{"id":70903,"date":"2011-09-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011"},"modified":"2016-12-25T08:44:22","modified_gmt":"2016-12-25T03:14:22","slug":"mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011<\/div>\n
                         CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                             Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                           Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                  Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                          Decision No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000645\/SG\/14720\n                                                                  Appeal No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000645\/SG\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n
 emerging from the Appeal<\/p>\n
Appellant                             :       Mr. Ajit Kumar Dubey
\n                                              Senior Manager
\n                                              M E S Extentioin Counter Pedhambe
\n                                              Chiplun Branch
\n                                              Ratnagiri Zone,
\n                                              Ratnagiri-415639<\/p>\n
Respondent                            :       Mr. B. K. Dhawale
\n                                              PIO & Dy. Zonal Manager
\n                                              Bank of India
\n                                              Ratnagiri Zone, Ratnagiri Zonal Office,
\n                                              Shivaji Nagar
\n                                              Near Arogya Mandir
\n                                              Ratnagiri KohlapurHighway
\n                                              Ratnagiri-415639<\/p>\n
RTI application filed on              :       30\/08\/2010
\nPIO replied                           :       29\/09\/2010
\nFirst appeal filed on                 :       29\/10\/2010
\nFirst Appellate Authority order       :       29\/01\/2010
\nSecond Appeal received on             :       04\/02\/2011<\/p>\n
Sl.           Information Sought                     Reply of the Public Information Officer (PIO)\n<\/p>\n
1. Name designation of the officer who            SM S. S. Bandiwadeka, Senior Branch Manager, Bank
\n    received the Appellant’s application          of India, Ratnagiri Branch received your application)
\n    under RTI and consequently replied to         dated 4.12.2009 referred to by you under RTI Act, on
\n    that letter conveyed to the Appellant         15.12.2009.
\n    vide letter no HO\/LGL\/NH 537 dated
\n    5.1.2010 also on which date the above
\n    referred application was received.\n<\/p>\n
2. If the above said RTI application was          The said application was forwarded to Head Office
\n    forwarded to corporate office without         along with a copy of the counterfoil of Rs.10, by Shri
\n    counter foil receipt of fee for Rs. l0 paid   S. S. Bandiwadekar, Senior Branch Manager, Bank of
\n    at Ratnagiri Branch, then please furnish      India, Ratnagiri Branch through Zonal Office,
\n    the name and designation of the officer       Ratnagiri, as it was addressed to the Chairman &
\n    who forwarded the application, and            Managing Director, Bank of India, Head Office.
\n    basis\/need for doing so?\n<\/p>\n
3. What is the detail of transaction number       The transaction No. M431414 dated 15.12.2009 is in
\n    M431414 dated 15-12-2009?                     respect of Rs.10, deposited under RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
4. Whether        the     application      was    Yes.\n    accompanied by cash receipt of Rs. 10\/-\n                                                                                               Page 1 of 5<\/span>\n      paid at Ratnagiri Branch along with the\n     above application under RTl ?\n\n5.   If yes then what was the basis for          However, the sheet containing Xerox image of the\n     rejecting the Appellant's application       counterfoil of Rs.10 might have got detached in transit.\n     and denying the desired information         Although the Appellant was informed about\n     there by denial of the Appellant's          nonpayment of fees and consequent non-\n     fundamental right. Now please furnish       maintainability of your claim, vide letter No.\n     all the information desired and was         HO\/LGL\/NH\/537 dated 5.1.2010, you were also\n     denied to Vide letter bearing reference     advised vide this letter that the Appellant should\n     number HO\/LGL\/NH 537 dated                  address the communication to CPID of Ratnagiri Zone,\n<\/pre>\n
     5.1.2010.                                   which is the correct authority under RTI Act. The
\n                                                 Appellant did not ask for the desired information from
\n                                                 the correct CPIO Authority subsequently. The
\n                                                 information that was sought now is hereby provided.\n<\/p>\n
6.   Please furnish authenticated copies of      The Appellant reported to Ratnagiri Zone on
\n     all transfer orders and relieving orders    01.02.2006. Copies of the transfer orders \/ relieving
\n     which undersign has acknowledged            orders issued during subsequent period are enclosed.
\n     along with all the relevant\/related         Transfer \/Relieving orders pertaining to earlier period
\n     documents clearly stating need\/basis for    are not available with our zone. The request for
\n     such transfers since 26 November’ 1996      information regarding need \/ basis for your transfers is
\n     till date.                                  declined as the information is of confidential nature and
\n                                                 disclosing such information would compromise the
\n                                                 functional freedom of the Management.\n<\/p>\n
7.   Name of the employees treated at            None of the employee from the Ratnagiri zone other
\n     FORTIS HOSPITAL, NOIDA, were                than the Appellant has been treated at Fortis Hospital
\n     issued letter for furnishing details of     NOIDA so far.
\n     break up as indicated in letter no. RZO:\n<\/p>\n
     HRD: SGP: 1359 dated 28.07.2010 and
\n     a copy of their reply too of any such
\n     employee.\n<\/p>\n
8.   Number of occasions and names of the        The rent payable in respect of the flat hired by the
\n     officers responsible for not paying the     Appellant under the TOA scheme at Ratnagiri was not
\n     rent of the flat allotted to me under       paid for the month from February 2010 to May, 2010,
\n     transferee officer scheme by the Bank       as balance for the part of the rent to be -borne by by the
\n     during die course of my service at          Appellant, was not available in account. The rent for
\n     Ratnagiri Zone till date and basis on       the month of June & July, 2010, which had remained to
\n     which such irregular payment of rent        be paid through oversight by Ratnagiri Branch, has
\n     was made.                                   since been paid on 27.9.2010.\n<\/p>\n
9.   Names of the employees who wanted to        The information is not available with us. Hence cannot
\n     take action against me whose reference      be supplied.
\n     is indicated in the complaint of Shri S S
\n     Bandewadkar on the basis of that
\n     undersign was place under suspension
\n     for around six months in recent past.\n<\/p>\n
10   Please furnish the authenticated copies     No non-statutory deductions have been made from the
\n.    of mandates available on Bank’s record      Appellant’s salary.\n<\/p>\n
     for effecting non-statuary deduction
\n     from my salary .lii case mandate not
\n     available on Bank’s record then name
\n     of the officer’s responsible for, illegal
\n     deductions from the Appellant’s salary
\n                                                                                                  Page 2 of 5<\/span>
\n      and number of occasions too in the past
\n     during the course of my stay at
\n     Ratnagiri Zone.\n<\/p>\n
11   Please furnish the names of the officers   Following officers were promoted from Scale MM II to
\n.    and their state of domicile who            MM III in batch other than the Appellant:\n<\/p>\n
     promoted in the Appellant’s batch from     Shri V. B. Pawar Maharashtra
\n     MM SCALE-II to MM SCALE–III                 Shri S. G. Sonavjane – Maharashtra
\n     from Ratnagiri                              Shri R. S. Salvi Maharashtra
\n     Zone Out of them how many officer’s         Shri B. V. Buchade Maharashtra
\n     designated as Senior Branch Managers.       Shri R. B. Dirangan\u00e9 Maharashtra
\n     and, also names of the ,officer’ s who     Though the above list is provided to you, transfers and
\n     were not designated as Senior Branch       posting of officers employees is Management’s
\n     Manager and need\/basis for doing so        prerogative and information regarding reasons etc. is
\n     along with documents supporting the        denied as it is of confidential nature.
\n     reasons given in this matter.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
12   Name and Designation of the officer        Immediately before the Appellant’s transfer to Chiplun
\n.    who was transferred\/relieved from          Branch, Shri AK. Deshpande- officer, was transferred
\n     Chiplun Branch immediate before I          from Chiplun to Mandangad Branch. You reported to
\n     joined Chiplun Branch. Please furnish      Chiplun Branch St Pedhambe Extension Counter on
\n     the date along with authenticated copies   09.08.2010. The distance between Chiplun Branch and
\n     of document showing reasons for the        MES Extn. Counter at Pedhambe is 16 kms. Transfers
\n     Appellant’s transfer\/posting at MES        and posting of officers\/ employees is Management’s
\n     Extesion, Counter Pedhambe please          prerogative and information such as reasons I basis
\n     furnish the dates on which the             therefore is of confidential nature and disclosing such
\n     Appellant joined Chiplun Branch and        information would compromise the functional freedom
\n     MES Extension Counter at Pedhmbe of        of the Management. Hence information regarding
\n     Chiplun Branch and the distance            reasons for your transfer is declined.
\n     between Chiphin Branch and MES
\n     Extension Counter at Pedhambe of
\n     Chiplun Branch.\n<\/p>\n
13   Name of Training programs at Ratnagiri     It’s the Management’s prerogative and disclosing such
\n.    Zone received from different training      information would compromise the functional freedom
\n     colleges of Bank of India and other        of the Management.
\n     institutions too for
\n     Deputing officers from Ratnagiri Zone
\n     for training during the course of the
\n     Appellant’s service at Ratnagiri zone
\n     till date.<\/p>\n
     Whether the Appellant was eligible for
\n     the programs? If yes whether my name
\n     was recommended? Name of the
\n     recommending         authority  of the
\n     program?\n<\/p>\n
     Whether the Appellant’s name- was not
\n     approved even after recommendation?\n<\/p>\n
     Name of the approving authority and
\n     reasons for declining the approval in
\n     case of the Appellant?\n<\/p>\n
14   On which date undersign appeared for       The information is already available with the Appellant
\n.    interview for promotion from scale         and the same is not available with Ratnagiri Zone.\n<\/p>\n
     MM-II to MM-III for the first time?\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                              Page 3 of 5<\/span><\/p>\n
 15   Number of APR (Annual Performance The information is declined as the same is of
\n.    Review)’s considered in the above confidential nature and disclosing such information
\n     mentioned promotion process.      would compromise the functional freedom of the
\n                                       Management. The information regarding number of
\n                                       APRs considered for promotion is explained in the
\n                                       promotion policy, which is circulated to staff from time
\n                                       to time.\n<\/p>\n
16   Please furnish authenticated copies of The information is declined .as the same is of
\n.    all APR’s considered in above confidential nature and disclosing such information
\n     mentioned promotion process.           would compromise the functional freedom of the
\n                                            Management.<\/p>\n
\n\n17   Please furnish authenticated copies of     The information is declined as the same is of\n.    all the relevant documents considering     confidential nature and disclosing such information\n     those my transfer to Ratnagiri Zone was    would compromise the functional freedom of the\n     conveyed to me along with the name         Management.\n     of\u2022 the officer(S) proposed and\n     approved my name for this transfer, and\n     reason if any.\n18   Please furnish authenticated copies of     The copies of the deliverable documents pertaining to\n.    all the documents considered in the        enquiry against the Appellant have already been\n     inquiry held against me for non-           supplied to during the course of departmental enquiry.\n     reporting at Ratnagiri zone.               Other documents, which are of confidential nature and\n<\/pre>\n
                                                cannot be supplied to the Appellant, are declined as
\n                                                disclosing such information would compromise the
\n                                                functional freedom of the Management.\n<\/p>\n
19   Please furnish authenticated copies of     The Appellant’s application being for inter-zone
\n.    all the documents considered vis-\u00e0-vis     transfer, had been forwarded to Head Office. Other
\n     the Appellant’s application for transfer   information sought is not available with us. Moreover,
\n     of services to Delhi Zone last year.       the same is of confidential nature and disclosing such
\n     What is the fate of                        information would compromise the functional freedom
\n     that application as the Appellant is yet   of the Management.
\n     awaiting so please furnish the same too.\n<\/p>\n
     Whether waiting list is maintained at
\n     Bank level for considering the same
\n     application form ensuring year or one
\n     has to apply a fresh every year?\n<\/p>\n
20   What was the need for office order By the said Office Order No. CHN:SNR: dated
\n.    bearing reference number CHN\/SMR 9.8.2010, the Appellant was designated as Officer in
\n     dated 9.8.2010.                          charge of Pedhambe Extn Counter. The information
\n                                              regarding reasons\/need etc. is declined as the same is of
\n                                              confidential nature and disclosing such information
\n                                              would compromise the functional freedom of the
\n                                              Management.\n<\/p>\n
21   Whether      any     designation     was   Yes. The Appellant’s designation of Senior Manager
\n.    withdrawn during the course of the         (DAS) was withdrawn at Ratnagiri Branch, when you
\n     Appellant’s service at Ratnagiri Branch.   were put under suspension and major penalty was
\n     If yes then what was the need for that.    imposed on the Appellant for alleged misbeviour on
\n                                                premises of the Bank which was accepted
\n                                                unconditionally by the Appellant and proved in the
\n                                                                                           Page 4 of 5<\/span>
\n                                               enquiry. It is prerogative of the management and
\n                                              disclosing reasons would compromise the functional
\n                                              freedom or the Management. Hence information is
\n                                              declined.\n<\/p>\n
22    Please furnish the details of approved It is prerogative of the management and disclosing
\n.     manning for Chiplu Branch for officers reasons would compromise the functional freedom or
\n      and also present deployment along with the Management. Hence information is declined.
\n      the reasons for doing so.\n<\/p>\n
23    What was the need for RZO: HRD: P: It is prerogative of the management and disclosing
\n.     279 dated 31 .12.2009 vide which the reasons would compromise the functional freedom or
\n      Appellant’s designation was withdrawn. the Management. Hence information is declined.
\n      What was the basis\/need for doing that?\n<\/p>\n
24    What was the address where letter The letter No. RTN\/SSB\/290 dated 18.1.2010 of
\n.     bearing         reference       number Ratnagiri Branch was sent to the Appellant on the last
\n      RTN\/SSB\/290 dated                       known address- Flat No. FE 3j, Plot No, 118, Sector 4.
\n      18.1.10 was sent for undersign.         Vaishali Gaziabad (UP).\n<\/p>\n
Grounds for the First Appeal:\n<\/p>\n
Incomplete and unsatisfactory information provided by the PIO.\n<\/p>\n
Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):
\nThe appeal was disposed off as the information sought by the Appellant was furnished by the PIO.\n<\/p>\n
Grounds for the Second Appeal:\n<\/p>\n
Incomplete and unsatisfactory information provided by the PIO and unfair disposal of the appeal by the
\nFAA.\n<\/p>\n
Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n
The following were present:\n<\/p>\n
Appellant: Absent;\n<\/p>\n
Respondent: Mr. B. K. Dhawale, PIO & Dy. Zonal Manager on video conference from NIC-Ratnagiri
\n              Studio;\n<\/p>\n
       The respondent states that he has provided all the information available as per records to the
\nAppellant. This appears to be correct.\n<\/p>\n
Decision:\n<\/p>\n
The appeal is disposed.\n<\/p>\n
      The information available on the records appears to have been provided.
\nThis decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                                       Shailesh Gandhi
\n                                                                                             Information Commissioner
\n                                                                                                    21 September 2011
\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)DIS<\/p>\n
                                                                                                              Page 5 of 5<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi – 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000645\/SG\/14720 Appeal No. CIC\/SM\/A\/2011\/000645\/SG Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal Appellant : Mr. Ajit Kumar Dubey Senior Manager M E S Extentioin […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-70903","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-25T03:14:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-25T03:14:22+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1869,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-25T03:14:22+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-25T03:14:22+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-25T03:14:22+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011"},"wordCount":1869,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011","name":"Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-25T03:14:22+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ajit-kumar-dubey-vs-bank-of-india-on-21-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Ajit Kumar Dubey vs Bank Of India on 21 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70903","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70903"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70903\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70903"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70903"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70903"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}