{"id":7525,"date":"2008-10-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008"},"modified":"2015-10-16T12:01:25","modified_gmt":"2015-10-16T06:31:25","slug":"fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy … on 20 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy … on 20 October, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.K.Patil<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
. ~.  A ‘~—3AN?3’AL<3\u00a3\u00a7E.<\/p>\n
I . CONSTITIJTIGN CF INOIA PRAYING TC 9-ET–ASID’E THE ORDERS OF THE<\/p>\n
” ”  “”..B”.5.\u00a7*ID ORDER CT. 2.82006 PASSES: BY THE LEARNED SESSION JUBGE,
\n .MAND\u00a7’*$, IN CRAPPEAL NO. 6308 AT ANI”~IEX~C AND DIRECTIGN MAY
\n Pt BE GIVEN T0 RELEJKSE THE SAID VEHICLE AFTER OBTAINING<\/p>\n
__ “THE. PROPER VALUATION FROM THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY.<\/p>\n
” ~ . \ufb02ag” comm mag mg FOLLOWING:\n<\/p>\n
IN Tffia”. HIGH COSRT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ‘\u00a5J’.NO,12444 OF 21303
\n-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH own!’ or KARMA TAKA A T BANGALOI.-{E
\nDATED THIS ‘mm 2011: nay or I. ‘A
\nssmka If I f
\nms Hcwms me. Jusr:r;\u00a3”IH.x.9I\u00a7 ru_.I   “I
\nW.P.NO. 12444 012’ 200-I”8″‘, 1 I
\nBETWEEN    I’
\n‘I FAIRQZKHRN
\n3:9 SAMIULLA KHAN,
\nAGED 3GYEARS, I ._ .\n<\/p>\n
R!:I}DI:!+?A%\u00a5’IL.i%f{3’ii0ST}I\u00a2;T$;\u00bb.3′  ‘<\/p>\n
MD:\n<\/p>\n
1 THEA “0FF’IQERIAt\u00a7D DEPUTY CONSERVATCIR OF
\nFQREST, ‘MANDXA DEVISIQN, = ‘
\nMANDYK’ I 2 ” .\n<\/p>\n
s2EP:~2gaErITE9,_Is’Y’Pu\u00e9L:c mosecuroa,
\n ‘HIGH counr auaaewzsve
\n RESFONDENT<\/p>\n
A   FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE<\/p>\n
RESPONBEN7; AUTHQRISED OFFICER IN ORDER DT. 244.2008 AT ANNEX-<\/p>\n
Tir-IIS WP. COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY,<\/p>\n
IN THE HIGH CQIJRT OF KARNAIAKA AT BAMGALQRE W.I’.}iO. I’2zt44 OF 29138<\/p>\n
EN TEE HIGH CQURT ()2? \u00a7\u00a7AR}\u00abEATAKA AT BANGALQRE. ‘&’}”.N{}. 32444 OF 2998
\n43-\n<\/p>\n
transported from Karnataka State in New Deihi in t\ufb01:e*–.iT\u00a7:rry<\/p>\n
beionged tn the pe\ufb01tioner herein. Further it \u00a7\u00a7v1e 3fi\u00a7:fs’\ufb01\ufb01z.<\/p>\n
the rmord made avaiiabie by the prosac;xt$\u00e9ii’ja;r\u00a7\u00a7i\u00a3\u00e9\u00a7xeAd\u00bb\u00a7{:.& <\/p>\n
the charge sheet that, the :;.:*_.1i<\/p>\n
least 3 to 4 trips aariier to HT ewV.DeIh-2..  i{;\u00e9’r::j1a.taVka3 am~  ‘<\/p>\n
though it is net possibie for  to.’pr\u00e9:\u00e9 g2m;.% or infer
\nthat on all such  the Jerry had
\ntransported S.va4s%\u00a7\u00a7;’ia!wo;piiiV’;’   ;i\u00a7’quite apparent
\nthat the Iorr’y g\ufb01ndi\ufb01on because it
\nwas    tgontraband goods from
\nsouthe\ufb01  $\u00a7:afe   New Delhi which is a far<\/p>\n
away. piac\u00e9i per the \u00a7\u00e9 izure mahazar dated 23.6.2005<\/p>\n
 ;,.tiwat\u00ab, \ufb01jt\u00e9fvalue of all the seized goods is<\/p>\n
   about 35 Lakhs and it has been<\/p>\n
s\ufb01ifrcijailyiiient\u00e9oned in \ufb01ne charge-sheet that, the total<\/p>\n
‘ H  \u00e9f\ufb01the Sandalwood seized from the lorry and from<\/p>\n
  fif\u00e9\u00e9iastody of the accused on 23.6.2005 was 1908 KGS<\/p>\n
T  “V\u00e9hd it was worth Rs.3,02,408l- and if the said value (if<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
f\u00e9\u00e9 TEE EIIGH C\u20ac.}I}R.T OF KAELNEATAKR AT BP\u00a3~?GALOR’\u00a3 ‘3s”P.N\u20acZ\u00a7, 1244:! 033 $198<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy … on 20 October, 2008 Author: N.K.Patil . ~. A ‘~—3AN?3’AL<3\u00a3\u00a7E. I . CONSTITIJTIGN CF INOIA PRAYING TC 9-ET–ASID’E THE ORDERS OF THE ” ” “”..B”.5.\u00a7*ID ORDER CT. 2.82006 PASSES: BY THE LEARNED SESSION JUBGE, .MAND\u00a7’*$, IN CRAPPEAL NO. 6308 AT ANI”~IEX~C AND DIRECTIGN MAY […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nFairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy ... on 20 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy ... on 20 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-16T06:31:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy … on 20 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-16T06:31:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":424,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy ... on 20 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-16T06:31:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy … on 20 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy ... on 20 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy ... on 20 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-16T06:31:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy … on 20 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-16T06:31:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008"},"wordCount":424,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008","name":"Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy ... on 20 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-16T06:31:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fairozkhan-vs-the-authroised-officer-and-deputy-on-20-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fairozkhan vs The Authroised Officer And Deputy … on 20 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7525\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}