{"id":72174,"date":"2008-10-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008"},"modified":"2014-08-17T04:34:04","modified_gmt":"2014-08-16T23:04:04","slug":"sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 24740 of 2008(T)\n\n\n1. SINDHU A.P.\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE DIRECTOR INDUSTRIAL TRAINING\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA\n\n3. THE PRINCIPAL, I.T.I.MALAMPUZHA\n\n4. THE PRINCIPAL, I.T.I.(W)\n\n5. SMT. M.B.BABY\n\n6. SMT. K.V.JALAJA KUMARI\n\n7. SMT. SHANTY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.AJITH NARAYANAN\n\n                For Respondent  :DR.K.P.SATHEESAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN\n\n Dated :16\/10\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                               P.N.Ravindran, J.\n                        =====================\n                          W.P(C).No.24740 of 2008\n                        =====================\n\n                 Dated this the 16th day of October, 2008.\n\n                                JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioner is presently working as Junior Instructor in the<\/p>\n<p>Industrial Training Department. She entered service as Junior Instructor<\/p>\n<p>on 27.4.1999. From the date of entry in service till 27.5.2008, she was<\/p>\n<p>stationed at the Industrial Training Institute at Malampuzha in Palakkad<\/p>\n<p>District. During the time of general transfer for the year 2008, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner applied for a transfer to the I.T.I. (Women), Chalakudy. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner belongs to Mambra, which is close to Chalakudy. Her request<\/p>\n<p>was considered by the Joint Director of Industrial Training and by Ext.P2<\/p>\n<p>order passed on 23.5.2008, the Joint Director ordered transfer of the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner from the I.T.I., Malampuzha to I.T.I. (W), Chalakudy. Pursuant<\/p>\n<p>to the order transferring the petitioner to Chalakudy, the fifth<\/p>\n<p>respondent was transferred out to I.T.I., Malampuzha.           The fifth<\/p>\n<p>respondent admittedly has completed five years of service at the I.T.I.,<\/p>\n<p>Chalakudy.      Pursuant to Ext.P2 order of transfer, the Principal, I.T.I.,<\/p>\n<p>Malampuzha relieved the petitioner on 27.5.2008 and she joined duty at<\/p>\n<p>the I.T.I. (W), Chalakudy on 29.5.2008.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WP(C) 24740\/08                      -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>        2. Aggrieved by her transfer to I.T.I., Malampuzha, the fifth<\/p>\n<p>respondent filed W.P.(C) No.19067 of 2008 in this Court with<\/p>\n<p>respondents 6 and 7 herein on the party array. The fifth respondent&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>grievance was that respondents 6 and 7 have completed a longer term at<\/p>\n<p>Chalakudy and they ought to have been transferred out instead of<\/p>\n<p>transferring her to Malampuzha. The petitioner herein was admittedly<\/p>\n<p>not a party to W.P.(C) No.19067 of 2008. The fifth respondent did not<\/p>\n<p>also challenge the petitioner&#8217;s transfer from the I.T.I., Malampuzha to<\/p>\n<p>I.T.I. (W), Chalakudy. By Ext.R5(e) judgment delivered on 25.6.2008, this<\/p>\n<p>Court disposed of W.P.(C)No.19067 of 2008 with a direction to the<\/p>\n<p>Director of Industrial Training to consider the representation submitted<\/p>\n<p>by the fifth respondent against her transfer to Malampuzha and take a<\/p>\n<p>decision thereon after hearing respondents 6 and 7 as well. As directed<\/p>\n<p>by this Court in Ext.R5(e) judgment, the Director of Industrial Training<\/p>\n<p>heard respondents 5, 6 and 7 and passed Ext.P4 order cancelling the<\/p>\n<p>transfer of the petitioner and the fifth respondent ordered as per Ext.P2.<\/p>\n<p>In this Writ Petition, the petitioner challenges Ext.P4 order to the extent<\/p>\n<p>it cancels her transfer from Malampuzha to Chalakudy ordered as per<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P2.\n<\/p>\n<p>        3. I have heard Sri.V.Ajith Narayanan, the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>appearing for the petitioner, Sri. P.Nandakumar, the learned Government<\/p>\n<p>Pleader appearing for the official respondents, Sri.C.D.Dileep, the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel appearing for the fifth respondent, Sri.M.K.Dileep Kumar, the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WP(C) 24740\/08                      -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>learned    counsel    appearing     for    the  sixth   respondent    and<\/p>\n<p>Dr.K.P.Satheesan, the learned counsel appearing for the seventh<\/p>\n<p>respondent. It is evident from the pleadings in W.P.(C)No.19067 of 2008<\/p>\n<p>and the directions issued by this Court in Ext.R5(e) judgment that the<\/p>\n<p>fifth respondent did not at any point of time have a grievance about the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8217;s transfer from I.T.I., Malampuzha to I.T.I.(W), Chalakudy. As<\/p>\n<p>noticed above, right from the date of entry in service in the year 1999 till<\/p>\n<p>she was transferred to Chalakudy, the petitioner was working at<\/p>\n<p>Malampuzha. The petitioner&#8217;s entitlement for transfer from Malampuzha<\/p>\n<p>was never questioned by the fifth respondent in W.P.(C) No.19067 of<\/p>\n<p>2008. The only dispute raised by the fifth respondent was that<\/p>\n<p>respondents 6 and 7 herein, who were joined as respondents 3 and 4<\/p>\n<p>respectively in W.P.(C)No.19067 of 2008 had served for a longer term at<\/p>\n<p>Chalakudy and therefore, one among them ought to have been<\/p>\n<p>transferred out instead of transferring out her from Chalakudy. In short,<\/p>\n<p>the directions issued by this Court in Ext.R5(e) judgment will have to be<\/p>\n<p>understood as one directing the Director of Industrial Training to<\/p>\n<p>adjudicate upon the said claim of the fifth respondent. Evidently on the<\/p>\n<p>wrong understanding of the directions issued by this Court in Ext.R5(e)<\/p>\n<p>judgment and without hearing the petitioner, the Director of Industrial<\/p>\n<p>Training passed Ext.P4 order annulling the petitioner&#8217;s transfer.<\/p>\n<p>       4. In my considered opinion, the decision taken by the Director in<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P4 to the extent it cancels the petitioner&#8217;s transfer to Chalakkudy is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WP(C) 24740\/08                      -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>not sustainable in law and was not called for the. The Director has in<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P4 held that transfers on administrative grounds can be ordered only<\/p>\n<p>by the State Government. Reference is made in Ext.P4 to paragraph 29<\/p>\n<p>of Ext.P5 Government order. I am of the view that the said reasoning<\/p>\n<p>also is faulty and not sustainable in law.     Ext.P5 only lays down the<\/p>\n<p>norms to be followed by the transferring authorities including the Joint<\/p>\n<p>Director of Industrial Training when transfers are effected by him.<\/p>\n<p>Paragraph 29 of Ext.P5 Government order only reserves power with the<\/p>\n<p>Government to deviate from the norms prescribed therein and to order<\/p>\n<p>transfer in relaxation of the norms. The only restriction is that such<\/p>\n<p>power can be exercised by the Government only on administrative<\/p>\n<p>grounds. I therefore hold that Ext.P4 to the extent it interferes with the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8217;s transfer from I.T.I., Malampuzha to I.T.I.(W), Chalakudy is set<\/p>\n<p>aside. The respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to continue<\/p>\n<p>at I.T.I.(W), Chalakkudy pursuant to the order of transfer effected as per<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P2.\n<\/p>\n<p>       5. A reading of Ext.P4 indicates that the dispute raised by the fifth<\/p>\n<p>respondent has not been considered by the Director when he passed<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P5. Therefore, there will be a further direction to the Director of<\/p>\n<p>Industrial Training to consider the representation submitted by the fifth<\/p>\n<p>respondent afresh after hearing respondents 5, 6 and 7. I further clarify<\/p>\n<p>that the Director shall not while passing fresh orders, interfere with the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8217;s transfer and posting at the I.T.I., Chalakudy under Ext.P2.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">WP(C) 24740\/08                    -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Director shall pass revised orders in the matter within two months<\/p>\n<p>from today.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The Writ Petition is allowed as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                              P.N.Ravindran,<br \/>\n                                              Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>ess 18\/10<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 24740 of 2008(T) 1. SINDHU A.P. &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE DIRECTOR INDUSTRIAL TRAINING &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA 3. THE PRINCIPAL, I.T.I.MALAMPUZHA 4. THE PRINCIPAL, I.T.I.(W) 5. SMT. M.B.BABY 6. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-72174","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-08-16T23:04:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-16T23:04:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1036,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-16T23:04:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-08-16T23:04:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-16T23:04:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008"},"wordCount":1036,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008","name":"Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-16T23:04:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sindhu-a-p-vs-the-director-industrial-training-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sindhu A.P vs The Director Industrial Training on 16 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72174","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72174"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72174\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72174"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72174"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72174"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}