{"id":72006,"date":"2010-02-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010"},"modified":"2017-07-11T04:42:15","modified_gmt":"2017-07-10T23:12:15","slug":"sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 28937 of 2004(T)\n\n\n1. SUNIL, S\/O. NAGAPPAN, PAZHANI HOUSE,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. K. SHAMSUDHEEN, 541, EDAYAR STREET,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. UMMAR, S\/O. MOHAMMAD, CHUNGONATH HOUSE,\n\n3. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.,\n\n4. C.K. PRABHAKARAN, S\/O. KUNJAPPAN,\n\n5. JOHNYU. A.P., ARIMBOOR HOUSE,\n\n6. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.CHANDRA MOHAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.A.C.DEVY\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :25\/02\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                   S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J\n                    -------------------------------------\n                    W.P.C No.28937 OF 2004\n                      --------------------------------\n             Dated this the 25th day of February 2010\n\n                                 ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>           Writ petition is filed by the claimant in an application<\/p>\n<p>for compensation pending on the file of the Motor Accidents<\/p>\n<p>Claims Tribunal, Thrissur.       The application was filed to seek<\/p>\n<p>compensation for the injury sustained by him in a motor accident.<\/p>\n<p>That application was initially filed under Section 166 of the MV Act<\/p>\n<p>1988 as amended by Act 54 of 1994 claiming a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,78,000\/-. Later, he moved an application for amending the<\/p>\n<p>claim as under Section 163A of the MV Act to get compensation<\/p>\n<p>under the structured formula.             Claimant, a painter, in his<\/p>\n<p>application has shown his income as Rs.3,600\/- per month. After<\/p>\n<p>the amendment of the petition as one under Section 163A of the<\/p>\n<p>MV act, the claimant moved an application for correcting his<\/p>\n<p>annual income limiting it to Rs.40,000\/-. That amendment was<\/p>\n<p>opposed by the respondent 3 and 6. The insurance company<\/p>\n<p>contending that the application as amended, under Section 163A<\/p>\n<p>showing an income, as stated earlier, above Rs.40,000\/-, was not<\/p>\n<p>maintainable, and so much so, the proposed amendment is not<\/p>\n<p>allowable.   The tribunal raised an issue as to whether the<\/p>\n<p>amended O.Pis maintainable.             In answering that issue, the<\/p>\n<p>tribunal has reached the conclusion that the application amended<\/p>\n<p>W.P.C No.28937 OF 2004            Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>as under Section 163A of the MV act in view of the annual income<\/p>\n<p>of the claimant stated as above Rs.40,000\/- is not maintainable.<\/p>\n<p>The claimant was directed to amend the application again as<\/p>\n<p>coming under Section 166 of the MV act. Ext.P2 is that order.<\/p>\n<p>Challenge in the writ petition is against Ext.P2 order so passed by<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. I heard the counsel on both sides. Claimant is a painter<\/p>\n<p>who has no fixed income and his income depends on the wages<\/p>\n<p>derived from his vocation from time to time is the submission of<\/p>\n<p>his counsel. It is submitted that no prejudice or hardship will be<\/p>\n<p>caused to any of the parties in permitting the claimant to<\/p>\n<p>prosecute his claim as under Section 163A of the MV act and that<\/p>\n<p>would further enable the claimant to get the compensation under<\/p>\n<p>the structured formula. On the other hand, the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>appearing for the respondent, insurance company, submitted that<\/p>\n<p>structured formula covered by the schedule which covers<\/p>\n<p>awarding of compensation under Section 163A of the MV act is<\/p>\n<p>applicable only in the case of socially weaker sections whose<\/p>\n<p>annual income is below Rs.40,000\/-. As the claimant on his own<\/p>\n<p>version is shown to be a person getting income much more than<\/p>\n<p>the sum fixed as the outer limit in the second schedule, his claim<\/p>\n<p>petition under Section 163A is not maintainable, submits the<\/p>\n<p>counsel.\n<\/p>\n<p>W.P.C No.28937 OF 2004           Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>            3. I have considered the submissions made by the<\/p>\n<p>counsel on both sides and perused Ext.P2 order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal. The Apex Court in &#8220;Oriental Insurance Company v<\/p>\n<p>Hansrajbhai&#8221; (2001(2) KLT 235(SC) has held that the benefit<\/p>\n<p>covered by Section 163A of the MV Act to claim compensation<\/p>\n<p>under the structured formula covered by second schedule can be<\/p>\n<p>availed by restricting the claim of income below the highest slab,<\/p>\n<p>ie, Rs.40,000\/- stated in the schedule. That decision indicates<\/p>\n<p>that even in a case where the claimant gets a higher annual<\/p>\n<p>income of Rs.40,000\/-, limiting his income below the highest slab<\/p>\n<p>under the second schedule, he can canvass his claim under<\/p>\n<p>Section 163A of the MV Act.      In &#8220;Deepal Girishbhai Soni v<\/p>\n<p>United India Insurance Company Ltd.&#8221; (2004(2) KLT 395<\/p>\n<p>(SC))      rendered by three judges bench, the apex court<\/p>\n<p>considering the aforesaid decision has held thus: &#8220;We do not<\/p>\n<p>agree that the findings in Kodala(Supra) that if a person invokes<\/p>\n<p>provision of Section 163A, the annual income of Rs.40,000\/- per<\/p>\n<p>annual shall be treated as a cap. In our opinion, the proceeding<\/p>\n<p>under Section 163A being a social security provision, providing for<\/p>\n<p>a distinct scheme, only those whose annual income is upto<\/p>\n<p>Rs.40,000\/- take the benefit thereof. All other claims are required<\/p>\n<p>to be determined in terms of Chapter XII of the Act&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>W.P.C No.28937 OF 2004           Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>            4. Since the latter decision had been rendered by a<\/p>\n<p>larger bench and that too after referring to the previous decision,<\/p>\n<p>needless to state that decision has to be followed. The law laid by<\/p>\n<p>the   apex court clearly indicate that only those whose annual<\/p>\n<p>income is upto Rs.40,000\/- alone can invoke the provisions of<\/p>\n<p>Section 163A of the Act to claim compensation under the<\/p>\n<p>structured formula covered by the second schedule.          In the<\/p>\n<p>present case the petitioner had shown his income as Rs.3,600\/-<\/p>\n<p>per month which on calculation on annual basis exceeds<\/p>\n<p>Rs.40,000\/-, the highest slab in the second schedule. But he has<\/p>\n<p>sought for limiting his income to Rs.40,000\/- per annum to bring<\/p>\n<p>his application within Section 163A of the MV Act. The learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the petitioner submits that his income is much less<\/p>\n<p>than Rs.40,000\/- per annum from his vocation as a painter. I find<\/p>\n<p>no reason to doubt the submission of the counsel. As a painter it<\/p>\n<p>is not possible to hold that the claimant was having regular<\/p>\n<p>income. His income, it can be reasonably assumed, depended as<\/p>\n<p>and when he got painting works. In the circumstance I find force<\/p>\n<p>in the submission of the counsel that when the application was<\/p>\n<p>moved to claim compensation after sustaining injuries in a motor<\/p>\n<p>vehicle accident his income was less than Rs.40,000\/- per annum.<\/p>\n<p>The claimant shall be given an opportunity by the Tribunal to<\/p>\n<p>correct his annual income which was shown in his application as<\/p>\n<p>W.P.C No.28937 OF 2004             Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>Rs.3,600\/- per month. In case the petitioner files an application<\/p>\n<p>for correcting his annual income, that has to be given<\/p>\n<p>consideration and appropriate orders to be passed expeditiously<\/p>\n<p>by the Tribunal taking note that the petition has been pending on<\/p>\n<p>its file for the last several years. It has to be noted that his<\/p>\n<p>petition was presented prior to the decisions rendered by the<\/p>\n<p>apex court referred to above explaining the scope and ambit of<\/p>\n<p>the second schedule with respect to annual income covered<\/p>\n<p>thereunder in presenting of an application under Section 163A of<\/p>\n<p>the MV Act.       Mere fact that the claimant had shown in the<\/p>\n<p>application his monthly income as Rs.3,600\/- earlier should not be<\/p>\n<p>given much significance to deprive him the benefit of agitating his<\/p>\n<p>claim under Section 163A of the MV Act if he seeks for an<\/p>\n<p>amendment to reduce his income supported by an affidavit that<\/p>\n<p>he is getting only an annual income of less than Rs.40,000\/-.<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P2 order passed by the court will not stand in the way of<\/p>\n<p>entertaining a fresh application filed by the claimant and if any<\/p>\n<p>such application is filed, the Tribunal shall pass appropriate orders<\/p>\n<p>on such application within three weeks, but, with notice to the<\/p>\n<p>respondents. Parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>on 25\/03\/2010.                                      Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN<br \/>\n            \/\/TRUE COPY\/\/                           JUDGE<br \/>\nvdv<br \/>\n                                              P.A TO JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 28937 of 2004(T) 1. SUNIL, S\/O. NAGAPPAN, PAZHANI HOUSE, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. K. SHAMSUDHEEN, 541, EDAYAR STREET, &#8230; Respondent 2. UMMAR, S\/O. MOHAMMAD, CHUNGONATH HOUSE, 3. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD., 4. C.K. PRABHAKARAN, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-72006","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-10T23:12:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-10T23:12:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1190,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-10T23:12:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-10T23:12:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-10T23:12:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010"},"wordCount":1190,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010","name":"Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-10T23:12:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-vs-k-shamsudheen-on-25-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sunil vs K. Shamsudheen on 25 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72006","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72006"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72006\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72006"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72006"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72006"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}