{"id":752,"date":"2009-06-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009"},"modified":"2017-01-06T15:05:35","modified_gmt":"2017-01-06T09:35:35","slug":"dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nTr.P(C).No. 199 of 2008()\n\n\n1. DR.SELVIN.J.PUTHIYADAM\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. BRUDY.S.PUTHIYADAM\n3. ALPHY.S.PUTHIYADAM,\n4. P.C.JOHN, PUTHIYADAM HOUSE,\n5. THRESIA, W\/O.JOHN, DO.DO.\n6. U.R.MENON, SINIOTIC SOCIETY,\n7. PADMINI.R.MENON, W\/O.U.R.MENON\n8. ANIRUDH.R.MENON, R\/AT.19,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. MURALEEDHARAN, R\/AT.TCV\/1302\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. UMA MURALEEDHARAN, W\/O.MURALEEDHARAN\n\n3. LAKSHMI, D\/O.MURALEEDHARAN,\n\n4. KRISHNAKUMAR, S\/O.MURALEEDHARAN,\n\n5. M\/S.SMART ENGINEERING\n\n6. DYNAMIC MARKETING, NEAR UNIVERSITY BUS\n\n7. GARNET POLITECS, ALATHUR DESOM\n\n8. TRANSTEC POLIMER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.UNNIKRISHNA MENON\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n\n Dated :05\/06\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n             S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n                 -------------------------------\n               Tr.P(C).NO.199 OF 2008 ()\n               -----------------------------------\n          Dated this the 5th day of June, 2009\n\n                     J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>     The transfer petition has been filed under Section 23 and<\/p>\n<p>24 of the CPC, seeking transfer of O.S.No.146\/2008 of Sub<\/p>\n<p>Court, Palakkad, O.S.No.70\/2008 of Sub Court, Irinjalakuda<\/p>\n<p>and O.S.No.122\/2008 of Munsiff Court, Thrissur to the Sub<\/p>\n<p>Court, Thrissur for joint trial alongwith O.S.No.1016\/2005,<\/p>\n<p>O.S.No.270\/2005 and O.S.No.63\/2008 pending before that<\/p>\n<p>court. Respondents 5 to 8 in the petition are partnership<\/p>\n<p>firms, in which, it is stated the petitioners and also<\/p>\n<p>respondents 1 to 4 were erstwhile partners. An agreement<\/p>\n<p>was entered into, copy of which is produced as Annexure I, as<\/p>\n<p>between the 1st petitioner and respondents 1 to 4 for<\/p>\n<p>dissolving the firms subject to the terms and conditions<\/p>\n<p>stipulated therein. Pursuant thereto, as disputes continued<\/p>\n<p>even in respect of the enforcement of the terms of agreement,<\/p>\n<p>two suits were filed by the 1st petitioner as O.S.No.270\/2005<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Tr.P(C).199\/08                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and O.S.No.1016\/2005 against respondents 1 to 4 before the<\/p>\n<p>Sub Court, Thrissur and four suits by respondents 1 to 4 as<\/p>\n<p>O.S.No.146\/2008 at Sub Court, Palakkad, O.S.No.70\/2008 at<\/p>\n<p>Sub Court, Irinjalakuda, O.S.No.122\/2008 at Munsiff Court,<\/p>\n<p>Thrissur and O.S.No.63\/2008 at Sub Court, Thrissur. Transfer<\/p>\n<p>of the suits pending before Sub Courts, Palakkad, Irinjalakuda<\/p>\n<p>and Munsiff court, Thrissur are sought to be transferred to<\/p>\n<p>Sub Court, Thrissur, where three suits as mentioned above are<\/p>\n<p>pending for joint trial with those suits.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         2.   I heard the learned counsel on both sides.       It is<\/p>\n<p>submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>that in all the seven suits the validity and enforcement of the<\/p>\n<p>terms covered by Annexure I agreement, is the main issue<\/p>\n<p>arising for consideration to determine the controversies<\/p>\n<p>arising for adjudication for the reliefs claimed by the<\/p>\n<p>respective plaintiffs in the suit, and, in the suits filed by the 1st<\/p>\n<p>petitioner against respondents 1 to 4 as O.S.No.1016\/2005<\/p>\n<p>and O.S.No.270\/2005, both pending before the Sub court,<\/p>\n<p>Thrissur, the relief of decree of permanent injunction and<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Tr.P(C).199\/08                  3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>declaration that respondents 1 to 4 have no right in the firms<\/p>\n<p>are sought for, and in the four suits filed by the respondents 1<\/p>\n<p>to 4 pending before various Sub Courts as mentioned above<\/p>\n<p>settlement of accounts of the firms, which are dissolved under<\/p>\n<p>the agreement, is claimed as the main relief. So, essentially,<\/p>\n<p>all the suits stem up from Annexure I agreement entered into<\/p>\n<p>by the 1st petitioner and the respondents 1 to 4, and that being<\/p>\n<p>so, the consolidation of all the suits by ordering transfer to<\/p>\n<p>one court and their joint trial, according to the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the petitioner, is absolutely essential to advance<\/p>\n<p>the ends of justice. The request for transfer is vehemently<\/p>\n<p>opposed by the learned counsel appearing for respondents 1<\/p>\n<p>to 4, contending that such a course is not feasible nor<\/p>\n<p>practicable.     The learned counsel has also canvassed a<\/p>\n<p>preliminary objection challenging the entertainability of the<\/p>\n<p>transfer petition advancing a plea that the request for transfer<\/p>\n<p>made in respect of suits pending in various Sub courts to one<\/p>\n<p>Sub court would tantamount to violating the legislative<\/p>\n<p>mandate covered by Section 16 to 20 of the CPC. According<\/p>\n<p>to the learned counsel, the institution of suits covered by<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Tr.P(C).199\/08                    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Section 16 to 20 of the CPC also govern the place of trial as<\/p>\n<p>well and a transfer to a different court, where the suit could<\/p>\n<p>not have been instituted is not permissible. On merits also,<\/p>\n<p>according to the counsel, transfer of the suits pending in Sub<\/p>\n<p>courts other than Sub court, Thrissur to that court would<\/p>\n<p>cause inconvenience and hardship to the defendants.             A<\/p>\n<p>further submission is also made that the suits pending in<\/p>\n<p>different Sub courts and Munsiff court, which are sought to be<\/p>\n<p>transferred to Sub court, Thrissur, have been filed at the place<\/p>\n<p>where the registered firms of the respective partnership firms<\/p>\n<p>are situated.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         3. I find no merit in the preliminary objection raised by<\/p>\n<p>the learned counsel for respondents 1 to 4 that the powers of<\/p>\n<p>transfer vested with this Court is whittled down in any way by<\/p>\n<p>Section 16 to 17 of CPC, which is applicable to the institution<\/p>\n<p>of the suits. Section 24 of CPC gives a general power of<\/p>\n<p>transfer of all suits, appeals and other proceedings pending<\/p>\n<p>before the Sub courts with High Court or District Court for<\/p>\n<p>trial and disposal to any court, subordinate to them. Whether<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Tr.P(C).199\/08                  5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>such transfer or withdrawal of the case to any other court is<\/p>\n<p>necessary to advance the ends of justice is with the court<\/p>\n<p>which is empowered under Section 24 of CPC to pass such<\/p>\n<p>transfer and withdrawal. From the submissions made and the<\/p>\n<p>facts and circumstances presented, it is evident that the<\/p>\n<p>disputes in all the suits are interconnected and have<\/p>\n<p>something in common demanding their consolidation to avoid<\/p>\n<p>loss of precious time of the courts, examination of common<\/p>\n<p>witnesses separately in all the suits, avoiding duplicity of<\/p>\n<p>evidence in the suits and lastly but most significantly, avoiding<\/p>\n<p>of conflicting decisions, which cannot be ruled out if the suits<\/p>\n<p>are separately tried in different courts. It appears that the<\/p>\n<p>agreement entered into by the 1st petitioner and respondents 1<\/p>\n<p>to 4 on which those respondents have also raised their claim<\/p>\n<p>for the reliefs claimed in their respective suits has a decisive<\/p>\n<p>value in the adjudication of the disputes in all the suits. So<\/p>\n<p>much so, I find that transfer of the suits, O.S.No.146\/2008 at<\/p>\n<p>Sub       Court, Palakkad,  O.S.No.70\/2008     at  Sub    Court,<\/p>\n<p>Irinjalakuda and O.S.No.122\/2008 at Munsiff Court, Thrissur<\/p>\n<p>for consolidation and joint trial with O.S.No.1016\/2005,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Tr.P(C).199\/08                   6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>O.S.No.270\/2005 and O.S.No.63\/2008 at Sub Court, Thrissur,<\/p>\n<p>is necessary for a fair decision in accordance with law in all<\/p>\n<p>the suits. Transfer of the cases as indicated above is ordered<\/p>\n<p>accordingly, leaving it to the learned Sub Judge, Thrissur, to<\/p>\n<p>decide which suit among them has to be treated as the main<\/p>\n<p>case in which the parties have to lead evidence. Communicate<\/p>\n<p>a copy of this judgment to the Sub Court, Palakkad, Sub<\/p>\n<p>Court, Irinjalakuda and Munsiff Court, Thrissur, directing<\/p>\n<p>them to send the records of their respective cases pending in<\/p>\n<p>their courts forthwith to the Sub Court, Thrissur. Copy of this<\/p>\n<p>judgment may also to be communicated to Sub Court,<\/p>\n<p>Thrissur, which is directed to take expeditious steps for joint<\/p>\n<p>trial and disposal of the suits.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>         Petition is allowed.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\n\n\n                             S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN\n                                      JUDGE\n\nprp\n\nTr.P(C).199\/08    7\n\n                S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN, J.\n\n\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>                       CRL.R.P.NO. OF 2006 ()<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>                                           O R D E R<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                                 23rd March, 2009<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Tr.P(C).No. 199 of 2008() 1. DR.SELVIN.J.PUTHIYADAM &#8230; Petitioner 2. BRUDY.S.PUTHIYADAM 3. ALPHY.S.PUTHIYADAM, 4. P.C.JOHN, PUTHIYADAM HOUSE, 5. THRESIA, W\/O.JOHN, DO.DO. 6. U.R.MENON, SINIOTIC SOCIETY, 7. PADMINI.R.MENON, W\/O.U.R.MENON 8. ANIRUDH.R.MENON, R\/AT.19, Vs 1. MURALEEDHARAN, R\/AT.TCV\/1302 &#8230; Respondent 2. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-752","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-06T09:35:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-06T09:35:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1092,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-06T09:35:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-06T09:35:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-06T09:35:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009"},"wordCount":1092,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009","name":"Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-06T09:35:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-selvin-j-puthiyadam-vs-muraleedharan-on-5-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr.Selvin.J.Puthiyadam vs Muraleedharan on 5 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/752","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=752"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/752\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=752"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=752"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=752"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}