{"id":73026,"date":"2010-08-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010"},"modified":"2016-10-25T07:33:11","modified_gmt":"2016-10-25T02:03:11","slug":"state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Sreedhar Rao B.V.Pinto<\/div>\n<pre>CRL.A.N0.715\/2004\n\nIN THE HIGH comm' OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE'\nDATED THIS THE 20%: DAY OF AUGUST 2010 ._\u00bb \nPR\u00a7sENT 'W'  }3\nTHE HONBLE Mr. JUSTICE K.5R15EDH%XR'  4-\nAND    4'\nTHE HONBLE Mr. JUS'\"\u00a3E_pE is-.VIP1N'rQ :'  \nCRIMINAL APPEAL  1 5_\/250-4  1 A \nBETWEEN:  .  K '  '\n\nByArakerePo1ice. _    V   '  LHAPPELLANT\n\n(By Sri.G.BhavaA1'i s_:4ng3h;;'._;;pI&gt;)V..,;__ \nAND:  --------  4' VV\n\n1. Ghouse Peer-- 8: Peer}  \nS\/0.Sri.Va'i!ip'eer, ' _ \"  .\nAged about 30' years,_ .\nR\/0. N02 15\/ 8,\" 4311 Cross}.\n\n _ Near Madeena Masjid, V\nNaza'1*b\u00e9'1d;'-A\u00bb.   \"\"\" \n\n =_ Kya'Eh_amaI=a11a ha11i,\n\nMysore-AA  -\n\n Hus'n__a Begu m'1.;C\u00a3Husna Banu\n\n_ @ Hus'na,~:_\n\n  'W\/0.Sri:Sii\u00a7andar Khan,\n Aged. sabout 22 years,\n\n \"R\/0V.Gh_.ousia Nagara,\n__=_My_s01e. ...RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>A .{i_3y~S1*i.Araxrinda Raddy, Adv.\n<\/p>\n<p>for m.Narayana Reddy 8: Associates, Advs.)<\/p>\n<p>CRL.A.No.715\/2004<\/p>\n<p>This Criminal Appeal is filed u\/s.378{1) of Cr.P.C., by<br \/>\nthe State RP for the State praying to grant leave to file an appeal<br \/>\nagainst the Judgement dt.6.2.2004 passed by the S.J, Mandya in<\/p>\n<p>S.C.No.~&#8217;~i6 \/ 2002, acquitting thegrespondentaccused for the&#8217;aofi7ence<br \/>\np\/u\/s.302 r\/w.34 XPC. &#8216;   <\/p>\n<p>This appeal coming on for hearing. this  <\/p>\n<p>RAD, J, delivered the following\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>JUDGMENT  A 3 &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>The Respondents 1 and 2 beforell<\/p>\n<p>the Trial Court {for short &#8220;Al  and  &#8211;$ikan1d&#8217;a&#8217;1A&#8217; Khan is the<\/p>\n<p>deceased and he is the   is  to have illicit<\/p>\n<p>relationship with\n<\/p>\n<p>2.  case&#8217;  deceased was harassing<br \/>\nand insisting &#8216;A_2&#8243;to ._p&#8217;r&#8217;os&#8217;titution. A1 and A2 did not like<\/p>\n<p>the conduct of V_:dec.e&#8217;ased  this regard. On 10.12.2001, A1<\/p>\n<p>;_f5l(&#8216;,\u00a7\u00a7_th\u00e9.c._dec:6:ased on&#8221;a&#8221;s&#8217;c&#8217;ooter towards Mahadevapura. He has<\/p>\n<p>killed and dead body was thrown in the jungle. The<\/p>\n<p>* v,,.,,__,.v.dead  was \ufb01\u00e9a\u00e9ed on the same day at about 4.45 pm. On the<\/p>\n<p> of one&#8221;:MahashimrnadasiP.W.1 near whose farm, the dead<\/p>\n<p> waslying, the police registered a UDR case. The identity of<\/p>\n<p>1&#8242;  the&#8217; body was not known at that time. The photographs were taken<\/p>\n<p> ._and the clothing of the deceased was preserved. The dead body<\/p>\n<p>CRL.A.No. 7 1 5\/2004<\/p>\n<p>was subjected to post mortem. The P.M. report chscloses that the<\/p>\n<p>death is due to shock and hemorrhage as a result of.-&#8220;injury<\/p>\n<p>sustained to the major necklblood vessels by a <\/p>\n<p>weapon. The photo of the deceased was published inxa&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>P.W.5. P.W.6 and P.W.23, the I-e1a:1vgsAA\u00bb&#8217; oftheldleceasled\ufb02haveu &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>identified the photographs as that of   <\/p>\n<p>persons are charged for committing offence tinder  reads V L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>with Section 34 IPC. The preo.sect1tion addticpedll following<\/p>\n<p>circumstances to prove the g1lii1&#8243;[Z7-. l&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>i) Al and  in  lodge prior to<br \/>\n offence landwtliey conspired in the lodge.<\/p>\n<p>ii]  and P{&#8216;\u00bbV\u00a7l6\u00ab_.te&#8211;stified to Al and A2 staying in the<\/p>\n<p>g 1odge\u00ab&#8230; &#8211; l C J<br \/>\nl  iii}&#8217;c&#8217;&#8211;  P.W;&#8217;2., ll  testified to accused last seen in the<br \/>\nll &#8216;  A1.\n<\/p>\n<p>iv)l.&#8221;&#8221; iielatives of A2, i.eE., P.Ws.5, 6 and 23 identified the<\/p>\n<p>dead body. P.W.7 and P.W.8 support to testify to<\/p>\n<p>extra-judicial Eonfession.\n<\/p>\n<p>CRL.A.No.715\/2004<\/p>\n<p>3. The weapons and the bl0od&#8211;stained clothing ig&#8217;of.gthe<\/p>\n<p>accused are seized. They are sent to FSL along with <\/p>\n<p>clothes of the deceased. The trial Court has <\/p>\n<p>deceased was insisting A2 to indulge inhlprostitutlon&#8217; t.hat._appears<\/p>\n<p>to be a provocative circumstance to cau&#8217;s__e&#8221;the murder, 2 i~ience&#8217;,~_<\/p>\n<p>convicted the accused under Section x&#8217;1hel\u20ac3\u00bbtai}e<\/p>\n<p>against the acquittal for offence un\u00a31er&#8217;3e:Ction._ .302l lP{3. <\/p>\n<p>4. On thorough considieratiior1V..  theleiriydence, We of the<\/p>\n<p>opinion that  ;;u1;i712\u20ac_xi%ho&#8221;:_&#8217;siip\ufb01oi~t&#8211;io testify to the last<\/p>\n<p>seen circumstance  anti  being together, have turned<br \/>\nhostile andjdo _not&#8217;f7si1pp3ortuthe&#8217;___prosecut1on case. P.Ws.7 and 8<\/p>\n<p>who support\/have giyenfieiitraijudicial confession, have turned<\/p>\n<p>hostile and. do  support the prosecution case. The blood-<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;clothand..weaponhave been sent to FSL, but the serologz<\/p>\n<p>report is.&#8217; to show that blood group on the blood-<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; l&#8221;=w\u00bbsta1nelci ,clothv_dolesnot tally with the blood group of the deceased.<\/p>\n<p>2&#8243;&#8221;3&#8221;:-i&#8221;&#8216;.%&#8217;!&#8217;*&#8217;\u00a7&#8221;i&#8221;&#8216;\u00a71&#8217;|liliiI|*7&#8217; &#8216;I?he prosecution has successfully<\/p>\n<p>   the motive and that death is homicidal. On these two<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; f circumstances, the order of conviction recorded is bad in law. The<\/p>\n<p>i CRL.A.No.71.5\/2004<br \/>\nargument of the State that the accused shouici be found guiity for<\/p>\n<p>the offence under Section 302 is untenable. The at:(::1:fSeicti~V._is<\/p>\n<p>acquitted.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Appeal is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>bnv*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao B.V.Pinto CRL.A.N0.715\/2004 IN THE HIGH comm&#8217; OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE&#8217; DATED THIS THE 20%: DAY OF AUGUST 2010 ._\u00bb PR\u00a7sENT &#8216;W&#8217; }3 THE HONBLE Mr. JUSTICE K.5R15EDH%XR&#8217; 4- AND 4&#8242; THE HONBLE Mr. JUS'&#8221;\u00a3E_pE is-.VIP1N&#8217;rQ :&#8217; CRIMINAL APPEAL 1 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73026","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-25T02:03:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-25T02:03:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":640,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010\",\"name\":\"State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-25T02:03:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-25T02:03:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-25T02:03:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010"},"wordCount":640,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010","name":"State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-25T02:03:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-vs-ghouse-peer-peer-on-20-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State, vs Ghouse Peer @ Peer on 20 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73026","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73026"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73026\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73026"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73026"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73026"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}