{"id":7560,"date":"2010-12-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010"},"modified":"2014-10-08T02:46:37","modified_gmt":"2014-10-07T21:16:37","slug":"smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>1.\n\nI    ramu , Adv.)\n\n 1.\n\nN I \n\n. Jayaramu,\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 6\"' DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010\u00a7:'f*ff~.V_\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.\\:EN.:J4Go;\u00e9ALAIaeowog  \nWRIT PETITION No.3o910:\/20150   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSmt.ChikkathayamrI__1a,\nAged about 61 years,\"=~._ _\nW\/o. late Moile Gowd'a\".g '-\n\nAged about \u00e9ftyear\u00e9z, 2:   A ' \nS\/o. fate\u00ab-F\/E'o\u00a7ie](\u00a7owd.a,._A ' \nWorking in _Defeni:e  Of '  ,\nPresvently\"'ca\"rrie;,to_ i3an.g'a\u00a3ore._H_ \n\non $'1oEiday..f~_,   _\n\nBoth are reside-nits ' '\n\nH on Da ya ka naha By I vi !.l_a\"g e ;'\n\nMaiur Hobii, \"_  I' \nCh.annap'afn'aTa--tukv, \nRamanagaram 'District.\nI \"  ~  \"\"\"  ...PETITIONERS\n\nOS~mt;..V'Savr'ojamma,\nAged about 64 years,\n\n I. .a\\\/'V\/o;\"'late Channappa.\n\n. \"KUmara,\n Aged about 35 years,\n\nS\/o. Eate Channappa.\n\n\n\nBoth are residents of\nHonnayakanahaliy village,\nMalur Hobli,\n\nChannapatna Taluk,\nRamanagaram District.\n\nAnd also residing at\nHunuganahalli village,\nKasaba Hobli, Maddur Taluk,\nMandya District.\n\n REsPoi\\i.D\"L{i\\iTs\"._\n\nThis writ petition is filed'-vandber articles: $227 it\n\nof the Constitution of India, praying to \"quash the order\ndated 24.5.2010 passed by'\"\"'i.'he- L'e.arned\"\"Civii Judge\n(3r.Dn.), Channapatna O.'S.Pio..1';1_1,\/2004 rejecting the\nI.A.S filed under Order  Ru.le;'7__goff'\u00bbCPC produced at\nAnnexure - E and quash_the-.order\",a'rid5'allow the writ\npetition. ,   I  -  '  '\n\nTh'isVi'p'et.i{ti_on\u00ab:i;orni'rig\"on for\"'piVre|iminary hearing in 'B'\ngroup tvhisday,\"the.ACourt_made the following]:-\ni M   igirinaa\n\nV'._\u00a7&amp;'O.S.i\\io.1\"1~3i_\/:2'OO\u00a2i on the file of Civil Judge (Jr.\n\n V.ADiv_n.,)_V.i'ACiha:nii.apatna, has been filed by the respondents<\/pre>\n<p> &#8216;\u00a7;&#8217;et&#8217;i&#8217;tioners seeking decree of partition and<\/p>\n<p>sepa&#8217;~rate:&#8217;pvo&#8217;ssession claiming half share in the piaint<\/p>\n<p>4&#8243;&#8221;&#8221;.&#8221;&#8216;gschegdulveiiproperties. The petitioners\/defendants, have<\/p>\n<p>  fi.|e&#8217;d&#8221;izvritten statement. Petitioners filed an application to<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;permit the amendment of the written statement i.e., to<\/p>\n<p>incorporate the proposed plea. The piaintiffs objected for<\/p>\n<p>grant of relief in the application. The triai court,j&#8221;fin&#8217;tiip&#8217;rigu<\/p>\n<p>the application to be devoid of merit, has <\/p>\n<p>same on 24.05.2010. Aggrieved.,~ii~~th_e&#8217;   <\/p>\n<p>filed this writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Sri H.C.Shivaramu,._,,:&#8221;&#8216;i&#8221;e.arned .co&#8217;uns&#8217;e|&#8221;avppeajring 0&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>for the petitioners, conztended&#8217;*V:t&#8217;lj*at&#8217;,&#8217;~-..,the&#8217; Alappiicaition for<br \/>\namendment has not the correct<br \/>\nperspective and[tli..e  irrational and<br \/>\nillegal, is   :1&#8243;\n<\/p>\n<p> -_  though served, have<br \/>\nremai ned  re p reserli 4&#8242; <\/p>\n<p>  I h&#8217;a&#8217;ve.,p_e_ri,:sed the writ petition papers.<\/p>\n<p>   ,,&#8217;\u00a5h:e*~trial court has dismissed the application on<\/p>\n<p>the&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;ioroiin:d&#8217;I__that, it is belated and further, there is<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V_commeni::_ement of trial, in view of which, the proviso<\/p>\n<p>A  Rule 17 of Order 6 CPC is attracted. It has further<\/p>\n<p>it<\/p>\n<p>_\/\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>u D<\/p>\n<p>observed that, plaintiffs will not get opportunity tomeet<\/p>\n<p>the proposed contention of the defendants.<\/p>\n<p>6. The principles which guide the <\/p>\n<p>discretion in allowing the amendment&#8221;are\u00e9_ that, <\/p>\n<p>of proceedings should be avoided,&#8221;t_he-_lVa&#8217;men;;..;fi&#8217;ent <\/p>\n<p>do not totally alter the charaCter~.,of axni-.actio,n, orjdlefence it<\/p>\n<p>should be granted, whi&#8217;ie__ta3&lt;irig&#039;  see\u00e9&#039;that.\u00bbv&#039;\u00a7njustice<br \/>\nand prejudice of an  not inflicted<br \/>\nupon the opposite&#039; partge  offllule 17 of Order<br \/>\n6 CPC makes  of pleading can be<br \/>\nPermitteda&#039;tVal..:afn?y.  &#039;th\u00e9&#039;..&quot;i5t&#039;o&#039;ceedi n9- However, the<br \/>\nproviso&quot;rmposes;l:o.ej.ai;ainbrelstrihctions. If it is established<\/p>\n<p>that,V_inspite~ of .du&#8211;.e i&#039;clili&#039;g&#039;ence the party could not have<\/p>\n<p>&quot;&#039;\u00ab._rais&#039;e&#039;d~ thew,,.matte&#039;r&#039;~before the commencement of trial,<\/p>\n<p> i4i&#039;pori-..the circumstances, the court can permit<\/p>\n<p>the,_.&#039;amendrlni.eii:t.\n<\/p>\n<p> The suit is one for partition and separate<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;:l:&#8221;poss&#8217;e_ssion. The petitioners by seeking amendment of the<\/p>\n<p>  written statement have only proposed to include an item of<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>\/a<\/p>\n<p>property, which they claim is also liable for partitio_r_z_.__ It<\/p>\n<p>has been averred that, they were unaware<\/p>\n<p>particulars till date of filing of the <\/p>\n<p>proposed amendment does not~\u00bbe.l.toge.ther&#8221;-a._al,te&#8217;i&#8217;.&#8217;_&#8217;_:the._,<\/p>\n<p>defence. Whether the property pro&#8217;pos&#8217;ed&#8221;&#8216;lto<\/p>\n<p>the written statement, c|airn_i:n&#8217;gV_ into be_3&#8243;..,3&#8217;oi.r1t&#8211;~~family&#8217;Vi&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>property is liable for division, Vi,s&#8212;-a:&#8217;inatter, vl:h&#8217;ich, isfrequired<\/p>\n<p>to be tried and decided&#8221;   ._     * &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>8. The Vamend&#8217;m_e&#8217;n.tV p_roj,po&#8211;sed&#8217;\u00ab..]c;an be granted,<\/p>\n<p>since multiplis;ity&#8221;j,;1,o&#8217;f prioceeding&#8217;s::.ca&#8221;nbe avoided and the<\/p>\n<p>real ccyvntroyerrsy bt\u00e9twee;a:&#8217;_&#8217;the .pa&#8221;rties could be decided in<br \/>\nthe very=su&#8217;it. H,ow:fjev_e&#8217;r&#8217;,._:t&#8217;o\u00ab.see that no injustice is caused<\/p>\n<p>to the .,plaintiffs on&#8217;.&#8217;*ac&#8217;coiJ&#8217;nt of commencement of trial, the<\/p>\n<p> .,aypiaiatirrss.cout,|,ci be &#8216;permitted to file a further pleading under<\/p>\n<p> ,___R&#8221;u_la&#8217;e&#8217;9  CPC to the proposed amendment and an<\/p>\n<p>issued &#8216;raised with regard to the amended plea,<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;-\u00bb.casting.[burden of proof on the defendants to prove,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;*V&#8217;.wh,etiher the property incorporated in the written statement<\/p>\n<p>\/.\n<\/p>\n<p>I<\/p>\n<p>is liable for partition and aiiotment of shares. The..___triai<\/p>\n<p>court being otherwise, is irrationai.<\/p>\n<p>in the result, the writ petition stands aiioyyed,  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>impugned order stands quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Application dated 31.0Ei&#8217;.2_QO8 f&#8217;i!e&#8217;d&#8217; in me;tiit san\u00a2s f<\/p>\n<p>allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>The petitioners pe-r:mi;tted~&#8211;..totingsorpoiraite in the<br \/>\nwritten statement, thei..i,3ro.P:o\u00a2.e.aaipieayhlVgiiiegfohre 03.01.2011<br \/>\nby paying co_st_:  in the trial cou rt.\n<\/p>\n<p> weeks from the date the<br \/>\namendnwlent  a copy of the amended<\/p>\n<p>written&#8217; statenient: is furnished, the plaintiffs are at liberty<\/p>\n<p> is directed to raise an issue with<\/p>\n<p>regard  &#8220;the amended piea in the written statement,<\/p>\n<p>if&#8221;4&#8243;;&#8211;,:c&#8217;asti_ngVVthe burden of proof on the defendants and reserve<\/p>\n<p>pi&#8221; _<\/p>\n<p>the right to the plaintiffs to Eead rebuttai evidence,_.._with<\/p>\n<p>regard to the additionai issue.\n<\/p>\n<p>The suit being one for partition   <\/p>\n<p>possession, the triai court is directedwtto&#8221;dispose <\/p>\n<p>as eariy as practicable and atany eVerS&#8217;t,_Aiwithinia&#8217; *peri&#8217;oo&#8221;o:f&#8221;~.<\/p>\n<p>six months from the date theasuit is by<br \/>\nraising the aclditionai issue as.vro&#8217;t$se.%yeVEir~.supra;&#8221;&#8216; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda 1. I ramu , Adv.) 1. N I . Jayaramu, IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 6&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF DECEMBER, 2010\u00a7:&#8217;f*ff~.V_ BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.\\:EN.:J4Go;\u00e9ALAIaeowog WRIT PETITION No.3o910:\/20150 BETWEEN: Smt.ChikkathayamrI__1a, Aged about 61 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-10-07T21:16:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-07T21:16:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":758,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-07T21:16:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-10-07T21:16:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-07T21:16:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010"},"wordCount":758,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010","name":"Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-07T21:16:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-chikkathayamma-vs-smt-sarojamma-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Chikkathayamma vs Smt Sarojamma on 6 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7560"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7560\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}