{"id":73107,"date":"2008-07-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008"},"modified":"2016-08-09T04:57:05","modified_gmt":"2016-08-08T23:27:05","slug":"the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.L.Manjunath &amp; B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n<pre>ITA.No. 997.2667\n\nIN THE HIGH coum' 0F\"K}\\r\u20aci\u00abATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY, 2008\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HGIWBLE MRJUSFICE K.L.MANJUNA'_m'\u00bb::':'_:'._\n\nANI}\n\nTHE HOWBLE MRSJUSPICE B.V.NAGAEu\u00a7$THA\u00a3\u00a7A._ 3  ~  \n\n \n\nI.T.A.NO.997::fA'2OQ4~?  ;,  '* = S\nmrwszmn: ' \"\n\n1 THE COMMISSIONER d'F..fNP,0ME TAX \nC R BUILDING _  =   \n\nQUEENS ROAD,;:_BANGi\u00a7I.Oi\u00a7f:;'. \n\n2 THE ASST CoMIsS'rtj_NSR:\" TAX\n\nVv*CIRc\u00a3;E:e2('i}1;  \" AV\n]BAI}!GALDR.E'a  \n . '      ...APPELLAN'I'S\n\n(By Sri: M'S?' SESH_AGHA.\u00a7SA, ADV.)\n\n     _____ \n\n_ --vM;'S'!3LECFORNlC RESEARCH LTD\n* ..oLp' mnms ROAD,\n' WRGOPJAKAR\nE.'-\u00abANG-ALORE\n '  RESPONDENT\n\n AA   [TA \ufb01led u[S.260-A of I.'i'.Act, 1961 arising out of\n*  Qmgzr dated 10~08----200'7 passed in rm No. 245\/Bang\/2006\nfor' the Assessment Year 1999-2000, praying that this\n\n1Hon'bIc Comt may be pleased to:\n\n' VV \" \"i. formulatxz the substantial questions of law smted therein,\n\n allow the appeal and Set aside the Order passed by the\nITAT, passed in ITA 245\/Bangjzoo\ufb01 dated 10-O8-2007\ncon\ufb01rm the oldest cf the Appelatc Commissioner and order of\nthe Deputy Commissioner of Income tax, Central circle,\n\nBangalore.\n\n\n\nI'I'A.No. 907.2007\n\nThis ITA coaxing on for ORDERS on  day,\nMANJUNATH J, delivered the following:--   \n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>This appeal is by the r\u00e9s}\u00e9\ufb01t;a,_  Qh&#8221;a1:11V'&#8221;1::;1\u00a71\u00a7g Vihex 1 j 2<\/p>\n<p>concurrent \ufb01ndings of the order    <\/p>\n<p>the Income Tax    <\/p>\n<p>245\/ Bang] 2006 dataizx 10.&#8217;3.:&#8217;20b_?   under of<br \/>\nCommissioner of   Bangalore dated<br \/>\n17.1.2006   (A)-\n<\/p>\n<p>VI   the \ufb01ndings ofthe<br \/>\nDepu&#8217;i:y~   Tax dated 3o.3.2oos in\n<\/p>\n<p>2. .. LA T116;  bf &#8216;they are stated as hmeunden<\/p>\n<p> .:&#8217;I&#8221;h.\u00a7: m\ufb01jio\ufb01denti assesses: \ufb01led its annual return of<\/p>\n<p>1  V   the assessment year 19994000 on 31.12.1999<\/p>\n<p>   income of Rs.78,98,397\/- under the regular<\/p>\n<p>Pxr\ufb01ii\ufb01i\u00e9ns of Income Tax Act. The matter was taken up for<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  V1  The assessment was \ufb01nalized on 28.3.2002 under<\/p>\n<p>Section 143(3) of the Inooxnc Tax Act and certain additions<\/p>\n<p>were made under two heads namely, under valuation of<\/p>\n<p>closing stock of Rs.39,3S,906\/ &#8211; and excess 801-A dwuctioa<\/p>\n<p>claim Rs.6.24.612I&#8211;. Accoxdinglv. the tax was computed<\/p>\n<p>A<\/p>\n<p>and the assesses was called upon to pay Rs.43,32,969\/ -.<\/p>\n<p>mi&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>ITA.NO. 907.2007<\/p>\n<p>3. On an appeal \ufb01led by the assessee the Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>of Income Tax (Appeals), the Commissioner of <\/p>\n<p>directed the Assessing O\ufb01cer to exclude two ite;;&#8217;1s- 5:&#8217; (<\/p>\n<p>the closing stock, as they were not  in   <\/p>\n<p>circumstances, the Deputy C0113-;1niss:i0x3ei*_)) cf <\/p>\n<p>invoking the Provisions of 27?_1(1)(e)&#8212;- the Tz\u00abix(&#8220;1&#8242;-&#8216;:et&#8217;= L)<\/p>\n<p>}ev1;ed&#8217; the penalty of Rs.9,4&#8217;f;\u00a730\/-. Agai.n\u00a7&#8217;-stV'(&#8216;~.ssi\u00a2h the<\/p>\n<p>assesses \ufb01led an  income<br \/>\nTax (Appeals), which allowed on the<\/p>\n<p>ground that the _1-\ufb01e  against the<\/p>\n<p>ori\u00a7&#8217;n)a1&#8243;61dei*;ofA\u00a7%3ssss'&#8221;*m.V_:&#8217;e\u00a71t  seen allowed. In the light<br \/>\nof  of &#8216; assessee against the order of<\/p>\n<p>assessme&#8217;t1t,((the) of Income Tax (Appeals) came<\/p>\n<p>   penaity cannot be levied under<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  of the Act. Being aggrieved by the order<\/p>\n<p>H  &#8216;eyj:..&#8217;vCemm1&#8217;ssioner of Income Tax (Appeals), he<\/p>\n<p>m\u00a7c;;u\u00a7((\ufb011e&amp; an appeal, which appeal has been disnnssed&#8221; on<\/p>\n<p>V    gound thereby con\ufb01rming the order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;A&#8217;v.Cc)11im5.ssioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Being aggrieved by<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8221; &#8216;These two orders, the present appeal is \ufb01led ra1sm&#8217; &#8216; g the<\/p>\n<p>folloiwing substantial question of law:<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Whether the appellate au\ufb02m\ufb01ties were<br \/>\ncorrect in holding ihat the penalty levied cannot<br \/>\nbe sustained as the quantum additions have<\/p>\n<p>3&#8243;\n<\/p>\n<p>O<\/p>\n<p>ITZLNO. 907.208&#8242;?\n<\/p>\n<p>_. 4 _.\n<\/p>\n<p>been set aside by the Tribune! and which order<br \/>\nhas been appealed begfore this cow! and is<br \/>\nawaiting disposal?&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>4. Having heard the counsel for the <\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the appc\ufb01ant submits <\/p>\n<p>matter is seized by this court on the   &#8220;of _ <\/p>\n<p>assessment, the appeal may be <\/p>\n<p>the appellant to initiate    <\/p>\n<p>of the Act provided the  bf;  ks; the &#8216;A<\/p>\n<p>Iegular assessment   &#8220;&#8216;W\u00e9 sce some<\/p>\n<p>force in thc arguments. &#8216; VA  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>5.   appcai is dismissed as<br \/>\nwithdras Vk    for the appellant to invoke the:<\/p>\n<p>:271(1)(c) pmvided the appeal fried<\/p>\n<p>  on&#8217;:s.ji;he:,.A&#8217;ongnna1&#8242;  sfder  of assessment in I&#8217;I&#8217;A.No.945\/2006 is<\/p>\n<p>#9.&#8217;?\n<\/p>\n<p>Sci].\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n<p>KV!l*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008 Author: K.L.Manjunath &amp; B.V.Nagarathna ITA.No. 997.2667 IN THE HIGH coum&#8217; 0F&#8221;K}\\r\u20aci\u00abATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JULY, 2008 PRESENT THE HGIWBLE MRJUSFICE K.L.MANJUNA&#8217;_m&#8217;\u00bb::&#8217;:&#8217;_:&#8217;._ ANI} THE HOWBLE MRSJUSPICE B.V.NAGAEu\u00a7$THA\u00a3\u00a7A._ 3 ~ I.T.A.NO.997::fA&#8217;2OQ4~? ;, &#8216;* = S [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73107","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-08T23:27:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\\\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-08T23:27:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":509,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008\",\"name\":\"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\\\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-08T23:27:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\\\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-08T23:27:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-08T23:27:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008"},"wordCount":509,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008","name":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-08T23:27:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-electornic-research-ltd-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Electornic Research Ltd on 9 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73107","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73107"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73107\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73107"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73107"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73107"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}