{"id":70147,"date":"2009-10-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009"},"modified":"2018-08-20T11:24:46","modified_gmt":"2018-08-20T05:54:46","slug":"p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"P G Nayak S\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">P G Nayak S\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V.Gopalagowda And B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 25\"?\" DAY OF OCTOBER, 200$\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.COpAL.A'GAvOLWDA.:  \"  2\n\nAND\nTHE HON'BLE MRS. JUS*rICE I3'.\"v,_NAOAT&lt;ATjI~I:NA \n\nWRIT APPEAL NO.5&#039;9&quot;7z::.\/20O9(S--&#039;I?._E;S1  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nP G NAYAK S\/O SURENDRIN N&#039;AY&#039;A.I_&lt;  Aw \nAGED ABOUT 58 ITEARS;      .\nSUB-MANAC:ER.,- SYNDICAT:E BANK&quot;, \n[COMPULSORILY E?...;!:)_&#039;fI}2,ED) = * A \nPRESENTLYR,\/A NO&#039;\u20ac,A5,  &quot;B&quot;_ CROSS\nABBAIAH NAGAR, KAGGADPISAPURA\n\nBANGALORE. 5&#039;6oQ9:3;~.  __ \n\n...APPELLANT\n\n A.  {By._S}\ufb01:  OANCI  ADV.)\n\n 3 SYNDICATE BANK\nA  A BODY CONSTITUTED UNTDER\n &#039; .fTHE&#039;BANKING COMPANIES\n T &#039;(ACQUISITION &amp; TRANSFER OF\n_V QUNZDERTAKINGS} ACT, 1970\nI    BY GENERAL MANAGER (P)\n&#039;&#039; HEAD OFFICE, MANIPAL 576119\n&#039;. UDUPI DISTRICT\n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>[By Sri: M\/ S SUNDARASVVAMY &amp; RAMDAS, ADV.)<\/p>\n<p>3. We have heard Sri.G.Gangireddy, learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p>the appellant and Sri.S.Ramdas learned senior counserlillfor<\/p>\n<p>M\/ s. Sundaraswamy 8: Ramdas, Advocate?&#8221;for&#8217;;-I _<\/p>\n<p>respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. It is contended on behalf of the&#8221;a_ppellant&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>several charges were framed against the   respect<br \/>\nof these charges, there loss  to the<br \/>\nbank. There were certain&#8221; which<br \/>\nwere not appai&#8217;entljr*  vva.ppellant and in the<br \/>\nabsence of   to the bank the<br \/>\naward  is a major penalty is<br \/>\n He further submits that<\/p>\n<p>the enquirydwasv also Vi-tiated in as much as the documents<\/p>\n<p> g_vreq1.1:e5s.tedp&#8217;for by Altheappellant were not furnished and that<\/p>\n<p> there-.was_lViolation of principles of natural justice and this is<\/p>\n<p>a 1&#8217;it.caseVWl&#8217;.ierep1&#8217;the award of punishment has to be set aside.<\/p>\n<p>   _pe19 contra, learned counsel supporting the decision of<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;  the &#8216;disciplinary authority as well as the learned single Judge<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; has submitted that the charges against the o\ufb01icer were with<\/p>\n<p>regard to not obtaining sanction for the disbursement of loan<\/p>\n<p>and several other procedural irregularities, as a result of<\/p>\n<p>93:.\n<\/p>\n<p>issues except for one issue the Enquiry Officer recorded a<br \/>\n\ufb01nding, that the charges levelled against the oraee1:&#8217;i~l_:l<\/p>\n<p>respect of twelve issues had been proved.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;7. As far as the non&#8211;furnishing_ of:-..thfe &#8216;deeen;e&#8217;ntgi\u00a7\u00a7_ae.ee7<\/p>\n<p>concerned though \ufb01fteen docurrientsdgvlere _:\u00a7the <\/p>\n<p>appellant, five documents wereV&#8217;Vl&#8217;\ufb01trr1i.shed learned<br \/>\nsingle Judge has given\ufb02a  that the<br \/>\ndocuments which were  appellant by the<br \/>\nEnquiry Officer;irrelevant;to'&#8221;the&#8221;:charl\u00a7es framed against<br \/>\nthe appellantilarildi essential to determine<br \/>\nthe disputs\ufb01 ,  thelllapplication made by the<br \/>\nof documents and apart from<\/p>\n<p>the five documents &#8216;which&#8217;~~&#8211;itrere ordered to be furnished to<\/p>\n<p>~'&#8221;~._the  the \u00ab\u00ab\u00ab\u00ab &#8212;other documents related to the<\/p>\n<p>l.&#8217;&#8211;..Aperl.&#8221;orl?nance&#8221;the petitioner as a Branch Manager which<\/p>\n<p>.are.i1&#8243;l=&#8217;nolvxtlgrlilconcemed with the charges framed by the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; Vbank: , <\/p>\n<p>  The learned single Judge has also recorded that the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;v\ufb01lcloncluct of the Enquiry O\ufb01icer was in accordance with the<\/p>\n<p>it rules of natural justice and that the same cannot be faulted<\/p>\n<p>with. As far as the nature of the penalty imposed is<\/p>\n<p>9\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>I<\/p>\n<p>concerned, it is seen that the disciplinary authority imposed<\/p>\n<p>a penalty of compulsory retirement, which was by<\/p>\n<p>the appellate authority. The learned single  _<\/p>\n<p>regard to the fact that there were as    <\/p>\n<p>accounts amounting to Rs. 36.56  iwerel <\/p>\n<p>without following proper procedure or yeri\ufb01cati&#8217;oi*J <\/p>\n<p>that the appellant had exceededVl&#8217;i&#8217;his authoiityi  sanctioning<br \/>\nthe said loans althougliilie  powered to do so,<br \/>\nIt has also been noted  Judge that<br \/>\ncertain loans},   taking collateral<br \/>\nsecurity of  exposing funds of the<br \/>\nbank totvthe   lalthough there has been<br \/>\nno actual  by the appellant, but<\/p>\n<p>considenngl;&#8221;t.he&#8217; fact AAt}_ia&#8217;t~*;the appellant was dealing with<\/p>\n<p> =   fiinds_, he was-duty bound to take all care and caution<\/p>\n<p> While .di&#8217;sbursing&#8212;-loans to customers of the respondent\/ bank.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;p9. it .. &#8216;Considering the total number of loan accounts in<\/p>\n<p> llfrespecpt  which the appellant had not followed proper and<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;  requisite procedure, we are of the view that the learned<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8220;single Judge was justified in not interfering with the penalty<\/p>\n<p>A imposed by the disciplinary authority as con\ufb01rmed by the<\/p>\n<p>la<br \/>\n\/1.\n<\/p>\n<p>appellate authority and we find no good ground to take<\/p>\n<p>contrary View in the matter.\n<\/p>\n<p>10. For the aforesaid reasons we find that  .appeal <\/p>\n<p>devoid of merit and is accordingly cii\u00e9irlisseci. .  V<\/p>\n<p>xJUDGE&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> gg;Egg\u00e9Jr $&amp;]_<br \/>\nr re\u00b0r :UoeE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court P G Nayak S\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009 Author: V.Gopalagowda And B.V.Nagarathna IN THE HIGH COURT OF&#8217; KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 25&#8243;?&#8221; DAY OF OCTOBER, 200$ PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.COpAL.A&#8217;GAvOLWDA.: &#8221; 2 AND THE HON&#8217;BLE MRS. JUS*rICE I3&#8242;.&#8221;v,_NAOAT&lt;ATjI~I:NA WRIT APPEAL NO.5&#039;9&quot;7z::.\/20O9(S&#8211;&#039;I?._E;S1 BETWEEN: P [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P G Nayak S\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P G Nayak S\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-20T05:54:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P G Nayak S\\\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-20T05:54:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":610,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009\",\"name\":\"P G Nayak S\\\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-20T05:54:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P G Nayak S\\\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P G Nayak S\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P G Nayak S\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-20T05:54:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P G Nayak S\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-20T05:54:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009"},"wordCount":610,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009","name":"P G Nayak S\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-20T05:54:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-g-nayak-so-surendra-nayak-vs-syndicate-bank-on-26-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P G Nayak S\/O Surendra Nayak vs Syndicate Bank on 26 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70147"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70147\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}