionA \u00a5;>f  fhe’~~.’;>1z:inti$’f and the<\/p>\n
\u20acVif.’1\ufb01i’1\u00a73\u20ac–.=$~f’  is yet is begin’ Themfere,
\nra\u00e9iyizag 5:2″; 3   {:\u20ac.>”x..1r\u00a3 reparte\u00e9 in 2001(2)<\/p>\n
i{m”.iL-Le}; \u20ac12 K}; “i*:h;:V_ :a:a_;’:–;::311issim}. made is \u00a3113: the saunter<\/p>\n
\u00bb \u00a7f:lEef;;m., __y:;:5:r:::\u00a7:te3d to be raised even after \ufb01iing caf<\/p>\n
‘% \u00a7j,:3.%’:1%\ufb01tf\u00a7\u00a2::n”T:;.Siat@m\u00a7nt bait, much befcr\ufb01 the 03.36 is<\/p>\n
rs\u00e9\u00e9rv\u00e9d fag” juda;\u00a7m.\u20ac11{g As such, 31:: \u00a331.11′: can be fauna<\/p>\n
\u00bb nir:L’i”.\u00a71&: imgmgged grder.\n<\/p>\n
 H Eizwizag thus h\ufb01ard bath sides, I de not 3&5 any<\/p>\n
merit 1:’: {his writ petiiion far thas fgliazvizig reasans, That<\/p>\n
frat \ufb02\ufb01\ufb01 313 that thifs cmumrt, awhile \ufb01i\ufb01zinasizzg 0f WwP,’\u00a7’\u00e9’G,<\/p>\n
i
\nr’<\/p>\n
*2<\/p>\n
EC-\n<\/p>\n
2\u00e9111;’2i)\u20ac.’.25 on ?.9;2{3Q@, had dir\u00e9ctari ‘(ha trial cum: :0
\ncensider issusjs-43 to 8 as pr\ufb01\ufb01minary issues and aftar<\/p>\n
h\u20ac:ar;”1g bath sides an that, in 1:93:53 an order; fJn::1 e’:* th\u20ac<\/p>\n
sgajd {2iFCi1II1S’CaI1C\u20acS, the trial cezsurt had no <:ga';;':+:;fV.<;'3_';3i;?Ig;:11<\/p>\n
but :0 pass: an ordasr 0:1 issuacs\u00e9 to 8  '1':\u00e9:';s4_1:::=\u00a7'r_=.%;1';..VV <\/p>\n
nraciselgr dent: 1:13' the trial  15:35 ': \u00ab"\u00a7a;\u00e9\u00a53Z:r1g:  <\/p>\n
impug11ed erder. Mr:rr21_3: \u00a5:n.=:.t:a_.3.1s:%.;f{r::”‘ (;’*.V_at;.;._~:-Vii?3-?\u00a3’;$;2\u00a3}06, the fact that<\/p>\n
the order of this mart fawas = pa\u00a7ss\u00a2\u20ac1l\u00bb.”:i1uch later on<\/p>\n
?;9,Q\u00a7}_06–_,   \u00a310 scope far that trial ceuri:
\n{Exam to {:~:*;.:1:=3~i{.”Zc\u00e9I;<'_f33;\u00e9  41331153 and ;3a$:-5 an Qrcien As<\/p>\n
 tkm g9 023_r.'\u00a7\u00a7.:1 missed in this regard d=::::s net merit<\/p>\n
\u00bb 3; :_;.{t:a::5id.\u00a21**a:ion;\n<\/p>\n
”   the Iimitatien point is concerned, :11:<\/p>\n
}s\u00e9;\u00a7*:”;e\u20ac\u00a7.a :\u00a7{;m1$&1 far the petitianer, by relying 91:3. tha<\/p>\n
” V.  rttferre\u00e9 ta abova cited by him submitted that the<\/p>\n
 ;;0:i,iA:1tar \u20ac333,111: cgrsultji mat have 236611 maria at 3. beiaieri<\/p>\n
V  “giage, that fee Lang after $116 \ufb01ling af th-3 written<\/p>\n
statameni and aftm” 3 gap af 12′.i’:% da’Ef;-Viz-E9 As far as $3313<\/p>\n
E1<\/p>\n
contanij-tm is cancemasd, {his team, in i;E1\u00a2 ,_rf\u00a7;:1::\u00a7;1g<\/p>\n
reparzsrtezj in 22{‘iO:(2_) Kar.L\u00a2J. 610, aftar   _<\/p>\n
several decissiens of the Apex \u20acZ30ur’:,  ‘::*i,i1(~,{\u00a3j. 4.:}:1\u00a3:\u00a7t,–\u00ab .. <\/p>\n
insvafar as the time limit f0rV=.A\ufb011i11g.?:QL1::t\u00a2:”- ;-32:4<\/p>\n
ceracemad, it can be f11ed_   <\/p>\n
statement: and it Car; bf:   flia  is not
\nC\ufb01i\ufb02pi\ufb01tely closcird by  :\u00e9m[\u00a7iA.\u00a7af9re the matter is
\nreserved \u00a30?’ .i’iJ4iggn\u20acni;;’   the gas: is
\nwill at \ufb01lm   the p1ainti\ufb01”s
\n  such, the question 91″\n<\/p>\n
the  cempleted dees not arise<\/p>\n
gnd,  also dtms not carry enough<\/p>\n
 fC\u00a7_1{\u00a7\u00a7:% 1;;{ehi_:1\u00e9’it;*–V…. %%%%% <\/p>\n
‘  as the ceurt fee is rsonccrxned, the learneci<\/p>\n
fria}; ju:i\u00a7;\u00a2,  the course 0f his orclar an i$SL1\u20ac~?, has<\/p>\n
 Agtisitd that aemrding it} the provisigns ef Secztien<\/p>\n
V’ ~  sf’ Cieurt Fees & Suits Vaiuatien Act, th\ufb01 mar: fee<\/p>\n
 .?:’;a$ ‘:9 be paid for 1:115: razlief ciaim\u00e9d in :c\u20ac;$*m\u20ac-At Qf an<\/p>\n
H agiculturai iazzd 011 the market valua csf tbs ymperty 23:’<\/p>\n
R3. 1,9091\u00bb, which\ufb01ver 11:3 higher 311$ has aim netrzd that<\/p>\n
3\u00bb<\/p>\n
wf<\/p>\n
Q53′<\/p>\n
\u00abA <\/p>\n
      …..\n<\/p>\n
593′ {‘2$'(i~’;’I’ ‘;:ra:.~”z.$r;:d by that ma} court an issuesd\ufb01 ti} 8. The<\/p>\n
ax .a.’\u00a7\\””‘\\\\\n<\/p>\n
 -5<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
11>.\n<\/p>\n
awn afzczr 1:31:-:: aznandment of the mitten statement by<\/p>\n
way ef cmmter ciaim, the defendants have fmnished
\nfI’\u20ac’:Sh valuation slip and alga have paid additionai”‘cQuxt<\/p>\n
fee: csf Rs.iZO{)\/- fear the relief sought for in  <\/p>\n
ciaim. Therefczm, I ‘SS6 110 error of law co;13ujj1ittc=:t:i;’.\u00a7:\u00a77y’ tiig <\/p>\n
trial mart in recordixlg a  ‘ <\/p>\n
defendantg on i:~:\u00absue–7’  Even”–oih.@rWis<-5,. :33' I'i*g1i't1\u00a7;*"~ %\u00bb<\/p>\n
submitted by the ieamed  f\u00e91*..\u00a72'–.\u00a7-:t{:L\u00a7R:6, the<\/p>\n
ccsurt is always at   "the. de\ufb02\u00e9if caurt fee
\nfrom the r::spo;;dentsAVa1f\u00a3}I~.,fG'_.i\u00a7ie:i11"'r(\u00a7r3p;5s\u00a2:<\u00a7f 0f the subject<\/p>\n
matt\u00e9zg' of th\u00e9 s.e;i.1;L':o:_1I2i:er zarlaim.
\n1?, F\u00a73;_ iihe 'af0fr\u00e9s:a._id\u00ab-..:*\u20ac;\u00e9_sons, I do not find an}? case:<\/p>\n
magie' 213:1: f\u00a3::r\u00bb  e\ufb01iuft ta: inttzrferes with 131$ impugxzed<\/p>\n
 tfiefgfem, I'\u20ac3j\u20acC'i\u20acd.\n<\/p>\n
*~ {\u00a3133 aim ma\ufb01a clear that the Qbsarvatiam\ufb01 ma\ufb01a<\/p>\n
  abev\u00e9 shall 139′: in any way irx\ufb02ucnca: the trial<\/p>\n
V.  __:i%<::\u00ab:..::'"\u00a3: while disposing of the suit and tbs cauntar eiaim<\/p>\n
on merits, The trial 001.11": is impressed upsn to disvpese<\/p>\n
kw
\nxi<\/p>\n
,\/'<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M.Rajasekhar S\/O Sri. Muniswamy … vs B.V.Pramod S\/O Late B.S. … on 20 November, 2009 Author: V.Jagannathan 1}? THE HIGH Ci”_’:L%RT \u20ac313′ KARNATAIIQA AT BANGALORE Dated ‘(ha :Z\u20ac;’\ufb01h dais? sf N{)V\u20acfI_T1\u00a73f3I’ 2909 : B E F {J R E : THE HC=N’BLB2- MRJLFSTXCE : \\f..JAGANNATHf;\u00a7\u00a7 WEI?’ \u00a7”~’E’FI’i’If>I\\3 No; 32846 I 2009 fGM–CP”C’\u00a7””–\u00ab.T”‘*, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM.Rajasekhar S\/O Sri. Muniswamy ... vs B.V.Pramod S\/O Late B.S. ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M.Rajasekhar S\/O Sri. Muniswamy ... vs B.V.Pramod S\/O Late B.S. ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-10T01:10:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M.Rajasekhar S\\\/O Sri. Muniswamy … vs B.V.Pramod S\\\/O Late B.S. … on 20 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-10T01:10:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1776,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009\",\"name\":\"M.Rajasekhar S\\\/O Sri. Muniswamy ... vs B.V.Pramod S\\\/O Late B.S. ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-10T01:10:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M.Rajasekhar S\\\/O Sri. Muniswamy … vs B.V.Pramod S\\\/O Late B.S. … on 20 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M.Rajasekhar S\/O Sri. Muniswamy ... vs B.V.Pramod S\/O Late B.S. ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M.Rajasekhar S\/O Sri. Muniswamy ... vs B.V.Pramod S\/O Late B.S. ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-10T01:10:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M.Rajasekhar S\/O Sri. Muniswamy … vs B.V.Pramod S\/O Late B.S. … on 20 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-10T01:10:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009"},"wordCount":1776,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009","name":"M.Rajasekhar S\/O Sri. Muniswamy ... vs B.V.Pramod S\/O Late B.S. ... on 20 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-10T01:10:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-rajasekhar-so-sri-muniswamy-vs-b-v-pramod-so-late-b-s-on-20-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M.Rajasekhar S\/O Sri. Muniswamy … vs B.V.Pramod S\/O Late B.S. … on 20 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69372"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69372\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}