{"id":73127,"date":"2007-07-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-07-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007"},"modified":"2014-12-27T08:35:00","modified_gmt":"2014-12-27T03:05:00","slug":"p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007","title":{"rendered":"P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRL A No. 748 of 2007()\n\n\n1. P.ANDRUMAN, C.NO.4456,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. STATE OF KERALA,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :INNOCENT FRANCIS PAPPALI[STATE BRIEF]\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.THANKAPPAN\n\n Dated :10\/07\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                                      K.Thankappan, J.\n\n                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n\n                               Crl. A. No.   748     of 2007\n\n                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n\n                          Dated this the 10th day of July, 2007\n\n\n                                         JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>          Appellant, accused in S.C. No.806\/2004 on the file of the Court of<\/p>\n<p>Session, Kasaragod Division at Hosdurg, faced trial for offence punishable<\/p>\n<p>under   section   55(g)   of   the   the   Abkari   Act   on   the   allegation   that   he   was<\/p>\n<p>found   in   possession   of     55   litres   of   wash   for   the   purpose   of   illegal<\/p>\n<p>distillation of arrack and the same was stored   adjacent to the house of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant  at the    place  called  Nellimala  in Malom Village.     To prove  the<\/p>\n<p>charge   against     the   appellant,   the   prosecution   examined   PWs.1   to   6   and<\/p>\n<p>produced Exts.P1 to P7.  MOs.1  to 3  were also produced on the side of the<\/p>\n<p>prosecution.       After   closing   the   evidence,   the   appellant   was   questioned<\/p>\n<p>under section 313 of Cr.P.C.   He denied  the   allegation  and stated that he<\/p>\n<p>was innocent and the case was foisted against him by the police. On the side<\/p>\n<p>of  the   defence,   DW1   was   examined     and   Exts.D1   to   D1(c)   were   marked.<\/p>\n<p>Relying   on   the   evidence   adduced   by   the   prosecution   both,   oral   and<\/p>\n<p>documentary, the trial court found the appellant guilty under section 55(g)of<\/p>\n<p>the   the   Abkari   Act     and   he   was   convicted   thereunder   and     sentenced   to<\/p>\n<p>undergo   simple     imprisonment   for   four     years     and   to   pay     a   fine   of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,00,000\/-     and   in   default   to   undergo   simple     imprisonment     for   nine<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.No.748\/07                                 2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>months.     The conviction and sentence awarded against the appellant are<\/p>\n<p>assailed in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         2. Since the appeal has been filed through the jail authorities and<\/p>\n<p>no   counsel   has   been   engaged   to   defend   the   case   of   the   appellant,   this<\/p>\n<p>Court appointed a member of State Brief panel to defend the case of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the trial court has<\/p>\n<p>committed serious error in relying on the evidence of PW1 and PW5, the<\/p>\n<p>official witnesses,   as the independent witness were turned hostile to the<\/p>\n<p>prosecution.   The   learned   counsel   further   submits   that   even   in   accepting<\/p>\n<p>the evidence of PW1 and PW5 it can be seen that the prosecution failed to<\/p>\n<p>prove   that   the   appellant   was   in   possession   of   contraband   article   for   the<\/p>\n<p>purpose of distillation or preparation of arrack, as there is no evidence to<\/p>\n<p>support the above charge against the appellant. To  substantiate the case of<\/p>\n<p>the   appellant,   the   learned   counsel   relies   on   a   decision   of   this   Court<\/p>\n<p>reported in Surendran V.State of Kerala (2004(1) KLT 404 and Sudhepan<\/p>\n<p>@ <a href=\"\/doc\/496541\/\">Aniyan V. State of Kerala<\/a> (2005(2) KLT (Cri) 631).<\/p>\n<p>         4.   The   prosecution   case   is       that   on     2-5-2002   at     4   P.M.   the<\/p>\n<p>appellant was found in possession of  55 litres of  wash for the purpose  of<\/p>\n<p>illegal distillation of arrack and was stored the same adjacent to the house<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.No.748\/07                               3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of the appellant  at place called Nellimala in Malom Village. The  further<\/p>\n<p>case of the appellant is that the appellant was arrested from the scene of<\/p>\n<p>occurrence   on   2-5-2002   itself   and     MO1   and   MO2   were   seized   as   per<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1 mahazar prepared in the presence of independent witnesses.   It is<\/p>\n<p>stated that the appellant was  produced before the court on 3-5-2002.  As<\/p>\n<p>per   Ext.P4   chemical   analysis   report,   the   samples   contained   11.77%   of<\/p>\n<p>ethyle alcohol by volume and the sample is wash.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         5. The   first contention  of the learned counsel that the trial court<\/p>\n<p>has committed serious error in relying on the evidence of PW1 and PW5<\/p>\n<p>official   witnesses   as   the   independent   witness   were   turned   hostile   to   the<\/p>\n<p>prosecution. There is no rule that the evidence of official witness cannot<\/p>\n<p>be relied on to prove the case, if the other circumstances are also proved in<\/p>\n<p>favour   of   the   prosecution.     Though   PW2,   independent   witness,     turned<\/p>\n<p>hostile   to   the   prosecution,   he   admitted   his   signature   in   Ext.P1   seizure<\/p>\n<p>mahazar.  In the circumstances, the evidence of PW1 and PW5 is  rightly<\/p>\n<p>accepted   by   the   trial   court   to   prove   that   the   appellant   was   found   in<\/p>\n<p>possession of 55 litres of wash.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>            6.   Question   to   be   considered   in   this   appeal   is   whether   the<\/p>\n<p>conviction entered by the trial court under section 55(g) of the the Abkari<\/p>\n<p>Act is sustainable or not ?\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.No.748\/07                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>          6.   The   prosecution   case   is   that   the   appellant   was   found   in<\/p>\n<p>possession   of   55   litres   of   wash   for   the   purpose   of   illegal   distillation   of<\/p>\n<p>arrack   and   the   same   was   stored   adjacent   to   the   house   of   the   appellant.<\/p>\n<p>Section 55(g) of the the Abkari Act reads as follows:-<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                    (g)   uses,   keeps   or   has   in   his   possession   any<\/p>\n<p>          materials,   still,   untensil,   implement   or   apparatus<\/p>\n<p>          whatsoever   for   the   purpose   of   manufacturing   liquor<\/p>\n<p>          other than toddy or any intoxicating drug&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>A   reading   of   the   above   section   would   show   that   the   prosecution   must<\/p>\n<p>allege and prove that materials were kept for the purpose of manufacturing<\/p>\n<p>liquor.  In  this  context,   there  is   no   evidence   to  show  that   materials   were<\/p>\n<p>kept   for the purpose  of manufacturing  liquor.   Either PW1 or PW5 had<\/p>\n<p>not stated before the court that they had seen any  materials or utensil  for<\/p>\n<p>the   purpose   of   distillation   of   arrack.     In   the   above   circumstances,   this<\/p>\n<p>Court is of the view that the finding of the trial court that the appellant had<\/p>\n<p>committed an offence under section 55(a) of the  Act is not sustainable. In<\/p>\n<p>this  context,     a  decision    reported  in      Sudhepan  @  <a href=\"\/doc\/496541\/\">Aniyan  V.  State  of<\/p>\n<p>Kerala<\/a>  (2005(2) KLT (Cri) 631) is relevant.       In the above decision this<\/p>\n<p>Court held that to attract an offence under section 55(a) of the the Abkari<\/p>\n<p>Act,   the   prosecution   must   allege   and   prove   that   possession   of   the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.No.748\/07                             5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>contraband   liquor   was   incidental   or   in   connection   with   export,   import,<\/p>\n<p>transport  or transit of liquor. Looking  into the above angle, for applying<\/p>\n<p>section 55(g) of the Abkari Act, it has to be pleaded and established that<\/p>\n<p>materials were   kept for the purpose of manufacturing liquor.   Therefore,<\/p>\n<p>the finding of the trial court that the appellant found guilty under section<\/p>\n<p>55(g) of the Abkari Act is not legally sustainable.<\/p>\n<p>              7.  In   the   above   circumstances,   the   conviction   and   sentence<\/p>\n<p>awarded against the appellant\/accused  in S.C.No.806\/2004  on the file of<\/p>\n<p>the Court of Session, Kasaragod Division, Hosdurg are set aside and the<\/p>\n<p>appellant   is   acquitted.     Therefore,   the   appellant     shall   be   released<\/p>\n<p>forthwith unless required in any other case.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          The appeal is allowed as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                  K. Thankappan,<\/p>\n<p>                                                                  Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">Crl.A.No.748\/07    6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                          K. Thankappan,J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                         &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>                         Crl.A. No. 748 \/2007<\/p>\n<p>                         &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211; &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                                Judgment<\/p>\n<p>                                10-7-2007<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRL A No. 748 of 2007() 1. P.ANDRUMAN, C.NO.4456, &#8230; Petitioner 2. STATE OF KERALA, Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :INNOCENT FRANCIS PAPPALI[STATE BRIEF] For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon&#8217;ble MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73127","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-07-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-27T03:05:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-27T03:05:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1076,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007\",\"name\":\"P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-07-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-27T03:05:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-07-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-27T03:05:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007","datePublished":"2007-07-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-27T03:05:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007"},"wordCount":1076,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007","name":"P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-07-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-27T03:05:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-andruman-vs-state-of-kerala-on-10-july-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.Andruman vs State Of Kerala on 10 July, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73127","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73127"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73127\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}