{"id":75804,"date":"2010-02-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010"},"modified":"2018-10-28T21:50:50","modified_gmt":"2018-10-28T16:20:50","slug":"pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Pralhad S\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Pralhad S\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\n\nCRICUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD 2  \n\nDATED TI-IIS THE 41:]; DAY or  '\n\nsspomze   L A}\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUsT1c;\ufb01eA:aA'tI \nCRIMINAL   \nBETWEEN:    \n\nPralhad -~ V \nS\/0. Tulasabai Kamble'    \nAged about \"Z2 years  '\nOcc:Agric1.1lt1ire1;_V_gt ' ._ __ \"\nR\/o. JugailVi_l1'age,\"\"-- J   \nTaluka\ufb02thani' \"*1.;.,\/'   \nDist:I-3e1gau\u00bbn1_   .  Appellant.\n\n(By Srif\u00abJtBasava1tajV.l;or.:A\" \nBahubali\"'Au.. iDanaWe:d'e,..iAdV.)\n\n VSt.ate 'Karnataka  Respondent<\/pre>\n
H (BlS.?”’53ri;VPV.uH\ufb02otlchindi, I-ICGP)<\/p>\n
  Criminal Appeal is \ufb01led under Section<\/p>\n
*  374(2)’=.- ” of Cr.P.C. against the judgment<\/p>\n
V~?”\u00bbdtd’;3gO.08.O6\/15.9.06 passed by the II Addl. S.J.,<\/p>\n
_ ‘ =B’e1g.aurn, in S.C.No.l87\/O5 W Convicting the<\/p>\n
 agapellant\/accused for the offences punishable under
\n”  ….secs. 376 and 306 of {PC and etc.<\/p>\n
(‘_’\u00a7’v’\\.._._-~….–\n<\/p>\n
‘ \\-.\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
 i <\/p>\n
This Criminal Appeal is coming on for further
\narguments this day, the Court made the fo1lowing:\u00bb,_”._V_<\/p>\n
JUDGMEKT<\/p>\n
The accused in Sessions case No..”i’8″.7:\/’_{}5″won.V the ” ”
\n\ufb01le of the learned II Addl. District  <\/p>\n
Belgaum, has filed the pre’s_en_t apapc-iai  ths\ufb01<\/p>\n
Judgement and Order  in the
\nsaid case convictingv ‘l’1xi}n.A for u\/secs. 376
\nand 306 of IPC:’and  R1 for 7
\nyears and:_5~  said offences and
\nto payvVVfiine_A’ofi sentence of R1 for<\/p>\n
 for each of the said offences.\n<\/p>\n
5-2._ the ‘arguments of Sr. J.Basavaraj,<\/p>\n
.i””lea”fn:ed”i:co:u~n_se1 forwthe appel1ant–accused on behalf of<\/p>\n
  learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
a}ip\u00abe1la.;it–ai5cused and Sri. A.R.Patil, the learned Add.<\/p>\n
 J’3.P.uP, Perused the entire records obtained from the Trial<\/p>\n
r~(Y\\\/’<\/p>\n
3. Stated in brief, the case of the prosecution is
\nas under:\n<\/p>\n
a) The deceased Smt. Nanda  it<\/p>\n
Balu Kamble, being theytfife ofthnei  it <\/p>\n
the accused herein,I_wa:s..the’; <\/p>\n
in-law of the accgu_sed.i4″Sin.ce the.”.past’ 1V5:
\nyears prior to the
\nused to have forcih1e.._se2;uaiiihtercotirse
\nwith the idefcxeased;ttvaki:nvg:”‘advantage of
\nthe fact    of the
\ndeceased    years<\/p>\n
1..   aboitts could not be<\/p>\n
t db}   at about 9.00 am
\n“1lti1\u00a23v  the deceased to have
\n intercourse with him and
\nevt.tb.1A’1ereifioi*e’;iithe deceased, being fed up
\n L’wt:t1t the conduct and attitude of the
\n ,””_”_\u00ab\u00bbg:a\u00a2i5ldsed, committed suicide by setting
\nrvherself on fire in the house of the<\/p>\n
accused.\n<\/p>\n
V” “4. Based on the oral evidence of PW1 to 1=>w21,<\/p>\n
T  “documents at EXs.P1 to P27 and MO Nos. 1 to 3, the<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
Trial Court, by its impugned Judgement and V-Grder,<\/p>\n
found the accused guilty of both the said <\/p>\n
convicted him accordingly. The defence of”\u00ab’the   <\/p>\n
is one of total denial. Thereforcefhe’ has  to<\/p>\n
get any witness examined for hitnrior has ‘tried,’ chosefg\/go”~.,<\/p>\n
produce any documents.\n<\/p>\n
5. Sri. J.   counsel for the
\nappel1ant–accus’ed,  {that PW} Smt.
\nPuspha eehdciliithe deceased and
\nyounger._.si’s’tefr    Srnt. Geeta, the
\nJunior,  PW3 Sangeetha, the<\/p>\n
daughter\u00a7icnflavvxlo.f the  1, PW4 Sampath Kumar, the<\/p>\n
 neprdevy-_pi”c{g the ” accused, PW5 Srnt. Hirabai, the wife of<\/p>\n
 the’ ..ac-c_use’d,\u00b0o_n whose evidence the prosecution has<\/p>\n
placed tV*eiia_r1e’eV in proving the factum of forcible sexual<\/p>\n
‘.,_pintercotirse on the deceased alleged to have been<\/p>\n
A ‘~:if”cornrnitted by the accused, have not supported the<\/p>\n
 prosecution case and therefore, the Trial Court<\/p>\n
c”‘~{w\\””_’\\–*’<\/p>\n
committed serious error in recording its \ufb01ndings that<\/p>\n
the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonabie<\/p>\n
doubts for both the said offences, reiying  <\/p>\n
document Ex.P.’7, the dying declaration of  ‘Vd.eceased’;;<\/p>\n
He further contends that even   <\/p>\n
declaration is accepted and “C-ontevntsph$gre:”heVid’Hproved, V<\/p>\n
it contents do not make’ outa cajseV’vg’again’st’Vthey\u00e9accused
\nfor the offence u\/ s 376  conviction of
\nthe accused;  offe’n’CeV…’b\u00a7\u00a7Sed on the said
\ndocumentii   law. He further
\n acceptable evidence placed on
\nrecordvzibyithe to show that accused did any<\/p>\n
act or ornitted~V’vto  anything, amounting to the<\/p>\n
. V.\u00b0’~a’oaternetnt’t’ suicide committed by the deceased and<\/p>\n
1 e—.therefor’ew,.vtheconviction of accused for the offence u\/s<\/p>\n
sodipct  em not be sustained.\n<\/p>\n
 x T  Per contra, Sri. A.R.PatiI, learned Addi.S.P.P.<\/p>\n
A   -strongly contends that the contents of the Ex.P.7 dying<\/p>\n
c..r’~–~\/c<\/p>\n
declaration of the deceased clearly go to show th-at the<\/p>\n
deceased was subjected to forcible sexual <\/p>\n
the accused for a period of more than  <\/p>\n
therefore, she, being fed up with’ the  <\/p>\n
accused, committed the suicide by setting herself o:-i’\ufb01re’\u00ab..L<\/p>\n
on the said date and time in:’th.e houis_e”of_” accused<\/p>\n
and hence, the iziipugneidm  Order
\nconvicting appe11ant–accused”‘for  said offences
\ndoes not ca11\u00a7~fo’rA(:vai.1y interference’-i’i’1V  appeal.<\/p>\n
‘7, “””   Hth\u00a7’at the evidence of PW1<\/p>\n
to  reiiedupon’ibvtpiro-secution does not support the<\/p>\n
prosecution “craswe thattfie accused committed forcible<\/p>\n
 sexual intercourse ____ on the deceased over a period of<\/p>\n
 \u00bbmore years prior to her death and therefore,<\/p>\n
 with the said conduct of the accused,<\/p>\n
 comrnitvtedvsuicide. Therefore, the only evidence against<\/p>\n
 “.,:if’\u00bbthei”4-accused is Ex.P7 the dying declaration of the<\/p>\n
i  deceased.\n<\/p>\n
r_f\\r\\a–\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
8. It is not in dispute that the deceaseidygot<\/p>\n
herself set on fire on the said date and _<\/p>\n
residence of the accused and immediate_.Ey–thereafter shew it<\/p>\n
was taken to the hospitai.\n<\/p>\n
Kanchnal, the Head Constable of VS-arigli, HSi..i1a.svVVs.tated-.t”<\/p>\n
in his evidence that on 22\/   on duty
\nin his P.S at Sangii Vhe.V:i*ece:ived:Vi’.t\u00e9fi\u00e9yviijntimation from the
\nCivil Hospital sangu mar   admitted in
\nthe said   injuries and
\ntherefo_reV,v  3ii;te’rV_V::ireceipt of the said
\nintimation;  said hospital, met duty
\ndoctor, it  as to condition of the<\/p>\n
deceased for uigivin_g_’her statement, and doctor in duty<\/p>\n
\u00bbtoici.hi.1fr1A.ythatv the deceased was in fit condition to give<\/p>\n
 He has further deposed that he recorded<\/p>\n
 theuustaternent of the deceased Nanda between 1.10 pm<\/p>\n
‘A “Cfanid<–..y1.40 pm in the presence of the duty doctor and<\/p>\n
 EXP'? is the said statement and it bears the<\/p>\n
<""\u00a3\\r\\""""\n<\/p>\n
endorsement of the doctor at Ex.P.7(a). He has further<\/p>\n
deposed that the said statement bears <\/p>\n
deceased at Exs.P.7(b), Ex.P.7(c) and hisepei.gee:’;i’re <\/p>\n
Ex.P.7(d), another endorsement .o\u00bbf~th4e  thejfocit ll<\/p>\n
of the said statement EXP.”\/(e).   <\/p>\n
that after he recorded  statemenptl ‘he”..fead”loverl” V<\/p>\n
its contents to the deceasedi-and:’she_adInit’ted\u00abthe same
\nas corrected and then _1’0nl’iy ihe  her thumb<\/p>\n
impressions on the said  ‘  V<\/p>\n
9. 1 e..Pwa;_pobi-.’pptil1\u00a7:etee;;ey tuiiip Vaze, is the junior
\nresident  the said hospital who was on
\nduty \/7  stated in his evidence that<\/p>\n
he pp4eXa1nined”‘theV deceased in casualty Ward at about<\/p>\n
 prn-.the_deceased had sustained external burns.<\/p>\n
llI~I(\u00a7…_ha{s:l’_furth’e.r deposed that about 1.00pm police<\/p>\n
constable carne to be hospital enquired with him as to<\/p>\n
it .,the-health condition of the patient, he informed the said<\/p>\n
—  constable that the patient was in \ufb01t condition to give<\/p>\n
(_’_r\\’*L_,,_..-.._–\n<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
Therefore, I do not \ufb01nd any reason to interfere with the<\/p>\n
NF’<\/p>\n
\ufb01ndings recorded by the Trial Court as <\/p>\n
recording of Ex.P.7, the statement of the  <\/p>\n
PW’? in the presence of PW8 theurnedicagl   <\/p>\n
to the contents of Ex.P.7<\/p>\n
11. Referring to  ‘the said
\nstatement of the deceased,  the learned
\ncounsel for the   contends
\nthat the  statement that
\nher  left the house about
\n15 years  till the said date of incident<\/p>\n
the accuse.d; beiingkher.:father—-in–law, had illicit relation<\/p>\n
 , Q’ Withigher and he*us_e(:1vf::ee her to have sexual intercourse<\/p>\n
r~\/IT”\n<\/p>\n
  –._she was yielding to the samekand she<\/p>\n
‘_–._g-‘Wu<\/p>\n
tolerated ‘.the..e1’same and therefore, this statement does<\/p>\n
 not in any way prove that the accused used to have<\/p>\n
A f”‘forcit_>le sexuai intercourse with her without her consent<\/p>\n
 and against her will and therefore, conviction of the<\/p>\n
r”‘r”\\’\\*-“‘”7<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
accused for offence 11\/3 376 based on this statement<\/p>\n
can not be sustained in law.\n<\/p>\n
12. Kannada version of the said<\/p>\n
insofar it relates to sexual intercourse  <\/p>\n
been committed by the accused,Aon:_the <\/p>\n
as under: V
\n.. ax; ms was seas  aaa   15
\na’$a=’.$s’m?oz3a 553$  as
\nand 351\u00b0’-7\u20ac2.F5   eggs ziozaoqi
\n    mm 1-sasari zsez\u00e9
\n _:i:5e\u00a7\u00a75ai_i.:\u00a3;asggcd$\u00a7;aaSs’\u00a7asa\ufb01 as; mom: :3o2.,5Jaer\u20ac<\/p>\n
maeaggsa. “;\u00a7g\u00a7aa:szi sass: asaaaaozsa uoazsgda. ”<\/p>\n
i   On careful reading of the above statement<\/p>\n
it in Ex.P.7 is dying the declaration,<\/p>\n
  irelation’ izvith the deceased during the said period,(\\in the<\/p>\n
“abseince of her husband and he used to force her to<\/p>\n
thdughjiteriould be held that the accused had illicit<\/p>\n
r’~\/:'”\n<\/p>\n
 “”have sex with him and she was yielding to the said<\/p>\n
 4<\/span><\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
offence u\/s 306 EPC and can not be accepted. On the<\/p>\n
other hand the contents of Ex.P7 dying declaration,<\/p>\n
c’–F:’:”\n<\/p>\n
which are proyed by the prosecution clearl’y__:–gojV’toVf’  <\/p>\n
em willful conduct of the accused in having Vsexuai.<\/p>\n
intercourse with her over _a periodiof abo_ut”1″5 years-..p<\/p>\n
taking advantage of the fac’t:th.at  the V<\/p>\n
deceased, who was “‘r1.one_\u00ab”ioither;.  theiison of the
\naccused, had left the norne _\u00a75.\u00abyear_S __ago’aazd o\u00a7%y
\ngoes to show that the decease:d,i7be.inig fed up with the
\nsaid cond5t1Vct.::_i\u00a7i_ithe  of putting an end
\nto  ‘life’ she committed suicide
\nsettinghhperself ..abl:a;te4d-lr”\u00ab”Therefore, I do not \ufb01nd any<\/p>\n
reason to interfere iiwith the findings recorded by the<\/p>\n
Trial   the prosecution proved beyond<\/p>\n
reasonable doubt its case against accused for the<\/p>\n
offe\u00abnce__”1i \/  E PC.\n<\/p>\n
A  As to the sentence of RI for a period of 5<\/p>\n
  years imposed by the Trial Court for the offence u\/s 306<\/p>\n
 ‘<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
Sessions Judge, Belgaurn, insofar it relates to conviction<\/p>\n
and sentencing of appellant-accused for the offenVoe44’_:3?’6<\/p>\n
IPC, is hereby set aside. However, his convi_ction’C .
\noffence u\/s 305 1130 is hereby.” ;;onfi_ri&r1’e.:i;_v: .B’utf,thte *
\nsentence of R1 for 5 years imposed1’oI1’iVhiini  <\/p>\n
offence is hereby reduced _v4~..years’   the<\/p>\n
period of imprisonment .’hirr1_aV$:\u00a7 on this
\ndate. Consequently  shall be set
\nat liberty forthwith if  tobe detained in
\nconnection      of Rs.2,000 \/ —\n<\/p>\n
  s 376 IPC, if has been
\npaid by ht1;:i,s  <\/p>\n
A  of o’pe1~’ative portion of this order shall be<\/p>\n
 f_orth,withV”‘t’o ——– the Trial Court and also to the<\/p>\n
    Central Prison, Belgaum for<\/p>\n
  compliance.\n<\/p>\n
    sd\/..\n<\/p>\n
JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Pralhad S\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010 Author: Arali Nagaraj IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CRICUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD 2 DATED TI-IIS THE 41:]; DAY or ‘ sspomze L A} THE HON’BLE MR.JUsT1c;\ufb01eA:aA’tI CRIMINAL BETWEEN: Pralhad -~ V S\/0. Tulasabai Kamble’ Aged about “Z2 years […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75804","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPralhad S\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pralhad S\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-28T16:20:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pralhad S\\\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-28T16:20:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1720,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Pralhad S\\\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-28T16:20:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pralhad S\\\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pralhad S\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pralhad S\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-28T16:20:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pralhad S\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-28T16:20:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010"},"wordCount":1720,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010","name":"Pralhad S\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-28T16:20:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pralhad-so-tulasabai-kamble-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pralhad S\/O Tulasabai Kamble vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75804","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75804"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75804\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75804"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75804"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75804"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}