{"id":69563,"date":"2010-10-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010"},"modified":"2018-01-31T11:04:25","modified_gmt":"2018-01-31T05:34:25","slug":"mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010<\/div>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n\n                                                                                              CIC\/AD\/C\/2010\/000648\n                                                                                           Dated:\u00a0\u00a0October\u00a020,\u00a02010\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                                  :      Shri\u00a0\u00a0R.\u00a0Subramanian\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0Public\u00a0\u00a0Authority                             :      Southern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Chennai.\n\n\n                                                       \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\nBackground<\/pre>\n
1.      The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a021.12.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Southern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Chennai\u00a0<\/p>\n
        wanting\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0considering\u00a0his\u00a0total\u00a0service\u00a0of\u00a036\u00a0years\u00a0from\u00a01.1.1954\u00a0to\u00a031.7.90\u00a0<\/p>\n
        as\u00a0 qualifying\u00a0 service\u00a0 for \u00a0 the\u00a0 payment\u00a0of\u00a0Pension\u00a0and\u00a0Gratuity\u00a0benefits.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0prayed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        authorities\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0Department\u00a0of\u00a0Personnel\u00a0&\u00a0Accounts\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0immediate\u00a0relief\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0notify\u00a0<\/p>\n
        the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0abnormal\u00a0delay\u00a0which\u00a0amounts\u00a0to\u00a0deficiency\u00a0of\u00a0service.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a027.1.10\u00a0<\/p>\n
        providing\u00a0detailed\u00a0reply\u00a0after\u00a0verifying\u00a0the\u00a0Service\u00a0Register\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0,\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0<\/p>\n
        is\u00a0not\u00a0eligible\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0benefits\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0him.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0further\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0seen\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant’s\u00a0<\/p>\n
        service\u00a0register\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0appointed\u00a0as\u00a0Ty.\u00a0Porter\u00a0with\u00a0effect\u00a0from\u00a017.3.59\u00a0only.\u00a0\u00a0Hence\u00a0qualifying\u00a0<\/p>\n
        service\u00a0is\u00a0calculated\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0case\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0appointment\u00a0as\u00a0Ty.\u00a0Porter\u00a0i.e.,\u00a017.3.59\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
        settlement\u00a0benefits\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0arranged\u00a0accordingly.\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0reply\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0<\/p>\n
        a\u00a0complaint\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0service\u00a0from\u00a01.1.54\u00a0to\u00a014.5.59\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0taken\u00a0into\u00a0<\/p>\n
        consideration\u00a0as\u00a0”\u00a0qualifying\u00a0service”\u00a0for\u00a0purpose\u00a0of\u00a0paying\u00a0terminal\u00a0benefits\u00a0of\u00a0pension\u00a0and\u00a0gratuity\u00a0<\/p>\n
        and\u00a0seeking\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0doing\u00a0so.\u00a0.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.      The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0October\u00a0<\/p>\n
        20,\u00a02010.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.\u00a0     Shri \u00a0 A. \u00a0 Narayanan, \u00a0 Sr. \u00a0 DPO \u00a0 represented \u00a0 the \u00a0 Public \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 and \u00a0 was \u00a0 heard \u00a0 through \u00a0 video\u00a0<\/p>\n
        conferencing.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0   The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0alongwith\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Baktavatsalam\u00a0who\u00a0represented\u00a0him\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Decision\n<\/p>\n
 5.       During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0complainant\u00a0reiterated\u00a0his\u00a0contention\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0appeal\u00a0and\u00a0requested\u00a0<\/p>\n
         once\u00a0again\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0reason\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0taking\u00a0into\u00a0consideration\u00a0the\u00a0total\u00a0service\u00a0period\u00a0for\u00a0purpose\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
         calculation\u00a0of\u00a0terminal\u00a0benefits\u00a0of\u00a0 \u00a0Pension\u00a0and\u00a0Gratuity\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0reason\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0issuing\u00a0fresh\u00a0PPO\u00a0<\/p>\n
         orders\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0revised\u00a0rate\u00a0awarded\u00a0by\u00a0VI\u00a0Central\u00a0Pay\u00a0Commission.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         PPO\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0revised\u00a0and\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Bank\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0\u00a0handed\u00a0over\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n
         copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0PPO\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0presence\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commissioner.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
6.       The \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 on \u00a0 careful \u00a0 consideration \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 holds \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 Complainant \u00a0 is \u00a0 simply\u00a0<\/p>\n
         narrating\u00a0his\u00a0\u00a0personal\u00a0grievance\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0seeking\u00a0any\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0relief\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n
         in\u00a0terms\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0issuance\u00a0of\u00a0orders\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0falls\u00a0outside\u00a0the\u00a0ambit\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         RTI \u00a0 Act. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 Complainant \u00a0 is \u00a0 advised \u00a0 to \u00a0 approach \u00a0 an \u00a0 appropriate \u00a0 forum \u00a0 for \u00a0 redressal \u00a0 of \u00a0 his\u00a0<\/p>\n
         grievance.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0accordingly\u00a0rejects\u00a0the\u00a0appeal\u00a0and\u00a0closes\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0enc.<\/p>\n
                                                                                                          \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                                  Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.       Shri\u00a0R.\u00a0Subramanian
\n         C\/o\u00a0Ekambaram
\n         37,\u00a0Perumal\u00a0Koil\u00a0Street
\n         Vengal\u00a0Post
\n         Trivellore\u00a0<\/p>\n
2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n         Southern\u00a0Railway
\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office
\n         Personnel\u00a0Branch,\u00a0
\n         Chennai\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0600004<\/p>\n
3.       Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 CIC\/AD\/C\/2010\/000648 Dated:\u00a0\u00a0October\u00a020,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Shri\u00a0\u00a0R.\u00a0Subramanian Name\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0Public\u00a0\u00a0Authority : Southern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Chennai. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Background 1. The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a021.12.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Southern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Chennai\u00a0 wanting\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0considering\u00a0his\u00a0total\u00a0service\u00a0of\u00a036\u00a0years\u00a0from\u00a01.1.1954\u00a0to\u00a031.7.90\u00a0 as\u00a0 qualifying\u00a0 service\u00a0 for \u00a0 the\u00a0 payment\u00a0of\u00a0Pension\u00a0and\u00a0Gratuity\u00a0benefits.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0prayed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0 authorities\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0Department\u00a0of\u00a0Personnel\u00a0&\u00a0Accounts\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0immediate\u00a0relief\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0notify\u00a0 the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0abnormal\u00a0delay\u00a0which\u00a0amounts\u00a0to\u00a0deficiency\u00a0of\u00a0service.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a027.1.10\u00a0 providing\u00a0detailed\u00a0reply\u00a0after\u00a0verifying\u00a0the\u00a0Service\u00a0Register\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0,\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0 is\u00a0not\u00a0eligible\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0benefits\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0him.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0further\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0seen\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant’s\u00a0 service\u00a0register\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0appointed\u00a0as\u00a0Ty.\u00a0Porter\u00a0with\u00a0effect\u00a0from\u00a017.3.59\u00a0only.\u00a0\u00a0Hence\u00a0qualifying\u00a0 service\u00a0is\u00a0calculated\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0case\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0appointment\u00a0as\u00a0Ty.\u00a0Porter\u00a0i.e.,\u00a017.3.59\u00a0and\u00a0 settlement\u00a0benefits\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0arranged\u00a0accordingly.\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0reply\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0 a\u00a0complaint\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0service\u00a0from\u00a01.1.54\u00a0to\u00a014.5.59\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0taken\u00a0into\u00a0 consideration\u00a0as\u00a0”\u00a0qualifying\u00a0service”\u00a0for\u00a0purpose\u00a0of\u00a0paying\u00a0terminal\u00a0benefits\u00a0of\u00a0pension\u00a0and\u00a0gratuity\u00a0 and\u00a0seeking\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0doing\u00a0so.\u00a0. 2. The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0October\u00a0 20,\u00a02010. 3.\u00a0 Shri \u00a0 A. \u00a0 Narayanan, \u00a0 Sr. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69563","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-31T05:34:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-31T05:34:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":476,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-31T05:34:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-31T05:34:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-31T05:34:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010"},"wordCount":476,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010","name":"Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-31T05:34:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-r-subramanian-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.R Subramanian vs Ministry Of Railways on 20 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69563","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69563"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69563\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69563"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69563"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69563"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}