{"id":75371,"date":"2010-10-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010"},"modified":"2015-12-07T07:24:14","modified_gmt":"2015-12-07T01:54:14","slug":"manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 12504 of 2009(G)\n\n\n1. MANAGER, ST.THOMAS COLLEGE, RANNI.\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION,\n\n3. MG UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY ITS\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.B.GANGESH\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI. T.A. SHAJI, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\n\n Dated :20\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                   T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR,J.\n                     -------------------------------------\n                     W.P.(C)No.12504 Of 2009\n               -----------------------------------------------------\n       DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010\n\n                                 J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioner is the Manager of St.Thomas College, Ranni,<\/p>\n<p>which is affiliated to the 3rd respondent-University. There was a<\/p>\n<p>vacancy consequent on retirement in Economics Department of<\/p>\n<p>the College and the management requested to sanction the post<\/p>\n<p>in the Department after computing the work load of the Statistics<\/p>\n<p>Department along with the work load of Economics Department.<\/p>\n<p>The Government took the view in Exhibit P1 that as per the staff<\/p>\n<p>fixation submitted to the College by the Empowered Committee,<\/p>\n<p>work load of Economics and Statistics papers of Economics were<\/p>\n<p>shown separately and according to which there are 40 hours of<\/p>\n<p>work load in Economics and six hours in Statistics. Accordingly,<\/p>\n<p>the Government was of the view that as per the UGC norms,<\/p>\n<p>College is eligible for two posts in Economics only. The request<\/p>\n<p>of the Manager was thus rejected, which is under challenge in<\/p>\n<p>this Writ Petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.   In the Writ Petition, the contention raised is that the<\/p>\n<p>Economics Department was handling the Statistics papers from<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)No.12504\/09               -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>1968 onwards, as there is no separate Statistics Department to<\/p>\n<p>the College and the College does not offer degree or post-<\/p>\n<p>graduate courses in Statistics. Thus, from 1968 onwards work<\/p>\n<p>load of Economics Department in the College was assessed upon<\/p>\n<p>taking into account the work load of Statistics papers in B.A.<\/p>\n<p>Economics.     Exhibit P2 is the true copy of the approved staff<\/p>\n<p>strength of the College dated 18.12.2002 wherein the work load<\/p>\n<p>of Economics Department has been assessed as 46 hours after<\/p>\n<p>taking into account six hours of Statistics also. If Exhibit P2 is<\/p>\n<p>accepted, then there can be three teachers in Economics<\/p>\n<p>Department.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.    In the year 2007-08, only two teachers were working<\/p>\n<p>in the Department of Economics.      A   retirement vacancy had<\/p>\n<p>arisen earlier by the retirement of one Shri A.P.Kuriakose on<\/p>\n<p>31.3.2006. This vacancy could not be filled up due to the ban<\/p>\n<p>order issued by the Government as per Exhibit P3, which was<\/p>\n<p>lifted as per order dated 23.6.2008. The petitioner, therefore<\/p>\n<p>prays, that the proceedings Exhibit P1 may be quashed and a<\/p>\n<p>direction may be given to the 1st respondent to grant concurrence<\/p>\n<p>to the petitioner to effect appointment to the existing open<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)No.12504\/09                -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>vacancy in the Department of Economics available in the College.<\/p>\n<p>      4.    By interim order dated 21.5.2009, it was made clear<\/p>\n<p>that the selection to the post of Lecturer in Economics can go on<\/p>\n<p>as scheduled with a nominee deputed in Exhibit P1 and all<\/p>\n<p>appointments will be done only after getting permission from this<\/p>\n<p>Court.     It was modified by another interim order dated<\/p>\n<p>29.7.2009.     It was directed therein that the Management is<\/p>\n<p>permitted to effect appointment of Lecturer in Economics<\/p>\n<p>pursuant to the selection conducted as per the direction of this<\/p>\n<p>Court, which will be subject to further orders to be passed in the<\/p>\n<p>Writ Petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5.    The 1st and 2nd respondents have filed a counter<\/p>\n<p>affidavit. The University has also filed a counter affidavit. The<\/p>\n<p>stand taken in the counter affidavit filed by respondents 1 and 2<\/p>\n<p>is that there is 40 hours of work load in Economics and six hours<\/p>\n<p>in Statistics Department and as per the the UGC norms two<\/p>\n<p>teachers are permissible. Apparently, this is without reckoning<\/p>\n<p>the six hours for the Statistics Department. So far as the said six<\/p>\n<p>hours are concerned, it is pointed out that a Guest Lecturer can<\/p>\n<p>be appointed.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)No.12504\/09               -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      6.    In the counter affidavit filed by the University it is<\/p>\n<p>explained in paragraph 6 that Statistics paper alone is not only in<\/p>\n<p>the Economics Department, but also in the Mathematics<\/p>\n<p>Department. Hence the University can identify the existence of<\/p>\n<p>any vacancy in the Department only after assessing the detailed<\/p>\n<p>work load of the concerned Department as per the students&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>strength of the College as on 1.1.2008 for the 2009-2010<\/p>\n<p>academic year. It is also mentioned in paragraph No.6 that the<\/p>\n<p>University is not in a position to identify the vacancy position at<\/p>\n<p>this stage because the detailed work load of the concerned<\/p>\n<p>Departments has not been assessed for the 2009-2010 academic<\/p>\n<p>year.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7.    The learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently<\/p>\n<p>contended that even in other Colleges under the University, the<\/p>\n<p>very same method has been adopted for fixing the work load.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the question to be decided is whether the six hours of<\/p>\n<p>the work load of the Statistics Department should be added to<\/p>\n<p>the 40 hours available in the Economics Department to justify the<\/p>\n<p>appointment of the petitioner. Since the work load assessment is<\/p>\n<p>yet to be take place, it will be only proper that the University<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)No.12504\/09                -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>considers the matter after hearing the petitioner. The learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel appearing for the petitioner further pointed out that<\/p>\n<p>Clause 7(1)(c) of the M.G.University Ordinances is clearly<\/p>\n<p>applicable to the facts of this case. The same is extracted below:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;In any case were certain papers of a<\/p>\n<p>            course of study are taught by teachers of<\/p>\n<p>            another Department (for e.g. Statistics<\/p>\n<p>            papers of BA\/MA Economics handled by<\/p>\n<p>            Statistics department) such hours of work<\/p>\n<p>            should be included in the work load of<\/p>\n<p>            Department which actually teaches and<\/p>\n<p>            there   should   be   consistency   in  the<\/p>\n<p>            allotment of such work every year.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>     8.      The learned Government Pleader submitted that the<\/p>\n<p>same will apply only if two departments are there. The effect of<\/p>\n<p>Clause 7(1)(c) is an important aspect for the University to<\/p>\n<p>consider, while fixing the work load. Therefore, to the extent to<\/p>\n<p>which Exhibit P1 disentitles the petitioner from having one more<\/p>\n<p>post in Economics Department is set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>     9.     There will be a direction to the University to take a<\/p>\n<p>decision in the matter after hearing the petitioner and the Deputy<\/p>\n<p>Director of Collegiate Education .    Appropriate decision will be<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C)No.12504\/09                -6-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>taken within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this<\/p>\n<p>judgment. The approval of appointment made pursuant to the<\/p>\n<p>interim orders will be subject to the orders to be passed by the<\/p>\n<p>University.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                              T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>dsn<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 12504 of 2009(G) 1. MANAGER, ST.THOMAS COLLEGE, RANNI. &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, 3. MG UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75371","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-07T01:54:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-07T01:54:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1034,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-07T01:54:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-07T01:54:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-07T01:54:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010"},"wordCount":1034,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010","name":"Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-07T01:54:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manager-vs-state-of-kerala-represented-by-the-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Manager vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 20 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75371","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75371"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75371\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}