{"id":73456,"date":"2008-06-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008"},"modified":"2016-06-09T15:56:17","modified_gmt":"2016-06-09T10:26:17","slug":"karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA.No. 328 of 2008()\n\n\n1. KARUNAKARAN NAIR, (DIED) EARIKATTAYA\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. RADHAMANI.V., HARTARTALKAR VIVEKANANDA\n3. SAROJINI AMMA, MANGATTU VEEDU\n4. MOHANDAS,VIVEKANANDA  HOSPITAL,\n5. SURESHKUMAR,\n6. LATHAKUMARI, KOLASSERI VEEDU,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n1. KALYANI AMMA (DIED) & ORS\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.P.BALACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :17\/06\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n              K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J.\n          ------------------------------------------------\n                   R. S. A. No.328 of 2008\n          ------------------------------------------------\n           Dated this the 17th day of June, 2008\n\n                         JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
    The plaintiff in O.S.298\/97 on the file<\/p>\n
of the Munsiff’s Court, Thiruvalla who has<\/p>\n
lost his case concurrently in both the courts<\/p>\n
below  is  the      appellant.              Out        of  the two<\/p>\n
defendants who were the respondents before the<\/p>\n
first appellate court, the first respondent<\/p>\n
died and her L.Rs are impleaded as additional<\/p>\n
respondents 3 to 5. The respondents herein are<\/p>\n
the defendants in the suit who were impleaded<\/p>\n
in the suit as respondents 1 and 2 and the<\/p>\n
L.Rs of the deceased first respondent as the<\/p>\n
deceased first respondent had not been removed<\/p>\n
from the party array, but was impleaded in<\/p>\n
this R.S.A also.\n<\/p>\n
    2. O.S.298\/97 was filed by the appellant<\/p>\n
as plaintiff for recovery of possession of a<\/p>\n
portion of the property alleged to have been<\/p>\n
trespassed   upon         by       the        defendants;      for<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.328 of 2008           -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
      fixation          of  boundary  and  for   mandatory<\/p>\n
      injunction inter alia on the allegation that<\/p>\n
      the scheduled property belonged to the mother<\/p>\n
      of the first defendant by virtue of partition<\/p>\n
      of 1118 M.E; that in the year 1970 vide Ext.A1<\/p>\n
      partition 13 cents of property was alloted to<\/p>\n
      the       plaintiff;    that  another  34  cents  of<\/p>\n
      property was purchased by the plaintiff under<\/p>\n
      Ext.A3; that thereafter the plaintiff is in<\/p>\n
      absolute possession and enjoyment of 47 cents<\/p>\n
      of property which is scheduled as item No.2;<\/p>\n
      that the 35 cents of property remaining in<\/p>\n
      possession of the first defendant is item No.3<\/p>\n
      property;         that  without  the  knowledge  and<\/p>\n
      consent          of the   plaintiff  the  defendants<\/p>\n
      constructed a compound wall to a height of 1.5<\/p>\n
      feet along the northern boundary of item No.2<\/p>\n
      property         from  east  to  west;  that  it is<\/p>\n
      understood that there is deficit of three<\/p>\n
      cents in extent in plaint item No.2 property<\/p>\n
      and that the same is scheduled as item No.4.<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.328 of 2008           -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
      The prayer is to have recovery of the said<\/p>\n
      three cents and to have fixation of boundary<\/p>\n
      and for a mandatory injunction to remove the<\/p>\n
      compound wall constructed by the defendants.<\/p>\n
              3. Defendants 1 and 2 filed a joint<\/p>\n
      written          statement  resisting   the    suit.<\/p>\n
      According         to  them,   there  was   permanent<\/p>\n
      boundary         on   the  southern  side   of   the<\/p>\n
      defendants’ property ever since the partition<\/p>\n
      of 1118 M.E and there is barbed wire fencing<\/p>\n
      and       the    trees were  also  standing in   the<\/p>\n
      boundary         separating  the  property  of  the<\/p>\n
      plaintiff and the defendants. The allegation<\/p>\n
      that there is deficit in extent by three cents<\/p>\n
      is false and is made with ulterior motive of<\/p>\n
      grabbing the property of the defendants. Item<\/p>\n
      No.4 property is not property belonging to the<\/p>\n
      plaintiff,         but  is  property  in   exclusive<\/p>\n
      possession of the defendants. There is well<\/p>\n
      defined boundary and there is no necessity for<\/p>\n
      the fixation of the boundary. If at all any<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.328 of 2008          -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
      portion of the property is found to be in<\/p>\n
      possession of the defendants, the plaintiff<\/p>\n
      has lost title thereto for adverse possession<\/p>\n
      for more than 30 years and therefore, the<\/p>\n
      plaintiff is not entitled to the relief sought<\/p>\n
      for. The defendants prayed for a dismissal of<\/p>\n
      the suit with their cost.\n<\/p>\n
              4. On the above pleadings, the trial<\/p>\n
      court raised necessary issues for trial and<\/p>\n
      considering the case in the light of the above<\/p>\n
      pleadings and the evidence adduced at trial<\/p>\n
      which consisted of oral evidence of PWs.1 and<\/p>\n
      3 and DWs.1 and 2 and documentary evidence<\/p>\n
      Exts.A1 to A3, B1 and C1 to C3 dismissed the<\/p>\n
      suit. The aggrieved plaintiff filed A.S.46\/03<\/p>\n
      before the first appellate court and the first<\/p>\n
      appellate          court  dismissed   the   appeal<\/p>\n
      concurring with the findings of the trial<\/p>\n
      court. Hence, this R.S.A by the plaintiff.<\/p>\n
              5. It is contended before me by the<\/p>\n
      learned          counsel for  the  appellant that<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.328 of 2008        -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
      actually three cents has been encroached upon<\/p>\n
      by the defendants and they have reduced it to<\/p>\n
      their possession; that the Surveyor has found<\/p>\n
      excess land in possession of the defendants<\/p>\n
      taking in “Kuthakappattam” property as well;<\/p>\n
      that possession of “Kuthakappattam” property<\/p>\n
      along with the property of the defendants has<\/p>\n
      not been pleaded in the written statement and<\/p>\n
      no       document   also was produced  by  the<\/p>\n
      defendants to establish that they have got<\/p>\n
      “Kuthakappattam” right over the property shown<\/p>\n
      by the Surveyor in the plan; that the total<\/p>\n
      extent of item No.1 property was found by the<\/p>\n
      Commissioner as 93 cents and 225 square links<\/p>\n
      whereas as per Ext.A1 the extent was 96 cents<\/p>\n
      and there was deficit to the extent of two and<\/p>\n
      odd cents and that therefore, if at all there<\/p>\n
      is such a deficit that deficit has to be<\/p>\n
      proportionately      made in item Nos.2 and  3<\/span><\/p>\n
      properties.\n<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.328 of 2008            -6-<\/span><\/p>\n
              6.      It  is   worthy  to  note  that  the<\/p>\n
      plaintiff has no case that the defendants did<\/p>\n
      trespass upon any portion of their property on<\/p>\n
      any particular day and constructed a compound<\/p>\n
      wall unauthorisedly reducing about three cents<\/p>\n
      of property to their possession. The commissioner<\/p>\n
      has reported that the boundary wall that has<\/p>\n
      been constructed was along the boundary that<\/p>\n
      existed          originally.  In  Ext.C2   Commission<\/p>\n
      Report,          the Commissioner  has  reported the<\/p>\n
      existence of remnants of old “kayyala” also<\/p>\n
      along the said line. The shortage found on the<\/p>\n
      measurement of the property of the plaintiff<\/p>\n
      is only 800 square links and not three cents<\/p>\n
      as pleaded in the plaint. It is an admitted<\/p>\n
      case that certain portions of the plaintiff’s<\/p>\n
      property was taken for widening the road. If<\/p>\n
      any portion of the property was taken for<\/p>\n
      widening the road certainly there will be<\/p>\n
      reduction in extent in the balance property<\/p>\n
      that         remains   in   the  possession  of   the<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.328 of 2008          -7-<\/span><\/p>\n
      plaintiff. For the mere reason that there is<\/p>\n
      reduction in extent in the property of the<\/p>\n
      plaintiff it cannot be concluded that the<\/p>\n
      defendants have trespassed upon any portion of<\/p>\n
      the property belonging to the plaintiff. The<\/p>\n
      court below has observed that the Commissioner<\/p>\n
      and Surveyor has reported that the boundary<\/p>\n
      separating the plaintiff and the defendants<\/p>\n
      was       along    the G.F  line and  the  present<\/p>\n
      compound         wall which is  sought to  be  got<\/p>\n
      demolished and removed is also exactly through<\/p>\n
      the G.F line. Consequently, therefore, the<\/p>\n
      plaintiff cannot seek to have a mandatory<\/p>\n
      injunction to remove the said compound wall<\/p>\n
      which is constructed along the boundary line<\/p>\n
      that was already in existence. There is no<\/p>\n
      prayer          also in  the  plaint  seeking  for<\/p>\n
      declaration that the plaintiff is having title<\/p>\n
      to any portion of the property now found in<\/p>\n
      possession of the defendants and therefore,<\/p>\n
      the question of declaration of title to any<\/p>\n
R. S. A. No.328 of 2008             -8-<\/span><\/p>\n
      portion of the property not in the possession<\/p>\n
      of the plaintiff also does not arise. It<\/p>\n
      appears that the attempt of the plaintiff is<\/p>\n
      to      grab      certain  portions  of   the  property<\/p>\n
      beyond          their  boundary   line   by   advancing<\/p>\n
      contentions that there is deficit in extent in<\/p>\n
      their         property  and  that  is   by   reason  of<\/p>\n
      putting          up of   boundary  by  the   defendants<\/p>\n
      though the boundary was being put up along the<\/p>\n
      line         in    which  already   there   existed   a<\/p>\n
      boundary. The case of the plaintiff did not<\/p>\n
      find favour in the circumstances with both the<\/p>\n
      courts below and there is no merit in this<\/p>\n
      R.S.A and no substantial question of law also<\/p>\n
      arises for consideration by this Court in this<\/p>\n
      R.S.A as is attempted to be made out.<\/p>\n
              7. In the result, refusing admission, I<\/p>\n
      dismiss this R.S.A in limine.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                            K.P.BALACHANDRAN,
\n                                                        JUDGE
\n      kns\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA.No. 328 of 2008() 1. KARUNAKARAN NAIR, (DIED) EARIKATTAYA … Petitioner 2. RADHAMANI.V., HARTARTALKAR VIVEKANANDA 3. SAROJINI AMMA, MANGATTU VEEDU 4. MOHANDAS,VIVEKANANDA HOSPITAL, 5. SURESHKUMAR, 6. LATHAKUMARI, KOLASSERI VEEDU, Vs 1. KALYANI […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKarunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-09T10:26:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-09T10:26:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1267,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-09T10:26:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-09T10:26:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-09T10:26:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008"},"wordCount":1267,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008","name":"Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-09T10:26:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/karunakaran-nair-vs-kalyani-amma-died-ors-on-17-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Karunakaran Nair vs Kalyani Amma (Died) & Ors on 17 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73456\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}