{"id":69985,"date":"2009-07-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009"},"modified":"2015-10-11T17:39:29","modified_gmt":"2015-10-11T12:09:29","slug":"smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 31sTDAY OF' JULY 2009 \n\nBEFORE'\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUsTIcE;\u00a7_s BQPAN:j\u00a7A \"~f  _   \n\nWRIT PE'I'I'I'ION NO. 1 x 193\/ izoo\u00e9z J;1<;I..4R-,-R:\u00ab:g}~   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nKIELMPAMMANM @ NAGAMMA\nW\/() G S DORESWAMAIAH. \n\nAGED ABOUT' 50 YEARS  ;  "\n\nR\/O SHANKARAPURA EXTENSEO-N. \nCHAMARAJANAGARA      "\nDIST:CHAMARAJANA(}A\u00a7\u00a7A  _  PETITIONER\n\n(BY M\/s:'qA\u00a5AKiI\u00a7;mR:' \u00bbP;\u00bb'J:'u\u00a7E;'._!aSSSOC1A'i'ES, Sr. COUNSEL)\n\nAND :\n\n =1' _ _'j'f':a;3;4_fm:%PUT\u00e9*"cs;-MMISSIONER\n\n._ LCHANEXRAJANAGARA DISTRICT\n' . ''CHA,MAbRAJANAGARA\n\n2 * . ' *rHEA\u00e9\u00a7s;1\u00aeANT COMNHSSIONER\n"~KC}Li;\u00a3GALA SUB--I}IViSlON\nKQLLEGALA\n\n n j CHAP4EARAJANAGARA DISTR\u00a5C'I'\n\n   -  TAHSILDAR\n\nCHAMARAJANAGARA TALUK\nCHAMARAJANAGARA\n\nav\n\ufb02\n\n \n\n\n\n2. e The peeeener claims that enuany; is\n\npetitioner had acquired the right to the preper-'-\ufb01t"  "\n\nWILL. However, the said WILL   \n\nsuch the parties were before   "\n\nO.S.No.37\/ 3971. In the said  the petitie::1ei~--,'iiere:i:1\nwas the plainti\ufb01 While the father  respondent<\/pre>\n
was the second defendaxditd.  pertdency of the<\/p>\n
said suit, the p;ar?:i.e’s.eI1\u00a7tez~ed.:’..i11t0″‘a’.jeomijromise. Out of<\/p>\n
the propertites -the issue relates only with<\/p>\n
regard \/4 measuring 20<\/p>\n
V g11I1ta4sj.’of_  V” In the said compromise, it was<\/p>\n
     vpetitieeer herein viz., the plaintiff would<\/p>\n
  of the said land, while the second<\/p>\n
A Vt .defeIida11’t: the -father er the 5m respondent would be<\/p>\n
 “12 gumas out of said Sy.No.33’7\/4. The said<\/p>\n
.j\u00e9eo’1t1’promise was accepted and a compromise decree<\/p>\n
 V   passed by the Civitgourt on 5.8.1975. Pursuant to<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
4. The contention on behalf of the petitioner is<\/p>\n
that the Deputy Commissioner was not justified_<\/p>\n
rejecting the revision only on the gound that A’<\/p>\n
revenue entry in {NH 21\/94\u00bb-95 related to  ”<\/p>\n
in Sy.No.337\/3 and its sub-numbers,’ while   <\/p>\n
relating to Sy.No.337\/4. Though  z\u00a7s=\u00a7di1i2:r:\u00a7\u00a71ttd%%tdi<\/p>\n
survey numbers as existing
\nand the judgment and decree”    as<\/p>\n
evident on the face of it,   of the<\/p>\n
petitioner isA”t\u00a3*;at’:*.%su.tiseque11t1y on enquity, the<\/p>\n
peti\ufb01onerdhestt   of the fact that an<\/p>\n
V extent;  the  S5;-.N.o.337′ was acquired by the<\/p>\n
V.   .iforvfo:rming the extension of the village. in<\/p>\n
  erehce is made to the documents at H1 to<\/p>\n
V’ H4. in  the said acquisition for formation of the<\/p>\n
H K  A44″\u00a7f\u00a2t}i;1ge<, the. sub numbers in Sy.No.337 was deleted from<\/p>\n
V'  records. It is in that context, the earlier<\/p>\n
T "-\u00ab:S'y[No.337\/4 was assigxed the new 160.337] 3 since the<\/p>\n
$<\/p>\n
.-\n<\/p>\n
4′.\n<\/p>\n
delay, if the third respondent is directed to o <\/p>\n
it is appropriate that the parties     <\/p>\n
Tahs\ufb02dar without further notic\u00a2,-  the _ <\/p>\n
Hence t}:1e petitioner and the V5″? resf\u00e9oiident  V<\/p>\n
to appear before the third  on
\n17.3.2009 as the  {vimout
\nfurther notice along    this order.<\/p>\n
Thereafter, the Tahsildar
\nand complete the en\ufb01re  as
\npossible.   V%    ‘H
\nIn terms ofthe eeo\ufb01e, the ciisposed
\no:’_ No order as to\u00a7;:o”s$s.  V V V ‘
\n3\u00a7f\u00a7
\n\u00bb~ Judi?\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 31sTDAY OF’ JULY 2009 BEFORE’ THE HON’BLE MR.JUsTIcE;\u00a7_s BQPAN:j\u00a7A “~f _ WRIT PE’I’I’I’ION NO. 1 x 193\/ izoo\u00e9z J;1<;I..4R-,-R:\u00ab:g}~ BETWEEN: KIELMPAMMANM @ NAGAMMA W\/() G S DORESWAMAIAH. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69985","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-11T12:09:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-11T12:09:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":364,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-11T12:09:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-11T12:09:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-11T12:09:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009"},"wordCount":364,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009","name":"Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-11T12:09:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-kempammanni-nagamma-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-on-31-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Kempammanni @ Nagamma vs The Deputy Commissioner on 31 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69985","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69985"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69985\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69985"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69985"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69985"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}