{"id":7561,"date":"2008-11-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008"},"modified":"2017-05-30T16:12:00","modified_gmt":"2017-05-30T10:42:00","slug":"mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n
 \n\nIn THE HIGH comm' or KARHATAIKA _\n\nI\n\nGzmaanm\nDated this the 7th day   \nTHE Horrnm  H.   \n\nR.S,A.xNo. \n\nBETWEEN :\n\nS\/0 Shhi\u00e9ish\u00e9ra\ufb01aypd  V\nKadda;gi\"  V  \nAge 4'?  '\n\nB\u00a3;savaraj?;g.,    ' '\n8\/<2.\u00bb Shiv&ah:%f9AL app'e':__ " "\n44Ye~\u00e9rs%%   %\n\nV,  A.\n_ ~ .}._W\/ Q-~Sizi\\fasha1i3ii\u00e9ppa\nA 3 'years\n\nA V Khughxmgsri'\n"Gu1?ja1g=:i Taluk and\n\nDisuipt - 585 101\n\n  A.ppe11a13ts No.1 ta 3 Iepresmted\n ' *--b:.y parwer of Attorney\n Sri Siddanna\n\nS] o Sharanasiddappa\nMali Biradar\n\nAged 68 ycam\n\nR\/0 Nandn Khnrd\n\nGulbarga Taluk - 585 101 ...AppcI1ants\n\n \n\n\n\nVA . No; 1531105 an the me of the I Additional Civil Judge (Sr.DI1.).\n\n  '\u20ac},uIba1'g'&,V Tpartly allowing the appeal and modifying the\n_  judgfamut  anti decree dated 27-0?'--2G05 passw in OS\n  "4.\u00bb35}1\u00a7f;89 on the fiie of the V Additional Civil Judge {Jr.Dn.),\n\n'V V " _  " '.'d<\u00a7\ufb01vemd the foliowing:\n\n(By s\ufb01 v N MadhavaRm:\u00a3dy, Advoaatc.-.3" V\n\nAM):\n\n1 Shivasharanappa\nS I o Mallappa Kandurgi\n\nAge 75 ycam\nOno: Agriculture\n\n2 Revanasiddappa \nS] o Shivasharanappgz '\nAged about 35   r\n\n3 Bhimashankar \nS\/o Shivasharanappa  \u00ab  \nAged about  years:  _V  \n\n4 Slut.  = = ~\nW,' o"Sh_iVash\u00e9iana"p~pa\nAged ab\u00e9iitgg  \n\nAll mg 411:-,side~:12t'*=.q:f _ "_ " '\nKhushnoor -' . ' V\nTaiuk 5:. V\ufb02isiirict\n.\u00bb's{}u1E2z~aI~ga --- S8f??_.10\u00bbl  Resp-cmdents\n\n,      Amaiesh S. Roja, Advecatc)\n\n ~.  under szection 100 of CPC against the\njudgment V.  decree dated 23-1143005 passed in RA\n\nThis RSA coming on for adraiasion this day, the (301311\n\n \n\n\n\n111:: family. Hausa bearing No. 1-27 and 2\/7 \n\nproperties. Their grievance is \ufb01nst defcndant_.iiI\u00a7:g\u00a7iii\u00a7f'  \n\nthe mother of defendant Nos. :3    "\n\nthey are the illegitimate  A':Ifi3erefo:f\u00a7:';.   *'\n\nplam' tiffs are cn\ufb01\ufb02cd to     nary\n\n4. A\ufb01cr  of_t\ufb01\u00e9 v_f\ufb01\u00e9\u00a7t'ciefcndant entered\nappcalancc.    defendant\nwas   v n=.emanded by the lower\n   an an earlier occasien had\nheld theVv'Sa;%t"w\ufb01as jbiixdcr of necessary pal\ufb01es. The\n\n\ufb01mf '.3\\tf\u00a3:ndz1fiii.. tI\u20acniiedA."t}\u00a5\u00e9.. mla\ufb01onshiy between himself and\n\n $10.3,' HE ;;~1\u00a2:3iec1 that the fourth defendant is his\n\n  "gcpntcnded that the thin! plain\ufb01\ufb02 aim to give\n\n  ran away \ufb01nm the house with 8 taken of gold\n\n  3iiv\u00a71*':.o1nam\u00a3:nts worth Rs.8,()O0\/- without consent of\n\n  " N<::r.I by eomzaitting theft. Thcmfare, plaintiff No.3 is\n\n \u00a7lIlOI'{\u00a7 his wife and only defendant Na-A is his legally wwdcd\n\n" Plainti\ufb01s 1 and 2 have no right to claim partition in the\n\nsuit schedule item. He denied the Chaim of the piainti\ufb01'. H:\n\n\n\nalso set up a plea of partition in the year 1981 \n\nof Panchas. He oontcndcd that the suit   \n\nwere given to his share in the    T\n\npmsczut suit \ufb01led by the plam\ufb01\ufb01s 4\u00a73m"\u00a7avc  -giv\u00a7a:\u00a7'%:1:a.%e';;c%\n\nshare in the pmperties is net    \n\nS. Defendants    amended Written\nstaicment dcnying\ufb02le  Qf  " ";F'ourth defendant\nalso \ufb01led her   c\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01fb\ufb01ding that she is the\nlegally   and her marriage took\nplace o:r,1    3 were beam out 91' the\nsaid   married plaiza\ufb01\ufb01 No.3 without\n\nher cQ;1ja.cnt \u00e9:1gi   hack and, therefore, plain\ufb01\ufb01s 1\n\n '  me  childnzn who have no right in the co-\n\n\n\n  afomsaid pleadings, the trial Court fmmcd\n\n  slevegn iss'u\u00e9s as 1mdcr:-\n\n"   Whether the defendcmis prove that there has been\nan and partition, in. Juiy, I 981' as per the details\ngiven in para Ho, 9?' qfwritien statement?\n\n\n\n.5.\n\n7.\n\nWhether the defendani No.3 pmves:V*'i}zi:1g __'f\u00a7\u00ab\ufb01%' \n\ndim3rc:erd the plainh\ufb01 N03 in the   \ntherefore she is not entitlegi    ' L. a\n\nfamily property?\n\nWhether defendant 1%.;     aha: _\n\nMahadevi and pf  .3 is\nhis legally wedded'. (de\u00a7ezed)?\u00ab . 1  \nWhether tha2; av3e3fenaE,ZaziVAtvL':'$'Vg;.V'proves ifrfij the lands\nsurvey No.1  '-}f?\u00a7*'\/  seif acxguired\nmg'pr;;;i:hjj"g  they are entitled\njfgr  as prayed?\n\n zhe\u00bb.;\u00a7:ain:gm\u00bb.g;;e valued the suit property\n\n__ arigif\u00e9ae has been paid?\n\n what  drqtecree?\n\n;'i'ht: t11:ird 'isgiitt w\ufb01sa iecastcd as issues 3(3), 3(1)) and 3(:::).\n\n% %%%%3%\n\nV' * . j\u00a7\u00e9':(z:)\n\n  Et\u00a751:2eu\"x3:zt-'Lire  issue was framed. They are as\n the pIain.t\ufb01\"s pmves that Maiuzdevfs\n Inarziage with defendant No.1 is mid, as alleged in\n\nplaintijj'?\nWh.e1her the plaintz'}_'f.\u00a7; prove that the suit pmperty\nexeept Syn 1170.193 are mtoestral pmperties cf the\n\nparties? \n\n\n\n3('c) Whsthgr the pIa1'n.tij\u00a7\"s suit is bad for  nf\n\nnecessary parties?\nAdditional Issue   \n\n1 Whether the defendants \ufb01m\ufb01e that p:air\u00a7\u00a7jg%H\u00a7.2L\n\nBasavamj is not  .__sing:e'-.:l\u00a2iS:t:\"i1:uf\u00e9 than\n1.3 years in the Qf.Kusnbor_\u00a7md h.e has not\nbeen seen   : vby'  inciuding his\n\nrelatives?\n\n7.  as PW2. Thin?!\nplaintiff Wzag   wimcseses were\ncxaminfxi Him.   pxoduced 28 documents\nwhich   ,Lp%1 to P28. 011 bchaif of the\n\ndcfcndants;\ufb011M93i d\u00a7fgn\u00a2a\u00a7n\u00a7L~was examined as mm and fourth\n\n  '-was  as EJW4. They also examined two\n\n 2 and 3 and pmdtlced 20 documents which\n\n~ia$hv'*\"\u00a3';'\u00a7<s. {)1 to D20.\n\nj 8". 1112 trial Court on appn-_=.ciai:ion of the aforesaid oral\n\n   evidcnm on l'GG()I'd hcid that the oral\n\nV.  pai\ufb01\ufb01on set up by the \ufb01rst defendant is; not pmved. The case\n\n" ef the defendant No.1 that he divorced the plainti\ufb01' No.3 in the\n\nyear 1967-68 and, themfcsm, she is not entitled to any share in\n\nQ\/%__,.. 'H\n\n\n\n \n\nthe family pmpcrty was held to be 1301: '.\n\ndefendant has failed to prove that i:I;g3\u00bb_l_ar1d'-- sy-,%%:~so.?2i%7L;. A' \n\ndcfcnda11t'3 maniagc   ij'oti1th  "V--.ti'a'fcndant is void.\nFurther they    except Sy. No.\n193 are   Plai:nt1'\ufb02"s suit is not\nhad for.;ao:'n  It also held that thc\nde\ufb01ndagitg : ihat plainti\ufb01" No.2 is not being\n\n'I   11:9 "ihc plainti\ufb01s and the first defendant.\n\n 'a\ufb01W11n' ed the \ufb01ndings of the trial Court that all the suit\n\nschedule pmpcrties are joint family pmpertiees and third\n\n \n\n\n\nail,\n\npiainti\ufb01' is the legally wedded wife of am  4'\nFcourth defendant is the second       \n\nDefendants 2 and 3 are the    i\ufb01jfst "\n\n \n\ndefendant. But, it set aside.f}I:_'ofV \nthe illegitimate children have fa  in a co-\npamenaxy property. It   to the Hindu\nMarriage Act, 19'2'6 the gtgiii\ufb01ns  beam from void\nmarriages is    'C'J;p81DEnBI'3 and their\nshare is    of the empacrencrs\n   pmpertics defendants 2\nand 3  L 5139 get a share in the joint family\n\npmpcrties ;:i'~..   defendant No.1 and plaintiff\n\n \n\n . iighcldh  *5\u00ab***\u00ab\ufb01\ufb01's 1 to 3 are entitled to get 1\/4*'!\n ga\u00e9h  the items of the pmper\ufb01es and aczcmtiingly\n\n 1 to 3 are cntitl\ufb01 to 1\/6"' share each in\n    \u00a303. I to 9 plaint schedule pmpctrtics and the\n\nH : : ' "\u00a7i\u00a71E:u<:Ig1:f\u00e9 1 to 3 are entitled to 115th share each in all the\n\n\n\n \n\npart:1'tioz1H}:_\u00a7etw\u00aen fthcy are not enii\ufb02cd to a\n\nshare  the \n\n11. I565.   counmzl for the respondents<\/pre>\n
 _  judgment and decrees.\n<\/p>\n
    .”.s1.’:-\u00e9bstan\ufb01al questions of law that arise for<\/p>\n
cx)nsi:i_\u00a7:1’a\u00a7:%l<JI1vLAi:*1Ajthj$ sec::;z1s:i appeal is :-\n<\/p>\n
 1, ” A1′ Whether the 1’Ifegitima..te children ham, out ef paid<\/p>\n
marriage are regarded as n::o-pamene:rs by virtue of
\nthe amenziwnem.’ to the Hindu Mamizge Ad, 1956?\n<\/p>\n
2; At a partition between the  whether
\nthey am entitled to :2 share in the :3ca’dpmpe1iies?\n<\/p>\n
reiegisiaiing on the sulybot, under    M
\ninterpretation, against the  of thee”
\ndearly expressed in the er?-;\u00a3’2Jc:\u00a2r1’_z:rA3’r:,\u00a7    ‘vig-V A :.  f<\/p>\n
irnpe71mbsibIe”.\n<\/p>\n
Further it wa.s held at  25  <\/p>\n
“26. The T   only (9-\n<\/p>\n
pareenwypmpe\ufb02y..a%i\u00a25~j0in1f\u00a2’iiI?y\u00a2bfb1%*erty\u00bb The
\nsaid \ufb01ght ~.~:\u00a7A&n;\u00bb: egmdga gagnsiz  law to the
\n$epa7′{zte””\u00bb9fi;iA\u00a3&L:F  cf the father.
\nAfter \u00a35225   of” Act, the rights
\n  the pmpe\ufb01y of thefather is
\n #13\u00bb  entzdmemf. The said
\nencz\u00e9\ufb01rzgeniv ziiiz\ufb01a to amend and  {he
\nI-zzwj  ‘ihte$’3a\u00a7e sucxrssion amang Hindus’<\/p>\n
_  ward ‘;f\u00a7zic~;3’i\ufb011e’ has been de\ufb01ned wzder
\n%   :1, person is deemed to die
\n.:   “iespeci czfpmperty of which he or she
\n”  v.n4′):t:’;r:’t;r;zd:-: :1 testamentary ciisposiiion capable<\/p>\n
V ‘bf. g\ufb01ed. In other war , if :2. person has
\n AA ;  a, testameniary ziispasition Qf his property
\n* ._qz’ad if such testczmentezry disposition is up held,<\/p>\n
V than his naizmxl heirs have no right to sucxyeed or to<\/p>\n
1’writ the said property.  ‘<\/p>\n
 V.  vt1::t:C.ili\u00e9@t:i1z1g~1te  out of the said wed lock. By virtue<\/p>\n
  (2) of Smticm 16 of the Hindu Marriage<\/p>\n
  Hc\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01ver, Saction 16(3) makes it clear these illcgiimxlatc
\n   have a right only in the pmpertzics of the parents<\/p>\n
‘ _ _  iidixc else. Thtzs conferring 011 the status did not a\ufb01isct the
\n  of the parties other than the parents in the pmpcrty.
\n ‘i$1ajn:a:\ufb01’s 1 and 2 being the legitimate sons of the first<\/p>\n
29. 17 a Iegitinzate son m:mz.,51\u00a2-4;’
\nda\ufb01rning share in ramped of Zhi\u00e9 _’,\ufb01::\u00a31;e\u00ae’$
\nby virtue cf Section 8 of
\nillegitimate son who has {mm begf.-r\ufb01.
\nstatus of :1 legitimate son’aL\u00a7a. has Iii}~  <\/p>\n
(1 share in thefa.ti\u00a7er’s pmpgag by}\ufb01zing’aVsm’i\u00a7 In
\nether words,  i:’;)’e;V\u00a3:7\ufb01\u00e9’V\u00abbf.e\u00a3i;,’;;then :2; son,
\nIegitimt.2.te or 1’I!egiiim\u00e9zfe=  r’E’\u00a3i. .’l’1’g\ufb01i\u00a3i’.V’to seek: 41
\nshare 1’nfQ,_\u00a3}mr’s     ar\ufb01as only
\ncg\ufb01er    <\/p>\n
14;” ….  clearly answers the
\nsubsta3i’$ja1\u00ab.qu\u00e9Siiziiz:\u00a7 ef in this appeal. When the
\ntwo Cou11a\u00a7”ht:av\u00a7:vVo\u00a25:a;\u00a7i:\u00a7fx*t3::;:f3y4held that the \ufb01rmrth defendant is<\/p>\n
the  wife  h:;-:r  mantiage: is void, defendants 2 and 3<\/p>\n
Aci   given equal status as that of a kgi\ufb01matc<\/p>\n
i;t\/ …. ..\n<\/p>\n
{\u00a31<\/p>\n
17<\/span>
\nduring his \ufb01fctimc. They have to Work out fhcir rights in the<\/p>\n
cxyparoencry property which is allotted to the first ejafgendant
\non his death and in that property they weuid have
\nalong with the legzitimate sons, i,e., plaintiffs 2  4_
\nthird plain\ufb01\ufb01’ who is fine icgally _w;,-,d;1m<  iifgf A 7
\ndefendant, In that View of the mattc\u00e9\ufb01r,' I   \u00e9\ufb01i\ufb01r<\/p>\n
(1) Second appeal is   L  <\/p>\n
\ufb01t) It is hereby  I, 2 and<\/p>\n
  \ufb01ne of them. are entitled to
\n'1",a'…3"**'V.sf'z::i'.*ae   schedule pmperties.
\n(iii? " The tn; third pzmnajrzzs rejected as well as<\/p>\n
:VVt\u00a3c;im qf defendants 2 its 4 to any share in the
\n  ! '<\/p>\n
(iv,l__  atxxmiingiy.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/-.6
\nJudg\u00e9”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008 Author: N.Kumar In THE HIGH comm’ or KARHATAIKA _ I Gzmaanm Dated this the 7th day THE Horrnm H. R.S,A.xNo. BETWEEN : S\/0 Shhi\u00e9ish\u00e9ra\ufb01aypd V Kadda;gi” V Age 4′? ‘ B\u00a3;savaraj?;g., ‘ ‘ 8\/<2.\u00bb Shiv&ah:%f9AL app'e':__ " " 44Ye~\u00e9rs%% % V, A. _ ~ .}._W\/ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7561","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-30T10:42:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-30T10:42:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":588,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-30T10:42:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-30T10:42:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-30T10:42:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008"},"wordCount":588,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008","name":"Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-30T10:42:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mallikarjun-vs-shivasharanappa-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mallikarjun vs Shivasharanappa on 7 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7561"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7561\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}