{"id":74650,"date":"2008-09-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008"},"modified":"2018-04-12T00:28:45","modified_gmt":"2018-04-11T18:58:45","slug":"state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>                 L.P.A. NO. 100 OF 1996(R)\n                             ...\n       In the matter of an Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent ;\n                              ....\n\n       The State of Bihar(now Jharkhand)\n       And others                                 ..... Appellants\n\n                             Versus\n\n       Suleman Mian                                ..... Respondent\n                            ...\n\n       For the Appellants          : Mr.P.Modi, G.P.I\n       For the Respondent          : M\/s Jai Prakash &amp; P.K.Mukhopadhaya\n\n\n\n                                    PRESENT\n                            HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE\n                           HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.K.SINHA\n\n\n                             ......\n\nBy Court :        This appeal had been preferred by the erstwhile State of Bihar,\n16.9.2008<\/pre>\n<p>        now the State of Jharkhand, against the judgment and order dated<\/p>\n<p>       6.2.1996 by which the learned Single Judge had been pleased to allow the<\/p>\n<p>       writ petition in favour of the writ petitioner- respondent herein and directed<\/p>\n<p>       the appellant-State to pay the amount of salary for the period ranging from<\/p>\n<p>       1.7.1994 to 11.4.1998 which was the period during which the writ petitioner<\/p>\n<p>       -respondent was treated to be in service on the ground that he was wrongly<\/p>\n<p>       made to retire on 30.6.1994.\n<\/p>\n<p>       2.     Relevant facts and circumstances giving rise to this appeal indicate<\/p>\n<p>       that the respondent (petitioner before the learned Single Judge) filed a writ<\/p>\n<p>       petition bearing CWJC No.3116 of 1995(R) assailing the order dated<\/p>\n<p>       1.9.1995 by which the writ petitioner- respondent had been directed to<\/p>\n<p>       refund the salary for the period of 16.6.1988 to 30.6.1994 on the ground<\/p>\n<p>       that as per his date of birth which, according to the appellant-State, should<\/p>\n<p>       have been 1930, he ought to have retired in the year 1988. The<\/p>\n<p>       respondent-petitioner had also prayed for a direction upon the respondent-<\/p>\n<p>       State, appellant herein, to correct his date of birth in the service book.<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                            2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>3.     The learned Single Judge on scrutiny of the facts in regard to the<\/p>\n<p>date of birth noted that the respondent&#8217;s date of birth although is stated to<\/p>\n<p>be 1930 as per the version of the appellant-State , his date of birth recorded<\/p>\n<p>in the service book was 1936. But the learned Single Judge held that his<\/p>\n<p>date of birth in the service book was not fit to be relied as his date of birth<\/p>\n<p>in the gradation list was shown as 1940, meaning thereby that his service<\/p>\n<p>book where the respondent&#8217;s date of birth was recorded as 1936 was not<\/p>\n<p>relied upon and the date of birth as shown in the gradation list as 1940 was<\/p>\n<p>taken to be his correct date of birth. But, it appears that the respondent in<\/p>\n<p>the meantime had retired from service as Class-IV servant, taking his date<\/p>\n<p>of birth to be 1936, as a result of which he retired on 30th June, 1994.<\/p>\n<p>However, the appellant-State initially insisted that the respondent&#8217;s date of<\/p>\n<p>birth should have been 1930 and according to the averment of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant-State he should have retired before 1994 i.e. he should have<\/p>\n<p>retired in 1988 itself . On this averment, the appellant-State had issued an<\/p>\n<p>order against the respondent directing him to refund the salary which he<\/p>\n<p>had received for discharging the duties beyond 1988 i.e. upto 30th June,<\/p>\n<p>1994. The learned Single Judge struck down this order of the appellant-<\/p>\n<p>State and held that he could not have been directed to retire in the year<\/p>\n<p>1988 as his date of birth ought to have been taken to be 1940 as per the<\/p>\n<p>gradation list. In view of this finding recorded by the learned Single Judge,<\/p>\n<p>he was pleased to quash and set aside the order dated 1.9.1995 by which<\/p>\n<p>the respondent had been directed to refund the amount which he had<\/p>\n<p>drawn by way of salary from 1988 upto 30th June, 1994, during which he<\/p>\n<p>had duly discharged his duties.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.     Mr.P.Modi, learned G.P.I, appearing on behalf of the State has stated<\/p>\n<p>that in sofar this part of the relief granted to the respondent is concerned,<\/p>\n<p>the appellant is not pressing this appeal but as the learned Single Judge has<\/p>\n<p>held that the respondent had wrongly been retired on 30th June, 1994 and<\/p>\n<p>he had four more years to go if his date of birth had been taken to be 1940<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                             3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>due to which he could not have been retired prior to 1998, the appeal is fit<\/p>\n<p>to be pressed,     since the learned Single Judge based on this premise<\/p>\n<p>granted further relief to the respondent and held that the respondent had<\/p>\n<p>been wrongly retired in the year 1994 as he could have retired only in the<\/p>\n<p>year 1998 and therefore he was entitled to the arrears of salary from the<\/p>\n<p>year 1994 to 1998 , although he had not discharged duties during this<\/p>\n<p>period since he had erroneously been retired in the year 1994.<\/p>\n<p>5.     It is this part of the order, which is under challenge in this appeal, in<\/p>\n<p>support of which it was contended that although the learned Single Judge<\/p>\n<p>was right in holding that the respondent could not have been made to retire<\/p>\n<p>in 1988 by taking his date of birth to be 1930, the entry of his date of birth<\/p>\n<p>as 1936 which was recorded in the service book, could not have been<\/p>\n<p>ignored.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.     We find force in this part of the contention of learned Government<\/p>\n<p>Pleader No.1, appearing in support of this appeal, as the learned Single<\/p>\n<p>Judge could not have entered into a scrutiny of the date of birth of the<\/p>\n<p>respondent as the entry made in the service book has to be treated to be<\/p>\n<p>the conclusive proof of the respondent&#8217;s age. If the learned Single Judge<\/p>\n<p>thought it otherwise then, in our opinion, the matter could have been<\/p>\n<p>referred to an Enquiry Committee or a Medical Board for assessment of the<\/p>\n<p>correct age of the respondent. As the respondent&#8217;s age was duly recorded in<\/p>\n<p>the service book as 1936, the learned Single Judge had no reason to rely<\/p>\n<p>upon the date of birth recorded in the gradation list. The date of birth<\/p>\n<p>recorded in the gradation list could not have been treated as a conclusive<\/p>\n<p>proof of the age of the respondent, ignoring the entry made in the service<\/p>\n<p>book. The respondent being a IVth grade employee, the date of birth<\/p>\n<p>recorded in the service book at the time of entry into the service alone could<\/p>\n<p>have been relied upon by the learned Single Judge and hence the view<\/p>\n<p>taken by the learned Single Judge that he was wrongly retired on 30th June,<\/p>\n<p>1994 has no reasonable basis and , therefore, the four years&#8217; of service which had<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                            4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>been allowed to be counted in favour of the respondent cannot be allowed<\/p>\n<p>to be sustained, so as to grant him salary for this period on the premise that<\/p>\n<p>he had wrongly been superannuated on 30th June, 1994.<\/p>\n<p>7.    For the reasons stated hereinbefore, the order of the learned Single<\/p>\n<p>Judge, in sofar as the direction to pay him salary for a period of four years<\/p>\n<p>being 30th June, 1994 to 1998 cannot be allowed to be sustained as the<\/p>\n<p>respondent&#8217;s date of birth could not have been taken from the gradation list,<\/p>\n<p>ignoring the service book in order to award benefit for the extended period<\/p>\n<p>of four years&#8217; of service during which he had not discharged any duty.<\/p>\n<p>8.    As already recorded hereinbefore, the aforesaid direction, therefore,<\/p>\n<p>stands quashed and set aside and the appeal, thus, is partly allowed.<\/p>\n<p>However, in the circumstance, there shall be no order as to costs.<\/p>\n<p>                               ( Gyan Sudha Misra,C.J.)<\/p>\n<p>                                     ( D.K.Sinha, J. )<\/p>\n<p>Jharkhand High Court<br \/>\n    Ranchi<br \/>\nThe 16th September,2008<br \/>\nG.Jha\/NAFR\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008 L.P.A. NO. 100 OF 1996(R) &#8230; In the matter of an Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent ; &#8230;. The State of Bihar(now Jharkhand) And others &#8230;.. Appellants Versus Suleman Mian &#8230;.. Respondent &#8230; For the Appellants : [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-74650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-11T18:58:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-11T18:58:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1138,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008\",\"name\":\"State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-11T18:58:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-11T18:58:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-11T18:58:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008"},"wordCount":1138,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008","name":"State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-11T18:58:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-bihar-ors-vs-suleman-mian-on-16-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Bihar &amp; Ors vs Suleman Mian on 16 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74650"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74650\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}