{"id":72578,"date":"2008-12-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008"},"modified":"2016-08-14T00:05:41","modified_gmt":"2016-08-13T18:35:41","slug":"smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre>III THE HIGH COURT OF KARHATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED TIFHS THE 1531 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2008\nBEFORE\n\nTHE Ir\u00a7(}N'BLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH B.ADI_.._'   \n\nM.F'.A.NO.6244(g207 IMVC)\n\nM. . . .3 7  \u00ab_ \n\nIN MFA _\u00a3\\_io.\u00a7244[20(}7:\nBETWEEN;\n\nSmt\ufb01hazadha Bee,\nWfo late Abdul Raheem,\nAged about 62 years, '~ _ j\nResiding at Cfu Sycd D:--1slagij:;\"  - \nNo.48l8, Opp. Pamzrann\ufb01a Lr.:yo:;tf\nNclamangala,  if\"  ~. 3 \nBangalore Rural  V \"V\" \"\n\n. . . APPELLANT\n\n \"\"\"    hdv.)\nThe Managing   A _\n\nBMTG, Eiogiiale Road-, _ \" ' '\n\n 'Banga1:\u00a7m~,.5\u00a70 C527.\n\n 'A _   *   RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>  &#8216;V   9&#8217;  V(&#8216;i.ByDi~SmtH.R.Rcnu1ca, Adv.)<\/p>\n<p>This M;:F..A;&#8221;is \ufb01led U13. 173(1) of MV Act against the<\/p>\n<p>*&#8217;\u00ab&#8230;j&#8217;;i-ud\u00e9gzxzcnt and award dated 1.12.2006 passed in MVC<\/p>\n<p>, .VVNo.T?.953f..2OO5 on the 151:: of the XIX Add}. Judge, Court of Small<br \/>\n  Cai1aee:.,_ Menzber, MACH&#8217;, Mehtapolitnn Ama, Bangakore,<br \/>\n (53Ci\u00a3H.,No&#8217;;1T), partly a\ufb02owing thc claim petition for<br \/>\n  &#8216;;}&#8221;:&lt;&quot;:mpe1i$a\ufb01on anti aeeking enhancement of compensation with<\/p>\n<p> V _ 1&#8211;\u20ac2\u00b0}&#039;o&#039;s&quot;iI&quot;1te1*est.\n<\/p>\n<p>IN MFA No.8138lg(){)7:\n<\/p>\n<p>BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n<p>Bangalore Metropolitan<\/p>\n<p>Transport Corporation,<\/p>\n<p>Boubltt Road, Shanthinagar.\n<\/p>\n<p>Bangalore,<\/p>\n<p>By its Managing Dimctor, _.  _<br \/>\nRepresented by its  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Chief Law Of\ufb01cer.    _ &#8216; V<br \/>\nT.   &#8230;.1i.PPELLAN&#8221;}&#8217;. V<br \/>\n(By Smt.f~I.R.Rcn\u00a711-mu, Adv.) V    <\/p>\n<p>MD:\n<\/p>\n<p>Shazadha Bee,<\/p>\n<p>W\/0 late Abdul Raheem,   :\n<\/p>\n<p>Aged aha-ut62 years,   &#8216;<br \/>\nC\/osyedbastagir, ..    .\n<\/p>\n<p>Noe4318,0pp:  Lasrmit,&#8217; k<br \/>\nNelamansala,  &#8221;     &#8216;<br \/>\nBangalore Rural Djst.__  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p> . RESPONDENT<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; (By :3.ifi..H.\u00bbB.Sg)\ufb012api1r, Adv.)<\/p>\n<p>This_-M.F.A.&#8221;is \ufb01le-.1 U-ls.&#8217; 1173(1) of MV Act against the<br \/>\nj1_1Li.gn1cnt\u00ab.?-{and awaztal _ datad 1.12.2006 passed in MVC<br \/>\nI*Io.79S8}&#8217;Q0(}5~.o1k the \ufb01lebfthe XIX Add}. Judge, Court of Small<br \/>\nC\u00a3u_1se2S3* -. M\u00a2nibt&#8217;\u00bb1&#8217;\u00bb &#8216;~&#8211;. MACH&#8217;, Metropolitan Area, Bangalore,<br \/>\n(SC\u20ac31&#8242;{i&#8217;i\u00a7\u20ac($.._AVax?a.!_:1&#8217;i;1g compensation at&#8217; Rs.1,32,00()\/- with<\/p>\n<p> . L\u00bb izulxtrcsi  P._21._  the dais: of yciiliuu (ill &lt;1t~:},xJsiL<\/p>\n<p>Th\u00e9gc  coming on for &#039;Hca;rin.g-IA&#039; this \ufb01ay, the<\/p>\n<p>C9iLr1 delive&#039;1\u00a7ci;the following:<\/p>\n<p>  i.;A.Nc.1\/2068 is faked for condonation ofdclay in \ufb01rmg the<\/p>\n<p> Aaj\ufb01pli\ufb01ta\ufb01on for recalling. I.A.No.2\/2008 is \ufb01led fbr mcalling the<\/p>\n<p> fcarder dated 22.9.2003.\n<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>2. It is stated that. due to inadvertence. the counsel has<\/p>\n<p>not noticed the case and he did not comply with the o\ufb01icc<\/p>\n<p>objection in time. Considexiag the cause shown, the <\/p>\n<p>dismissal is mcalled and both the matters are taken  _<\/p>\n<p>disposal.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Smt.H.R.Renuka is directed  <\/p>\n<p>100.5244; 200?. With consent,  a.\u00bb\u00a20..afm  1.100.. 005.31%<\/p>\n<p>disposal.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. MFA No.5244\/M9? &#8216;A     &#8216;_V__c1ai&#8217;ma.nt for<br \/>\nenhancement, whepe\u00e9e,   \ufb01led by the<br \/>\nCorporation  the quantum.\n<\/p>\n<p>S.    in a mad accident on<br \/>\n25.10.2005. At&#8221;&#8216;abgmt   claimant was waiting for the<br \/>\nb.u$&amp;_at  101:3 stop, at that tixne, a BMTC bus<\/p>\n<p>bea;ing\u00ab0g.KgA.01{F\u00bb35s7 being driven by its ciriver in a rash<\/p>\n<p> _ and   031100 and ran over the left leg of the<br \/>\n T*:VVe\u00a70imanf..&#8221;&#8221;.4.s of which, she su\ufb01bxed \ufb01acture to the left<br \/>\n ggrievous injuries on other parts of the body. She<\/p>\n<p>V   to Nelamangala Hospital and {mm them she was<\/p>\n<p>   , _   to Victoria Hospital. Claimant was inpatient from<br \/>\nL&#8221;e&#8217;V\u00abA.\u00e90.i0.2005 to 2&#8217;?.1.2006. Claimant has examined the doctor as<\/p>\n<p> PW2- the Orthopedic Surgeon attached to the Victoria Hospital.<\/p>\n<p>Considering the evidence, the Tribunal held that the claimant is<\/p>\n<p>entitled for compensation of Rs. 1.22.000] -.<\/p>\n<p>6. The Corporation has seriously ques\ufb01ggz\u00e9\u00e9i&#8217; &#8220;-.2.<\/p>\n<p>involvement of the BMTC bus in the accident,  H<\/p>\n<p>of the Corporation is that, the bus was    <\/p>\n<p>am. to Nclamangala bus stop and the   7.:<\/p>\n<p>bus is involved in the said accident<br \/>\non %.10.2005, the driver of \ufb01ne   per<br \/>\nthe schedule for that day  -invvolvcd in any<br \/>\naccident. She further   Nelartnangala<br \/>\nbus stop at I 1.1()    at 12.35 pm. In<br \/>\nthis regard &#8216; as RW1. On<br \/>\nthe basis  AV   counsel for the<br \/>\nCorporation &lt;&#039;.;A&lt;511_t\u00e9ndetiVV._;\u00a3i1AAi\u00a7L1:,\u00bb:ts}i1s:I5:is itscif has left Neiamangara<br \/>\nbus stop at 1 1,.1o4&quot;5.\u00a7\u00a7%, ff\ufb01e {$1-:&amp;si.:io11 of the-bus being involved in\n<\/p>\n<p>  1._1__.45  Nclamagaia bus stop does not<\/p>\n<p>s\u00a7n~$ng\u00a7:us1y gave a. \ufb01nding that the sync bus is<\/p>\n<p> :z&#8221;~\u00a3nvolVc:&#8217;i  mg  }.at\u00a7cident It is also contended that, the<\/p>\n<p>s. s[ss&#8217;s;;;sn;pensau\u00a2sV_;\u00a7warded by the Tribunal is on the higher side.<\/p>\n<p>    contra. Icamed counsel for the claimant submitted<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;  , _  claimant has su\ufb01entd fracture of left kg in the accident<br \/>\n be disputed. as she was admitted to the Nclamangala<\/p>\n<p>hospital and fnom there she was admitted to the Victoria<\/p>\n<p>Hosgital. In the Wound certi\ufb01cate, discharge summary, there is<\/p>\n<p>reference to the road accident and also refers to the BNFFC hes.<\/p>\n<p>He relied on the evidence collected tinting the investigatioa&#8217;: ._&#8217;<br \/>\nby the poiice and submitted that, merely because  4&#8242; .<br \/>\nthat he left the Nelamangala Bus Stop as   k V&#8217;<br \/>\nitself cannot be held that, the bus  11&#8217;\u00a7r_j_\u00e9te~  7&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>accident He also submitted that,  is<\/p>\n<p>highly inadequate, and no eompensatien. :i_.s&#8211; err:  head<br \/>\nof loss of futuxe earning and evezlg-\u00a7t\\=va1*ded on the<\/p>\n<p>other heads is not reas&lt;)nah]g ,&#8230;&#8211;   &#039;<\/p>\n<p>8. in so     is concerned.\n<\/p>\n<p>Txibunal onthe   the evidence on<br \/>\nreccrd. it is: V::_1ot  police has registered the<br \/>\ncase as per    very same day, mahazar is<br \/>\ndmym. m; mre ex.I52.zeeeet1;e%As\u00e91ctoria Hospital certi\ufb01cate. Ex.P3-<\/p>\n<p>  the involvement of the BIWPC bus in<\/p>\n<p>  the accent  on 26.10.2005. This is also reflected<br \/>\n izhe  Hospital showing that the injury was due to<\/p>\n<p>A &#8216;   considering these material documents<br \/>\n \u00ab.:::&#8217;}:1\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7;.&#8217;.Af::\u00a71,ii1a.i&#8211;&#8216;.&#8217;i:i1at the bus is involved in the said accident. May be<\/p>\n<p> _  1; variation in the timings, but that may not be the<br \/>\n &#8220;&#8221;&#8216;:Ae&lt;5:tiVeIuei:s:e proof, some times the bus may leave the bus stop<\/p>\n<p>Vslittle later than the schedule em. RW1 though is examined and<\/p>\n<p>Broduced EXSRK to R3 shcwin\ufb01 the entries in the wa&#039;i;&#039;&#8211;hi}1&#039;, but<\/p>\n<p>at the same time, conespending document and the injury<br \/>\nsu\ufb01ezed by the claimant also Show that the accident was argued<br \/>\n11.45 am. if the medical documents are to be accepted, &#039;4<br \/>\nmy opinion, the accident has been proved  V&#039;<br \/>\ndoubt. As far as way-b\ufb02l and other documents   &#039;A u<br \/>\nthe conductor of the said bus would<br \/>\nmay be said that, same times &#8230;ent1&#039;ie~3&#039;<br \/>\naccording to the trip sheet,   actual<br \/>\ndi\ufb01erence of time. Then: is  T  in accident<br \/>\nwhen the documents .1-mow   due to the<br \/>\newe bus, I am 9:&quot;    has considered<\/p>\n<p>the and&#039; ease andihgasi.  V<\/p>\n<p>9. As far as is concerned. though the<br \/>\nTribunal   of Rs.50,000\/- towards<br \/>\n pthexi\\iv&#8217;isae,___ifvit is calculated at 15% of disability<\/p>\n<p>te\ufb01zc \ufb01irhele  would not be much more than<\/p>\n<p> 10.&#8221;$&lt;;j}n:s3;ti4e1&#039;i11g the same, on the enhancement of<\/p>\n<p> I \ufb01nd no reason ta interfere with the order of the<\/p>\n<p> .e1f;-i1:&#039;u;A;:,a1}% Accordingly, the appeals \ufb01xed by the claimant and the<\/p>\n<p>._  .   stands dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>The amount in deposit in MFA 530.8138} 200&#8242;? is directed<br \/>\nto be transferred to the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd.\/-#<br \/>\nIudge <\/p>\n<p>*AP\/ &#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi III THE HIGH COURT OF KARHATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED TIFHS THE 1531 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2008 BEFORE THE Ir\u00a7(}N&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE SUBHASH B.ADI_.._&#8217; M.F&#8217;.A.NO.6244(g207 IMVC) M. . . .3 7 \u00ab_ IN MFA _\u00a3\\_io.\u00a7244[20(}7: BETWEEN; Smt\ufb01hazadha Bee, Wfo late [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-72578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-13T18:35:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-13T18:35:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1096,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-13T18:35:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-13T18:35:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-13T18:35:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008"},"wordCount":1096,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008","name":"Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-13T18:35:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-shazadha-bee-vs-the-managing-director-on-15-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Shazadha Bee vs The Managing Director on 15 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72578"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72578\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}