{"id":75398,"date":"2011-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011"},"modified":"2016-09-01T23:27:43","modified_gmt":"2016-09-01T17:57:43","slug":"mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRSA.No. 1106 of 2009()\n\n\n1. MATHAI, S\/O.MATHEW,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. ANTONY, S\/O.MATHEW,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.K.ISSAC\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :10\/02\/2011\n\n O R D E R\n            M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n          ===========================\n           R.S.A. No.1106    OF 2009\n          ===========================\n\n   Dated this the 10th day of February,2011\n\n                   JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
        The defendant in O.S.517\/2001 on the<\/p>\n
file  of   Munsiff’s   Court,   Aluva  is   the<\/p>\n
appellant.   Plaintiff   is   the   respondent.<\/p>\n
Respondent instituted the suit for partition<\/p>\n
and separation of his share in the plaint<\/p>\n
schedule  property.    Trial  court  granted  a<\/p>\n
decree finding that plaint schedule property is<\/p>\n
available for partition and it is to be divided<\/p>\n
into  two  equal   shares  and   respondent  is<\/p>\n
entitled to get one share allotted to him.<\/p>\n
Appellant  challenged   the   judgment   before<\/p>\n
Additional  Sub   Court,   North   Paravur   in<\/p>\n
A.S.No.27\/2004. Learned Additional Sub Judge,<\/p>\n
on reappreciation of evidence, confirmed the<\/p>\n
decree.     The     Second   Appeal   is  filed<\/p>\n
challenging the concurrent decree and judgment.<\/p>\n
R.S.A.1106\/2009                      2<\/span><\/p>\n
      2.     Second appeal was admitted formulating the<\/p>\n
following questions of law.\n<\/p>\n
             (i) When a plot of land is outstanding in<\/p>\n
       tenancy with a family whether the assignee<\/p>\n
       member of the family can claim exclusive right<\/p>\n
       over the same on the      basis of assignment<\/p>\n
       alone?\n<\/p>\n
             (ii) Whether suit is maintainable for<\/p>\n
       partial partition excluding the joint property<\/p>\n
       held by the respondent?\n<\/p>\n
      3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant<\/p>\n
and respondent were heard.\n<\/p>\n
      4.         Plaint      schedule        property     admittedly<\/p>\n
belongs jointly to the appellant and respondent.<\/p>\n
The    claim      for     partition       was     defended  on   two<\/p>\n
grounds.        Firstly it was contended that there was<\/p>\n
a family arrangement whereunder                      plaint schedule<\/p>\n
property was given exclusively to the appellant and<\/p>\n
another co-ownership property was given to the<\/p>\n
respondent and therefore plaint schedule property<\/p>\n
R.S.A.1106\/2009              3<\/span><\/p>\n
is not available for partition.      Secondly   it was<\/p>\n
contended      that   the  suit  is  bad  for  partial<\/p>\n
partition as partition of       the other co-ownership<\/p>\n
property was not sought for.          Learned counsel<\/p>\n
appearing for the respondent pointed out that as<\/p>\n
against       the  other  item  of  property,    which<\/p>\n
according to appellant is available for partition<\/p>\n
and    no partition was sought for and hence   suit is<\/p>\n
bad for partial partition,      appellant subsequently<\/p>\n
instituted       O.S.307\/2004  before  Additional  Sub<\/p>\n
Court, North Paravur and a decree for partition was<\/p>\n
passed, in respect of        the said property. It is<\/p>\n
also pointed out that       the preliminary decree was<\/p>\n
challenged by the respondent herein in     A.S.89\/2008<\/p>\n
before       Additional District Court, North Paravur<\/p>\n
and the          appeal was dismissed and the    final<\/p>\n
decree application filed by the appellant herein is<\/p>\n
pending.        A Commissioner was appointed and the<\/p>\n
Commissioner       inspected the property and in such<\/p>\n
circumstances the contention that suit is bad for<\/p>\n
partial partition is now no more survives.         The<\/p>\n
R.S.A.1106\/2009             4<\/span><\/p>\n
challenge against the exclusive right is also in<\/p>\n
respect of the other property which is already<\/p>\n
directed to be divided. Learned counsel appearing<\/p>\n
for the appellant      submitted that in view of the<\/p>\n
decree       passed  in  O.S.517\/2001  appellant   was<\/p>\n
constrained to file O.S.307\/2004 for partition of<\/p>\n
the other item of co-ownership property and that<\/p>\n
preliminary decree was challenged by the respondent<\/p>\n
before       Additional District Court, North Paravur<\/p>\n
and now the final decree application is pending.<\/p>\n
In    view     of the  preliminary  decree  passed  in<\/p>\n
O.S.307\/2004 on the file of Additional Sub Court,<\/p>\n
North Paravur,     the plea  that  present suit is bad<\/p>\n
for partial partition does not survive.<\/p>\n
      5.    Case of the appellant was  that in view of<\/p>\n
the family arrangement, plaint schedule property is<\/p>\n
not available for partition.       When in respect of<\/p>\n
the      remaining    co-ownership   property,   which<\/p>\n
according to appellant was allotted to the share of<\/p>\n
the     respondent   under  the  family  arrangement,a<\/p>\n
preliminary decree was passed in O.S.307\/2004 at<\/p>\n
R.S.A.1106\/2009              5<\/span><\/p>\n
the    instance     of  the  appellant,  it  cannot  be<\/p>\n
contended       that because of the family arrangement,<\/p>\n
plaint schedule property is          not available for<\/p>\n
partition.        When a decree for partition of the<\/p>\n
other co-ownership        property was already granted<\/p>\n
by the trial court and confirmed by the appellate<\/p>\n
court,       appellant  cannot   contend  that   plaint<\/p>\n
schedule property is       not available for partition,<\/p>\n
because of the said family arrangement.         In such<\/p>\n
circumstances, I find no reason to interfere with<\/p>\n
the preliminary decree passed by Munsiff, Aluva in<\/p>\n
O.S.517\/2001 as confirmed by the Additional Sub<\/p>\n
Judge, North Paravur in A.S.27\/2004.<\/p>\n
      6. But in view of the submission at the Bar<\/p>\n
that     a     decree  for  partition   is  passed   in<\/p>\n
O.S.307\/2004 by Additional Sub Court, North Paravur<\/p>\n
in respect of the remaining co-ownership property<\/p>\n
and    final decree applications are    pending, for an<\/p>\n
equitable        division, it is necessary to direct<\/p>\n
transfer        of   final   decree    application   in<\/p>\n
O.S.517\/2001 also to Additional Sub Court, North<\/p>\n
R.S.A.1106\/2009              6<\/span><\/p>\n
Paravur      where  the  final  decree  application in<\/p>\n
O.S.307\/2004      is   pending.    Munsiff,  Aluva  is<\/p>\n
directed to transfer the final decree application<\/p>\n
in O.S.517\/2001        to Additional Sub Court,North<\/p>\n
Paravur      to  be  disposed  with  the  final  decree<\/p>\n
application in O.S.307\/2004.      While dismissing the<\/p>\n
appeal in view of the submission of the learned<\/p>\n
counsel       appearing  for  the  appellant  that  as<\/p>\n
appellant and respondent being        brothers, it is<\/p>\n
possible       to settle all the disputes, Additional<\/p>\n
Sub Judge, North Paravur is directed to refer the<\/p>\n
final decree applications to the      to the Taluk Lok<\/p>\n
Adalat to afford an      opportunity to the parties to<\/p>\n
settle the disputes. If the disputes cannot be<\/p>\n
settled, learned Sub Judge      shall necessarily pass<\/p>\n
the final decree in accordance with the preliminary<\/p>\n
decree in both the cases expeditiously.<\/p>\n
                                 M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
\n                                            JUDGE
\ntpl\/-\n<\/p>\n
R.S.A.1106\/2009    7\n\nM.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n\n\n\n\n     ---------------------\n      W.P.(C).NO. \/06\n     ---------------------\n\n\n         JUDGMENT\n\n\n\n\n     SEPTEMBER,2006\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RSA.No. 1106 of 2009() 1. MATHAI, S\/O.MATHEW, … Petitioner Vs 1. ANTONY, S\/O.MATHEW, … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.V.K.ISSAC For Respondent :SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) The Hon’ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR Dated :10\/02\/2011 O R D E R M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75398","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-01T17:57:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-01T17:57:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011\"},\"wordCount\":871,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011\",\"name\":\"Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-01T17:57:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-01T17:57:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011","datePublished":"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-01T17:57:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011"},"wordCount":871,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011","name":"Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-01T17:57:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mathai-vs-antony-on-10-february-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mathai vs Antony on 10 February, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75398","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}