{"id":75843,"date":"2010-02-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010"},"modified":"2016-03-03T18:55:04","modified_gmt":"2016-03-03T13:25:04","slug":"pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Pravin S\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Pravin S\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\n\nCRICUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 01\" DAY OF FEBRUARY,..A4;ZO1V0:J   '\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE AI&lt;.ALIIO1ON~AGARA3AV   \n\nCRIMINAL PETITIo&quot;H,EN~Q%.7016\/2oIVOOvI_E \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1. Sri.Pravin &#039; &#039;\nS\/0 Prakash Shinde\n\nAge: 19 yea_rs,.__0cc&#039;:&#039;  V&#039;\n\nR\/0 KoEna&quot;Exte-nsio:n\nShinde__.Nag4a  ragi   \nMahara:sVht.;.a&#039;_,VState _ \n\n2. Sri&#039;;Mahe=:.&#039;r;I_V  .4  .\ns\/o Shankar5&#039;5}\u00a7ra&#039;3?e&quot;&lt;__   \nAge: 19 years; \u00a33cc&#039;:--~.St&#039;Lur:E&#039;ent\nR\/0 H&quot;;N0;5, S SVGa&#039;ua&quot;g&#039;;e Chawl\nPa_rsEwad&#039;i_,_Gh.ai:ko&#039;par&quot;\n,,.r:i\/Q!um~bai &#039;  ,\n- a ma rashtra State\n\nV.  n.d&quot;a\ufb01.wade, Adv)\n\nAND:.__r\n\n  &#039;E State of&quot; K\u00e9rnata ka\n }&#039;3y*TCTh..E4_kod&#039;E Pofice Station\n&#039;  &#039;i&#039;dQ&#039;e\\.:_}Te&#039;p by HCGP\n\n .,&quot;:(ByI%sri:A.R.Pat:I, Addl. SPP)\n\n=-~..(&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&quot;&#039;\u00b0&#039;&quot;&#039;\n\n PETITIONERS\n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>This Cr|.P is fiied under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.<br \/>\npraying to grant bail to the petitioners in SC No.361\/2-Q09<br \/>\non the file of the Fast Track Court-I, Chikodviutwith<\/p>\n<p>conditions in Crime No.2S0\/2009 registered<br \/>\noffences punishable under Sections 302, 201,<br \/>\nread with 149 of IPC by the respondent Chii&lt;_odi~..po-lice<\/p>\n<p>station.\n<\/p>\n<p>This CrE.P is coming on for OrdA_ers:.th.ifs &#8216;d.a3&#8217;r,..&#8217;the&#8217;\ufb02seiurtiv. .9<\/p>\n<p>made the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>onben, g g<br \/>\nAccused Nos.4 and  in AS-esRsio&#8211;n&#8217;s&#8217;-\u00bb_C.aseA&#8217;i\\io&#8230;36:i\/2009<br \/>\npending on the file of the&#8217;A&#8217;_!_ea&#8217;r&#8217;ne:&#8217;d::&#8217; Officer, Fast<br \/>\nTrack Court-I, Chikitodi petition<\/p>\n<p>under Section&#8221;&#8216;4&#8217;3i.9 \u00bb.me &#8216;\u00e9.tiri_ier bail petition filed<\/p>\n<p>by theseviiaiccueecl  sesvswions case came to be<br \/>\nrejected  the order dated 19.12.2009.\n<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, they have.&#8217;-mAo.ve&#8221;d the present petition.<\/p>\n<p>9&#8242;   vistated in brief the case of the prosecution as<\/p>\n<p>cou.id&#8217;&#8211;.befrom the police papers, copies whereof<\/p>\n<p>A are fu&#8221;i&#8217;nis&#8217;heo&#8221;&#8216; the learned Addl. State Public Prosecutor<\/p>\n<p>9&#8217; &#8221; V  as: under:\n<\/p>\n<p>a) Accused No.1 was the wife of<br \/>\ndeceased Rajendra. Accused No.2 is her sister.<\/p>\n<p>,&#8230;&#8230;:r*r&#8221;&#8221;*r*&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>has been filed against all the accused Nos.1 to<br \/>\nfor the offences under Sections 302, 201, <\/p>\n<p>1203 read with Section 149 of IPC. Th_e&#8221;&#8221;s&#8217;a.icjjv&#8230;.j:_7<\/p>\n<p>sessions case is now at the stage of fiayminjg <\/p>\n<p>charge against the accused fovr&lt;the.saicl_&quot; offgejncesi  <\/p>\n<p>3. It is not in dispute that t\u00e9hiereiis no.&#8221;,e_;vid&#8217;er1ce1&#8211;y 0&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>any eye witness to the incident&#8221;of&#8221;;nurder&#8217;-owfthe decewased<br \/>\nalieged to have been comnjitteciby&#8217;  Nos&#8217;.&#8217;4 and 5 at<br \/>\nthe instance of accused  3_..:_a&#8211;rifg&#8217;.therefore, the<br \/>\nentire case rests.  ci.rcuirnstan&#8217;tia\u00abIiAeti.ideVnce.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>4. Sri..M}.f3:&#8217;;\u00a7uni:l_a&#8211;wade,::niearined Counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners-acciused&#8230;V_s:trorigi_i&#8217;y.,._contended that there is no<\/p>\n<p>circumstance of &#8216;the&#8221;\u00abide,_c\u00e9a_se.d being iast seen in the<\/p>\n<p>company of these _ac&#8217;cus&#8217;ed Nos.4 and 5 nor is there any<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V;_c&#8217;i&#8217;rcum&#8221;stah&#8217;ce recover any incriminating materiai from<\/p>\n<p>th&#8221;erii\u00ab.ipuirs-uiannt tfotheir volunta ry statements and therefore<\/p>\n<p>  these&#8221;-peti_tion;ers~accused deserve the grant of bail. He<\/p>\n<p> contended that the police obtained the custody of<\/p>\n<p>A &#8220;trh&#8217;e.se\u00bb.a..ccused I\\ios.4 and S on 18.01.2010 i.e., after the<\/p>\n<p>0% &#8217;11&#8217; ch,a.rgehseet was submitted and the case was committed to<\/p>\n<p>{J____N~{-2.\u00bb-\\_____,.-&lt;<\/p>\n<p>the sessions Court and then they coilected some further<\/p>\n<p>evidence against these accused and therefore, <\/p>\n<p>evidence cannot be considered against  &quot;<\/p>\n<p>submitted that the grant of po|ice&quot;i&#039;ic-ustody<\/p>\n<p>Nos.-4 and S itself is illegai and th.er:efore the <\/p>\n<p>coliected by the investigating -.o&#039;f\u20acicer A.by.__ obta&#039;i.hi&#039;&quot;ng&quot;&#039;&quot;these<br \/>\npetitioners-accused to their cusgtordygvcahnot be roadsagainst<\/p>\n<p>these petitioners-accused.&#039;  <\/p>\n<p>S. Per;&quot;&#039;Co\u00a2ntra,.  Acidi. State<br \/>\nPublic  that though there is<br \/>\nno  last seen with<br \/>\nthese accusedVor:_&#039;t.h.eV_bcir.curn&#039;stance of recovery of any<\/p>\n<p>incriminatingrn?J_feria&#039;i fr&#039;orn&quot;:them based on their voluntary<\/p>\n<p>._f&quot;V&quot;statern\u00e9&#039;nt:_s.,. there is &quot;&quot; &quot;ample evidence coiiected by the<\/p>\n<p>  during investigation to show that these<\/p>\n<p>  two&#039;a.ccused&quot;p:ei&#039;sons were with accused i\\los.1 to 3 during<\/p>\n<p> periodgt&#039;-rom 08.06.2009 to 11.06.2009 and therefore,<\/p>\n<p>i..t&quot;i&#039;iere_g &quot;are ciinching circumstances connecting these<\/p>\n<p> -\ufb02asccused petitioners with the murder of the deceased.<\/p>\n<p>( <\/p>\n<p>fail in line with the voluntary statement of accused No.3<\/p>\n<p>that accused Nos.3 to 5 together stayed in thjefsaidv\ufb02<\/p>\n<p>lodgings on 08.06.2009, 09.06.2009 and 10.05;\u00a72009s&#8217;\u00e9t&amp;.;*f&#8217;~<\/p>\n<p>Further, the statement of one Moha_n&#8230;th_e owner&#8221;of&#8217;;Agar&#8217;wa|&#8217;r-._V it<\/p>\n<p>Stores at Miraj goes to show that a:\u00a7;&#8217;cu&#8217;sed*._Nos.3:V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>together went to his shop oniV__&#8217;G~9z.O6&#8242;.2v-Oi(J9. _be.tw=e_en\u00bb..8~;330<\/p>\n<p>and 9.00 p.m. and purchased   further,<br \/>\nthe statement of one  who is working<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">in Motor Garageggoges to&#8217; Nos.3 to 5<\/span><br \/>\ntogether   satidugawrage on the night<br \/>\nof Vierit the said place at<\/p>\n<p>about   &#8216;t<\/p>\n<p>9. _ TheV_:staternents: of other witnesses transpire<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;x&#8221;i:hat accused&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;I\\ios.4 and 5 were found in the<\/p>\n<p> Nos.2 and 3 during that relevant<\/p>\n<p>pericsd. Tvhetipcistmortem examination report reveals that<\/p>\n<p>Vi&#8217;~,.\u00ab.4_&#8217;death ofvlthe deceased was due to head injuries, which<\/p>\n<p>  co_u!d_uh&#8217;ave been inflicted on the deceased by hitting with<\/p>\n<p> -.._\ufb02criciE:et stumps.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>10. Thus, it is ciear from the statements of various<\/p>\n<p>chargesheet witnesses recorded prior to 18.()1.2(}_&#8217;i~{):&#8217;_&#8221;&#8216;t_|:1&#8217;e.,&#8217;4<\/p>\n<p>date on which the police obtained the custody_.A4*uf <\/p>\n<p>Nos.4 and S that accused Nos.2 and..\u00bb.3._wer_\u00e9&#8221; in<\/p>\n<p>Nos.4 and 5 during the reievant pleriosfi&#8221;ciuriirig_v&#8221;w_hicVh[:&#8221;i.h\u00a7?1.i.1<\/p>\n<p>deceased was done to death.&#8221;V__VF&#8217;u..rther&#8217;,&#8217;-   are<br \/>\nsought to be proved fhy they_&#8230;i:ofi&#8217;osecutio.n the<br \/>\nstatements of chargesheetiw.i.tn.e_sse.sfali in iine with<br \/>\nthe voiuntary sta_tenjentA&#8221;g&#8217;ive:n  involving<br \/>\naccused Nos_._-4.    not constitute<br \/>\nconfessionoi  No.3 or of any of the<\/p>\n<p>other accused as&#8221;tnf&#8217;-the.srniu,rder of deceased.<\/p>\n<p>:t1_, to the stagi\u00e9\u00e9: at which the accused may be<\/p>\n<p>;_vj&#8221;&#8221;~g1Veni.jt$b custody oi thepoiice, Sri.Gundawade, the iearned<\/p>\n<p>Vtounseis. t4h&#8217;es.:p.etitioners has cited the decision of the<\/p>\n<p>Suorenie  AIR 1992 SC 1768 (Central Bureau of<\/p>\n<p>ii..,_&#8217;.lEr:vestig;zvtiiJn, Special Investigation Cell-I, New Delhi Vs<\/p>\n<p>  zirmp\u00e9nq J Kuikarni) and AIR 1994 sc 1447 (Kosanapu<\/p>\n<p> _y__&#8221;&#8216;i?anJreddy Vs State of Andhra Pradesh and Others). AS to<\/p>\n<p> \u00ab<\/p>\n<p>the further investigation, the iearned Addi. SPP has reiied<\/p>\n<p>upon the decision of the Hon&#8217;b|e Supreme Court reViia\u00bbo\ufb01r&#8217;t.ed<\/p>\n<p>in zoos CrI.L.J 337 (Dinesh Dalmia Vs c.s-.1).    _<\/p>\n<p>to say that since the question of further    <\/p>\n<p>that of giving the accused to police, cu,stociy4&#8217;*is&#8217;:n.ot- 4i&#8217;n&#8217;v:e_i_V\u00e9ed it<\/p>\n<p>in this petition, I need not disc:._;_ss atieizgth r:),r_i.Vncij&#8217;p|es <\/p>\n<p>laid down in the said decisEons.vHV\u00ab &#8216; _<\/p>\n<p>12. Further,   is at the stage<br \/>\nof framing of charge.   be said that<br \/>\nthere would  disposai of the<\/p>\n<p>said catse.\n<\/p>\n<p>13. V&#8221;\u00a5F_40ii&#8217;_ff&#8217;ie.&#8217;t&#8217;V.ife&#8217;a\u00a7t;n&#8217;S aforesaid, I am of the<\/p>\n<p> considered opinioniithai: petitioner Nos.1 and 2 who are<\/p>\n<p> .res\u00abpecti_\\ke.|,y&#8217;-accused Nos.4 and 5 in the said sessions case<\/p>\n<p>iiooiinot grant of baii. Hence, the present<\/p>\n<p>-V petition i-srej\u00e9cted.\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-3<br \/>\nI UDGE<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8216;&#8221;*&#8217;bgn\/&#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Pravin S\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010 Author: Arali Nagaraj IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CRICUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 01&#8243; DAY OF FEBRUARY,..A4;ZO1V0:J &#8216; BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE AI&lt;.ALIIO1ON~AGARA3AV CRIMINAL PETITIo&quot;H,EN~Q%.7016\/2oIVOOvI_E BETWEEN: 1. Sri.Pravin &#039; &#039; S\/0 Prakash Shinde Age: 19 yea_rs,.__0cc&#039;:&#039; V&#039; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-75843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Pravin S\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pravin S\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-03T13:25:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pravin S\\\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-03T13:25:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1084,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Pravin S\\\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-03T13:25:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pravin S\\\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pravin S\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pravin S\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-03T13:25:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pravin S\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-03T13:25:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010"},"wordCount":1084,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010","name":"Pravin S\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-03T13:25:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pravin-so-prakash-shinde-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pravin S\/O Prakash Shinde vs State Of Karnataka on 1 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75843","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=75843"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/75843\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=75843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=75843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=75843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}