{"id":75204,"date":"2009-05-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009"},"modified":"2015-12-22T22:52:52","modified_gmt":"2015-12-22T17:22:52","slug":"narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 1124 of 2009()\n\n\n1. NARAYANAKKURUPPU, S\/O.N.NARAYANAKKURUPPU\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. ROHITH R.KURUPPU,S\/O.RAVEENDRA KURUPPU,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. N.RAVEENDRAKURUPPU,S\/O.NARAYANAKKURUPPU,\n\n3. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.E.NARAYANAN\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :27\/05\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                             THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.\n                           --------------------------------------\n                              Crl.R.P.No.1124 of 2009\n                           --------------------------------------\n                       Dated this the 27th day of May, 2009.\n\n                                        ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
       Public Prosecutor takes notice for respondent No.3.<\/p>\n
       2.     Heard counsel for petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.<\/p>\n
       3.     Dismissal of a private complaint under Section 203 of the Code of<\/p>\n
Criminal Procedure (for short, “the Code”) is under challenge in this revision.<\/p>\n
Petitioner and respondent No.2 are direct brothers. Respondent No.1 is the son<\/p>\n
of respondent No.2 and during the relevant time was engaged in his college<\/p>\n
study. Case of the petitioner is that on the request of respondent No.2, he<\/p>\n
arranged residence for respondent No.1 in his residential building on the<\/p>\n
agreement that respondent Nos.1 and 2 would pay him rent at the rate of<\/p>\n
Rs.2,000\/- per month. Respondent No.1 accordingly stayed in that room for the<\/p>\n
period from 2.9.2004 till October, 2008 and completed his study.               While<\/p>\n
respondent No.1 vacated the room he offered that respondent No.2 will pay the<\/p>\n
rent as per the understanding that at the time of vacating the entire rent will be<\/p>\n
paid. But, respondent Nos.1 and 2 did not pay the rent. It is the further case of<\/p>\n
the petitioner that it was with the intention to cheat the petitioner that respondent<\/p>\n
Nos.1 and 2 offered to pay the amount when respondent No.1 vacated the room.<\/p>\n
Sworn statement of the petitioner and two witnesses were recorded by the<\/p>\n
learned magistrate. Learned magistrate has considered the sworn statement<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1124\/2009<\/p>\n
                                          2<\/span><\/p>\n
and held that no material is produced to show dishonest and fraudulent intention<\/p>\n
on the part of respondent Nos.1 and 2 at the time of taking the room on rent to<\/p>\n
cheat the petitioner and consequently dismissed the complaint under Section<\/p>\n
203 of the Code. Learned counsel for petitioner contends that the finding of the<\/p>\n
learned magistrate is not correct. According to the learned counsel the act may<\/p>\n
give rise to a civil or criminal action and it is open to the parties to choose any<\/p>\n
one of it. Learned counsel also submitted that what the learned magistrate had<\/p>\n
to consider    at this stage was not whether sufficient material to enter a<\/p>\n
conviction is produced but only whether there is sufficient ground to proceed, ie.,<\/p>\n
whether a prima facie case is made out.         Learned counsel placed reliance on<\/p>\n
the decisions in Imbicha Bava Haji v. Imbichi Bava<\/a> (1965 KLT 771), Balraj<\/p>\n
Khanna v. Moti Ram (AIR<\/a> 1971 SC 1389), Nirmaljit v. State W.B. (AIR 1972 SC<\/p>\n
2638) and N.Devindrappa v. State of Karnataka<\/a> ([2007] 5SCC 228.<\/p>\n
       3.     In Imbicha Bava Haji’s case this Court               referred to the<\/p>\n
circumstances     to be considered by the magistrate.         It is stated that for<\/p>\n
determining the question whether any process is to be issued or not, what the<\/p>\n
magistrate has to be satisfied with is whether there is “sufficient ground for<\/p>\n
process” and not whether there is sufficient ground for conviction. In Balraj<\/p>\n
Khanna’s case, Apex court has stated that where the magistrate is satisfied on<\/p>\n
the basis of the material placed before him by a complainant that the prima facie<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1124\/2009<\/p>\n
                                        3<\/span><\/p>\n
case is made out, he must commit the accused for trial. The same view was<\/p>\n
taken in Nirmaljit’s case. In Devindrappa’s case in paragraph 6, the Apex Court<\/p>\n
has observed that,<\/p>\n
                            “On the other hand, the case of the<\/p>\n
                    prosecution was that the appellant-accused was<\/p>\n
                    not the owner of the land and he made the<\/p>\n
                    complainant to believe that he was the owner of<\/p>\n
                    the land and for selling a plot of the land he<\/p>\n
                    received part of the sale consideration as<\/p>\n
                    advance from the complainant though he<\/p>\n
                    subsequently did not allot him any land despite<\/p>\n
                    repeated requests.”\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                              (emphasis supplied)<\/p>\n
       4.     What Section 203 of the Code requires is that if after considering<\/p>\n
the statements on oath of the complainant and of the witnesses and the result of<\/p>\n
the enquiry or investigation under Section 202 the magistrate is of opinion that<\/p>\n
there is no sufficient ground for proceeding, he shall dismiss the complaint. In<\/p>\n
this case, it is not disputed that respondent No.2 is the direct brother of the<\/p>\n
petitioner and respondent No.2 is the son of respondent No.2. Case is that there<\/p>\n
was an agreement between the petitioner and respondent No.2 as per which<\/p>\n
respondent No.1 was given a room in the residential building of the petitioner<\/p>\n
on rent and as per the agreement the rent was Rs.2,000\/- per month payable as<\/p>\n
and when respondent No.1 vacated the room. It is the further allegation that<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1124\/2009<\/p>\n
                                          4<\/span><\/p>\n
respondent No.1 did not pay the amount though respondent No.2 vacated the<\/p>\n
room.      Going through the order under challenge and hearing the learned<\/p>\n
counsel     I  am      not  satisfied that    any   material    sufficient  for  the<\/p>\n
prima facie satisfaction as stated in Section 203 of the Code was produced.<\/p>\n
The decision of the Apex Court in Devindrappa’s case rested on the factual<\/p>\n
basis that the complainant was made to believe by the accused that he was the<\/p>\n
owner of the land agreed to be sold but later it was revealed that the accused<\/p>\n
was not the owner. There was apparently a dishonest representation by the<\/p>\n
accused that he was the owner of the land agreed to be sold and on that<\/p>\n
representation he caused the complainant to pay part of the sale consideration<\/p>\n
in advance. No such factual situation arises in this case and what is involved is<\/p>\n
only a civil liability.  I am not persuaded to think that any civil liability by an<\/p>\n
ingenious drafting of the complaint or a sworn statement accordingly could be<\/p>\n
converted into a criminal liability inviting the process of criminal law. It is not<\/p>\n
sufficient that materials are produced before the magistrate.       What is required<\/p>\n
is that the magistrate is of the opinion that there is sufficient ground to proceed.<\/p>\n
Assuming that respondent Nos.1 and 2 did not pay the rent at the time<\/p>\n
respondent No.1 vacated the room or even that they deliberately did not pay the<\/p>\n
rent, that cannot amount to cheating. Dishonest or fraudulent inducement at the<\/p>\n
time of the agreement should have been shown, prima facie. Any tenant not<\/p>\n
paying the rent as agreed cannot be prosecuted for the offence of cheating by a<\/p>\n
clever drafting of the complaint. Learned magistrate has considered all relevant<\/p>\n
Crl.R.P.No.1124\/2009<\/p>\n
                                           5<\/span><\/p>\n
aspects and was of the opinion that no sufficient grounds existed to proceed<\/p>\n
further. I do not find anything illegal, irregular or improper in the finding that<\/p>\n
complaint is liable to be dismissed under Section 203 of the Code.<\/p>\n
       Resultantly, revision petition fails. It is dismissed.<\/p>\n
                                                   THOMAS P.JOSEPH,
\n                                                           Judge.\n<\/p>\n
cks<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1124 of 2009() 1. NARAYANAKKURUPPU, S\/O.N.NARAYANAKKURUPPU … Petitioner Vs 1. ROHITH R.KURUPPU,S\/O.RAVEENDRA KURUPPU, … Respondent 2. N.RAVEENDRAKURUPPU,S\/O.NARAYANAKKURUPPU, 3. STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC For Petitioner :SRI.E.NARAYANAN For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon’ble MR. Justice THOMAS […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75204","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNarayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-22T17:22:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-22T17:22:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1085,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-22T17:22:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-22T17:22:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-22T17:22:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009"},"wordCount":1085,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009","name":"Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-22T17:22:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narayanakkuruppu-vs-rohith-r-kuruppu-on-27-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Narayanakkuruppu vs Rohith R.Kuruppu on 27 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75204","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75204"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75204\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}