{"id":76452,"date":"1997-11-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1997-10-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997"},"modified":"2016-02-21T18:25:05","modified_gmt":"2016-02-21T12:55:05","slug":"naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997","title":{"rendered":"Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion &#8230; on 1 November, 1997"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Delhi High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion &#8230; on 1 November, 1997<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K Ramamoorthy<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: D Gupta, K Ramamoorthy<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>K. Ramamoorthy, J.<\/p>\n<p>1.     The  petitioner  has  prayed  for the  quashing  of  the  order  dated<br \/>\n19.7.1995  in  and by which the petitioner is kept  under  suspension.  The petitioner does not challenge the validity of the proceedings taken against her but her case is that when criminal proceedings are pending against  her she  cannot  be kept under suspension and according to the  learned  Senior Counsel for the petitioner till the conclusion of the criminal  proceedings the petitioner should not only be suspended from service but no  departmental  proceedings could be initiated against her till the conclusion of  the<br \/>\ncriminal proceedings.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.   The charge sheet against the petitioner was filed in the Court of Shri G.P.  Mittal,  Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi on 8.2.1995  u\/Sec.  420,<br \/>\nI.P.C. and Sections 12(1)(b) and 12 (c) of the Passport Act,1967. When  the charge  was filed in the Criminal Court the first respondent did  not  pass any  order of suspension. According to her, the crux of the charge  in  the<br \/>\ncriminal  case  is &#8220;she submitted two applications  for  obtaining  private passport in two different names.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>3.   On 14.2.1995 a memorandum of articles of charges against the petitioner were issued. The charges are as under:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>     &#8220;(i) The petitioner obtained leave making false grounds  indicating purposes other than visiting abroad. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>     (ii)  She visited Saudi Arabia and U.A.E., on 4 occasions  during 10.5.1982  to 7.4.1994 without obtaining prior permission of  the Competent Authority. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>     (iii) She also got issued 2 private passports without the  requisite No Objection Certificate.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>     The petitioner filed C.W.974\/95 in this Court challenging the issue of charge  memo  on  14.2.1995.  This Court  passed  the  following  order  on 18.7.1995: <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      &#8220;We  have  seen the articles of charge served on  the  petitioner<br \/>\nwith regard to the disciplinary proceedings and the charge  sheet filed against the petitioner. We find that both are not based  on same facts, whereas the disciplinary proceedings are being initiated against the petitioner on account of her obtaining leave  on false pretext and visiting foreign country without any permission but the criminal charge is based on petitioner obtaining a number of  passports in different names giving false  information.  Both the  matters are not based on same facts and thus, the<br \/>\ndisciplinary proceedings cannot be stayed till the disposal of the criminal case. Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs. Interim order is vacated.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>     In  the  petition  it is stated that the simultaneous  facing  of  the departmental enquiry and the criminal trial are prejudicial to the interest of the petitioner. It is stated that the Service Rules provide for dismissal  in case of conviction by a Criminal Court and, therefore,  it  pre-supposes that the departmental enquiry should be stayed till the conclusion of the criminal trial.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.   The  learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner Mr. Mukul Rohtagi  submitted  that the facts and circumstances before the Criminal Court and  the departmental  enquiry  being the same, when the Department  had  chosen  to prosecute  the petitioner, the Department cannot take  departmental  action against  the  petitioner. l therefore, the departmental enquiry  should  be stayed  till  the criminal case is over. The learned  Senior  Counsel  also submitted  that on 19.7.1995 the order of suspension was passed  which  was the  next  day  after  the dismissal of  the  Writ  Petition  No.974\/95  on 18.7.1995 and, therefore, it was a mala fide exercise of power.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.   The  learned  Senior Counsel relied upon the judgment of  the  Supreme Court  in O.P. Gupta Vs. Union of India and Others,   and  the case reported in Allahabad Bank  and  Another  Vs.<br \/>\nDeepak Kumar Bhola, .\n<\/p>\n<p>6.   Mr.  A.K. Sikri, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents  submitted that  it is open to the first respondent to initiate departmental  proceedings against the petitioner and pendency of the criminal case is no bar  to the  initiation of the departmental proceedings. About the passing  of  the order of suspension on 19.7.1995 the learned Senior Counsel submitted  that it  was  shear  co-incidence that dismissal of the  writ  petition  was  on 18.7.1995 and the suspension order was passed on 19.7.1995 but the  Department had considered the matter carefully and the order came to be passed on 19.7.1995. The case of the petitioner that immediately after the  dismissal of  the writ petition the first respondent passed the order  of  suspension was not at all correct.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.   The Supreme Court in State of Rajasthan Vs. Shri B.K. Meena &amp;  Others,<br \/>\n, which was decided on 27.9.1996, and Depot  Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Mohd. Yousuf Miya Etc., 1996  (9) SCALE 65, which was decided on 20.11.1996 had laid down that  the approach  and  objective in the criminal proceedings and  the  departmental proceedings  is  altogether  distinct and different, and  the  question  of staying  departmental  enquiry has to be considered on the  materials  produced.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.   On  a consideration of the entire facts before us, we are of the  view that the dictum laid down by the Supreme Court would apply to this case and the  facts and circumstances do not warrant any consideration for the  stay of  the  departmental proceedings. We have considered this  point  in  C.W. 96\/94  Sh.  H.C. Changra Vs. National Institute of Public  Corpn.  &amp;  Child Development and Another in which the judgment is delivered today and in the light  of  the  legal position, we are of the view  that  the  departmental enquiry  should not be stayed and the petitioner has not made out any  case<br \/>\nfor  setting aside the order of suspension dated 19.7.1995. The writ  petition, accordingly, stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Delhi High Court Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion &#8230; on 1 November, 1997 Author: K Ramamoorthy Bench: D Gupta, K Ramamoorthy JUDGMENT K. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The petitioner has prayed for the quashing of the order dated 19.7.1995 in and by which the petitioner is kept under suspension. The petitioner does not challenge the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-76452","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion ... on 1 November, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion ... on 1 November, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1997-10-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-21T12:55:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion &#8230; on 1 November, 1997\",\"datePublished\":\"1997-10-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-21T12:55:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997\"},\"wordCount\":921,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997\",\"name\":\"Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion ... on 1 November, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1997-10-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-21T12:55:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion &#8230; on 1 November, 1997\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion ... on 1 November, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion ... on 1 November, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1997-10-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-21T12:55:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion &#8230; on 1 November, 1997","datePublished":"1997-10-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-21T12:55:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997"},"wordCount":921,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997","name":"Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion ... on 1 November, 1997 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1997-10-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-21T12:55:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naseem-ishaque-vs-india-trade-promotion-on-1-november-1997#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Naseem Ishaque vs India Trade Promotion &#8230; on 1 November, 1997"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76452","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76452"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76452\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76452"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76452"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}