{"id":74151,"date":"2011-07-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011"},"modified":"2016-12-22T20:36:08","modified_gmt":"2016-12-22T15:06:08","slug":"navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>FAO No. 2379 of 1990                             1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                                         FAO No. 2379 of 1998\n                                    Date of decision May 31, 2011\n\nNavjot Singh                                                 ....Appellant\n\n                              Versus\nKuldip Singh and others\n                                                 .....Respondents<\/pre>\n<pre>CORAM:                  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN\n\nPresent:                Mr. Harsh Aggarwal, Advocate\n                        for the appellant.\n\n                        Mr. Shailender Sharma, Advocate\n                        for respondent No.1.\n                        None for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.\n\nK. Kannan, J (oral)\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>                        1.    The appeal is against the dismissal of the<\/p>\n<p>petition claiming compensation for injuries suffered in a motor accident.<\/p>\n<p>The contention of the petitioner was that when he was going on his motor<\/p>\n<p>cycle on 30.3.1994 along with the D.C.road, Hoshiarpur. When he had<\/p>\n<p>reached at a road junction, he stopped at the red signal and when there<\/p>\n<p>was a green signal, he started when the jeep driven by the first respondent<\/p>\n<p>coming from the opposite direction drove against him and crushed his leg.<\/p>\n<p>The written statement was one of the denial of accident itself but at the<\/p>\n<p>time of trial, the appellant was cross examined on the aspect of when he<\/p>\n<p>started the vehicle at the signal. RW-1 gave evidence to the effect that<\/p>\n<p>when he reached the Government College Chowk a motor cyclist came<\/p>\n<p>from the side of the Government College and struck against his jeep. His<\/p>\n<p>contention that he was driving his jeep on the left side of the road and at<\/p>\n<p>the time when he proceeded there was a green signal. It was the motor<\/p>\n<p>cyclist who had come from the Government College side when there was<\/p>\n<p>still a red light. The Tribunal purported to undertake a minute perusal of<\/p>\n<p>the evidence, and the Court observed that the counsel for the claimant<\/p>\n<p>when he cross examined the respondent suggested to him that there was<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> FAO No. 2379 of 1990                               2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>no green or red light &#8220;but there was a twinkling light of yellow colour.&#8221; I do<\/p>\n<p>not see how there is a contradiction to the appelllant&#8217;s own case. It is one<\/p>\n<p>thing to state that the appellant had started after stopping at the signal<\/p>\n<p>when there was green light to go but quite another to make a suggestion to<\/p>\n<p>the respondent that there was a twinkling of amber on his side, though he<\/p>\n<p>he was himself contending that there was a green light to proceed and<\/p>\n<p>there was red light in the direction where the petitioner was to proceed. A<\/p>\n<p>case where there was admittedly a collision and the appellant had injuries<\/p>\n<p>on his leg could not have been thrown over board on realistic appreciation<\/p>\n<p>of evidence by the Tribunal. I set aside the finding and hold the driver of the<\/p>\n<p>jeep was responsible for the accident. The Tribunal must have seen that<\/p>\n<p>the respondent was suggesting up a plea of no accident but he did not take<\/p>\n<p>courage to stand by his version at the trial and was only trying to explain<\/p>\n<p>that he was not guilty but the motor cyclist was. I would find no virtue in the<\/p>\n<p>defence to discard the appellant&#8217;s version.\n<\/p>\n<p>                   2.    As regards the quantum, the petitioner had<\/p>\n<p>produced evidence to show that he had fairly a long period of<\/p>\n<p>hospitalization and the injuries with serious soft issue damage required<\/p>\n<p>reconstruction by surgical reduction of the fracture and by skin grafting. He<\/p>\n<p>had 83 days of hospitalization at various times and had undergone seven<\/p>\n<p>surgeries. The doctors who treated him were examined as PW-2 and PW-<\/p>\n<p>3. The medical bills showed that the accident took place on 20.3.1994 and<\/p>\n<p>he had been taking treatment extending up to 17.10.1995 for nearly a year<\/p>\n<p>and six months. For the various phases of hospitalization, I would make<\/p>\n<p>provision for attendant charges, special diet and transportation at<\/p>\n<p>`10,000\/-, `5,000\/- and `10,000\/- respectively. The doctors had assessed<\/p>\n<p>him for disability at 50% but stated that he required support while walking<\/p>\n<p>by crutches which I would understand as a temporary disability.            The<\/p>\n<p>permanent disability could have a bearing to difficulty in walking in long<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> FAO No. 2379 of 1990                                        3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>stretches due to stiffness in the ankle and soft issue damage. I have no<\/p>\n<p>evidence to suggest that 50% functional disability in the leg could have any<\/p>\n<p>serious impact in his future earning skills. For prolonged hospitalization and<\/p>\n<p>surgery, I will provide for `25,000\/- towards pain and suffering and towards<\/p>\n<p>the 50% disability, for the accident has taken place in the year 1994, I will<\/p>\n<p>provide for `50,000\/- which I would hold as going towards the loss of<\/p>\n<p>amenties. The petitioner claimed that he has lost one year of study since<\/p>\n<p>he had suffered accident in March with impending exams for which I would<\/p>\n<p>estimate `25,000\/- as the resultant loss. The over all compensation will<\/p>\n<p>be as `3,29,500\/- tabulated below:-\n<\/p>\n<pre>           Age            30.3.1994 to\n                           17.10.1995\n       Occupation\n       Claimants\n       S.No.          Heads of Claim             Tribunal        High Court\n                    1 Medicines                                  `2,04,500\/-\n                    2 Attendant charges                          `10,000\/-\n                    3 Special diet                               `5,000\/-\n                    4 Pain and suffering                         `25,000\/-\n                    5 Transport                                  `10,000\/-\n                    6 Disability                                 50%\n                    7 Loss of amenities                          `50,000\/-\n                      Loss of        year   in                   `25,000\/-\n                    8 studies\n                      Total                                      `3,29,500\/-\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>                     3.       The amount awarded by the Tribunal shall carry<\/p>\n<p>interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date<\/p>\n<p>of payment. The liability shall be on the respondents jointly and severally.<\/p>\n<p>The award is set aside and the appeal is allowed in the above terms.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                (K. KANNAN)<br \/>\n                                                                  JUDGE<br \/>\nMay 31, 2011<br \/>\narching\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011 FAO No. 2379 of 1990 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 2379 of 1998 Date of decision May 31, 2011 Navjot Singh &#8230;.Appellant Versus Kuldip Singh and others &#8230;..Respondents CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE K. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-74151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-22T15:06:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-22T15:06:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":787,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-22T15:06:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-22T15:06:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-22T15:06:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011"},"wordCount":787,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011","name":"Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-22T15:06:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/navjot-singh-vs-kuldip-singh-and-others-on-1-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Navjot Singh vs Kuldip Singh And Others on 1 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74151","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74151\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}