{"id":71607,"date":"2009-03-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009"},"modified":"2015-03-24T18:09:58","modified_gmt":"2015-03-24T12:39:58","slug":"ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Ivrcl Infrastructures And &#8230; vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ivrcl Infrastructures And &#8230; vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 4895 of 2009(G)\n\n\n1. IVRCL INFRASTRUCTURES AND PROJECT\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY,\n\n3. THE PROJECT MANAGER, JBIC ASSISTED\n\n4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA.\n\n5. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (R.R), CHERTHALA.\n\n6. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THANNIRMUKKAM\n\n7. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.K.CHANDRAN PILLAI\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP,SC, BSNL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :02\/03\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                       K. M. JOSEPH, J.\n                --------------------------------------\n                W.P.C. NO. 4895 OF 2009 G\n                --------------------------------------\n                Dated this the 2nd March, 2009\n\n                          JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>    Petitioner challenges Exts.P40 and P41 as evidenced by<\/p>\n<p>Clause 4 of Ext.P38. The prayers, inter alia, are as follows:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>           &#8220;ii. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or<\/p>\n<p>     such other appropriate writ, order or directions<\/p>\n<p>     quashing Exts.P40 and P41 and the decision<\/p>\n<p>     evidenced by Clause 4 of Ext.P38.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           iii) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus<\/p>\n<p>     or such other appropriate writ, order or direction<\/p>\n<p>     commanding the 1st respondent to co-operate for<\/p>\n<p>     the joint inspection on the basis of Exts.P20, P25<\/p>\n<p>     etc. and abide by the results of such inspection.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           iv) Declare by issuance of appropriate writ,<\/p>\n<p>     order or direction that the petitioner is not liable<\/p>\n<p>     to pay any compensation to the 1st respondent on<\/p>\n<p>     the basis of the agreement between the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>     and the 2nd respondent.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There are further prayers relating to the irrecoverability under<\/p>\n<p>the Revenue Recovery Act, including without deciding actual<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC. 4895\/09 G                  2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>damage.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. Petitioner Company entered into an agreement with the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent for the laying of pipes in the area covered by<\/p>\n<p>Phase II and III from Thaikkattukara to different villages of<\/p>\n<p>Cherthala Taluk. The Project is intended to give drinking water<\/p>\n<p>to more than six lakhs of people. It is the case of the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>that digging is to be done by the petitioner by using JCB. The<\/p>\n<p>first respondent BSNL is alleged to have interfered stating that<\/p>\n<p>the cables were damaged, meetings were convened and<\/p>\n<p>decisions were taken. Ext.P2 is a tripartite agreement between<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner, the BSNL and the Kerala Water Authority.<\/p>\n<p>Clauses 3 and 4 being relevant, they are extracted below:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             &#8220;3. If local\/OF cable is damaged on course<\/p>\n<p>        of the work, IVRCL has to settle all the dispute<\/p>\n<p>        regarding the claim in consultation with BSNL.<\/p>\n<p>        BSNL will prepare the estimate in consultation<\/p>\n<p>        with M\/s. IVRCL (BSNL has to ensure the<\/p>\n<p>        correctness of the estimate before sending it to<\/p>\n<p>        IVRCL for making (4) payment) and raise demand<\/p>\n<p>        note as per BSNL HQ instructions for damage vide<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC. 4895\/09 G                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       letters No:110-7\/2002-Regin dated 5th October,<\/p>\n<p>       2004 and No:110-7\/2002-Regin dated 16-01-2003<\/p>\n<p>       of Jt. DDG (Regulation-1, BSNL HQ.Delhi (copies<\/p>\n<p>       attached) to M\/s. IVRCL, if M\/s. IVRCL is not<\/p>\n<p>       paying the bill within 30 days, KWA JBIC project<\/p>\n<p>       will pay the amount to BSNL within 30 days by<\/p>\n<p>       recovering the amount from Running bill at KWA<\/p>\n<p>       Office, Tvm.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The revenue recovery notices, in short, are raised at the instance<\/p>\n<p>of the first respondent claiming compensation for the alleged<\/p>\n<p>damage done by the petitioner. A Counter Affidavit is filed on<\/p>\n<p>behalf of the first respondent BSNL.\n<\/p>\n<p>     3. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned<\/p>\n<p>standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 1 and 2,<\/p>\n<p>and also the learned Government Pleader. Exts.P37 and P39 are<\/p>\n<p>the Minutes of the District Collector. Ext.P44 is the Minutes of<\/p>\n<p>the Meeting held by the Additional Secretary, Water Resources<\/p>\n<p>Department. In short, it is contended that there may be a joint<\/p>\n<p>inspection. Of course, according to the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC. 4895\/09 G                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>first respondent BSNL, as also the Kerala Water Authority, a<\/p>\n<p>joint inspection was already commenced on 20.9.2008.<\/p>\n<p>      4. After having heard the parties, I am of the view that<\/p>\n<p>interest of justice will be subserved, if a joint inspection is<\/p>\n<p>ordered to be conducted in the presence of the representatives of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner, the first respondent and the Water Authority and<\/p>\n<p>under the watchful eyes of the representative of the District<\/p>\n<p>Collector, Alappuzha. In this regard, I take note of clause 3 of<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P2 tripartite agreement which, undoubtedly, contemplates<\/p>\n<p>the first respondent taking the petitioner into confidence in the<\/p>\n<p>matter of raising a claim for damage, if any, caused by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as<\/p>\n<p>follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>      A joint inspection will be conducted in regard to the<\/p>\n<p>various demands of the first respondent in the presence of the<\/p>\n<p>representatives of the petitioner, the first respondent and also the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent Water Authority.          The fourth respondent<\/p>\n<p>District Collector will convene a meeting of the representatives<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC. 4895\/09 G                    5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of the petitioner, and respondents 1 and 2. No notice need be<\/p>\n<p>issued to them and in view of the urgency of the matter, the<\/p>\n<p>representatives as aforesaid will be present in the office of the<\/p>\n<p>fourth respondent at 11 AM on 10.03.2009.              The fourth<\/p>\n<p>respondent District Collector will, after deliberations with the<\/p>\n<p>representatives, fix a schedule of the dates on which the<\/p>\n<p>inspections in regard to the various demands are to be held.<\/p>\n<p>The representatives of the petitioner and respondents 1 and 2<\/p>\n<p>will be present, so that the joint inspection is carried on<\/p>\n<p>smoothly. The schedule of dates shall be so arranged that the<\/p>\n<p>joint inspection should be completed within ten weeks from<\/p>\n<p>10.03.2009. The representative of the fourth respondent will be<\/p>\n<p>present at the time of all the joint inspections. Should there arise<\/p>\n<p>any dispute during the carrying out of the joint inspection, the<\/p>\n<p>representative of the District Collector shall immediately bring it<\/p>\n<p>to the notice of the fourth respondent and further steps will be<\/p>\n<p>taken as directed by the fourth respondent. The costs will be<\/p>\n<p>defrayed by the party who was meeting the costs earlier. I also<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WPC. 4895\/09 G                  6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>make it clear that the joint inspection which was already<\/p>\n<p>completed need not be reopened.          The revenue recovery<\/p>\n<p>proceedings against the petitioner will be kept in abeyance<\/p>\n<p>unless and until the inspections are completed as directed.<\/p>\n<p>Provided the second respondent will ensure that there are<\/p>\n<p>sufficient funds to meet the demands due to the first respondent<\/p>\n<p>from the petitioner, it will be open to the second respondent to<\/p>\n<p>release monthly payments.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                            Sd\/=<br \/>\n                                     K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>kbk.\n<\/p>\n<p>                     \/\/ True Copy \/\/<br \/>\n                                             PS to Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Ivrcl Infrastructures And &#8230; vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 4895 of 2009(G) 1. IVRCL INFRASTRUCTURES AND PROJECT &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE KERALA WATER AUTHORITY, 3. THE PROJECT MANAGER, JBIC ASSISTED 4. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-71607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ivrcl Infrastructures And ... vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ivrcl Infrastructures And ... vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-24T12:39:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ivrcl Infrastructures And &#8230; vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-24T12:39:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":959,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Ivrcl Infrastructures And ... vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-24T12:39:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ivrcl Infrastructures And &#8230; vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ivrcl Infrastructures And ... vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ivrcl Infrastructures And ... vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-24T12:39:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ivrcl Infrastructures And &#8230; vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-24T12:39:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009"},"wordCount":959,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009","name":"Ivrcl Infrastructures And ... vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-24T12:39:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ivrcl-infrastructures-and-vs-bharat-sanchar-nigam-limited-on-2-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ivrcl Infrastructures And &#8230; vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited on 2 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71607"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71607\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}