{"id":69575,"date":"2009-08-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009"},"modified":"2016-04-21T08:07:43","modified_gmt":"2016-04-21T02:37:43","slug":"swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009<\/div>\n
CWP No.11846 of 2009                                : 1:\n\n        In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.\n\n\n                                Date of decision: 19.08.2009\n\n\n\nSwami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education\nAcademy                                                    .. Petitioner\n\nVs.\n\nState of Haryana and another                       .. Respondents\n\n\n\n        CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PERMOD KOHLI.\n\nPresent:      Mr.Rajive Atma Ram, Senior Advocate,with\n              Mr.Arjun Partap \"Atma Ram, Advocate,\n              for the petitioner.\n\n              Mr.SK Monga, Sr.DAG, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1&2.\n\n              Mr.AS Virk, Advocate,for respondent No.3.\n\n              Mr.SK Sharma, Advocate,for respondent No.4.\n\n              --\n\nPERMOD KOHLI, J. (Oral)\n<\/pre>\n
              The petitioner is an institution established to impart education<\/p>\n
for various engineering courses. The institute was duly recognised by the<\/p>\n
AICTE vide letter dated 29.06.2008 as an Engineering College for girls<\/p>\n
only.      The intake capacity of the college is 270 for three different<\/p>\n
engineering courses with 90 intake capacity for each course. The petitioner<\/p>\n
approached the AICTE vide letter dated 28.08.2008 for permission to<\/p>\n
convert the girls college to a co-education institution from academic session<\/p>\n
2008-2009.         Receiving no response, the petitioner sent another<\/p>\n
representation     dated 16.10.2008     for the same purpose.         Even this<\/p>\n
representation of the petitioner has not been responded to. The petitioner
\n CWP No.11846 of 2009                                   : 2:<\/span><\/p>\n
has accordingly approached this Court seeking a direction in the mature of<\/p>\n
mandamus to permit the petitioner to convert the Institute from Girls<\/p>\n
Institute of Engineering to Co-educational Institute for Engineering as the<\/p>\n
petitioner has not been able to attract enough number of girl students to fill<\/p>\n
up the intake capacity. It is stated that during the academic session 2008-<\/p>\n
2009 only 24 girl students could be admitted and for the session 2009-<\/p>\n
2010, only 9 girl students have been admitted.\n<\/p>\n
             It is contended that the petitioner has created all infrastructure<\/p>\n
and has also requisite number of the faculty members according to the<\/p>\n
intake capacity of the students. However, the girl students are not available.<\/p>\n
The petitioner-institute is starving and is at the stage of collapse.<\/p>\n
             The AICTE has not filed the reply and has argued the matter.<\/p>\n
However, Mr. Sharma appearing on its behalf submits that the petitioner<\/p>\n
should possess the requisite infrastructure and faculty members for the<\/p>\n
purpose.     It is further contended that the petitioner institution cannot be<\/p>\n
converted into a co-educational institution as various incentives were given<\/p>\n
to the petitioner-Institute at the time of its establishment as a girls institute.<\/p>\n
             A similar issue came to be considered by this Court in CWP<\/p>\n
No.8318 of 2009 (Shree Siddhivinayak Educational Trust Vs. State of<\/p>\n
Haryana and others), decided on 15.07.2009. In the aforesaid writ petition<\/p>\n
also, the issue of conversion of the girls institute into a co-educational<\/p>\n
institute has been considered after rejection of the request by the AICTE.<\/p>\n
While considering the aforesaid issue, this Court made the following<\/p>\n
observations:-\n<\/p>\n
                           “…………………… The petitioner now wanted to<\/p>\n
                           convert the Women Institutions into Co-education
\n CWP No.11846 of 2009                                : 3:<\/span><\/p>\n
                       Institutions.<\/p>\n
                                       In the     short reply filed by the\n\n                       respondents,      the     grounds   for   rejection   as\n\n<\/pre>\n
                       mentioned in Annexure P-7, have been reiterated.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                                       Vide order dated 10.07.2009, further<\/p>\n
                       information was sought from the AICTE. The said<\/p>\n
                       order reads as follows:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n
                             “Reply on behalf of respondents No.3 and 4<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                             filed in Court is taken on record.<\/p>\n
                             The moot question that needs consideration<\/p>\n
                             is whether the policy of the AICTE<\/p>\n
                             permitting establishment of girls institute is<\/p>\n
                             an absolute bar for its alteration at any<\/p>\n
                             subsequent stage or there is no embargo for<\/p>\n
                             such an established institution to apply for<\/p>\n
                             deviation for conversion into a co-education<\/p>\n
                             institution.       Mr.Sharma shall produce the<\/p>\n
                             requisite policy on the next date of hearing.<\/p>\n
                             List on 14.07.2009.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                       Mr.SK     Sharma,    learned    counsel<\/p>\n
                       appearing for the AICTE has produced the Policy<\/p>\n
                       Decisions of the Council with regard to Approval<\/p>\n
                       Process. He has referred paragraphs 9.20, 9.21<\/p>\n
                       and 9.28 of the Policy Decision to argue that the<\/p>\n
                       petitioner is not entitled to convert its existing
\n CWP No.11846 of 2009                            : 4:<\/span><\/p>\n
                       institutions into integrated Campus as a Co-<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                       education institution. Paragraph 9.20 deals with the<\/p>\n
                       change      of name of an institution, whereas<\/p>\n
                       paragraph 9.21 deals with change of category of an<\/p>\n
                       Institution i.e. from Self-financing to Aided etc.<\/p>\n
                       Both these paragraphs have no application in the<\/p>\n
                       present case. Paragraph 9.28 deals          with the<\/p>\n
                       establishment of New Technical institutions for<\/p>\n
                       Women, which is reproduced as under:-<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                             ” 9.28 Establishment of New Technical<\/p>\n
                             Institutions for Women.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                             For    establishment      of    new    technical<\/p>\n
                             institutions exclusively set up for women<\/p>\n
                             certain norms have been relaxed which are<\/p>\n
                             as follows:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                             a.    Land: For the technical institutions<\/p>\n
                             exclusively set up for women, the land<\/p>\n
                             norms prescribed for establishment of all<\/p>\n
                             other Technical Institutions have been<\/p>\n
                             relaxed up to 50% in rural category and 20%<\/p>\n
                             in Metro & State Capital category and 10%<\/p>\n
                             in Mega Cities category.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                             b. FDR and Processing Fee: 20% relaxation<\/p>\n
                             are allowed in FDR amount and processing<\/p>\n
                             fees for establishment         of new technical
\n CWP No.11846 of 2009                                 : 5:<\/span><\/p>\n
                             institutions exclusively set up for women.<\/p>\n
                             c. Built up area & Number of courses and<\/p>\n
                             intake: The total built up area required for<\/p>\n
                             setting up of new institutions are as per<\/p>\n
                             existing norms. However, to start with<\/p>\n
                             institutions for women will be allowed up to<\/p>\n
                             5 courses with total annual intake of 300<\/p>\n
                             with each course intake not exceeding 90.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                             d.     Single window system for processing\n\n                             proposals: Two copies          o the application\n\n<\/pre>\n
                             shall be submitted to the Member Secretary,<\/p>\n
                             AICTE along with a proof                of having<\/p>\n
                             submitted a copy of the application each to<\/p>\n
                             the     affiliating     University   and        State<\/p>\n
                             Government        and    a Demand       Draft     of<\/p>\n
                             Rs.5000\/- drawn on a nationalized bank in<\/p>\n
                             favour of “The Member Secretary, AICTE”<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                             payable at New Delhi.          One copy of the<\/p>\n
                             application shall be directly submitted each<\/p>\n
                             to the affiliating University and the State<\/p>\n
                             Government either in person or through<\/p>\n
                             Speed\/Registered Post.”.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n
                                     From the perusal of the aforesaid<\/p>\n
                       paragraph,    it   is   abundantly    clear    that     for<\/p>\n
                       establishment of the New Technical Institutions for
\n CWP No.11846 of 2009                             : 6:<\/span><\/p>\n
                       Women, the AICTE          had introduced various<\/p>\n
                       incentives stipulated therein. It is not in dispute<\/p>\n
                       that the petitioner did avail all incentives while<\/p>\n
                       introducing two Women Institutions referred to<\/p>\n
                       above and now the petitioner-Trust has approached<\/p>\n
                       AICTE for conversion of these Institutions into co-<\/p>\n
                       educational institutions and for integration of the<\/p>\n
                       Campus.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                   Mr.Sunil Chadha, learned counsel for<\/p>\n
                       the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar and<\/p>\n
                       has also referred to the averments made in his<\/p>\n
                       application Annexure P-3 to the effect that the<\/p>\n
                       petitioner is still ready and willing to forego all<\/p>\n
                       incentives. Not only this, the petitioner has given<\/p>\n
                       the details in paragraph 21 of the writ petition to<\/p>\n
                       indicate that petitioner has already surrendered all<\/p>\n
                       incentives and benefits secured at the time of<\/p>\n
                       establishment of the two Women Institutions. It is<\/p>\n
                       also    stated    that    the    land    for     co-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                       educational\/integrated Campus has already been<\/p>\n
                       purchased and the necessary infrastructure is<\/p>\n
                       complete and     ready.   It is also stated that the<\/p>\n
                       petitioner even deposited the additional fee for<\/p>\n
                       establishing a co-educational Institution.     It is,<\/p>\n
                       accordingly, prayed that the petitioner may be<\/p>\n
                       permitted to switch over to the co-educational
\n CWP No.11846 of 2009                             : 7:<\/span><\/p>\n
                       institution because the petitioner has completed all<\/p>\n
                       norms as required by the AICTE.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                     Even though        the AICTE in its<\/p>\n
                       impugned letter Annexure P-7 has rejected the<\/p>\n
                       claim of the petitioner for conversion of the Girls<\/p>\n
                       Institutions to Co-educational Institutions, no but<\/p>\n
                       rules, regulations or norms or policy decision has<\/p>\n
                       been brought to the notice of this Court with<\/p>\n
                       regard to conversion of the Girls Institutions into<\/p>\n
                       co-education Institutions. What has been brought<\/p>\n
                       to my notice is paragraph 9.28 of the Policy<\/p>\n
                       decision which only provides for relaxation of<\/p>\n
                       norms in case one intends to establish a girl<\/p>\n
                       institute. It does not, in any manner, create an<\/p>\n
                       embargo for conversion of the girls Institution to<\/p>\n
                       co-educational institution if the Institution is ready<\/p>\n
                       and willing to meet all norms\/requirements of the<\/p>\n
                       AICTE.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                     In view of the above, present petition<\/p>\n
                       is allowed.    Impugned letter dated 04.03.2009,<\/p>\n
                       Annexure P-7, is hereby set aside. The AICTE is<\/p>\n
                       directed to take a fresh decision on the application<\/p>\n
                       of the petitioner for conversion of the existing girls<\/p>\n
                       Institutions to that of    co-education Institutions<\/p>\n
                       with integrated campus on the basis of the norms<\/p>\n
                       meant for the Co-education Institutions\/integrated
\n CWP No.11846 of 2009                                : 8:<\/span><\/p>\n
                         campus, as stipulated in Annexure P-2.           The<\/p>\n
                         petitioner has also notified the courses intended to<\/p>\n
                         be started after conversion,          even though,<\/p>\n
                         presently, the petitioner is running different kinds<\/p>\n
                         of courses. AICTE will also examine this aspect of<\/p>\n
                         the matter and may permit the petitioner to switch<\/p>\n
                         over to new courses as may be considered<\/p>\n
                         appropriate.      The AICTE is further directed to<\/p>\n
                         pass a fresh order keeping in view the above<\/p>\n
                         aspects subject     to fulfillment of the necessary<\/p>\n
                         conditions\/norms by the petitioner in this regard.<\/p>\n
                         Let the decision in this regard be taken within a<\/p>\n
                         period of one week from the date a certified copy<\/p>\n
                         of this order is made available to the competent<\/p>\n
                         authority.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
            In the present case also, the petitioner has stated that the<\/p>\n
petitioner is ready and willing to forego all the incentives obtained by it for<\/p>\n
establishment of the girls institute. Not only this, in paragraph 14 of the<\/p>\n
writ petition, the petitioner has also stated that the petitioner is ready and<\/p>\n
willing to pay the additional processing fee. It is also averred that the<\/p>\n
petitioner has also purchased the additional adjoining land of 5 acres and<\/p>\n
has already created the additional FDR of Rs.15 lacs.\n<\/p>\n
            In view of the above circumstances, this petition is allowed in<\/p>\n
the light of the judgment mentioned hereinabove. It is directed that the<\/p>\n
petitioner be allowed to convert the girls institute to a co-educational
\n CWP No.11846 of 2009                                : 9:<\/span><\/p>\n
institute subject to completion of all formalities. Respondent No.4 will<\/p>\n
accordingly allot the students to the petitioner institute after it acquires the<\/p>\n
status of co-educational institute. It is further directed that the AICTE will<\/p>\n
take decision on the request of the petitioner for conversion of the present<\/p>\n
girls institute into a co-educational institute within a period of 10 days. In<\/p>\n
the meantime, respondent No.4 will allot students to the petitioner<\/p>\n
institution treating as a co-educational institute.        However, the final<\/p>\n
admissions will remain subject to the decision of the AICTE.<\/p>\n
19.08.2009                                   (PERMOD KOHLI)\nBLS                                              JUDGE\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
      Note: Whether to be referred to the Reporter? YES\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009 CWP No.11846 of 2009 : 1: In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. Date of decision: 19.08.2009 Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education Academy .. Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and another .. Respondents CORAM: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69575","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSwami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-21T02:37:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-21T02:37:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1577,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-21T02:37:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-21T02:37:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-21T02:37:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009"},"wordCount":1577,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009","name":"Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-21T02:37:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/swami-devi-dyal-hi-tech-education-vs-state-of-haryana-and-another-on-19-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Swami Devi Dyal Hi-Tech Education vs State Of Haryana And Another on 19 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69575","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69575"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69575\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69575"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69575"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69575"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}