{"id":74462,"date":"2011-09-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011"},"modified":"2018-07-16T10:10:27","modified_gmt":"2018-07-16T04:40:27","slug":"mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                        CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                            Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                          Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                 Tel: +91-11-26161796\n                                                Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/001542\/14014-Adjunct\n                                                                Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/001542\nRelevant facts emerging from the Appeal:\n\nAppellant                           :       Mr. Anirudh Sharma\n                                            1037, LIG DDA Flats,\n                                            East of Loni Road,\n                                            Shahdara, New Delhi - 110 093\n\nRespondent            (1)           :       Mr. Raj Pal\n                                            Deemed PIO &amp; EE(M-III)\n                                            O\/o the SE-II\n                                            Municipal Corporation of Delhi,\n                                            Shahdara North Zone\n                                            Keshav Chowk, GT Road,\n                                            Shahdara, New Delhi - 110 032\n\n                      (2)           :       Mr. A. K. Mittal\n                                            PIO &amp; SE-I\n                                            Municipal Corporation of Delhi,\n                                            Shahdara North Zone\n                                            Keshav Chowk, GT Road,\n                                            Shahdara, New Delhi - 110 032\n\nRTI application filed on            :       04\/03\/2011 and 10\/03\/2011\nPIO replied on                      :       Not mentioned.\nFirst Appeal filed on               :       21\/04\/2011\nPIO reply after First Appeal        :       Not mentioned.\nSecond Appeal received on           :       08\/06\/2011\n\nInformation Sought:\n   1. As in RTI application dated 04\/03\/2011\n          \u2022 Complete details and use of mobile phones towers installed with due permission and\n              N.O.C issued by MCD in Shahdara North Zone.\n   2. As in RTI application dated 10\/03\/2011\n          \u2022 Complete details and photocopies of relevant documents pertaining to various\n              developmental works done using councilors' fund during last 4 years, i.e\n   Financial year 2007-2008\n   Financial year 2008-2009\n   Financial year 2009-2010\n   Financial year 2010- till date\nBy M.C.D councilors viz,:\n   1. Sh. T.C Sharma, M.C.D Councillor ward no. 256\n   2. Sh Divya Jaiswal, M.C.D Councillor ward no. 267\n\nGrounds for the First Appeals dated 15\/04\/2011 and 21\/04\/2011:\nInformation was not furnished within the prescribed period of 30 days by the PIO\n\nOrder of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):\nNo order given by the FAA.\n\n\n                                                                                     Page 1 of 3\n Ground of the Second Appeal:\nNo information has been provided by the PIO and further no order has been passed by the FAA by the\nfirst appeal.\n\nRelevant Facts<\/pre>\n<p> emerging during Hearing on 11 August 2011:\n<\/p>\n<p>The following were present<br \/>\nAppellant: Mr. Anirudh Sharma;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Mr. Raj Pal, Deemed PIO &amp; EE(M-II);\n<\/p>\n<p>        &#8220;The respondent states that the RTI application filed on 10\/03\/2011 was received by him on<br \/>\n22\/03\/2011. He states that the information for ward no 256 and 267 would be available with PIO\/SE-I<br \/>\nMr. A. K. Mittal. He therefore sent it back to PIO\/SE-II who had sent the RTI application to him. The<br \/>\nPIO\/SE-II transferred the application to PIO\/SE-I on 31\/03\/2011. He claims that PIO\/SE-I sent the RTI<br \/>\napplication to him on 06\/05\/2011. The Appellant had mentioned that he wanted information about the<br \/>\nexpenditure of Mr. Divya Jaiswal of ward no 267. The respondent states that Mr. Divya Jaiswal&#8217;s ward<br \/>\nnumber is 247. He then sent the information regarding the total expenditure on 23\/06\/2011 to the<br \/>\nAppellant and asked for additional fees to be paid for the documents giving the details. The Appellant<br \/>\nstates that he has received no information from PIO\/SE-I about the expenditure by Mr. T. C. Sharma<br \/>\ncorporator of Ward no. 256. The respondent has erred in demanding additional fee since the period of<br \/>\n30 days has already been over.\n<\/p>\n<p>The Appellant also points out that the FAA Mr. D. P. Ture did not pass any order in this matter. He had<br \/>\nfiled the appeal on 21\/04\/2011 but the order of the FAA was issued only on 20\/06\/2011. The FAA had<br \/>\nnot passed any order within the time specified under the RTI Act.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision dated 11 August 2011:\n<\/p>\n<p>The Appeal was allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The deemed PIO Mr. Raj Pal is directed to send the balance information to the Appellant free of cost<br \/>\nbefore 25 August 2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>PIO\/SE-I Mr. A. K. Mittal is directed to provide the complete information regarding the funds spent by<br \/>\nMr. T. C. Sharma, Corporator ward no. 256 to the Appellant before          30 August 2011.<br \/>\nThe First Appellate Authority Mr. D. P. Ture is directed to send his explanation to the Commission<br \/>\nbefore 30 August 2011, why the Commission should not recommend disciplinary action against him for<br \/>\ndereliction of duty.\n<\/p>\n<p>The issue before the Commission is of not supplying the complete, required information by the<br \/>\nPIO\/SE-I Mr. A. K. Mittal and Deemed PIO Mr. Raj Pal within 30 days as required by the law.<br \/>\nFrom the facts before the Commission it is apparent that the PIO and deemed PIO are guilty of not<br \/>\nfurnishing information within the time specified under sub-section (1) of Section 7 by not replying<br \/>\nwithin 30 days, as per the requirement of the RTI Act. It appears that the deemed PIOs actions attract the<br \/>\npenal provisions of Section 20 (1). A showcause notice is being issued to them, and they are directed<br \/>\ngive their reasons to the Commission to show cause why penalty should not be levied on them. PIO\/SE-<br \/>\nI Mr. A. K. Mittal and Deemed PIO Mr. Raj Pal will present themselves before the Commission at<br \/>\nthe above address on 06 September 04.30PM alongwith their written submissions showing cause why<br \/>\npenalty should not be imposed on them as mandated under Section 20 (1). They will also bring the<br \/>\ninformation sent to the appellant as per this decision and submit speed post receipt as proof of having<br \/>\nsent the information to the appellant.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Submission&#8217;s received from Mr. D.P. Ture, First Appellate Authority:\n<\/p>\n<p>        The Commission has received a letter from the First Appellate Authority Mr. D. P. Ture on<br \/>\n29\/08\/2011 stating that, &#8220;Regarding mentioned decision it is submitted that this appeal along with some<br \/>\nother appeals were not listed for hearing due to the pendency of appeals left by my predecessor. In<br \/>\naddition to this it is also stated that Sh. Satya Prakash, Jr. Steno who were dealing in the matter was<br \/>\nsuddenly transferred to Commission of Inquiry setup by GNCTD to inquire into the unfortunate incident<br \/>\nof Lalita Park in Laxmi Nagar area. However, as soon as it came to my notice, the appeal was disposed<br \/>\nimmediately vide order No. 470\/PA\/DC (SHAH) NORTH ZONE\/2011 dated 20.06.2011 &amp; 454\/PA\/DC<br \/>\n(SHAH) NORTH ZONE\/2011 dated 20.06.2011. The delay is highly regretted. In view of above, the<br \/>\ncommission is requested to kindly withdraw the notice contained in the above mentioned decision.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                              Page 2 of 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p> Relevant Facts emerging during the showcause hearing on 06 September 2011:<br \/>\nThe following were present<br \/>\nAppellant: Mr. Anirudh Sharma;\n<\/p>\n<p>Respondent: Mr. A. K. Mittal, SE-I; Mr. Raj Pal, EE(M-III), Shahdara North Zone; Mr. P. V. Singh,<br \/>\n       EE(M-II); and Mr. Ajay Kumar, AE(M-II);\n<\/p>\n<p>       The Commission accepts the explanation of the First Appellate Authority with a warning that he<br \/>\nshould ensure that he holds the hearings and issues decisions within the time mandated under RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>The information has been provided to the Appellant but the information provided from EE(M-II) does<br \/>\nnot have the work order number, date and tender amount. These should be provided to the Appellant<br \/>\nbefore 12 September 2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>The RTI application had sought information regarding the corporator&#8217;s funds in two different wards.<br \/>\nAccording to the respondents these wards belong to SE-I &amp; SE-II. The RTI Application is claimed to<br \/>\nhave been received on 22\/03\/2011 by Mr. Raj Pal, EE(M-III). He claims that the person responsible for<br \/>\nsupplying the information was Mr. A. K. Jain, AE who did not provide the information. As per the RTI<br \/>\nAct Mr. Raj Pal was the deemed PIO as per Section 5(4) of the RTI Act. However, if Mr. A. K. Jain, AE<br \/>\naccepts that he was responsible for delay the Commission will consider the matter. The Commission<br \/>\ngives an opportunity to Mr. Raj Pal and Mr. A. K. Jain to present themselves before the Commission on<br \/>\n12 September 2011 at 04.00PM to showcause why penalty under Section 20(1) should not be imposed<br \/>\non one of them for not supplying the information within 30 days as mandated under the Act.<br \/>\nThe RTI application is claimed to have reached Mr. A. K. Mittal, SE-I on 14\/03\/2011. He claims that he<br \/>\nsought the assistance of Mr. A. K. Dixit on 15\/03\/2011 to provide the information to the Appellant. He<br \/>\nclaims that the deemed PIO Mr. A. K. Dixit sent a letter to the Appellant on 08\/04\/2011 asking him to<br \/>\ncome and inspect the records. The Appellant states that he has never received this letter and the<br \/>\nrespondent has not brought any speed post receipt to prove that he had sent the letter. The Commission<br \/>\nnotes that the minimum requirement for anyone to claim that he had sent the information is the speed<br \/>\npost receipt. However, the Commission gives one more opportunity to Mr. A. K. Mittal and Mr. A. K.<br \/>\nDixit to present themselves before the Commission on 12 September 2011 at 04.00PM.\n<\/p>\n<p>Adjunct Decision:\n<\/p>\n<p>Mr. P. V. Singh is directed to rovide the information as directed above to the Appellant<br \/>\nbefore 12 September 2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>The Commission also directs Mr. Raj Pal EE(M-III), Mr. A. K. Jain AE, Mr. A. K.<br \/>\nMittal SE-I and Mr. A. K. Dixit to present themselves before the Commission on<br \/>\n12 September 2011 at 04.00PM to showcause why penalty under Section 20(1) should<br \/>\nnot be imposed on them.\n<\/p>\n<p>If they feel that they are other persons responsible for the delay they are directed to bring<br \/>\nsuch persons before the Commission on 12\/09\/2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>This decision is announced in open chamber.\n<\/p>\n<p>Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                      Shailesh Gandhi<br \/>\n                                                                                            Information Commissioner<br \/>\n                                                                                                   06 September 2011<br \/>\n         (In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number. (JS))<\/p>\n<p>Copies to:\n<\/p>\n<pre>  1-       Mr. A. K. Jain,\n  2-       Mr. A. K. Dixit,\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                                              Page 3 of 3<\/span>\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/001542\/14014-Adjunct Appeal No. CIC\/SG\/A\/2011\/001542 Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Anirudh Sharma 1037, LIG DDA Flats, East of Loni Road, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-74462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-16T04:40:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-16T04:40:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1246,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-16T04:40:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-16T04:40:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-16T04:40:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011"},"wordCount":1246,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011","name":"Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-16T04:40:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-anirudh-sharma-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-6-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Anirudh Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74462"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74462\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}