{"id":71854,"date":"2011-09-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011"},"modified":"2018-08-03T02:27:35","modified_gmt":"2018-08-02T20:57:35","slug":"shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                        CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                            Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                          Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                 Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                              Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002103\/14636\n                                                                      Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002103\n\nRelevant facts emerging from the Appeal:\n\n\nAppellant                            :       Mr. Raj Kumar Tomar\n                                             F-70\/4, Gali No. 3,\n                                             Subhash Vihar, North Ghonda,\n                                             Delhi - 110053\n\nRespondent                           :       Mr. A. K. Mittal\n                                             Public Information Officer &amp; SE-I\n                                             Municipal Corporation of Delhi\n                                             Shahdara North Zone\n                                             Keshav Chowk, Red Light,\n                                             Opp. Welcome Metro Station,\n                                             Shahdara, Delhi\n\nRTI application filed on             :       19\/04\/2011\nPIO replied on                       :       Not mentioned.\nFirst Appeal filed on                :       26\/05\/2011\nFirst Appellate Authority order of   :       14\/07\/2011\nSecond Appeal received on            :       29\/07\/2011\n\nThe information sought: The Appellant wants information about ward no. 256 and 257.\n   1. How many illegal constructions were booked from 01 January 2011 to 31 March 2011? Provide\n       me Name, Address, Property No., file book no.\n   2. How many building height are more than 50 feet's? What the action was taken against it?\n\nThe PIO reply:\nNo PIO reply mentioned.\n\nGrounds for the First Appeal:\nThe appellant did not receive reply from the PIO.\n\nOrder of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):\nMr. B.L.Sharma AE was present. \" The main ground for appeal was dissatisfaction with the reply\nfurnished by the PIO. Appellant states that he has not supplied the details of booked, property from\n01.01.11 to 31.03.11 PIO is directed to supply the details to the appellant within seven days from the date\nof issue of this letter.\" PIO SE I Shahadara North transferred the application on 18\/7\/2011.\n\nGround of the Second Appeal:\nThe applicant has not received reply by PIO and unsatisfactory order was passed by the First Appellate\nAuthority.\n Relevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging during Hearing:\n<\/p>\n<p>The following were present<br \/>\nAppellant: Absent;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Mr. A. K. Mittal, Public Information Officer &amp; SE-I;\n<\/p>\n<p>        The PIO claims that the RTI application was not received. However, no such claim has been made<br \/>\nbefore the FAA during the hearing on 12\/07\/2011. The FAA had recorded that Mr. B. L. Sharma, AE was<br \/>\npresent on behalf of the PIO. The FAA had also directed the PIO to supply the information to the<br \/>\nAppellant within 07 days of the order which was issued on 14\/07\/2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>The PIO has provided some information regarding the wards covered in EE(B-I) which is 17 wards<br \/>\nincluding ward no. 256. Ward no. 257 is under the charge of SE-II\/EE(B-II). The Commission directs the<br \/>\nPIO Mr. Mittal to provide the details of the illegal bookings done in EE(B-I) and obtain the details of<br \/>\nillegal constructions booked in EE(B-II) from the concerned officer and provide it to the Appellant before<br \/>\n05 October 2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Appeal is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The PIO is directed to provide the information as directed above to the Appellant<br \/>\nbefore 05 October 2011. He will take the assistance of any other officer if necessary and<br \/>\nprovide the information to the Appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>The issue before the Commission is of not supplying the complete, required information by the PIO<br \/>\nwithin 30 days as required by the law.\n<\/p>\n<p>From the facts before the Commission it appears that the PIO is guilty of not furnishing information<br \/>\nwithin the time specified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 by not replying within 30 days, as per the<br \/>\nrequirement of the RTI Act. He has further refused to obey the orders of his superior officer, which raises<br \/>\na reasonable doubt that the denial of information may also be malafide. The First Appellate Authority has<br \/>\nclearly ordered the information to be given. It appears that the PIO&#8217;s actions attract the penal provisions<br \/>\nof Section 20 (1). A showcause notice is being issued to him, and he is directed give his reasons to the<br \/>\nCommission to show cause why penalty should not be levied on him.\n<\/p>\n<p>He will present himself before the Commission at the above address on 10 October 2011 at 12.30pm<br \/>\nalongwith his written submissions showing cause why penalty should not be imposed on him as mandated<br \/>\nunder Section 20 (1). He will also submit proof of having given the information to the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>If there are other persons responsible for the delay in providing the information to the Appellant the<br \/>\nPIO is directed to inform such persons of the show cause hearing and direct them to appear before the<br \/>\nCommission with him. If no other responsible persons are brought by PIO to the showcause hearing, it<br \/>\nwill be presumed that he is the responsible persons.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.<br \/>\nAny information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                        Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                              Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                                     16 September 2011<br \/>\n(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.) (MG)\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002103\/14636 Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/002103 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Raj Kumar Tomar F-70\/4, Gali No. 3, Subhash Vihar, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-71854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-02T20:57:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-02T20:57:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":520,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-02T20:57:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-02T20:57:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-02T20:57:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011"},"wordCount":520,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011","name":"Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-02T20:57:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-raj-kumar-tomer-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-16-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri.Raj Kumar Tomer vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 16 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71854"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71854\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}