{"id":74512,"date":"2010-10-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010"},"modified":"2019-03-31T09:08:08","modified_gmt":"2019-03-31T03:38:08","slug":"mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HXGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 1\" DAY OF OCTOBER 2o10,j~A \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. KU'WiARA\u00a3\u00a7WAM\u00a7'._ it  \n\nCRIMINAL PETITION NO.48'O522Oi0EE\"-.,,A' \u00bb. O,  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1. Mr. Ganapa Sreenivasa Rae,   \nS\/o Ganapa Pedda Koteshwafra R--ao,,-- V.  \nAged about 46 years,     \nResiding at NO.6O1,A11\"' Blo.c.k,_=.    .1\nHeritage Estate, Doddabai|;apura';Ro,a'd.,'_~.._ ' \"\n\nYelahanka,   \n\n2. Mr. Kandas.w.aaTiy__Vei1=gmani,  \"\nAged about 56 yeaajs,  g  .\nS\/o Athyarman'Karic;aswamy_ -. '\nR\/0 No.106,= \"  \nCascade Range Block\" 15,. = \nHeritage Estate,\" i')_Odda--ba'i%ap'u ra Road,\n\n4_.Y.e|ahani?,a, E3angai'ore--560, 064.\n\n3.\"'i\\_Gr..' Serjjthivi  _\nAged eb0t*ttC30vtesa\n8\/0 3-avaprakash;*;; \"\n\nA  *.Residin_g at gi~,:.o.T;:,o6,\n\nCascade Ra----nge 'Block 15,\n\n~if-&lt;.He-ritage Estate, Doddabaliapura Road,\n &quot;Y&#039;e!at:an4i<a>leadeEj\n\nThis Criminai Petition is  SeiV:tiAt5,_n\u00bb--%i82 of Code of\n\nCriminal Procedure_.,\u00abpra--ying' TFIR in Crime\n\nNo.:l_37\/2010.,\"ioeridiiiig, o.\u00bbi}'i.4VV't.*_i:e~..'.:'i_*iie ofthe IV Additional Chief\nlvietropolitan i2iagistrate,~T,\"eangaiiao,,re_.\n\nThis C.rimina'i\"P_etiitio~n is iioming on for admission this day,\nthe 'Court._':rfiacie. the f0|iowi.ng:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Ti:iVs&#8221;Crim&#8217;iria! Petition is filed under Section&#8211;482 of Code of<\/p>\n<p>V*7Crim,ina| iiiirorieydtire praying to quash the FIR in Crime<\/p>\n<p>.1i\u00a7io&#8217;.\u00a71.,.37\/2C0-1,0 bending on the file of the iv Additional Chief<\/p>\n<p>V.\u00b0v~4&#8243;_vMetto;ac\u00a7|i&#8217;tan Magistrate, Bangalore.<\/p>\n<p>if<\/p>\n<p>2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader for<\/p>\n<p>the respondent &#8212; State, this matter is heard on merits..&#8221;&#8216;._,:&#8221;7li_l*i-ev<\/p>\n<p>materials placed before this Court is sufficient to  _<\/p>\n<p>case at this stage.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The primary facts of the case are&#8221;-as\u20ac.in&#8217;dVer&#8217;:&gt;.  <\/p>\n<p>3.1 one Sri Gadde Babji,<br \/>\nLimited, Bangalore has filed,&#8221; a co-mVpl&#8217;gain&#8217;t..__bef0&#8242;&#8221;re-,the Police<\/p>\n<p>Inspector, Yelahanka New T0v\\in&#8221;Po_li};i;=:i~ \u00a7:ta&#8217;tio:n&#8217;,.,Bangalore on<\/p>\n<p>27.4.2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.2 ThevzC0Vnt.entsVgoflthe&#8217; c0;m.pl&#8211;aint are as under:<br \/>\nThat _McMi_xlaS~\/s&#8217;temis Ai&gt;=trl1i\\l\/ate Limited is a Private Limited<br \/>\n W.,as&#8221;in&#8217;Ct)&#8217;r&#8221;&#8216;p0rated on 9.8.2009. The firm<\/p>\n<p>transectsthe:p:,isin&#8217;ess_:,thr0ughout the world having its office at<\/p>\n<p> Ind&#8217;i3_s&#8217;trialv_.E&#8217;stg:*te, Yelahanka, Bangalore. Mr. Ganappa<\/p>\n<p>-4d.lSr.een.i,vasa Raoi S\/0 Peeda Koteshwara Rao was appointed as<\/p>\n<p> it~l5?ia\u00abna:g_ing,l\ufb01irector of this firm in January&#8211;2003. and he was paid<\/p>\n<p>. V&#8217;xa7lp-proximately Rs.8 lakhs as salary per year. On 28.2.2010<\/p>\n<p>2&#8230;?\n<\/p>\n<p>Ganappa Sreenivas Rao resigned from the post of Managing<\/p>\n<p>Director. His resignation was accepted by the Board of<\/p>\n<p>Directors. During 2010, he was drawing a saiary of Rs.24.<\/p>\n<p>peryean<\/p>\n<p>3.3 Every year the accounts of the firm._wer_embein&#8217;g\u00bba.udi&#8217;_tedt-._V in<\/p>\n<p>by Akasham &amp; Associates. The yearly ;&#8217;transaction. <\/p>\n<p>was crores of rupees and the busin_e&#8217;s.sx even<br \/>\nIndia. The Board of Directors infOr&#8217;n&#8217;i_atip5n from<br \/>\nAuditors viz. Akasham &amp; Associates that ethical<br \/>\nbusiness and financiatpracticles&#8217; On perusal<\/p>\n<p>of the preiimifnary&#8217; audit}-re&#8217;port,:&#8221;it.was noticed that Mr. Ganapa<br \/>\nSreenivasa Rao&#8221;&lt;a_nc!_three&#039;.&quot;en1-pioyees of the firm viz., Mr.<br \/>\nVe.i_u.mani,,.\u00abi\u00a7{1&#039;rv. 1&#039;5enthVi&#039;i&quot;J.:a_ndAvMr. Suresh .M have created faise<\/p>\n<p>anci,_fajbricate-d._documents to cheat the company and<\/p>\n<p>&#039;xv._misapprop&#8211;rirat&#039;eda&quot;_thegfunds of the company to the tune of more<\/p>\n<p>V&#039;.:-grhar:VRs.3t3&#039;O  when the Board of Directors interrogated ali<\/p>\n<p>.1the4&#039;ab:o&#039;vepersons, in the beginning they ciaimed the ignorance<\/p>\n<p>AV&quot;rt.&quot;Vand.jwere&quot;sa&#039;ying that they did not do any wrong. Later on when<\/p>\n<p>h&quot;&quot;&#039;v.__the..:preIiminary Audit Report and ail the concerned records were<\/p>\n<p>\u00a39},<\/p>\n<p>brought: to their notice, they admitted the guilt of creating false<\/p>\n<p>and fabricated documents and cheating the company ___and<\/p>\n<p>misappropriating the funds of the company to the tune <\/p>\n<p>iakhs.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.4 Ni the documents regarding ap_pointme&#8211;n&#8217;t&#8221;of*t.h\u00bbe&#8221;ab&#8217;ovevi-V_V it&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>four persons in the Company, the :&#8221;:detfaiii~3; of  <\/p>\n<p>misappropriated and fabricated docur&#8217;i&#8217;ients c&#8217;reatedf&#8221;toA&#8217;cheatthe<br \/>\ncompany were also furnished a_|..oingwiitVh .the..,_AAcofnp|aint.<br \/>\nTherefore it is prayed in the &#8220;co&#8217;mpia.ir;{t&#8217;for-Vregis,tering the case<\/p>\n<p>against the above persons an:d&#8221;&#8216;t&#8217;o&#8211;recfoueir_the  they have<\/p>\n<p>misaDDr0Driafed if\n<\/p>\n<p>4. On the basis A:.:ti*ii\u00bbs&#8221;wcompiaint, Yeiahanka New Town<br \/>\nPoiice haveg.registe&#8217;red avcase in&#8221;:Crime No.13?\/2010 against the<\/p>\n<p>actusea for\u20ac&#8217;th&#8221;e offenceswpfuvnishable under sections 408, 420,<\/p>\n<p>  Indian Penai Code. The remand<\/p>\n<p>7.g:&#8221;a&#8217;pvp|ication4__Vof_.the&#8217;i&#8217;..Po|ice Inspector of Yelahanka Police Station<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8221; -disci_oses the foiiowing:\n<\/p>\n<p>  gV&#8221;&#8216;;friva.t:uAccused No.4 was a Group Finance Officer of the<\/p>\n<p> On 13.7.2009 Accused No.4 aiongwith Accused No.1<\/p>\n<p>if<\/p>\n<p>had obtained a contract order for Rs.32,50,000\/- from a<\/p>\n<p>Maiasiyan company. Through E.maii accused had p|an:3e&#8217;d_:bit.o<\/p>\n<p>cheat 10 to 20 lakhs to the company in the above contract&#8221;iejrider*;..__J&#8221; _<\/p>\n<p>In this Connection, accused had also Vpyrepared&#8221;&#8221;fa&#8217;i.&lt;&#039;:e&quot;:vdbiil&quot;forth <\/p>\n<p>Rs.19.00 lakhs. They have aiso crea,tecififa&#039;ise,_.&#039;T.&#039;A; &quot;bVi:i&#039;\u00a7ti\/__Aof;_s<\/p>\n<p>empioyees to the tune of Rs.90,000;*&#8211;:_,..<br \/>\nRs.3,60,000\/&#8211; in the name 1_ of onetyi:ii&#039;jr4:ad~h,\\uri1iiasitont\u00e9suitancy<br \/>\ncharges by creating fake ._in the remand<br \/>\nappiication it is statedthat  false and<br \/>\nfabricated docum.e\ufb01\u00a7&#039;\u00e9.\u00e9   funds of the<\/p>\n<p>company.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. It is the  iearned counsei for the<br \/>\npetitioners ;_t&#8217;h&#8221;a.t. accuse_d&#8221;wasv&#8217;working with the complainant as a<\/p>\n<p> thereafter he retired in the month of<\/p>\n<p> February%2Qi1GV[&#8220;&#8216;-\u00abAuteyr.he was retired, one of the Directors fiied a<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;qcom_piairat&#8217;~..bef_oretithe Poiice Inspector, Yeiahanka New Town<\/p>\n<p>dddydtfioidicemStaytionpBangalore though he has not been authorised to<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;a_V&#8217;C-C-napiaint. Learned counsei for the petitioners aiso<\/p>\n<p>  that the facts narrated in the complaint are civii in<\/p>\n<p>{\/1<\/p>\n<p>averments made in the complaint constitute the offences alleged<\/p>\n<p>or not. At this stage, merit or demerit of the case of the accused<\/p>\n<p>or the defence of the accused cannot be examined. It is..:a.l.leig_\u00e9dV<\/p>\n<p>in the complaint and also in the preliminary audit  .<\/p>\n<p>accused have misappropriated the funds_,oft_he com&#8221;panyl&#8221;tov&#8217;_&#8217;_t.he-_ ll&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>tune of Rs.36O lakhs. 1: have carefully :&#8217;peru_sed the&#8221;~ayerrn1f:&#8211;nt&#8217;sii.j<\/p>\n<p>made in the complaint with great&#8221;E:a&#8221;reV and-imy r L&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>view, the allegations made against the\ufb02&#8217;pe_titi_oners&#8221; constitute the<\/p>\n<p>offences alleged. The matter isitstillrurider&#8221;investigation. This is<\/p>\n<p>not the rarest of rare_r&#8217;cases;-Where t&#8217;l1i.s.__Cour,t:&#8221;&#8216;can exercise its<\/p>\n<p>inherent   of Criminal Procedure<br \/>\nto quash the crime.This&#8217;Criim&#8217;ina&#8217;l~\u00abpetition is devoid of merits and<br \/>\nthe same is .li,ablet&#8217;o be di&#8217;smi.ss\u00e9cl.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;~53, I&#8217;\\l:ti.:&#8217;thi..si:stage, lxear&#8217;n&#8217;ed counsel for the petitioners submits<\/p>\n<p>that&#8217; and filing of the charge sheet, the<\/p>\n<p>V7.:f&#8221;&#8216;p&#8217;etitioneifs&#8217;V%mayiibelll given liberty to file an application for<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;i-liliii-Vs\u00abc_h&#8217;arge before the Court below. They are at liberty to do so<\/p>\n<p> the grounds which are mentioned in the criminal<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;ipetitionf In case if petitioners file an application for discharge<\/p>\n<p>id\/2&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>before the Court beiow, the same shall be disposed&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. In view of the above discussion;\u00bb~I..pasahthe&#8217;t.-fof&#8217;iov\\}.i:ng&#8217;o&#8217;._V &#8216; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>order:\n<\/p>\n<p>0RDE\ufb01gh<\/p>\n<p>This Criminai petition is   it   &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>Gss\/&#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010 Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy IN THE HXGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1&#8243; DAY OF OCTOBER 2o10,j~A BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C.R. KU&#8217;WiARA\u00a3\u00a7WAM\u00a7&#8217;._ it CRIMINAL PETITION NO.48&#8217;O522Oi0EE&#8221;-.,,A&#8217; \u00bb. O, BETWEEN: 1. Mr. Ganapa Sreenivasa Rae, S\/o Ganapa Pedda [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-74512","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-31T03:38:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-31T03:38:08+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1073,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-31T03:38:08+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-31T03:38:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-31T03:38:08+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010"},"wordCount":1073,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010","name":"Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-31T03:38:08+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-ganapa-sreenivasa-rao-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr Ganapa Sreenivasa Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 1 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74512","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74512"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74512\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74512"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}