{"id":71938,"date":"2009-08-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009"},"modified":"2016-10-11T20:25:26","modified_gmt":"2016-10-11T14:55:26","slug":"sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And H.Billappa<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH coum\" OF KARNA TA KA A T BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2009 \n\nPRESENT:\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE N.K,p,m;e  % T L\n\nAND\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE 1!\ufb022.;.IUSTfCE ' I-I. BI\ufb01;APE'A    A %'\n\nM.F.A.No. 7081 20o7&lt;{m:i*\nBetween  R K \n\n1 Sri Masood Server &#039;- _\n\nS\/o Syed\ufb01hamed  ~ \n\nAged 3?&#039;Yea&quot;:&#039;s,  ,_ \nNo.48\/-9, ?i;jst._v_Cr-as-s &#039;V ._  V\nK.H5Ran&#039;ga\ufb01at11a &#039;Cfo}.o&quot;1&#039;1y__.  \nBangaiomtsso 3   \n\n APPELLANT\n(By  N R &#039;Na1i\u00a7j&#039;~&amp;&#039;As:\u00e9;oc:ates, Advocates}\n\nAnd_:_\n\n V&#039;  _  2&#039;1-kfiway Fo&#039;i9war&quot;ders Pvt Ltd\n\n No.19\/._1, Sn&#039; Venaktadri\n _ &#039;vtl\ufb01niyappa Layout,\n. V&#039;Eio12ena&#039;A&#039;.grahara Vimanapura Post,\nBangalore 560 017\n\n2 ~  tionai Insurance Co Ltd\nRegional Office No.144,\n\nA  Subbaram Complex,\n\nM.G.Road,\nBangalore 1.\nRespondents<\/pre>\n<p>&#8221; [Rd Served; Sri: Vishwanath S Shettar, Advocate for R2 )<\/p>\n<p>This M.F.A. is \ufb01led U\/8.1730) of MV Act against the<br \/>\nJudgment 8: Award dated 1\/ 2\/ 2007 passed In MVC<br \/>\nNo.T941\/O5 on the \ufb01le of the XVI Addl Judge, MACT,<br \/>\nMetropolitan Area, Bangalore {SCCH.14], partly allowing the<br \/>\nClaim Petition for compensation &amp; seeking enhancement of<br \/>\ncompensation. &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>This M.F.A. coming on for ADMISSIOi.\\_i_    V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>PATIL J, delivered the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>:JUDG M[;:&#8217;iN:Zif:;&#8217;~&#8217;lV<\/p>\n<p>This appeai is directed:vg&#8221;&#8221;against the and-it<\/p>\n<p>award dated 15&#8242; F3-\u00a7luaryVA..&#8212;&#8212;\u00abx.&#8217;20Ci7_ p&#8221;assed..:\u00a7 in MVC<br \/>\nNo.7941\/2005 by the Judge and<\/p>\n<p>Motor Accidents VVBa.nVoalore, SCCH-14,<\/p>\n<p>(hereiVnatte&#8217;ro&#8217;reterre5d&#8217;to_l:as.:&#8217;fC|ainis\ufb02iiribunal&#8217; for short).<br \/>\n Bygthe._ii&#8217;n_ptilgnedi\u00abjudgment and award, the Claims<\/p>\n<p>Tribunagl has awa.r&#8217;ded&#8217;-aisum of Rs.2,34,000\/- with interest at<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; &#8216;~  6% {p.a;-, from thevdadte of petition till the date of realisation.<\/p>\n<p>  by that, appellant has filed this appeal,<\/p>\n<p>se-eking elnhalncement on the ground that, the Claims Tribunal<\/p>\n<p> has not awarded any amount towards loss of future income.<\/p>\n<p>3. The appellant claims that he is aged about 36<\/p>\n<p> V. -3\/ears, by profession he is a Doctor and running two ciinics.<\/p>\n<p>That on 6.10.2005 at out 11.30 a.m., the appellant was<\/p>\n<p>~IIr&#8221;&#8216;*&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;\u00b0&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>documentary evidence, has allowed the said claim petition in<\/p>\n<p>part and awarded a sum Rs.2,34,000\/- as conipe&#8217;rl.sat,ion<\/p>\n<p>under different heads with interest at 6% p.a., from <\/p>\n<p>petition till the date of realization.  Begingi <\/p>\n<p>said judgment and award, the appelia.Ant&#8217;lVhas&#8211; <\/p>\n<p>appeal, seeking enhanceme&#8211;E1,,f&#8221;&#8216;~~..,0f &#8216;compeAnsatieVn;&#8217;lllon then<\/p>\n<p>ground that the Claims &#8216;net awarded any amount<br \/>\ntowards loss of future inlcomell&#8217;  be awarded.<\/p>\n<p>4. Thegvpriiineiypal;:ls&#8217;ubr*rtlssi:on,l&#8221;canvassed by the learned<br \/>\ncounsel    that,&#8221; the Claims Tribunal<br \/>\nhas  a:rl\u00a5g:.;erro~r.VgiV&#8217;nV&#8217;notawarding any amount towards<br \/>\nloss ofgfuturevnheeds to be awarded. He also<\/p>\n<p>subrnittedthatv,  profession, the appellant is a Doctor and<\/p>\n<p>  r,unnin&#8217;g&#8217;vv&#8211;two clinics and getting the income of<\/p>\n<p> :to*&#8211;.20,000\/- per month. The said claim of the<\/p>\n<p> been rejected by the Claims Tribunal stating<\/p>\n<p> that, per the evidence of the Doctor, the fractures are<\/p>\n<p>A  properly united and therefore, the question of awarding any<\/p>\n<p>amount towards loss of future income does not arises and<\/p>\n<p>which is contrary to the evidence of PW3. Therefore, he<\/p>\n<p>7. The Claims Tribunal has rejected the ciai_m__ of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant towards loss of future income, stating thajt&#8217;:&#8217;vtih&#8217;e:hi.the<\/p>\n<p>fractures are properly united as per the evidence of <\/p>\n<p>uestion of awardin com ensation\u00bb~towardsv,ioss Vofjfiutyitire f &#8216;<br \/>\nCi 9 P . . . . . .\n<\/p>\n<p>earnings does not arise. The said reasonirig&#8217; gi,ven&#8217;Qby,iVt&#8217;l*.eV<\/p>\n<p>Claims Tribunal for reiectinVg\u00bb;i&#8217;\u00ab.t:h&#8217;e.claini~._of  appel&#8217;iant for<br \/>\nfuture loss of income cannot &amp;b&#8217;e&#8217;Vau_:siained and&#8221;i*tt isiiable to be<br \/>\nset aside at thresho|d.ll&#8221;lt\u00e9is&#8217;  here itself that,<br \/>\nthe Doctor   occupation, nature<br \/>\nof injury,  radiological, sonological<br \/>\nexaminat&#8211;ion,i&#8217;aliirni6t;os r&#8217;ttair&#8217;iual, &#8216;hczsiassessed the disability of the<br \/>\nappellant :of.&#8217;t4he:_:i:&#8217;njIiries sustained at 25% to lower limb<br \/>\nand 10\u00b0\/e&#8221;io_.tlie  liver laceration 30% disability; chest<\/p>\n<p>i\ufb01j,lliiy and lung&#8217; contention 12% disability. Further, the Doctor has<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;stated_v.&#8217;that.:;iii..Vview of the chest injury, the appellant should be<\/p>\n<p> .g&#8217;iiJ&#8217;_en Ci_iestviv.1&#8217;-&#8216;physiotherapy and he has to consult chest<\/p>\n<p>ph&#8221;ysioi.an.-V iiurther, the Doctor has stated that, appeliant is a<\/p>\n<p>   ..A,yurvedi&#8217;c Medical Practitioner and with the above disabilities, it is<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216;t~,diiiio&#8217;ult for him to practice his profession. Taking all these relevant<\/p>\n<p> = \u00bb..&#8211;factors into consideration, we can safely take the disability of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant at 20% to the whole body. Further, it is the case of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant that he was earning Rs.i5,000\/ to 20,000\/~ per<\/p>\n<p>month by running clinics. But he has not produefed:y&#8221;&#8216;-a\u00e9ny<\/p>\n<p>documents to establish that he was <\/p>\n<p>2o,o0o\/- per month. Therefore, keepingin vi&#8217;e.w&#8217;Vih&#8217;ei.r3ii5pe&#8221;i\u00a7ianr._Vie&#8217;ir .0<\/p>\n<p>an Ayurvedic Medicai Practitioner, we 1&#8217;_&#8217;tai&lt;e <\/p>\n<p>appellant at Fis.5,000\/ per mont_h;&#039;&#8211;._The&#039;avppeil.anti.was:&#039;aged; about&#039;<\/p>\n<p>36 years and the appropriate muitiiplyier will be.&#039;15\u00ab.i_   income of<br \/>\nthe appellant is taken  with disability at<br \/>\n20% to the whoie bozziyiw-anci\u00bbth&#039;e.V rnuitipiier of 15 is<br \/>\napplied,  of::&#039;futu_r_exincojmeiicomes to Rs. 1,8o,o00\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>(5000    we award a sum of<br \/>\nFist  &#8216;l&lt;os&#039;s&#8230;oi.future income.\n<\/p>\n<p>0. v.._yjThe&#8217;  ..4&#8242;:co.pmpensation payable comes to<\/p>\n<p>i=ze,gi,r.a.,ooo&#8211;  teed the break- up is as follows:<\/p>\n<p>it  pain and sufferings Rs. 45,000\/-\n<\/p>\n<p> _  Toward.s&#8217;~l.os*s of income during<br \/>\n&#8221; ._  the*p&#8221;er_iodtv&#8217;o&#8217;i treatment Rs. 10,000\/~<\/p>\n<p> iTowar\u20acis._niedical expenses Rs. &#8216;i,49,000\/&#8211;<br \/>\n4 &#8220;Toward&#8221;:&#8221;conveyance, nourishing<br \/>\nfeod&#8217;:.&amp; attendant charges Rs. 5,000\/-\n<\/p>\n<p> .5. Towards loss of<\/p>\n<p>amenities of life Rs. 25,000\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>0 &#8216;-m6;~Tewards loss of future income Rs. 1,80,000\/-<\/p>\n<p>Total Fis.4,14,000\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>9. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and theimpugned<\/p>\n<p>judgment and award passed by the Claims Ttt,biLtaatll,;:&lt;g;ii two<\/p>\n<p>No.7941\/2005 stands modified, granting a <\/p>\n<p>Rs.4,t4,000\/&#8211; instead of Rs.2,3,4,00Ul&#039;\u00bb  7.<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,80,000&#8211;) with interest at 6\u00b0\/o&#039;1&#039;p,a;*,._fzrom tgihedate of-tjetittontg<\/p>\n<p>till the date of realisation. .\n<\/p>\n<p>The insurance company.tsdttected.to deposit the enhanced<br \/>\ncompensation amount \\it}i&#8217;th__irttetest,t&#8217; tfsgeeks from the date<br \/>\nof receipt of the cooy of:this&#8221;jt,:,atgtften&#8217;1;&#8217;__V  ~ 2 hi it<\/p>\n<p>The   d:&#8217;&#8211;.r&#8221;ected__touidisburse the enhanced<br \/>\ncompensation.&#8217;a*mt}l,tttt&#8217;,  appellant, immediately, on<br \/>\ndepostt by theln&#8217;eurartr:e&#8217;Cornpany.\n<\/p>\n<p>Dra,wtLt,pvthe av\u00abatv&#8217;d,af:cordrngly.<br \/>\nJUDGE<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/1.\n<\/p>\n<p>EUDGE<\/p>\n<p>ten&#8217;-..__<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil And H.Billappa IN THE HIGH coum&#8221; OF KARNA TA KA A T BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2009 PRESENT: THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE N.K,p,m;e % T L AND THE I-ION&#8217;BLE 1!\ufb022.;.IUSTfCE &#8216; I-I. BI\ufb01;APE&#8217;A A %&#8217; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-71938","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-11T14:55:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-11T14:55:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":958,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-11T14:55:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-11T14:55:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-11T14:55:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009"},"wordCount":958,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009","name":"Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-11T14:55:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-masood-server-vs-triway-forwarders-pvt-ltd-on-7-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Masood Server vs Triway Forwarders Pvt Ltd on 7 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71938","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71938"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71938\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71938"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71938"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71938"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}