{"id":73140,"date":"2009-07-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-04-07T07:42:13","modified_gmt":"2016-04-07T02:12:13","slug":"b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 2564 of 2004()\n\n\n1. B.M.MOIDEEN KUNHI S\/O. PAKRU,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. A.M.ABDULLA S\/O. C.A.MOHAMMAD SARANG,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :02\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                        THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                          CRL. R.P. NO.2564 of 2004\n              = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                   Dated this the 2nd   day of July,  2009\n\n                                 O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
                                 ————–\n<\/p>\n
\n      Heard both sides.\n<\/p>\n
      2.    This revision is in challenge of          judgment of learned<\/p>\n
Sessions Judge, Kasargod in Crl. Appeal No.257 of 2001 confirming<\/p>\n
conviction of petitioner for offence punishable under Section 138 of<\/p>\n
the Negotiable Instruments Act but modifying the sentence.             Case<\/p>\n
arose on a private complaint preferred by           respondent No.2.      He<\/p>\n
alleged that petitioner borrowed Rs.75,000\/- from him and for<\/p>\n
repayment of that amount issued Exts.P2 and P3, cheques                dated<\/p>\n
25.11.1997 for Rs.25,000\/- and dated 10.12.1997 for Rs.50,000\/-. He<\/p>\n
presented the cheques for encashment but the same were<\/p>\n
dishonoured for insufficiency of funds. Respondent No.2 served the<\/p>\n
statutory notice on petitioner intimating dishonour and demanding<\/p>\n
payment.    He neither replied nor repaid the amount.              Power of<\/p>\n
Attorney holder of respondent No.2 gave evidence as P.W.1. Exhibit<\/p>\n
P1 is the Power of Attorney. Exhibits P4 and P6 are produced to prove<\/p>\n
dishonour of the cheques for insufficiency of funds.        Issue and service<\/p>\n
of notice are proved by Exts.P7 and P8. There is no challenge before<\/p>\n
me to the finding of the courts below regrading cause of dishonour<\/p>\n
CRL. R.P. No.2564 of 2004<\/p>\n
                                 -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
and issue and service of notice. It is contended by learned counsel for<\/p>\n
petitioner that there is no evidence to prove the alleged execution of<\/p>\n
the cheques.     According to petitioner cheques were stolen from his<\/p>\n
office. Petitioner gave evidence as D.W.1 and proved Exts.D1 and<\/p>\n
D2.    Exhibit D1 is the copy of the complaint dated 10.12.1997<\/p>\n
allegedly given by the petitioner to the Circle Inspector, Kasargod.<\/p>\n
Exhibit D2 is   copy of letter dated 10.12.1997 allegedly given by the<\/p>\n
petitioner to the drawee bank requesting stoppage of payment. Courts<\/p>\n
below were not impressed by the evidence of D.W.1 and Exts.D1 and<\/p>\n
D2 and     found in favour of due execution of the cheques.       It is<\/p>\n
contended by learned counsel that the finding is not correct.<\/p>\n
      3.    It is not disputed that cheques are drawn on the account<\/p>\n
maintained by the petitioner. Counsel contends that signature in the<\/p>\n
cheques are disputed by the petitioner.      I have gone through the<\/p>\n
evidence of D.W.1, petitioner. He has not stated that cheques did not<\/p>\n
contain his signature. It is seen from Exts.P4 and P5 that dishonour of<\/p>\n
the cheques was merely for insufficiency of funds and not on account<\/p>\n
of any difference in the signature with the specimen signature of the<\/p>\n
account holder.     Therefore  that contention of the counsel cannot<\/p>\n
stand.     On the question whether Power of Attorney holder was<\/p>\n
CRL. R.P. No.2564 of 2004<\/p>\n
                                   -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
competent to give evidence, Power of Attorney of respondent No.2<\/p>\n
stated that petitioner borrowed Rs.75,000\/- from respondent No.2 and<\/p>\n
for repayment of that amount he issued the cheques.            It is not<\/p>\n
disputed as seen from the cross-examination of P.W.1 that he had<\/p>\n
direct knowledge about the transaction and execution of the cheques.<\/p>\n
There is no cross-examination of P.W.1 in that line. Hence there is no<\/p>\n
reason to think that P.W.1 was not aware of the transaction or<\/p>\n
execution of the cheques.\n<\/p>\n
      4.    I shall refer to Exts.D1 and D2. They are only copies of the<\/p>\n
complaint and letter stated to have been given by the petitioner to<\/p>\n
the Circle Inspector and the drawee bank respectively. There is no<\/p>\n
evidence to show that complaint or letter were actually given to the<\/p>\n
Circle Inspector and drawee bank respectively. What is produced is<\/p>\n
only copy of the complaint and letter stated to have been given by the<\/p>\n
petitioner.   It is seen from Exts.P4 and P5 that dishonour of the<\/p>\n
cheques was not for the reason of payment being stopped. If Exhibit<\/p>\n
D2 had reached the drawee bank in time, necessarily dishonour would<\/p>\n
have been for the reason of payment being stopped.         It is  to be<\/p>\n
remembered that       cheques are dated 25.11.1997 and 10.12.1997<\/p>\n
whereas Exts.D1 and D2 are dated 10.12.1997.                  In these<\/p>\n
CRL. R.P. No.2564 of 2004<\/p>\n
                                -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
circumstances courts below did not accept Exts.D1 and D2.<\/p>\n
      5.    So far as evidence of petitioner as D.W.1 is concerned,<\/p>\n
what he stated is that he had not issued any cheque and he had no<\/p>\n
transaction with respondent No.2.      As per     Exts.D1 and D2, one<\/p>\n
J.C.Thomas is stated to have broke open office of petitioner and<\/p>\n
taken away valuable securities. In Ext.D1 there is no reference to any<\/p>\n
cheque being taken by the said J.C.Thomas. What is stated is only that<\/p>\n
valuable securities are taken away. Even if it is assumed that valuable<\/p>\n
securities include the cheques in question I stated that there is no<\/p>\n
evidence to show that the complaint was actually given to the Circle<\/p>\n
Inspector. In the circumstances I am unable to act upon the evidence<\/p>\n
of petitioner as D.W.1 and Exts.D1 and D2. There is        evidence of<\/p>\n
P.W.1, Power of Attorney holder regarding the transaction and due<\/p>\n
execution of the cheques. Further fact to be noted is that in spite of<\/p>\n
being served with statutory notice petitioner did not reply.    In the<\/p>\n
circumstances courts below are justified in rejecting the evidence of<\/p>\n
D.W1. Courts below have considered the evidence and concluded that<\/p>\n
petitioner issued the cheques in favour of respondent No.2 for the<\/p>\n
discharge of a legally enforceable debt\/liability. There is no reason<\/p>\n
why this Court in revision should interfere with the concurrent finding<\/p>\n
CRL. R.P. No.2564 of 2004<\/p>\n
                                  -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
which rested on a proper appreciation of the evidence let in by the<\/p>\n
parties. Hence there is no reason to interfere with the conviction of<\/p>\n
the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
      6.    Learned magistrate sentenced the petitioner to undergo<\/p>\n
simple imprisonment for eight months. Appellate court modified the<\/p>\n
sentence as simple imprisonment till rising of the court. Petitioner was<\/p>\n
directed to pay compensation of Rs.75,000\/- (Rupees Seventy five<\/p>\n
thousand only) and in case of default to undergo simple imprisonment<\/p>\n
for three months. There is no reason to interfere with the judgment of<\/p>\n
the appellate court as well.\n<\/p>\n
      Revision fails. It is dismissed. Petitioner is granted one month<\/p>\n
from this day to deposit the compensation in the trial court. He shall<\/p>\n
appear in the trial court on 4.8.2009 to receive he sentence.<\/p>\n
                                            THOMAS P.JOSEPH, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
vsv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2564 of 2004() 1. B.M.MOIDEEN KUNHI S\/O. PAKRU, … Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE … Respondent 2. A.M.ABDULLA S\/O. C.A.MOHAMMAD SARANG, For Petitioner :SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73140","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nB.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-07T02:12:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-07T02:12:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1055,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009\",\"name\":\"B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-07T02:12:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-07T02:12:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-07T02:12:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009"},"wordCount":1055,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009","name":"B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-07T02:12:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-m-moideen-kunhi-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-2-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"B.M.Moideen Kunhi vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 2 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73140","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73140"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73140\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73140"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73140"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73140"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}