{"id":70064,"date":"2010-08-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010"},"modified":"2018-08-19T08:47:43","modified_gmt":"2018-08-19T03:17:43","slug":"railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Railway Mens’ House Building … vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its … on 31 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Railway Mens’ House Building … vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its … on 31 August, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: J.S.Khehar(Cj) And Chellur<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDA'I'ED THIS THE 31.53\"' DAY 0? AUGUST 201.0\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE 1~:ION'I:3L,E3 MR.J.S.K1-IEHAR, CHIEF JUS'IfIC5_E._V\n\nTHE EHONBLE MRs,JUs'r1cIa: MANJUIA _: \"  \n\nWRIT APPEAL Nos.2318\/2602 cm?\" u2L3i9\/L2'0Cr2%.& \n\nAND\n\n2321 \/2002 & 2320\/2\u00a3)f)2'(L_AvRES;_}A'* . \u00ab.\n\nW.A.NO.2318\/2{)O2\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n3  G.SHA.NKAR RAO.\n\n {BE$1221\u00bb:E{S..4iVEANJUNA'\u00a3'H FOR\n  N.1f3A_Y'KA._REI)\u00a3)Y, ADVS. ,)\n\nAN'{: \n\n 1\n\nRAILWAY i\\\/KENS' HOIJSEZ :BUI'LVI31A3\\:'@\nCOWOPERATIVE soCII:,\"r\"{ L'rL>._ '- A  \n\nA REGISTIEZRED CU>O'PE:Ee.z\u00a7:fr1vE sfocIE:'1f'Y\nREG1sT:\u00ab:R?;:13 UN_DEI>;TH1a;\"  VA \n\n \"S~OCIETIES ACT,\n\n14f-AVING 'I*1fS._ _OFF'LC'}E.. AT I\nSOUTHERN'R;AILWAY,.INS'J'ITUTE BUILDING,\nM. G';-RAILWAY\" (3 GLO NY,\n\nREP BY ITSVVEXECUTIVE DIRECTOR\n\nTEIE STATE OF' KARNATAKA\n\n*  RE\"'PRE:~:sEN1\"E1i) BY ITS SE1CRE'I'A_RY\n. _ .DEPA_RTME1NT OF' HOUSING\nVIDHANA SOUDHA\n\nBANGALOREw56() 001..\n\nTHE D E}PU'I\"\"S:' COMMISSIONER\n:8AN'C}AI,OREI I7)IS'I'RiC'l\", BANGALORE.\n\n... APPELLANT\n\n\n\n3 SHIVANAN DA\n8 \/ O LATE MARILINGAPPA\nMAJOR\n\nii\u00bb M. V. RUDRAIAH\nS \/ O LATE) VElERECrOW'I')A\nMAJOR\n\n5 PATEL RUDRAPPA M   \nS\/O MAYANNA 1\nMAJOR\n\na) SMT LAKSHMAMIVEA 'j \nW \/0 LATE PATEL RU1>RA1?p,A\nAGED ABOUT 45 ${EARs---- .  A'\n\nb) SMTSUJAYA _  _  \nW\/O LATE,M.R.N_AN,m1\\IDA1AH ; \nAGED ABOUT 4:3  * 'V\n\nc) SR1 pRA:_::\u00a7;EP'--.._ J _  _  \nS\/O IATE :1:\/;.R.'NAN-.L\u00a5NDA1AH\nAGED A.Ai33OU?fT\"fI:() ~.'( EARS' '  \"\n\nct)   \nD \/0- LATE\"M.R.BJAE\u00a7EJUNI)AIAH\nVAGED\"~A_BO.U=T 18 YEARS\n\n \"  .,RgAA\u00a73i302r1NG ~.\/X?-.NO.86,\n<,.M,ALAT_HAHA:_.L: VILLAGE.\n\n BANGAE_.QRE.\n\nY.P;sWAN'\u00a7HPLJ'R HOBLL\nBAAKAALORE NORTH TALUK.\n\n RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
  {BY  BMEZERAPPA, AGA FOR Rm 1 81 2:\n<\/p>\n
 G.D.ASF\ufb01V1~\\’i’HNARAYANA, ADV, FOR R-3 & 4;<\/p>\n
M    SR1 f).R.MANJUNA’1’H, ADV}. FOR R–5{A–D})<\/p>\n
THIS VVRIT APPEAL IS FILEI) UNDER SEICTIOENE 4
\nOF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COUR’i’ ACT PRAYING TO<\/p>\n
\u00a38<\/p>\n
SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN CIVIL PEFITION
\nNO458\/I998 DATED 12.2.2002 AND CONSEQUE3.\\I’I’I.Y
\nDISMISS W.P.NOS. 17892w1.7694\/ 1989.<\/p>\n
W.A.N(J.23 I 9\/2002
\nBETVVEEN<\/p>\n
RAIL-WAY MENS’ HOUSE I-3IIII,OINO    I<\/p>\n
COWOPEZRATIVEZ SOC1E%3’i’YI,_TI;>..,_ j ”   . <\/p>\n
A REGISTEREI) C-O~OPER!-‘KIVEQ ‘SOcII\u00ab;’ry –   \u00ab<\/p>\n
REGISTERED UNDER THE ‘CO1~_O?ERA’I’IVE’ _<\/p>\n
SOCIEITIES ACT, HAVING I*I’S.OI:’F*IcIa:OIAiI*’ ‘ <\/p>\n
SOUTHERN RAILWAY I.N:”:,’sffI’I’U’I’E3 BU_iLD’E.NG.,. <\/p>\n
M G RAELVVAY COLONY,”.._ ”   I  <\/p>\n
REP BY ITS EXEJCU’FI\\];_’,..[)IREC”1’OR’;’  <\/p>\n
SR1 O. SIIANKAI\u00a7’I::AO_” 1.\n<\/p>\n
   ‘  …APPELLAN’1’<\/p>\n
(BY SR1 P.S.I\\\/IAAI .UNA*III9I “I\u00ab’7OI\u00a7 S121 I’I~.B,I\\IYYA REEDDYI
\nADVSJ W1 ;._i: i~ IAS.\u00abW,<\/p>\n
AND<\/p>\n
THE  ‘I;AIaI\u00a7IAI’AKA
\nRE113\u00a5%.ESEN’.F}:3D’ B__Y- .IfIiS SECRETARY
\nDI3I”2AR’rM’EN*:’A OF*IIOUSII\\IO,<\/p>\n
.\\\/IDIIANA VSOUIOHA,<\/p>\n
..  BANGALORESBO 001<\/p>\n
‘If’I:~IE –I\u00a7E.PU’I’Y COMMISSIONER<\/p>\n
 — DISTRICT
\n BANGALORE<\/p>\n
 TIIIVEIVSPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER.<\/p>\n
FODIIJI\\iI BLOCK<\/p>\n
S  II BLOCK. VISWESVVARAYYA CENTRE,<\/p>\n
 I’)R.AMBE?DI{AR VEEDHI ,<\/p>\n
BANGALOREW 560 00 I.\n<\/p>\n
 REESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
[BY SR1 BVEEIERAPPA, ASA)<\/p>\n
THIS XPVRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4<\/p>\n
OF THE KARE\\\u00a7A’I’AKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYiNG TO
\nSET ASIDE TH_E ORDER PASSED IN CIVIL PETITION
\nNO459\/1998 DATED 12.2.2002.\n<\/p>\n
W.A.NO.2321\/2002
\nBETVVEEN<\/p>\n
RAILWAY 1vIENS’ HOUSE BUILDING S
\nCO~OI?’ERATIVE SOOIEIY I;TI>.,    ‘I _
\nA REGISTERED CO\u00bbOPERA’I’IVE SOCIFZTYV  ..\n<\/p>\n
REGISTERED UNDER     ‘ I. *
\nCO~OPERATIVE SOOEITIESAAOTO. j;   ._
\nHAVING ITS OFFICE AT SOUTHERN ‘- .2 \u00bb
\nRAILWAY INSTITUTE _SUI_I,I)IN’G, ”
\nM.G.RAILWAY COLONY;._  I
\nREPRESENTED BY ITS
\nEXECUTIVE I)IRmECTOR”” —\n<\/p>\n
GSHANKAR   I    <\/p>\n
.2 ‘   APPELLANT<\/p>\n
(BY SRI ’13″jS;3I\\?\u00a7;J9IN.3?'{}jI’\u00bblz3CI7IfI- I3: S’I{I”~N:.EAYYA REDDY,
\nA1:)VS;–._}        I<\/p>\n
AND<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
4;j”i”‘T1’~*H:”. STATEOII IIARNATAIIA<\/p>\n
I-:._\u00b0R\u00a733PREEN’1*EE)***E3Y ITS SECRETARY,<\/p>\n
I)EiP\u00a3\\..RTMEN’T OF HOUSING,<\/p>\n
V2 T_ ” ‘\\\/I’I)I4IAIIA” SOUOIIA,
\n*  \u00abBAI\\I’GAI\u00bb,;ORE–5S0 001.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘I’P\u00a3E DEPU”FY COMMISSIONER<\/p>\n
EANGAIORE DISTRICT,<\/p>\n
2 ” < BANGALORE.\n<\/p>\n
\u00b0SHIVANANI)A<\/p>\n
S \/’ O LAT E MARILINGAPPA, MAJOR<\/p>\n
M V RUDRAIAH
\nS\/O IQATE VEE-REGOVVIDA, MAJOR<\/p>\n
U:\n<\/p>\n
PATEL RUDRAPPA
\nS\/O LATE MAYANNA
\nSINCE DEZCEASED BY HIS LRS<\/p>\n
SMT LAKSHMAMMA.\n<\/p>\n
W’\/O LATE PATEI. RUDRAPPA
\nAGED ABOUT 70 YEARS<\/p>\n
SMT SUJAYA A
\nAGED ABOUT 4.5 YEARS.\n<\/p>\n
SR1 PRADEEP
\nMAJOR.\n<\/p>\n
d) SMT M.N.MA_MATH.A_’–..  ‘<\/p>\n
AGED  i ‘1.8*Y1′:ARs\u00a3  A
\nRESPONDE1’J’I.’E?~ TO 4.a)-fro’ (:1)
\nARE R}E:SIVD’1’N’?E} A'”I”?-:\n<\/p>\n
MALA’i”~HA_HALI;iV’JILLAC;’\u00a3+3V,..__ A ‘
\nYESWANT}{PU’R
\nBANGALORE} NORTH K,
\nBANG-A\u00bbLORE. ‘  ‘ <\/p>\n
 .{B1fO  :3..’JfE\ufb01RAppA, AGA FOR R– 1;
\n  G.VDw.ASHW}’X”I’HANARAYANA, Ami. FOR R53 3; 4;<\/p>\n
S\/O LATE M.R.NANJU1\u00a73OA1AH–\u00bb..<\/p>\n
W\/O LATE) M.R.NANJONOAiAH.%_%%%O ~ <\/p>\n
D \/O LATp:.;viA;R.1\\iANJuNOA;AL: ‘ ‘V <\/p>\n
 RESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
$R1..VD.R;IvLAN;JOUNATIa. AOV., FOR R–5{A~D})<\/p>\n
 ‘1*1\u00a2::1S'”&?v’R1’r APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4<\/p>\n
 ‘I’I3iE;?__ 1’ KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO
\n ‘ uf..SE3T._.&ASII)E THE ORDER PASSED IN WR1’I’ PETITION
\n _ ‘NOS_,:]7892A17694\/1989 DATED 28.5.1998.<\/p>\n
VV.A.N’O.2320\/2002
\nBEE WEEN<\/p>\n
RAILWAY MENS’ HOUSE BUILDING  A
\nCO~OPERA’I’I\\fE SOCIETY 1.11).,   ‘
\nA REGIS’1’EREI) CO\u00bbOI3’E’,RA”I’IVE sOc1E?O*.
\nREGISTERED UNDER THE <:OAOPERA"i**1waV"AA '
\nSOCIEITIES ACT, HAVING ITS OFF1cE;fA':'  ._<\/p>\n
SOUTHERN RAILWAY INSTI"i'UTE BUI_LfJI-NC,   A'<\/p>\n
M G RAILWAY COLONY,     .\n<\/p>\n
REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, *   .. ” ‘
\nSR1 G.SHAE;\\JKAR RAO.’  ‘ ”\n<\/p>\n
{BY SR1 P.s.MANJUNA’.:fH &A.s’R;A”B’A:%YA ‘REDEAY,
\nADVS.,}   p   <\/p>\n
AND<\/p>\n
1 THE sTA’FE}?’OO:r NARN%ATAKA%%  <\/p>\n
 5,. ‘<\/p>\n
REPR’ES5i–N*1’E”D A BY? –I’AI’S_ RILTARY
\nDEPART1’v’\u00a3B_N’F :71?’ H()USING,
\n SC\u00e9}U’D_f%A;’ 1′ ‘
\nBANGALORE~’:”\u00a76GA\u00bb_OG1′ A<\/p>\n
 COMMISSIONER
\nBANGALORE D1″S’I’R1C’1′<\/p>\n
V, ._%;:BANGALOREV’ _<\/p>\n
– ‘  ‘S:-\u00a2ENc1AL LAND AcQU1smON OFFICER,
\n ‘PQ\u00a3)_IUM._L3.LOCK,
\n\u00ab.11 8LOc:\u00e9<.' VISVESWARAYYA CENTRE,<\/p>\n
'  I)R;A1\\7\/\u00a7\u00a73EE)KAR VEEDHE,<\/p>\n
" BANGALORE 560 001.\n<\/p>\n
 RESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
‘   BVEERAPPA, AOA)<\/p>\n
THIS VVRIT APPEAL IS FILEI) UNDER SECTION 4<\/p>\n
u  THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO
\n” SET ASIDE TI*”I1?. ORIJER PASSEIID IN VVRIT PI\u00a7<3TI'1'ION<\/p>\n
NO. ]6\u20ac340\/1994 DATED 28.5.1998.<\/p>\n
  . A   ANr\u00a7i3'E1;LANN T'<\/p>\n
THESE WRIT APPEALS COMING ON FOR FINAL
\nHEARING THIS BAY, CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE
\nFULLQKXUEQG: —\n<\/p>\n
JUDGM ENT<\/p>\n
J.S.KHEHA_R, C.J. (Ural)<\/p>\n
It is essential for us to re\u20ac:c5:*ci  fh.e’*p a1’\u00a3ie:?5u1\u00e9if$<\/p>\n
ef the neti\ufb01cations vide whic:h ;’~~.1and”u1{::::_s1j;1ng ‘1;V8. acresw.”<\/p>\n
and 28 guntas caxvne\ufb01 to’V,-b\u00a7. ‘ -a\u00e9cgglir\u00e9ai’  Village
\nMallajthahalii, as 3139   38 acreg and 1
\ngunta from Exziiigge  x  the action
\ninitiated M   a.fbiyesaid lands, it is
\nessentialmale%\u00a7\u00a7vf,%(;: actions initiated at
\nthe  efVt11V\u00a7V;V as also the beneficiaries, in<\/p>\n
I’\u20acSp\u20acC.t of th3_’\u00a7>r0c’:-esga \u00e9f\u00e9xcquisition, referred to above.<\/p>\n
3   “E3.8,i988, a notificatian wa$ issued under<\/p>\n
 of the Land Acquigition Act, 1894. The<\/p>\n
 afore.$;3;iii ngtification was published in the official gazatte<\/p>\n
 __e:r;1 2.\u00a7.8.1988. Besides pubiication in tha officiai gazet\ufb01\u00e9,<\/p>\n
V%   ___t\u00a7’r1e afamsaid noti\ufb01cation was 21133 published in t2\u00e9\u00e9i:>’<\/p>\n
newapapers,  ‘Lgkavanf and ‘SanjevaI1:i’ 01:: 7.8.1988.<\/p>\n
110nwpmse(:ui:i0I1, by an order datieci 28.5.1998.<\/p>\n
4. The beneficiaries of the aeq1.nisit,ior1 process<\/p>\n
i.e., the Railwaymen House Building C0–ope:*at’.ive ;S’_()c:iet.3!<\/p>\n
Limited approached this C()ur'{,, by fiiing <\/p>\n
i\\io.21980\/1991., seeking a direction from\u00bb .. i<\/p>\n
as to require the State G0vei’11mVe11t’,;-ton iaptpriexi-*e <\/p>\n
award prepared by the Lani-‘i LA'(3C1L1i”E-}i_t’ix(}3}V C-iffie._e:f4_yvii;1\u00a71irii aiu ><\/p>\n
reasonabie time. The af01*esaid’-w1’\u00a3.t\u00bb pe’iii;iQi1 Came to be
\ndismissed, in View of the 1ij1rz(:1e.;r’i;e1’1{i..1\ufb01’vg;: given by the State
\nGovernment that it wcniid –r\u00a7\u00e9gpp:’.0_’\\Ize igheaz\u00e9irieifi award within<\/p>\n
2: reasonable time,_  ‘<\/p>\n
5.  VPe'{.it.,ivc:)1i.,’~7I\\io.16640\/1994 was again fiied
\nby f\u20ac,1_\u00a71.e”benefitiimfies of the land acquisition process, viz.,<\/p>\n
V”i:he REiliiE\ufb017&i}’I}1\u20acI1 Hcruse Buiiding C0~epe1fative Society<\/p>\n
 e__I;\u00a3:nifeCi:”ugh’efeii’i.. 21 ctheiliezigcr was 1″a.ise(ii to 2111 order dated<\/p>\n
ii)i\u00bbS;ii.9Q4i.i”fjgaihereiri, the office of {the Special Land<\/p>\n
r_.ACqui:;~:~ii:ion Of\ufb01cer, Bangalore. had informed the<\/p>\n
~bAeheIfieiary wsoeiety, that the proposed a(:quisit:i0n of land<\/p>\n
\u00a311e’\u00e91$11ri11g 18 acres and 218 gimtzis si’t.uat,ed at<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
ctotmiiiiig the period eiivisaged under Section ii-A of the
\nLand AcqL1isii’.i.o11 Act. 1894, whiie c()mput.ix1\u00a7g the period
\nof two years, the only period that. could be iakeri into<\/p>\n
c()I1sicierat.ioi1 was from 1.9.1989 to 3.10.3989 ‘lsvifxorx<\/p>\n
there was no ir1teri1n order opeisting. ‘I’i1e1fe21–i3;i\u00a7:i:,_i’ <\/p>\n
period from 4.1.199} opio 27.11.19911..d1;ii=i;ig::xxgI1iovh<\/p>\n
period, Writ. Poi:it.i()1′”; Nos.1769251176914;\/i’1.o9\u00e9\u00a79 =fr’emggi1\u00a7;;d:’<\/p>\n
dismissed for noidprosectliiozi4__i.he19\u00e9:._b\u20ac:ing ,;*1’o’vvsiibsisi,ii1g_'”L.<\/p>\n
interim order, the same   into
\nconsiderenion while  oi isvo years.
\nNone of the   taken irziio
\nconsideration  of two years<\/p>\n
[envisaged uindczw\ufb01iSec’iio1’\u00a77’i\u00ab–}{A  tho Land Acquisition<\/p>\n
Act, 1894]’*i..navsmo_<:h._ sas,-7'i'.h<m: interim order cxanie to be
\nresstmjc\u00e9ds.i:hereai1.c%i4, "i'hi..zs Vi\u20acVU\u20acf(.L it  apparent that<\/p>\n
."\\ax;q_e'11 \u00a31 1\u20ac:s.ri'1.ed SiI1g$;1'\u00e9AJi1dge of this Court dismissed Writ<\/p>\n
"2i\u00e9eziijeuii\\io[i~ss54g0\/1994 on 28.5.1998, by holding that<\/p>\n
{lie ':1ot.ifi(:\u00e91\ufb01..i(\u00a7i1Vs isstied by the State: Governmezit, to<\/p>\n
V _ ac:qii'i–re \u00bbi1i.e.'i'\u00e9111d measuriiig 18 arcres and 28 giinias in<\/p>\n
K "".__VV\\;-'i.11E.1\u00a7\u00a7(') ..i\\[3\u00e911i21t.h21h2iIii had lapsed. on acczouni of no1='1–<\/p>\n
'=s;p.proVe11 by the Siiaiie Goverr1.me1'1i:, Wit.11i:r1 21 pmfiod sf {two<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
years, the said determinat.ion by a learned Single Judge
\nof this Couifii was obviously un3’usi:ifie<_i. From the fzictiiai<\/p>\n
position 'r1oi.i(:ed above. if fhe period during whi(:bv\u00bb.i_11t.ei'rin1<\/p>\n
orders passed by this Couri: had the effec__:to'i\u00b0s\u00a3;i}?ii1.g' .<\/p>\n
"..,any action or proceeding to  ,t,ake:imii'1"=p;ifsiia,I1ee<\/p>\n
of…" the deeiaraiion issued u.r1Cie'ii S:e_etion1'6 ' <\/p>\n
Acquisition Act 1894, is ex\u00a7:i.ii':ied, Atiixeiiv …pe1"i0d'\u00bb.i'<\/p>\n
has certainly not eiapsegi.\n<\/p>\n
7. In the  the order
\ndated 10.55   wherein it was
\nConcluded.tiiai::.’s;iizg:e  not been approved by
\nthe Ste-te  the time limits, the same<\/p>\n
had beerixrendefed Ai.:i\\*:;\u00a7i’id and oughi to have been set<\/p>\n
  asi:ie\u00ab:.c;;i1not, be”‘ar.X:_epted. In the circumstances noticed<\/p>\n
iwe are satisfied. that Writ. Appeal No.<\/p>\n
2320\/2oo\u00e9;’:g\u00a31s;mg out of Writ 13etii1ion No.18640\/1994 is<\/p>\n
y_1iab1e to ‘be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed.<\/p>\n
 it is also essentia} to riottiee, i:l’ia.i: when the<\/p>\n
“(‘,i\u00a7.1\u00a3131\u20acI1g(;? raised by i:}:1e beneficiaries, vi2:., the<\/p>\n
Railwaymeii House Buildizagg C()’Of)\u20acf&1fl\u00a7V’\u20ac S()eiei.y Limiiieci<\/p>\n
1:\n<\/p>\n
was rejected with the dismisssal of Writ Petition
\nNo.16640\/199:-:3\u00bb, vide order dated 28.5.1998, this Court
\nsimulmnecitisly dismissed Writ Petition Nos.1′?’692\ufb01<\/p>\n
17694\/\u00a3989 as having been [‘CI.’}(‘l\u20acI”\u20acCl iiii’r’t1(:t’.Liet:;\u00a23._o on<\/p>\n
account of the disniisesal of Writ Petition No. ‘1<\/p>\n
However, since we have now, through th<%_.inE;I.a':it: orcle'r,._ <\/p>\n
allowed the claim raised by the <\/p>\n
Railwaymen House Building;e'C4o–oper_ait'ive  lLirli;1ited,.* \\'<\/p>\n
by accepting the prayer   Petition
\nNo.l.ESE3'4O\/1994. a  :'3_I_'-.'\u00bb.vf.llAe':'.lizisvtolne passed
\nrecalling the order  Nos.l7692~
\n17894\/ 1989   is, accordingly,<\/p>\n
hereby  ll <\/p>\n
9"  vl,,\u20ac':lE.1I_"ilt':dl veoimsel for the rival parties are<\/p>\n
  W:'\u00e9.\u00abh…._.t.Fvie acceptance of Writ Appeal No.<\/p>\n
 '2323\/2902\u00abi.e\u00a7'1-asmg out of Writ Petition No.166-40\/1994,<\/p>\n
Writ'll Petitioteiil Nos.17e92–17694\/1989 ought: to be<\/p>\n
zremandefi for re~\u00ab:iet.erminat.io'n to the learned Single<\/p>\n
"\u00ab."d;1dg_r3. We, ac:c<)'rdi11gly, liereby remand Writ Petition<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
N0s.17\u20ac>92~}_’?694\/1989 to the Eeained Single Judge fez’<\/p>\n
disposal on 111erit.s.\n<\/p>\n
E0. it is also re1eva11i, to Inemioli, that the learned<\/p>\n
COE.1.I1S\u20ac1 for the benefictiaries. i.e.. ‘\u00a3116: RailwaymenjHouse<\/p>\n
Building Co–operative Society Li1Tlit\u20ac’.d made <\/p>\n
to us, ciuri11g’ the course of hearing, that _h_.e._”Li.i.d’ -130?: wish__ <\/p>\n
to assail the order passed by this <\/p>\n
N0. 1664} \/ 1994 pertaining i;0_’_ac1q{:isi’t.i(>11 (if  = ”<\/p>\n
1 gunta of land in viliage   \u00e9iucth, Writ
\nPetition No. 16641\/ I  as not 1:ii’\u00a7\u00a7ssed.<\/p>\n
 V._bkv V ..\n<\/p>\n
”  Em.-:}..cx: yes\/no<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Railway Mens’ House Building … vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its … on 31 August, 2010 Author: J.S.Khehar(Cj) And Chellur IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DA’I’ED THIS THE 31.53″‘ DAY 0? AUGUST 201.0 PRESENT THE 1~:ION’I:3L,E3 MR.J.S.K1-IEHAR, CHIEF JUS’IfIC5_E._V THE EHONBLE MRs,JUs’r1cIa: MANJUIA _: ” WRIT APPEAL […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRailway Mens' House Building ... vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its ... on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Railway Mens' House Building ... vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its ... on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-19T03:17:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Railway Mens’ House Building … vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its … on 31 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-19T03:17:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1870,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Railway Mens' House Building ... vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its ... on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-19T03:17:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Railway Mens’ House Building … vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its … on 31 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Railway Mens' House Building ... vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its ... on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Railway Mens' House Building ... vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its ... on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-19T03:17:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Railway Mens’ House Building … vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its … on 31 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-19T03:17:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010"},"wordCount":1870,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010","name":"Railway Mens' House Building ... vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its ... on 31 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-19T03:17:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/railway-mens-house-building-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-reptd-by-its-on-31-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Railway Mens’ House Building … vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Its … on 31 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70064\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}