{"id":72487,"date":"1976-01-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1976-01-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976"},"modified":"2018-09-02T00:41:27","modified_gmt":"2018-09-01T19:11:27","slug":"raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976","title":{"rendered":"Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: ILR 1976 KAR 299, 1976 (1) KarLJ 82<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: E Venkataramiah<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p> 1. The petitioner is a religious institution. It has questioned the validity of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1973 (Act 1 of 1974) by which the State Legislature amended many of the provisions of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (Act 10 of 1962). The constitutional validity of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, was upheld by the Supreme Court in Golaknath v. State of Punjab . In Bhaskar Krishnaji v. State of Karnataka  I have upheld the validity of the Karnataka Act 1 of 1974 being of the opinion that it is protected by Article 31A of the Constitution. The validity of Sections 48 and 48A relating to the constitution of the Tribunals and the procedure to be followed before the Tribunals under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act has been specifically upheld in Khatija Bi v. State of Karnataka (ILR (1975) Kant 1481).\n<\/p>\n<p>2. It is however contended by Sri. T. Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, that the Amending Act (Act 1 of 1974) which affected the right of the religious institutions to bold property is violative of Article 26 of the Constitution. The provisions of the Act are not open to attack on the above ground for two reasons (i) Act 1 of 1974 has been included in the Ninth Schedule to the Constitution by the Constitution (Thirtyfourth Amendment) Act, 1974; and (ii) the right guaranteed under Article 26 of the Constitution is not an  absolute right. In Acharya Maharajashri Narendra Prasadji Anadaprasadji Maharaj v. State, of Gujarat  dealing with Gujarat Devasthan Inams Abolition Act, the Supreme Court has observed as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;When we look at the object of the Act  and of the various provisions enacted in furtherance of  agrarian reform, the Act is squa rely protected under the saving provision of Article 31A. But it is then  submitted that  Article 31A does not provide against the vice of contravention of Article 26 while Articles 14, 19 and 31 are expressly mentioned in  Article 31A. The question, therefore, arises whether the right under Article 26(c) is an  absolute and unqualified right to the extent  that no agrarian reform can touch upon the lands owned by the religious denominations.  No rights in an organised society can be absolute. Enjoyment of one&#8217;s rights must be  consistent with an enjoyment of rights also by others. Where in a free play of social forces it is not possible to bring about a  voluntary harmony, the State has to step into set right the  imbalance between competing in terests and there the Directive Principles of State Policy, although not  enforceable in  courts, have a definite and positive role introducing an obligation upon the State under Article 37 in  making laws to regulate the  conduct of men and their affairs. In doing so a distinction will have to be made between  those laws which directly infringe the freedom of religion and others, although  indirectly af fecting some secular activities of religious institutions or bodies. For example if a religious institution owns large areas of land far  exceeding the ceiling under relevant laws and indulges in activities  detrimental to the in terests of  the agricultural tenants, who are at their mercy, freedom of religion or freedom to manage religions affairs cannot be pleaded as a shield against regulatory remedial measures adopted by the State to put a stop to ex ploitation and unrest in other quarters in the interest of general social welfare. The core  of religion is not interfered with in providing for amenities for sufferers of any kind.  We  take the view that the Act and its provisions do no violence to the rights guaranteed wider Article 26(c). In the view we have taken  it is also not necessary to mention Article 26  in Article 31A and its omission therein is not at all of any consequence&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>3. In the instant case it is not shown that owning of agricultural land by a mutt forms art essential tenet of Hindu religion. Since Act 1 of 1974 has been held to be protected by Article 31A of the Constitution, it cannot be said that it is violative of Article 20(c) merely because some lands belonging to the mutt in question is being taken away by that Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. In the result, the petition fails and it is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Petition dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976 Equivalent citations: ILR 1976 KAR 299, 1976 (1) KarLJ 82 Bench: E Venkataramiah ORDER 1. The petitioner is a religious institution. It has questioned the validity of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1973 (Act 1 of 1974) by which [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-72487","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1976-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-01T19:11:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976\",\"datePublished\":\"1976-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-01T19:11:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976\"},\"wordCount\":721,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976\",\"name\":\"Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1976-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-01T19:11:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1976-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-01T19:11:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976","datePublished":"1976-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-01T19:11:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976"},"wordCount":721,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976","name":"Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1976-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-01T19:11:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/raghavendra-swamy-mutt-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-5-january-1976#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Raghavendra Swamy Mutt vs The State Of Karnataka on 5 January, 1976"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72487"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72487\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}