{"id":7127,"date":"2010-10-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010"},"modified":"2017-03-31T22:13:21","modified_gmt":"2017-03-31T16:43:21","slug":"sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n<pre>WP 27372\/10\n\nIN rm: HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 20TH DAY or OCTOBER 2010' _ \nBEFORE ' Q\n\nTHE HONBLE MRJUSTICE A.s.PAc1--1}\u00bb:ADv.:i:%.,\u00a7\u00ab:;*wA.T.::: _ 3\n\nWRIT PETITION No.27372\/2()1o    X   D 1:'\n\nBETWEEN\n\nSri. S.L. Nataraj,\n\nS\/o. Lakshminarayana Dixjt,\n\nAged about 37' years, ' __ . .\n\nNo.468, 12th Main, nth 'A' Cross.'-\n\n'A' Sector, Yelahanka, \" _ . '   __ \n\nBangaiore -- 560 106)'   *  \"   \"PETITIONER\/S\n\n(By Sri. G.B.    7 . \"\n\nAND\n\n1. The State of Ka1*na.t\u00e9.i\u00ab:aL;~~ \nRep. by. its PriDci\"p3.i .S\u00e9c,retary,\nDe_partn1\"e:=nt\"of Land Revenue,\nGgovemmeni of Karriataka,\n\n~ _  .B1I'.i_idi1'1g$\" A ..... .. v\n\nA \u00ab , Dr. Ambeiiigar Veedhi,\n'  'Bangalore 5560 001.\n\n  2.  The S\u00ab1)o?i':aVf'IV)eputy Commissioner,\n\nBangaior.-3' District,\nBangalore -- 560 009.\n\nV The Tahsiidar.\n V' --..B.\u00e9.nga1ore North (Addi.] Taluk,\n Yelahanka.\n' Bangaiore -- 560 064.  RESPONDENT\/ S\n\nIf    ~ (By Sri. R. Om Kumar, AGA)\n\n\n\nWP 27372\/10\n\nThis Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 22? of\nthe Constitution of india praying to quash the order dated\n30.11.2009 passed in Case No. RRT(2)N(A)\/CR\/557\/2008-09\nby the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore District,\nBangalore i.e., the 2115' respondent vide Annexure--N as the {same\nis iilegai and Void AB--initio. '~   \n\nThis Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary 0' 0\n\nday, the Court made the following: _- \"  \u00bb ..  g\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Learned AGA is directed ,__.to ttaite notice   <\/p>\n<p>respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. The petitioner chatllefng&#8217;ed.._&#8217;t.he~.order passed by<\/p>\n<p>Respondent No.2 deleting iilecord of Rights<\/p>\n<p>in respect of the    measuring 0-20<\/p>\n<p>guntas sitnated\ufb02at&#8221;,Htittan&lt;aha.i1i; Bangalore North Additionaj<\/p>\n<p>Taluk. 0&#039;  . &#8211; g ._\n<\/p>\n<p>3. _The facts ret:eai.V_tha&#8217;t the land referred to supra was<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;grante_d&#8217;3&#8217;\u00abtoEone_iVIuni&#8217;anj.a..nappa and later, the petitioner herein<\/p>\n<p>Vpurchasedv._thev&#8217;~same on 23-04-2007 under a registered sale<\/p>\n<p>deed asper An,jne\u00a7;tire~L. Since then, the name of the petitioner<\/p>\n<p> was aptpeafingin the Record of Rights.<\/p>\n<p>N\ufb01fff<br \/>\n x-\n<\/p>\n<p>VVP 27372\/10<\/p>\n<p>4. It appears that the Tahsildar &#8212; Respondent No.3<\/p>\n<p>submitted a report stating that the land in S.i\\Jo._&#8221;?..&#8217;?.l_:\/&#8217;.\u00a3:&#8217;2\u00e9l<\/p>\n<p>situated at Huttanahalli, Jaia Hobli,  _<\/p>\n<p>Additional Taluk is classi\ufb01ed as &#8216;Gomalafpand th&#8211;at~e.ritries::l:aveVp: it <\/p>\n<p>come up for an extent of 20 guntas <\/p>\n<p>petitioner herein in the revenue records llil:elRTC<br \/>\nno land grant records forthcominlgliri pthel .lC,V}f\ufb01ce to<br \/>\nSupport the Said e&#8221;tTY-    action<br \/>\nunder Section 136  of  Revenue Act,<br \/>\n1964, {hereinafter the  On the &#8216;oasis of<br \/>\nthis report,  and as it could be<br \/>\nseen frornpdthev    under Section 30 of<br \/>\nthe Act  served &#8216;:one'&lt;lS:pi1itl.i-iikhkayyamma on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner _vherel1r.- and j_as7._the&quot;il petitioner did not appear, has<\/p>\n<p> Jpassed_jtli*1e;_ifriptugned &#039;ord~e&#039;r.<\/p>\n<p>  i*lhaire:l.hve&#039;ard the learned counsel for the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>V V&#039; and also tb\\_e&#039;1eai-ned AGA.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.  As could be seen from the order that has been<\/p>\n<p>  reveals that the show cause notice in respect of the<\/p>\n<p> frevisgion petition was served upon one Smt.Akkayyamma, on<\/p>\n<p>-1}&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>4 WP 27372\/ 10<\/p>\n<p>behalf of the petitioner herein and as none appeared before<br \/>\nRespondent No.2. the impugned order came to be passed<\/p>\n<p>deleting the name of the petitioner from the recordpppof\u00e9rightsfw.<\/p>\n<p>Now, as couid be seen from the provisions of Section M<\/p>\n<p>Act, every notice under this Act, uniessfitis&#8217;exprevs.siyHg<\/p>\n<p>provided shall be served by tenderingp_&#8217;oi&#8211;;.A_\ufb02deliveringl. at<br \/>\nthereof, to the person on whom 19 bevhservedd<br \/>\nif he has any, or by aft&#8217;udng:;&#8211;apcopy.itiiereofto some consipicuous<br \/>\nplace of the land, if any,  Vv;1&#8217;iich refers. in the<br \/>\ncircumstances, the<br \/>\non behalf the    not known as to<br \/>\nwhat is  Sint.Akkayyamma with the<br \/>\npetitioner here.in.   the impugned order is<\/p>\n<p>without _n_otice&#8221;to &#8216;the&#8217;v&#8211;peti_tio~~:ier and against the principles of<\/p>\n<p> J V1&#8217;1?1Fur:3t1_ \u00a7u$ticc\u00ab\u00ab  &#8216;  &#8212;&#8211; ~ &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>3&#8243;,<\/p>\n<p>V    the petition is allowed. The order passed<\/p>\n<p> by Respon\u00a7f&#8217;.ient.:&#8217;~i&#8217;\\io.2 &#8212; Special Deputy Commissioner dated 23-<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;\u00a5i&#8217;::1&#8217;j.:2~2oo9 &#8221; in: RRT(2}N[A}\/CR\/557&#8217;\/2008-09 at Annexure-L is<\/p>\n<p>i   The matter is remitted back to Respondent No.2 &#8212; the<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;&#8211;&#8216;.&#8217;;S&#8217;pe_cia1 Deputy Commissioner to afford an opportunity to the<\/p>\n<p>   petitioner and dispose of the same in accordance with iaw. The<\/p>\n<p>2&#8243;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>5 VVP 27372\/ 10<\/p>\n<p>petitioner shall appear before the Special Deputy<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner on 30~1 1&#8211;2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>8. Learned AGA is permitted to fiie Memo 1 V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>within fifteen days.\n<\/p>\n<p>JL<\/p>\n<p>e image  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010 Author: A.S.Pachhapure WP 27372\/10 IN rm: HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY or OCTOBER 2010&#8242; _ BEFORE &#8216; Q THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE A.s.PAc1&#8211;1}\u00bb:ADv.:i:%.,\u00a7\u00ab:;*wA.T.::: _ 3 WRIT PETITION No.27372\/2()1o X D 1:&#8217; BETWEEN Sri. S.L. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7127","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-31T16:43:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-31T16:43:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":531,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-31T16:43:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-31T16:43:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-31T16:43:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010"},"wordCount":531,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010","name":"Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-31T16:43:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-l-nataraj-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri S L Nataraj vs The State Of Karnataka on 20 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7127","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7127"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7127\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}