{"id":69806,"date":"2009-06-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009"},"modified":"2014-08-29T19:08:56","modified_gmt":"2014-08-29T13:38:56","slug":"north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"North West Karnataka Road … vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
North West Karnataka Road … vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
M,F.A. Na;2846f'20{)4\n3 1 2 C;'w MFA Crab .:\"5'9,'{}8\n\n11:: THE HIGH comm? or KARKATAKA %\ncmcvrr BENCH AT nnamvan  %  V\nDATED THIS THE 15%: DAY OF JmN%ES%Li'\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7%9%%j~j J?  _\nTHE IEOWBLE MR.JUS'I'ICE  N\nTHE Horrsm h\u20acR.JUSTIC\u00e9 \n\nMISCELLANEOUS 1i'::\u00a7';\u00e9:*:f A,ppf\u00a7;;i'L' ~--;\u00bb;';:i{2s4e 12005 {MVC}\ncxw M.F.A..TcR{>B ;sz,i:z:)::\u00e9s\n\nM   '\n\n\u00a311 M.?\u00e9;A3~:ov.1i2_.3_g\u00a7:;i'2@%'\n\nBETWEEN: AA %\n\nI. N.:*-mth  Afiainafaka Road\nv_\u00bb'\u00a773::a::Sp 0rt COI'{)Q_If8;ti0\ufb02,\nE:\u00a5.u'::'2'Ii Divisien, Hubii,\n\n'  \"$3:-' \u00a7.1js~1Z;i\u00e9J\u00a71i:r:i0I1a1 Controller\n\nV .;Re'Tg:;f:::\u00ab$e\":2t\u20acd..~by its\n\nH  C\ufb01hief I\u00a7.'g\u00a7.vA'TQ\ufb02icer.\n\n 2.  '\u00a3\u00a7V\ufb01:$t Kamataka Raa\u00e9\n\nAA _'I':'a;n;\"%p0rt Corparatixm,\n' Entematiena} Insuranse Fund,\n\n \" --\u00bb.<T:okuI Road, Hubii by its Managng Directar,\n Rcpregented by its\n\n Chief Law Q\ufb01icsr. ,..APPELLAN'T'S\n\n(B3; Sri. Madam Mahan Miiarmur, Advecaie}\n\n\/4-x\n\n\n\n\u00a7\u00bb\u00a7.F,?:. \u00a5\\e'<).f.3;846f2004\n:3; Cfw MFA Crz\u00e9b 59\/O8\n\nAME:\n\nI. Anjana, W\/0 Raxnachandra Dhumal,\nAged abom. 2"? yams,\n\n2. Kumar. Shxikant,\nRamaehandra Dhumzli,\nAged about 10 \u00a7;e:31"$,\n\n3. Iiumari. Kavita : " .. \nD\/9 Rarnachaxlcira Dhuma},   A \nAgsd. about 8 y<=:a1*$,  '\n\nRespondents 2 35 E?\u00bb I11i110fS-\u00bb<\/pre>\n
Represented by hig r1a\u20ac;ura,1_
\nMother petitioner ‘ca;  L <\/p>\n
4. Shi:1′(i’s;..[{\u00a7”‘2’\u00a2\u00e9i;!:i1z.i’:
\n@:’H01?f13<1?—'1t1\u00a5138l, *  –  –
\nag\ufb01ii 'absut 8}'.  V\u00bb ' "\n<\/p>\n
AI} r\/5 E::\u00a7ma.1:\u00a73*;:%1u1;-:% Chikodi,
\nQisargct: B’61g_3.u1n.’ …”RE}SP\u20ac;)NDEN’FS<\/p>\n
   :Af%’\/f\u00a7\u20ac;\u00abData3″, Adv”. far R1}<\/p>\n
‘~’fh;is misce\ufb02arzsaus first appeal is \ufb01le\u00e9 Eifi\u00e9i\ufb01f’<\/p>\n
  Ss;x_j;;i0\ufb01 i’?’3{1} of the Matcr Vehicles \ufb01at against 1:116
\n _\u00a7Vu;dgf3:1ent and award date\u00e9 16.99.2004 passed in MVC
\nN0.387j2()02 on th\u00e9 file fa the civi} Judga {Sr.D:1.) 65<\/p>\n
Additia\ufb01al MACE’, Chikodi, awarding camgansatisxz of<\/p>\n
 ‘””Rsk3,;’28,00{}\/- with iI1I;\u20acI’CSt at the rate of 8% pa. from<\/p>\n
the date of the petition tj\ufb01 its entire realisation arid
\ncii1’\u20ac<':t.i1"1g the appeiiant\ufb01 hamin ta d\u20ac:p0:s;.ii: the $211116.<\/p>\n
M\u00e9ia. No.2a46\/:29e4
\n; 3 ; {fjw MFA Crab 59,568<\/p>\n
In ?a\u00a3I.f9.A. Crab. N::).2846I'2\u20ac3G5<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
. Kumar. Shrikanih,<\/p>\n
Anjana, W\/0 Ramachandrza.\n<\/p>\n
Age: 80 yaars,   ‘<\/p>\n
Sf 0 Ramachandra Dhuma};  ‘
\nAge: 10 years,   ‘<\/p>\n
. Kumari. Kavitha, D9 1?:zam_a\u00a7t:If1aIid\u00a7’a:V%\u00a33?1umai,<\/p>\n
Aged about 8years,__  <\/p>\n
AppeBants_”Nai;{\u00a3  A31\u00a7e”i:1ir:0.:’S* ‘ ”
\nR\u20acpI’CS\u20ac;’lE.”\u00a7(i__  hisf n;3fi.Lf a1~”I1ir3t}’:;f”:r
\nAppenaxag: N_d;.:’_1, A1: If\/’ci_’I{cji:ha1i,<\/p>\n
Di.s’.’f:’i{:t: ‘Be1ga.;1m%.   …CRC}SS OBJECTGRS<\/p>\n
{By Sri. x:f,._R;a3;m\u00a7~’,-\u00a7iga\u00a7:::.\u00a2\u00a7:\u00e9;<\/p>\n
 ‘   \ufb01ierporatian,
\n _ ‘%i:1b’1i.}3.:vis\u00a7;a::, Hubii,
\nA18? its i\ufb01iikisianai \ufb02antralier<\/p>\n
 zA~:.s  V, <\/p>\n
kA:~i%o%:E:[%a\u00a7;7es: KazT1\u00e9H;ta}<a Road<\/p>\n
1"-\u00e9E':::p:r%:=$e:1'\u00e9s\u00a7 by its
\nCi1:'::=*:fi';-.1w Q\ufb01icer.\n<\/p>\n
 \u00a7” dr{h West Eiaxnataka E25336}
\n. “f:\u00e9’az1sp\u00bb0rt Carporaticn,
\n Zntcmaticrial E11su::’a.n<:c: Fund,<\/p>\n
" Gekui Road, E\ufb01zbii by its Managing Directar',<\/p>\n
Representad by its
\nChiaf Law Q\u00e9\ufb01cer.\n<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
\u00a74\u00a7.F’.A. Ne.2s45,!2eo4
\n; 4 ; cg\u00bb: MFA Crab ;t~:9,re:>8<\/p>\n
3. Shiddu Rama Dh1m1a} @ Eiennadhumal, _
\nage: 90 years, QCC2 Nil,  ”\n<\/p>\n
R\/0 KothaIi,Ta1: Chikodi, %    *\nDist: Belgaum.    ' '..&...APPi?L'LLf;NTS\n\n<\/pre>\n
{By Sri. Madam Moharx “1\u00a7\u00a7,d\u20ac3{)Cat’\u20ac )  <\/p>\n
This MFA Cross Objecti\u00e9rg. ia:,Vf\ufb02ecI’z;r_.21de1′ i\ufb02rder 41
\nRule 22 of cm in Mm NoA\u00a2+28e46;’2″m5 fledfaggajzlst the
\norder dated 15.09.2Q0f4_ pa:3_s:=:(\u00a7”‘-.’Lb}f”~\u00a3h\u20ac Civil Jduge
\n(SRDHJ an\ufb02 AddL ;MAC$;,@E\ufb01km\ufb01, in .MVC
\nNo.38?\/2002, .partly*A.~z3–l.1Qwii;g ‘=_t}:1ev_ {piaim petition for
\nr::oInpe11sa1:io1f1.~,_   _.\n<\/p>\n
Thesie f:3″‘E’A””a.nd”‘–.<3:zft\u00a7s\u00bbs, ;objAe\u20actions coming on for
\nAdmission, =f1:i\u00a7;1:d,ay,  J, delivered a
\nthe f0}lt:vi%ing;i:i:' "ff   _ <\/p>\n
F \u00a7\ufb01\u00a7\u00e9MENT<\/p>\n
 V- "':Ti1e1'\u20ac%'is ea ""d\u00e9V\u00a3ay of 998 in filing the crass<\/p>\n
 _0?t:_\u00a7::5_*<*;":\u00a7<:}'n._$; -?3.<;*:\u00a3_a\u00a7 is condoned.<\/p>\n
2.  fhazzgh this agptsal and cross abjectian are<\/p>\n
 “..f\u00a3i$’iz’es:i_f0i” admissiarz, they are takan up far fma} hearing<\/p>\n
 “the cansent cf the iemned sounsei appearing for<\/p>\n
” iiie parties. $3,\/”‘”‘<\/p>\n
MFRA. N<:z.2846;';2004
\nCfw MFA Crcfa 339138<\/p>\n
(J!<\/p>\n
3. The appeal fiied by the North  _
\nRead Transport Corporation is diracte\ufb01.  2 9\u00bb
\njti\ufb01g\ufb02l\u00e9iit and award dated
\nNo.38?\/2002 011 the me .91′  Aad:2::a;\u00a7\u00a7::%V%;\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a5.:ez~ fA<\/p>\n
Ac:cider11: Claims Tribunal, C?rV\u00a7ii'<1\u00a7.,V 1<\/p>\n
4. The   the wife, txzw
\nminor ch:1drg:n;\u00ab;;%;d Sf <\u00a7i':\u00a7I?\u00a2'i:\u00a72,\u00bb;:i\u00a3:hz3I1dra, \ufb02ied the
\nciaim  fer the death of
\nsaid    in the motor vehicie
\naccide\ufb01\ufb01i that'  12.92.2002. 'Fm: claim<\/p>\n
p\u20actitAianLAwa'\u00e9;' c:;\u00e9A11t\u20aci{st\u00e9 c;\u00a5;  the appellant-Corporation. O11<\/p>\n
.  *\ufb01'S$\u20ac!\u00a7SJ\u00a7'\ufb02\u20acfiis~;\u20ac}f the' (}r'a} and documentary evidenca, the<\/p>\n
  judgment under appeal, aliowed the<\/p>\n
p\u20acii:i0I:__va1?\u00e9;i\u20aciz1g ztompansatien of Rsy3,28,\u00a78G;' -.<\/p>\n
  " Span service: of noiica 0f the appea}, 'aha<\/p>\n
  1'\u00a2Sp01'::dant$~claimaI1t$ have \ufb01led cross abjeetian inter<\/p>\n
 aiia contending {hat the C\u20ac}II1pf3I1SatiO}"1 awarded by tbs<\/p>\n
MEA' ?\u20ac\u20ac3.284\u20ac:[i2\u20ac}O\u00e9
\n: 6 , C\/us \u00a3\u00ab:'\u00a3\u00a7<'A Crab 59,2233<\/p>\n
Tribunal is an the lower side an-:1 des<:\u00a5v'\u00e9$VV'..__\u00a7(\u00a7wl' <\/p>\n
\u20acI1haI"lC\u20ac\ufb01.\n<\/p>\n
6. We have heard both the <\/p>\n
7. The death Qf\ufb01e\ufb01 ae\u00e9;c’t::oui:1t of the
\nsaid accident is mat   far the
\npurpase sf    u\u00a7;f’*’fA.;;{E:p\u20acI1d:*i~11cy’, has
\ntaken th\u20ac;’\u00e9\u00e9\u00a3\ufb01y \u00e9i\u00a73c.cased at F\u20acss.?’S\/~ and
\nby (f’f\u00a7\u20ac1};};C7V;\u00a2.i.7′.V{1A.:gf”.   towards his personal
\naxpe\ufb01gg\ufb01’   :11ulti;.;~}.ie:”* 16 with regard<\/p>\n
to the  :}f._:-h%’–._\u00bb’cZ’r:ffeas\u20acd, assessed the ‘less of<\/p>\n
 aAi:xI5<E'::~;;'2',8\u00e9?s,fj)(3{?:\/~, and furthesm awarded a<\/p>\n
   .  ~ under the canventionai heads<\/p>\n
  \u20ac3QI}1\u00a7)\u20acI1S3Ii()fi :31' RS\u00bb 328,508} WV<\/p>\n
73:: is the centeutiari 01' $16 leamed ceunsel far<\/p>\n
 _I;h\u00a2 :%.;zppeI1ant~C0rp{)rat:;0I1 that in the absence of any<\/p>\n
   Wp\ufb01sitive \u00e9viderrxce with regarci to the incame cf' \u00a33116<\/p>\n
'\u20ac';$"\ufb01\/"\n<\/p>\n
MR3. No.2846f2{)G4
\n; 7 ; Cjw MFA {firob 2’59\/{)8
\ndeceased, the Tribunal has ccammitted an error in
\nthe daily mcoxne at R335\/-. V_  _<\/p>\n
9. On tha ether hand, it is stibmji\ufb01d
\nlearned counsel for the Y6Sp(\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7d3\ufb02tSi*Cia’\u00bb3;i\ufb01}5v\u00a7i\ufb01’%\u00a73 =  =
\nhaving regard to the Cost of livifzg
\nwhen the accident 0Ccu1″r\u20ac ci’,-.. ‘h\u00e9VLv\u00a7;1g1  ‘
\nfact that the decease\ufb01 was  t\ufb01  himself,<\/p>\n
his Wife, two n1in(\u00a7i”*.  ‘\u00e9i:;dA ‘a,ged father’, me<\/p>\n
Tribuy\ufb01\u00e9iv   \u00a7.%,V”.:(‘)   the income 0f the
\ndecea$<':irj{,":3,t  1\u00b000\/~ per day and quantified<\/p>\n
the.'ia$_S 0f"c\u00a7r:f:pe'r1d&1i\u20ac_\u00a7:*v'at that rate.<\/p>\n
  '\u00a3356 366:' '{:':;311sicierabie force in the submigsiora 0f<\/p>\n
   ~{.\u00a7\u20aci{:_iI'iS6\u00a7 fer \ufb02ue I'\u20acS\u00a7OI}\u20ac1\u20acI1tS-C18.i\u00a7I1&\ufb02'\u20ac.Sg The<\/p>\n
'a<:;;;:;Vi;{ie:1?f,':(}}\u00a7f;<;:\u00a3;:*:*e\u20aci in Eh\ufb01 year 2002. Having regard \u00a30<\/p>\n
 the f7a.:f:"i'.'3~\u00a3hat aiaimant. was requira\ufb01 :0 Hzainta\ufb01i himse\ufb01',<\/p>\n
 'iai%sf%;'\u00a2ifs, twa minor Chiidrmtz and age\u00e9 father, 3.11:1 taking<\/p>\n
 .,  _5f:1t0 consideration the cost crf living <i'::1'i11g tiha year<\/p>\n
\/2<\/p>\n
f
\n\u00e9ga\/,\/*\u00b0'
\nL.\/"\n<\/p>\n
Es{.\u00a7’.A. N=:\u00a7.284′<3j'2(}G4
\n; 8 I Cfw MFA Crab 59;'{}8<\/p>\n
2092 and also the Wages paid te a eimiiar
\nother \u20acI11p10}"j{I1\u20ac\u00a7I"HZ, we are of the
\nTribune} is 1101: justified in
\n\ufb01eceased at 1735.75 \/ ~. In the
\nthe case; we deem it \ufb01t to  the  i';:1ee\u00a71\u00a71eVV0f the
\ndeeeaseci at Rs. 100\/   qee\ufb01\ufb01iying the
\n'less ef depeneezacy'.  fact that the
\ndeceased   of dependants,
\nWe \ufb01nd    Iiiethed evcxlved in the
\ncase  _i'RfLOKCIIANI)RA reported in
\nSLR   this method, the total 2,3111:
\niec\ufb01idx\ufb02g ei1e'~-fieeeeeed would be 8 as there are three
\n  minors. The cost of each unit Weuld be
\n 'Veeet: 0}" two units ef the deceased mexnely<\/p>\n
Re.."'?\u00a7{}V, \u00a7f'\u00e9edueted, the baianee weuld. be Re.2,25i}d If,<\/p>\n
u  tliien ieemitiplied by 15, the tetal lees ef dependency<\/p>\n
 'A'wei*\u00a7<e em; to Re,4,32,000\/–. Q\ufb01e earn; em meme<\/p>\n
find :10 ground to enhance the eempensatieri Elifld\ufb01f'<\/p>\n
'.3<\/p>\n
%v\u00a3.m,; Ne\u00a3584\u00e9;':L20\u20ac34
\n; 9 ; Cfw MFA Crab 59588
\nc:011ve11'::io11a} heads as time Txmunal has avxardt\u00e9ci.
\nR$.4{),()()O\/– in ail ) :._zn<i\u20acr these heads. '1"hus, the
\nre$pox1(ie11tsw~<:ia\u00a7.111a:1t:s are eratiflszd to t.1f;e';',:.:4"'\u00bb:.\u00a7)t.a3
\n<:o'z11peI1sa\u00a3:i011 :31" RS. 4~,'?'2 \u00a3980 \/ — a $"' ' \u00ab'   H
\nRs.3,28,GGO\/~, as awardsd by the 'E'ribrL;.:2a:: i,: 2 :
\nsf the matter, 9.26 cm net see  fi; \u00a3
\nby the C0rp0r*a<:io11. On {rug .gthef"
\nfiled by the res:30:1dents;'\u00e9i;-\u00a7;i1n_;;;nt\u00a7:*\u00a7"fi\u00a7:S\u00e91'\u00a7\u00a5\u00e9;$ to "tag<\/p>\n
a1k::w\u20acd.\n<\/p>\n
 v\u00a7:c\u20ac:ordi:ii*J’ , -‘\u00a7i “‘}(55E1} ‘\ufb02ied EV the Cor aratiarx is
\nI {:.J_  >pf ..\n<\/p>\n
ciism,issr4;1:{_._ ‘”=:’EfV1\u00e9V”\u00a2::_z*i3~_=*’s$”z\u00a7af’_:_L;’e(:1::rT_0a\/1 filed by aha I’\u20acSpOi”1d\u20acI}iiS~<\/p>\n
:::\u00a79i\u00a711ai;1:s is.’3;E1o\u00a7ved,. Tbs cczznpensatian is rzmhancecgi is<\/p>\n
\u00bbA e_ as against Rs.3,28,\u00aeQG\/~\u00bb awardad by the<\/p>\n
.$1′;-{3L1iia\u00a7.;’_”-..’f’}:i\u00a7-: enharzcsed \u00ab::0m’}j:ensatio:1 sshail cams;<\/p>\n
i3″1\u00a7 &’\u00a7je$;vi:AV a..t4 V6% par aiinum frail: 1116: dat\ufb01 Qf the petitien<\/p>\n
  i,i;i}-._%;\u00a71%N\ufb01ate of p8.}r’3iI1\u20ac1’1’E. T316 appellant shall depesit the<\/p>\n
 ‘(\u00a7I3.}i81}C\u20acC\u00a7 C0;EI}}3\u20acI1Sa\ufb01.\u20ac)I1 tegether with interesi wiihiTI1<\/p>\n
V’ H\u00e9zight xmeks. The apparftiamtnern; 23,5163 disbursement Qf<\/p>\n
.” \u00a7<\/p>\n
?&’f.FXA. N328-\u00a26f2004
\nI. K} : Cjw MFA C\/ro% 59598<\/p>\n
the \u20acn}r1a1’z<:eci compensa\ufb01iion shall be i21A..\u00ab..tij<:<\/p>\n
prop0:*ti011 as imiicateci in the order of  3<\/p>\n
The ameumt in deposit b\ufb01fgf\ufb01\n<\/p>\n
-:9 be iransnaitted to the V. for’.   f;
\ndisbursemerzt. A  .4    <\/p>\n
E{ms*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court North West Karnataka Road … vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar K.N.Keshavanarayana M,F.A. Na;2846f’20{)4 3 1 2 C;’w MFA Crab .:”5’9,'{}8 11:: THE HIGH comm? or KARKATAKA % cmcvrr BENCH AT nnamvan % V DATED THIS THE 15%: DAY OF JmN%ES%Li’\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7%9%%j~j J? _ THE IEOWBLE MR.JUS’I’ICE N THE Horrsm […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69806","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNorth West Karnataka Road ... vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"North West Karnataka Road ... vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-08-29T13:38:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"North West Karnataka Road … vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-29T13:38:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1451,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009\",\"name\":\"North West Karnataka Road ... vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-29T13:38:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"North West Karnataka Road … vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"North West Karnataka Road ... vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"North West Karnataka Road ... vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-08-29T13:38:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"North West Karnataka Road … vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-29T13:38:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009"},"wordCount":1451,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009","name":"North West Karnataka Road ... vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-29T13:38:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/north-west-karnataka-road-vs-anjana-on-16-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"North West Karnataka Road … vs Anjana on 16 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69806","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69806"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69806\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69806"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69806"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69806"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}