{"id":74188,"date":"2008-10-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008"},"modified":"2018-11-06T17:41:16","modified_gmt":"2018-11-06T12:11:16","slug":"shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police &#8230; on 16 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police &#8230; on 16 October, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>                         CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                           Appeal No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2007\/00715 dated 15.5.2007\n                             Right to Information Act 2005 - Section 19\n\n\nAppellant        -          Shri Sunil Kumar\nRespondent           -      Deputy Commissioner of Police (Traffic)\n\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p>:\n<\/p>\n<p>     By an application of 23.11.06, received in the Office of DCP (Traffic) on<br \/>\n23.12.06, Shri Sunil Kumar of Malikpur Delhi sought the following information:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;I want to know that why and how I have been dismissed under<br \/>\n         Rule 5(1) of C.S.S., when it is not applicable in my case. Please<br \/>\n         provide the information because it is question of future of<br \/>\n         appellant.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>To this he received a reply on 15.1.07 from the DCP (Traffic) as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;While filling the recruitment form you have written &#8216;No&#8217; in reply to<br \/>\n         325\/24 IPC PS Model Town and have hidden the fact, which was<br \/>\n         later on substituted with &#8216;Yes&#8217; by an Officer of any office. Besides,<br \/>\n         while applying you had given Permanent &amp; Temporary address as<br \/>\n         N-11, New Police Line, Kingsway Camp, Delhi whereas in<br \/>\n         verification form you had recorded it as House No. 383, Gali No. 8,<br \/>\n         Sant Nagar, New Delhi as temporary and V&amp;PO Jarara, PS Surir,<br \/>\n         Distt. Mathura (U.P.) as Permanent address. For this reason, your<br \/>\n         services were terminated under sub Rule 5, C.C.S. (Temp. Service)<br \/>\n         Rules, 1965. &#8220;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>     In the meantime appellant had already moved his first appeal on 5.1.07<br \/>\nbefore the Police Commissioner, Police Headquarters upon which Shri M.S.<br \/>\nUpadhyaya Addl. Commissioner of Police (Traffic) and First Appellate Authority,<br \/>\nafter examining the case in detail, directed as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;As far as complaint of not providing him the requisite information to<br \/>\n         the appellant in the stipulated time period under RTI Act 2005 is<br \/>\n         concerned, I have examined the issue and found that the<br \/>\n         application submitted by Shri Sunil Kumar in Police Headquarters<br \/>\n         was received in the office of PIO\/ Traffic from the office of DCP\/IV<br \/>\n         Bn. DAP on 22.12.2006 vide Memo No. 21\/APIO\/AP\/IV Bn. DAP<br \/>\n         dated 20.12.2006.       The requisite information related to his<br \/>\n         termination from the service was sent to the applicant vide letter<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                               1<\/span><br \/>\n       No. 248\/Complt. Br. Traffic dated 15.1.2007 by PIO\/ Traffic which is<br \/>\n      within the time limit as given in sub-section (1) of section 7 of Right<br \/>\n      to Information Act-2005. As the application of the appellant was<br \/>\n      received by PIO\/Traffic on 20.12.2006 and the requisite information<br \/>\n      was sent to him on 15.1.2007 i.e. within 30 days of the receipt of<br \/>\n      application, the contention of the appellant that the officials<br \/>\n      concerned did not provide him the requisite information is not true.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      Since the requisite information sought by the appellant has been<br \/>\n      provided to him by PIO\/ Traffic, no further action is required to be<br \/>\n      taken by the undersigned being the appellate authority and hence,<br \/>\n      the appeal is not accepted.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Appellant has then moved a second appeal before us with the following prayer:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8220;(a)   pass order directing the concerned officials i.e. the<br \/>\n             respondents to perform their duties diligently and to<br \/>\n             provide the information sought for by the appellant, at<br \/>\n             the earliest possible;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      (b)    impose penalty upon the erring\/ guilty officials as<br \/>\n             provided under the relevant provisions of law so that in<br \/>\n             future no official could date to shirk from his duties;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      (c)    provide an opportunity of personal hearing to the<br \/>\n             appellant to explain his case in person;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>      (d)    any other or further relief (s) which this Hon&#8217;ble<br \/>\n             Commission may deem fit and proper under the facts<br \/>\n             and circumstances of the case, may also be awarded in<br \/>\n             favour of the appellant and against the respondents.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The appeal was heard on 16.10.08. The following are present:<br \/>\nAppellant<br \/>\nShri Sunil Kumar<br \/>\nShri Inderjit Singh<br \/>\nRespondents<br \/>\nShri Prabhakar, DCP (Traffic) HQ Delhi &#8211; PIO<br \/>\nShri Mukesh Chander, Addl. Commissioner of Police (Traffic),Delhil;1st appellate<br \/>\nauthority.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Shri Inderjit Singh, assisting appellant, submitted a copy of a letter received<br \/>\nfrom DCP (Traffic) on 23.2.07 in which the entries to Col. 11A &amp; B are as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        2<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>        a)     Have you ever been prosecuted? Remained under House<br \/>\n              Arrest or had furnished any bond or fined or have been<br \/>\n              declared as defaulter or you have been deprived from<br \/>\n              appearing in any exam by any Public Service Commission or<br \/>\n              declared unfit for any service ?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       Yes &#8211; case file No. 339\/93 u\/s 325\/34 IPC.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       b)     Is any case pending in any Court of Law at the time of filling<br \/>\n              of this form? If answer is yes, then provide details of<br \/>\n              Prosecution, house arrest, arrest, fine, penalty for default<br \/>\n              etc.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>       Yes &#8211; as above. &#8220;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>     He, therefore, stated that the information, on the basis on which he was<br \/>\ndismissed, is incorrect.\n<\/p>\n<p>                           DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n<p>     Appellant Shri Sunil Kumar has in his application clearly sought to know the<br \/>\ngrounds for his dismissal, which have been provided to him. Whether these are<br \/>\njustifiable grounds or not is not for this Commission to decide, nor does it merit<br \/>\nprocessing of his application under the RTI Act 2005. This is an issue falling<br \/>\nsquarely within the jurisdiction of CAT.    The contention of appellant that the<br \/>\ninformation provided to him was incorrect or misleading is also not justified<br \/>\nbecause he has asked for grounds of his dismissal, which have been disclosed<br \/>\nto him. Appellant Shri Sunil Kumar has also been provided with a copy of his<br \/>\napplication form in the possession of the concerned public authority. If he feels<br \/>\nthat the allegation of tampering with his form is unjustified remedy will lie<br \/>\nelsewhere, since this Commission has jurisdiction only to enforce providing<br \/>\ninformation as held by or under the control of a public authority, which in this<br \/>\ncase has been provided.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       Respondents inform us that this matter had been decided by CAT as well<br \/>\nas by the High Court. If appellant feels, therefore, that CAT has come to its<br \/>\nconclusion on the basis of forged documents, he is free to agitate the matter<br \/>\nbefore that authority.   This is not an issue meriting interference by this<br \/>\nCommission. The appeal is, therefore, unsustainable and is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Announced in the hearing. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to<br \/>\nthe parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Wajahat Habibullah)<br \/>\nChief Information Commissioner<br \/>\n16.10.2008<\/p>\n<p>Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against<br \/>\napplication and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO<br \/>\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Pankaj Shreyaskar)<br \/>\nJoint Registrar<br \/>\n16.10.2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                       4<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police &#8230; on 16 October, 2008 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No.CIC\/WB\/A\/2007\/00715 dated 15.5.2007 Right to Information Act 2005 &#8211; Section 19 Appellant &#8211; Shri Sunil Kumar Respondent &#8211; Deputy Commissioner of Police (Traffic) Facts : By an application of 23.11.06, received in the Office of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-74188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police ... on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police ... on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-06T12:11:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police &#8230; on 16 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-06T12:11:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1011,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police ... on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-06T12:11:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police &#8230; on 16 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police ... on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police ... on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-06T12:11:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police &#8230; on 16 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-06T12:11:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008"},"wordCount":1011,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008","name":"Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police ... on 16 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-06T12:11:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-sunil-kumar-vs-deputy-commissioner-of-police-on-16-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Sunil Kumar vs Deputy Commissioner Of Police &#8230; on 16 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74188"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74188\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}