{"id":7117,"date":"2008-06-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008"},"modified":"2019-01-18T16:20:13","modified_gmt":"2019-01-18T10:50:13","slug":"nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.K.Patil<\/div>\n
H4 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNA'fAkl.\ufb01k AT BMQGALQRE W.P.E'\\%C}.38-435 OF 2813}\n\n-3-\n\nIN we I-HGH scum' as KARMA rA1% 1\n\n1.<\/pre>\n
  ; < .1_\u00a7i++:}.\n<\/p>\n
NAZEER 8&8 MIENDAKKE
\nSI\u20ac},KHA8lM S\/KB MAN{3AE'{K\u00a7~,.\n<\/p>\n
SNCE DEAD BY MS LES:\n<\/p>\n
saazvzsaacz SEGUM we :s;zs;;zk;-:E\u00a7r\u00e92:”\u00a7;=;e.’;;\u00bbz.;s\u00a7:~:\u00a3\u00a7’::a:<;-\u00a7i:';  " '
\nmgr: ABQUT i\u00a7'3":'E\u00a3\u00a7{RS    ~  j<\/p>\n
ABBUL e<:\u00bb4:AL'E}s;;.\u00ab.,._ \u00a3%<:y~'r;:A:a;\u00e9;5.\u00a7 'sAe :~.21_A:%\u00e9._cA\u00a7_<;<:<\/p>\n
\ufb01\u00a3ED Agog: 33_Y\u00a7\u00a7.ARS \u00bb _
\na.aAQ:\u00a7\u20ac:@L S;(:':,h\u00a7f,AZEi;R: $A\u00a7B'V5\u00a7\u00a7.%ND\ufb01;i{\u00a7{\u00a7
\nAssts\ufb02onsr 3G"f.E?gEES   * –\n<\/p>\n
r~:Az:rx;1A’B9a\u00a74&L; ax:-NAzE:::\u00e9” QANQAKK:
\nAGES A3023″ 23 YEARSA ._ V ‘<\/p>\n
R_g{FF’:\u00a3;%Asz\u20ac: NAEEEESABI MANBAKK\u00a5
\n;5\u00a73E.:\u00a7::r’gf\u00e9.s$Q’,_fr 26 YEAR–S\u00ab *<\/p>\n
V’ss~5m~=:. VAi~EME31_5″\u20ac.\u00a7f_Q NAZEER SAB MANURKKE
\n‘ as\u00e9msggasr 2;: fgisgas<\/p>\n
” .a;;\u00e9;\u00e9EE:\\\u00e91A’*”3;_\u00e9.r\u00a7:i; 0:0 NAZEER SAB f~\u00e9AEx%i3\u00a3%KKE<\/p>\n
ASEU g:ae.:.:z” 20 mags
\nAvass\u00e9m awn use NAZEER sag MANDAKK!<\/p>\n
V , ~ \u00e9sgssa Asour ’59 YEARS
\n“ALL ARE. EEAT NQ.2′!9{3<\/p>\n
GHQ?’-A BANE} MGHALLA HKQ RQAE)<\/p>\n
V’ —..s;-:mLA:A SHEKAREPLSR TALUK
\n..jS.Hi%.\u20ac\u00a3DG\ufb01z mas?\n<\/p>\n
 PE-TQTEGMERS<\/p>\n
{By 33: MQHAMED FARQQQ AQVQCATE }<\/p>\n
IN THE PHGH COLERT OF KARNKTAKA AT B\u00a31.2~EGAL{)i3iE ‘s\u00a7i,?fI*i{?.38\u00e93:3 Q? 268?<\/p>\n
IN TEE HIGH CQURT OF KARNATAKA ix’? BAZ’\u20acCu%\u00a7.C}RE. ‘\u00bb1f.P.E*\u20acC>.3843:”s OE? ZIIIIZIE<\/p>\n
-73-<\/span><\/p>\n
ANS :\n<\/p>\n
‘E STATE (3? KARNATAKA
\nBE’ KS SECRETARY ET} GGVT;\n<\/p>\n
REVENUE DEPARTMENT?\n<\/p>\n
t’3AN\u20ac3.\u00a7L{3RE.\n<\/p>\n
2 THE LENS TREBLJNAL
\nSH\u00a7\u00a7<LAR\u00a7PUF{?\n<\/p>\n
E’? ETS SECRETARY?\n<\/p>\n
3 \u00a5’=J\u00a7Ai_L\u00a7Ri RAG
\nSfQ.HA\u00a7’\\\u00a7{}MANTH RAG:\n<\/p>\n
S\u00a3f~\u00a7CE agceasaa BY Hts ;:’–z\u00e9f _ <\/p>\n
A K.iTT.ANNA we fv%Ai..\u00e9;ARE RA?’-3.3″‘ ” ” — .5
\nMAJOR,R\u00a3Q,BiS\u00a7.\u00a7~&%\u00a7X\u00a7;\u00a7_iE!\u00a3i;;i.:*%<;:':\u00a7\ufb01  ~  :
\ns:u<n==c:3s"::sHs1s<AR::3:VU_R?A-M13 _  '
\nSHIMQGA      .\n<\/p>\n
B euzaagasag   ,
\ns:0.r~;w;;.LA\u00a7<:A4.\u00a22,,a;;:, '21:  '-
\nMAKBFZ, Rz<:,8:si;aHA;LL:.2.v2Ls,,a;a3,a . '
\nB;L;<1P<:;s?; V
\nsH:KARimm'ALuK, *  "\n<\/p>\n
SHEMGGA 1:>:s1*:2:c”:*’;~ ” .\n<\/p>\n
:: GEE??xMi’s\ufb02A  ~
\n._ a:<::\u00ab.2g4ALL+'2R: Rm;  _ _
\n e.\u00bbs.2:..aR,a_:\u00a5:9;2s;sLAHA:_:;:’VILLAGE:
\n, B.\u00a3LK\u00e9;9C}S1g’!’,.\n<\/p>\n
 SH:-:<A525.s\u00e9;_s{\u00a7'z<A:'ui_<..;
\n $iri%iiv\u00a3C}f&P\u00a3'~lT}i5:2"fF<E.\u20ac3T2~'.<\/p>\n
'  \u00ab:2 \u00a7~s.a$:JAMW–'-T\ufb01'i..\n<\/p>\n
8i\u20ac’.3′.—-MA\u00a7.–.fi_AR\u00a7
\n.V bJ\u00a3.\u00e9.i{;R, RIQBISLAHRLLE VILLAGE}
\n B\u00a7LKiPQ,_\u20acT,
\nV’ “3%-\u00a72.KARtE3L?R YALEJK,
\n SHWEOGA D2STR.iC?,<\/p>\n
  KAMALAMMA<\/p>\n
.V V __W’iQ;HANUMANTH \ufb01gs}
\n‘ 9!\u00a3A.\u00a5QFZ;\u00a7 R!C}Bl$’L\u00a3xHA\u00a3..i.t WLLAGE,
\nam: 9933′,<\/p>\n
IN THE EEEGH CCEURT OF K,5aRNA’FAKA XI’ BANG ALGRE ‘Jv’.P.N{).3843S OF’ 2891<\/p>\n
3*? THE HIGH COURT OF KARN:’a’?AKA AT BANGALORE. W.P.?<:'O.3S43S C3}? 299}<\/p>\n
– R.\n<\/p>\n
S\u00a7~{iK2’3\u00abRiF’UR TALUK}
\nSHEMQGA DESTRFCT.\n<\/p>\n
 RESPDNDENYS<\/p>\n
{Sriz NADEGR SHlVa5.NAN\ufb01\ufb01.PPA HCGF’ 909 R1 & 2
\nRESF’DNDENT–3A TC} CZ $ER’~JE\u00a7}<\/p>\n
THIS WR 13 HLEB UNDER \ufb01RTi\u00a33LES 226 ms 22?’A”QF 3:’HF_5 %
\nco:-2s’:*mmo:x: OF mma, PFEAYENG Ti}: QuAsHM:’HE Qf~'{IE\u00e9E’R,13ATE\u00a7’*_
\n32.42989 PASSED 3*: was LAMS TREBUNN. sHigr;a.Rz\u00a7>u\u00a7A2>;9 arc;-V _ V <\/p>\n
“ft-HS WP. comm ON FOR QRBERS *\u00a7’:~::\u00e9’r3Av, Ti;%:r:’;;A5i;:R5r’=–4  ‘<\/p>\n
MADE THE. FOLLQWENG: V
\n:ORDER:’~–., <\/p>\n
Thaugh this matter \ufb01g ‘”;;~g_$te_d” ‘\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9ii\ufb01y  – grde\ufb01s\u00e9 ‘s’:st’\u00a5% the
\nmatter is taken up far \ufb01ngf 9}’ iiha
\npenderzcy sf this       V.\n<\/p>\n
2. T.he–.  ;\u00e9’ce\u00a7\u00a7”v’*re’p%esen:ed by his Saga?<\/p>\n
representativ\u00e9,’L.._;,\u00a7s$EViin\u00a7’ _th\u00a7..’ sorrectness cf the order<\/p>\n
:d*a.f_e\u00a7d  1 9″8’9… ….. .passed by the Land Tribunai,<\/p>\n
   LRF:\u00a5fx$A:5:2:4t3:83-84 in respect<\/p>\n
 Sy;N\u00a7’$.  and 54!2 measuring 6 acres ‘E8<\/p>\n
.4….:’:v\u00a7i,_i’r\u00a7’:3S; 3″ .ja \u00a7:*;:es 29 guntass and 4 acres 08 guntas<\/p>\n
4″‘–VVVAres\u00a7\u00a7:..act\u00e9v\u00e9’iy, s\ufb01uate at Kade<\/p>\n
‘ ‘{“aA%uk,  has filed an ap<\/p>\n
inahaiii viiiageg Shikar\u00e9pura<\/p>\n
before the Land Reforms<\/p>\n
IN THE HEGH C{)i?R’1” OF KARNATAKA AT BFNGALCERE W.P.NO.384 35 OF 330?<\/p>\n
IN 11% HEGH COURT OF KARN\u00a7&TA\u00a7{A AT BA2\\\u20acGr\ufb01i.\u20ac3RE. WfP.NC},3843S {EF 20$}
\n.4.\n<\/p>\n
Appeatiate Autharity; Sagar in LRA No. ?’?’!1 988. When<\/p>\n
the matter was pending ac\ufb01udication befere the Land<\/p>\n
Ref<;rm$ Appa\ufb02ate Autherity, Sagan in View cf <\/p>\n
amendment to the Land Refcrms Act, the cansti*;1;;t~i–:::ir3V~':\u00a7\u00a7f :  <\/p>\n
the Appellate autharity has been abaiished _.2':..*V+:<*s:':Ai jfj,*:*V:va\u00a7:s"A'r.:\u00a7e?'..~:';A 3<\/p>\n
have been permitted ta \ufb01ie 3 CiviE:=..1Pe\u00a7-\u00e9t\u00e9\u00e9in %3\u00a7f::f\u00e9'i;%\u00a7:%s\u00a7_V <\/p>\n
Court under section 17 ef the 'i<_Ia–:f;ff:ata '\u00a7<-a'xLanc.\u00a7'v F\u20acA.\u00a7f:9{:}f::\u00a7
\n(Amendment) Act, 1990. Accofdi\ufb01g\u00e9y,'VV.,pet\u00a7{\u00a3n:\u00aefA h\u00e9rein<\/p>\n
has f\ufb01ed C.F'.\u00a3\\}o. 31a41:9\u00a7iber\u00a2:g %:;i:::,%jfc;{~_\u00bb;;:t and the<\/p>\n
same was'V\u00a2dhve\u00a7?ied i\u00e9ifc  inst\u00e9vhi writ petition.<\/p>\n
2. i Rave he_a”r?f\u00a7 . Seafried caunsei appearing far<\/p>\n
petitiener 3:36 i\u00e93:\u00a7\u00a7ed.v’Gdvef’r\u00a7ment P\u00e9eader appearing for<\/p>\n
  2!  . . . . . .. ‘<\/p>\n
 ._  c\u00e9r\u00e9fui evahjation of the entire or\u00a5g\u00a7nal<\/p>\n
 recerd\u00a7* axe\ufb01lavkilie on fiie, what it emerges is that, me<\/p>\n
  ‘;’3’\u00a7;\u00a7\u00a7l\u00a7:::a\u00a7\u00a7\u00a73n ‘fiied by deceased father :3? the petitianers in<\/p>\n
 __ Fior’\u00a7’t’:\u00a7  1 far registration sf eccupancy rights befere the<\/p>\n
% A   “L\u00a5a.r\u00a7\u00a7J Tribunal, Shikaripur 5 been rejected on 2?_1.’\u00a597’7<\/p>\n
EN TEE HIGH C\u20acC)iER’i’ OF i<;A.RE\\\u00a7A'\u00a7'AFiA Xi' BRNGRLQRE 's\u00a5'.P.3\\E{}.3S\u00a7<i3S Q}? 2%}<\/p>\n
IN Ti\ufb02 HIGH CCFEERT OF KXXFJGATAKA AT BANGEALC-RE. W_P.Nff}.38-\u00a335 OF 2003
\n*1<\/p>\n
in N0. LRT:CR:2:?5~76. Be that as it may. Thereafiar,<\/p>\n
pe\ufb01ticxners' father has \ufb01\u00e9ed app\ufb01cat\u00e9ons before the <\/p>\n
Tribune! an 235.1977, 285.1983 and cm 5.?,.f\u00a7'1;3\u00a5"8 '543:\u00ab:'V\u00a7?}i'—-VA<\/p>\n
canfirmat\u00e9en of occupancy rights. The' aaid <\/p>\n
\ufb01!eeE by gaetit\u00e9oners' \u00a7athar have {;t3\u00a7'z":a\u00bb':\u00a23g:: f{fzi*'T<\/p>\n
before the Land Tribunai, 8hii{ar'-\u00e9:\u00a7Ur or;
\nThe Land Trsbunaz, Sh.\u00a7i\u00a7a\u00a71\u00a7pur'V"\ufb01\u00a7;2}'j4.1\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7epted 'th\u00e9 said
\nappiicatiarzs \ufb02ied by Vpet\u00a7ti0f}_g\u00a7:\u00a7:'?_Vf'\u00e9tf\u00a7'\u00bb\u00a3\u00a7f iv\ufb01vavi\ufb01ions 31'<\/p>\n
the Karnamka  .\u00e9~z3d\u20ac_sfZ\u00a7i'1\u00e9\u00a7'\u00a7\u20ac\u00e9$%'e~E\ufb01dewment Act<\/p>\n
stating tfiat, –. i:.~.~.Vz\u00a7V;’;.>r;:>;;:r:i_***:\u00a7g=zvVA:a7{:\u00a5:ht3ri’ty as pmvided under the relevant<\/p>\n
:  pravisi\ufb01zs ;:f'{\u00a7’;*:~\u00a7 Act and Ri\ufb02es, under mis–c;encep?:\u00a7on<\/p>\n
— –..,’_j’:V.-v\u00e9\ufb01tat\u00e9orz, petificners’ father has \ufb02ied an app-53$ before the<\/p>\n
 ‘*–L\u00a7%\u00a7A\u00e9VRL\u00e9’farms Appe\ufb02aie Autharity, Sagan which has me<\/p>\n
%TLk%%%ggr:s\u00a7ict;an to consider the appeal fiied by him.<\/p>\n
 ”  “‘8\u00a33bseqL:ent\u00a7y, pet\u00e9t\u00e9ene the: has cammiirted the<\/p>\n
 THE. EEG}? {.’.'{1iL=”i”-{T (‘AF KARNKSXT;-‘kI*<LA AT E\u00a7a'NGAL\u20acj)RE W.PNC).3%435 if)? 2&3}<\/p>\n
IN TEE HIGH CCELFRT C)? K.3.IiNA'I'AI<;.=% AT E:'k\u00a7\\I\u20acZ'\u00a7\u00a7&;E.C}R\u00a3. '\u00a7v".?.N\u20ac).3843\u00a7 QF 2&0;
\n43-\n<\/p>\n
same error in \ufb01\ufb01ng the Civii Petitien befere this Qeurt<\/p>\n
under eectien 1?’ of the Kerneteke Land Referz.\ufb01_Ve:_ ~.V_<\/p>\n
(Amendment) Act in C_F3.Ne.8’\u00a564l’!991 <\/p>\n
eenverted irate this writ petition. Afte:r~.ee_refu.i’  <\/p>\n
the impugned erder passed by   <\/p>\n
Shiker\u00e9purg interference by <\/p>\n
eetitienere’ father wee reds*eeein’ge”‘hie.:’j3;\u00a7\u00a3fiexgeneee”‘be\u00a7;ere
\nthe ineempetent eutherit\u00e9eeii    his
\ngrievance befere   eevieeged
\nunder the tee est end Rteee ie eat
\nbe guse=sab:e.   ‘   Ak %% %  L<\/p>\n
   effects and eireumeteneee ef the<\/p>\n
eeee ee–\u00bbsteted e\u00a3ie~J_e, the writ petition \ufb02ied by pei\u00e9t\u00e9onere<\/p>\n
 dismissed ‘ee’j_r?:is–eenee%ved, reserving \u00a3iber%y to the<\/p>\n
.j%_T’e~_–\u00ab.eeth’._\u00a7’eeere~~  t:;:a redress their grievenee before the<\/p>\n
 euther\u00e9ty, es envisaged under the reievent<\/p>\n
. ‘V:’Ve-%e}\u00a7{?\u00a7e_\u00a5ene ef the Act and Rates, if so advised or if need<\/p>\n
  : ‘erieee.\n<\/p>\n
 THE HIGH COURT {X3 KARN}\u00a7TA}{A AT B,-“&;\\EGAT.ORE W.?.3*\u20acC).33\u00a335 C)? Eiifii<\/p>\n
IN  HIGH CGURT OF KARNATAKL-*\u00a5. A’? BAEEGALORE. ‘%\u00a7.P.}~iC}.38435 \u00a31}? 2681<\/p>\n
vs
\n__;..\n<\/p>\n
Qf\ufb01ce is directed ta return the entire or\u00a5gin3\u00a7’– “~ ‘<\/p>\n
racards to tha Land tr\u00e9bunaig Shikaripur, Farthw\u00e9th.  <\/p>\n
2551*<\/p>\n
 TEE. HIGH CCELRT ii”??? KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE 3\u00a5.P3\\EC3.38ai35 OF E\u00e9\ufb01i<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008 Author: N.K.Patil H4 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNA’fAkl.\ufb01k AT BMQGALQRE W.P.E’\\%C}.38-435 OF 2813} -3- IN we I-HGH scum’ as KARMA rA1% 1 1. ; < .1_\u00a7i++:}. NAZEER 8&8 MIENDAKKE SI\u20ac},KHA8lM S\/KB MAN{3AE'{K\u00a7~,. SNCE DEAD BY MS LES: saazvzsaacz SEGUM we :s;zs;;zk;-:E\u00a7r\u00e92:”\u00a7;=;e.’;;\u00bbz.;s\u00a7:~:\u00a3\u00a7’::a:<;-\u00a7i:'; […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-18T10:50:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-18T10:50:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1364,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-18T10:50:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-18T10:50:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-18T10:50:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008"},"wordCount":1364,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008","name":"Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-18T10:50:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nazeer-sab-mandakki-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Nazeer Sab Mandakki vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7117"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7117\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}