{"id":7651,"date":"2008-11-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-09-24T01:54:10","modified_gmt":"2018-09-23T20:24:10","slug":"abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT    .\n\nDated: This the 2631 day of  ~ _  E4  'V\n\nBEFORE  \n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE'-.AV.\u00a7IA(}AI\u00a7f\u20ac\/\u00a7'FE;IAAN \"  \"\n\nREGULAR sEc0ND'AEEEAL N'o.v=1\u00a775[':2oD\u00a7\n\nABDUL RAHIM sABr  \n\ns\/0 KULMI KHASIM SAB .,\n\nAGED ABGIJT EQYRS, _   \n\nR\/O OPP.\"MAHA:DEVA\"RICE MILL'\n\nSHIKARIPU;R_A_ ~     \u00bb\n\nSHIMDGA,  ' .   \n  :1. \"  APPELLANT\n\n(By s\ufb01 S.R._A  AND\nSR1 P\"-IJHANANJAYILZ'A_D'HSm.---)\n\nAND:\n\n, .iji'D NTADAERADYA PPA\n- s\/ea SH.[VARUDRAPPA\n\n  ., 'AGED 'ABQUT 54 ms\n\n _ 'R[C\u00bb...SA.LU.Ri.~VILLAGE\n._  ._ANJANAP'I;JRA HOBLI\nA _ SHIKAR'I.PURA TALUK\n\n\"'sH:M0C;A 577 201.\n~ V t.  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
    Size KRISHNA MURTHY, ADV. )<\/p>\n
RSA FILED U\/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST THE<\/p>\n
_ :”4:JU’DGEMENT 85 DEGREE DT.8.2.2006. PASSED m
\nR.A.NO.25\/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE<\/p>\n
(SR.DN.) SAGAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND
\nCONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DEGREE<\/p>\n
2<\/span>
\nD’I’.i29.1.’Z29(}5 PASSED H4 {)’S.17?\/1997 SN THE FILE
\nOF THE CIVIL JUDGE QJRDN.) SH\u00a5K\u00a7\u00a7.R\u00a3PUR.<\/p>\n
‘I”H\u00a5S APPEAL {::o:vnNG am FOR HEAR1Nc;tF:*I\u00a7?i;:;;:”‘\u00bb.,
\nBAY; THE COURT DELEVERED THE F?Gi..LOWIN__(‘\u00a7\u00a7._;  ‘  1’-‘ ”<\/p>\n
JGDGMENEWM<\/p>\n
This second appeal is by  1:i\u00a7.i:3;i19}L\u00a3iff’*b \u00e9f9:r3_ifrii11\u00a2g iSV ‘azf\u00e9: \u00bb:f\u00a7*’al1ed_  vqusstion.<\/p>\n
2. Thg %p1aii’1tif?$\u00bbc\u00e9a.f5e in brief is that he entered<\/p>\n
into”._%j{aj’VII10rtgan\u00a7g’e.. itranssactian with the defendant an<\/p>\n
 _to0\u00a7<: Rs.i2,000\/– as the mortgage<\/p>\n
 '\u00a7'1f;d'A'T:=.iif.:1e}:'ea\u00a7'(:er the plaintiff' has been in<\/p>\n
'V p0s\u00a7::$SiVQ:1.' 'bf the suit property, but Iater on, the<\/p>\n
 V'  Gama ta lmew that the defendant had<\/p>\n
'  \u00e9igt\u00e9iized 3. sale: \u00e9eeci in respect ef the very same suit<\/p>\n
u  and the plaintiff thus became a vi-3t'jm of<\/p>\n
fraud. The 03.13.56 of actien arose on 5.5.9'? just few<\/p>\n
}<\/p>\n
I5<\/p>\n
ansvzared agamsiz. the piaimii\ufb01'. The triai cdiiii<\/p>\n
{iiSII1iSS('3d the suit of the plaintiff and   <\/p>\n
pref\u00e9rreci by the plaintiff also was dis1I1is:.s $ :ciV.Vvb;{\u00a7?.::'i'}i1e  "  <\/p>\n
lower appellate caurt.\n<\/p>\n
5. I have heard the ijotzigasal
\nparties azzd perused 1:11:63 eI2i:ir:3″119i,a1t\u00e9I’-\u00a7{;a1 O\ufb01’2’1″i:3′{3(}I”V(:\u00a71 and<\/p>\n
alm the statements Gf  b\u00a7I{.*:a :\u00a72.,:  -.<\/p>\n
6,  \u00abc<}s;1j;1sf'3:\u00a7 \u00a7 Hegde
\nHudiaznangz put. folward the
\nconte\ufb01\u00e9ici\u00e9   f '$3.3 a mortgage cieeci
\ndailed   which is; a registered<\/p>\n
dz1 of the suit pmperty being<\/p>\n
  ‘plaintiff in favem” of the dafendant (ices<\/p>\n
}f1Qt5’__ ar:’:.”s\u00e9’ ~v.111i1;t%:’:\u00a7S the 1:119rtgage is first 1″ec\u00a3t;-tamed.<\/p>\n
 _ ‘I’I”1c3’if*~’:>f0;=-7%,’ ‘:2\u00a7?itl\u00b0:0ut there being rsdemption of the<\/p>\n
 .L,:::x;A\\:7:’:4gag\u00e9,. the sake couid not hava been made: by the<\/p>\n
   in favour of the defendant and this itself goeg<\/p>\n
T  tdshew that fraud was piaye\u00e9 on the piainti\ufb01” by the<\/p>\n
A defermaxlt. Learned counsel in this cannection<\/p>\n
F\ufb01f\ufb01ff\ufb01d to the evidance 0f {ha parties and aisc: iih\ufb01<\/p>\n
2′?\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
documant. pmduced, and submitted t.ha*:_i both the<\/p>\n
cauzis did mat censider this aspect of the matte:”.,”-.1:<\/p>\n
was 3139 =;:{::11?;$11\u00e9<:Ci \u00a3319.': '\u00a31516? plaintiff is in .,<\/p>\n
01' the suit property even til} this day" a11\u00a5\u00a7;"\u00a7cc*;}.fj*;;35i:1.% ' "<\/p>\n
E'\u20acV\u20acI}.U.\u20ac reeortis were seughii tofb\u00e9 \ufb01m\ufb01-Licg\u00e9id.   <\/p>\n
regard. Anothcr submissian n1aci'<?.__ iisthat <\/p>\n
11195;" cansi\u00e9iei' remandizlg ma"i:!:e3:'* ._t_.o3"\u00bbf;%:1e"',I0Wer<\/p>\n
appeiiam Ceurt.\n<\/p>\n
3′. _(‘_.;’_f:   I\u00e9am\u00e9\ufb01i <::c:11:"1se1 Sri.G.
\n.\u00a7'\u00ab'LI'iS\u00a7"11"}f\u00a3i;~I?{11,11;i\u00a7'.1_'\u00a7"  t1;i:~;:.__:V:'\u00e9spQ1)rIi:ed th-:3
\njudgmi\ufb01xts ‘ :?:f—-b<:=i<;:w by coI1ter1di:1g that<\/p>\n
fha sale "d:_;e\u20act{i  .:'::\u00a7,\u00a7:'<\u00a7ci11c:eci by th@ defendant<\/p>\n
 az1s3,'s\u00a7\u00a7I';sL'~ all  ' V\u00a7;_<_);i:ttc?;11ti.<3I1s put fmward by the<\/p>\n
 :3\u00a7;ip\u00e9:1ia:;t:'.s'\u00abzjiimifxsei. Tm: triai court has considered<\/p>\n
the. "<:iI1E:i:;::"."%:s:1Vfi'\ufb02&I1ce in proper p\ufb01rspectivtz and the<\/p>\n
 3.pp<_;\u00a7i1ga_\u00a3\u00a73..c.'94\u00a7;1rt also confirmed '\u00a3116 View taken by the<\/p>\n
 …. ?.f'i3}"\u00ab.QOL\u00a5fE by ebservirxg that net Grxiy th\ufb01 suit 0f the<\/p>\n
'   is barmd by iimitatien, but at the Same 1:11:16,<\/p>\n
'4  sale dead EXMD1 i\ufb02dicates that the dafendant is<\/p>\n
the absoilgzlte {}"'E%'116T in pesssssion cf the suit property,<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
'T<\/p>\n
subsequelitiy the 3.333 \u00e9e\ufb01d came tea be executed by<\/p>\n
the _p1:5s:ini;iiff in favaur af defendant as per EXI) 1 <\/p>\n
the sale deed. is of Ul\ufb01 year 1971. Th\ufb01 (3{)fiiZ(':Ij}.':\u20acZi%f.VZff1'.4<\/p>\n
the ieamad csounsel for the appeiiant that',I. j'\u00e9x?if\u00a3;1':{V\u00a7j1;'i:ii%  u<\/p>\n
that being mo1*tgage, the sale {i\u00e9\u00a2\u00a7\ufb01'\u00abC(\u00a7\ufb02i1(i_:3ii\u00a7% _h\u00e9.'Si\u00a7: <\/p>\n
ba\ufb01n \u00e9x\ufb01ctlteci, @065 not cgiivin\ufb01g :E\u00a5.1\u00a3'".3 h3V_i\ufb01?g\u00bb. goi&\u00a3"–.V <\/p>\n
througii the a::onter:t:s   g–,;}e~ _Ex.D1 itself.<\/p>\n
\nAdjustzixent \u00absf the   {Bf ailieullt
\nullder    Ca\ufb01i\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9idarantien are
\n:’c:fQ~yr\u20acd 1:01:   and both ceurts
\nhave   aJ;’1d HI11<31'e particularly the<\/p>\n
trial} {:0Li\ufb01:._ \u00a7(;\u20acT1t,e\ufb02tS sf .E)x.D 1 at para]? .<\/p>\n
 '~  _  3\u00a711ef\u00e9ibi*\u20ac*;'as tbs: pazfie\ufb01 {(3 both the deeds<\/p>\n
 _a1'\u00b03:  'cxn\u00e9-v.,_g\ufb02:?iCitE':{e game and as the sala deed alga<\/p>\n
\ufb02i\ufb01l\u00e9\ufb01eilv\ufb01. —  th\ufb01 adjustment of the xnortgage<\/p>\n
 .  R.am<:m:r;t {inc towards sale Cazlsideratiolz and ftxrthcr,<\/p>\n
  "'-"\u00a7i2\u00a3*, E;i;a1anc$ ameunt being also paid in the presence<\/p>\n
 H91'? the Sub-Registrar and endorsement aisa beixzg<\/p>\n
 made by the Sub-\u00a7\u20aceg's\u00a3:ra:z* himsalf in thc sale deed<\/p>\n
EXJDI, it has-:; to be infermd that the mortgage I<\/p>\n
y<\/p>\n
ya'<\/p>\n
transaction got extinguished urzder \ufb01x-:3 saie da\ufb01d<\/p>\n
E331. Hausa, E do not \ufb01nd any II1\u00a7I"i{ in the <\/p>\n
<:::3m:\u20ac:"1t:i:3r1 put fmward by the app\ufb01ilantfs CO_1;i3s\u00e9\u00a7{'.   A '<\/p>\n
11. As far as the piea of f1*afgi<j\u00ab;iS_ C{\u00a7\ufb01s?_\u20ac:13iI\u00a7:dV,A  f<\/p>\n
there is :10 evidance pIa.ce\u00a2:if;0_proVc'3. pa_rfti::1tia13s iyf <\/p>\n
the fraud piayed by the app\u00e9\ufb02\u00e9\ufb01t.  8131- pther
\nhand, executinn 0f the pr\u00e9i\u00e9z-\ufb01;:1:'1c:3 0?
\nthe Sub\u00ab~Reg5St:'ar as  \u00a7__)\u00a2:\u00a3f -fiu\ufb02i\ufb01es the
\n(3-:)I1ter2ti0z1::' "   as regards the
\nfraud    $\u00a7ijS't:7V1:Vr1<:e ef any avidance
\nfoxthccwfai\ufb01g {mi emf fraud, boil": ceurts<\/p>\n
have _I'ighil\u00a7;-\u00bb reja\u00a2f:.a6;'v_ th\u00e9 submission made in this<\/p>\n
 V'    x'   ….. .. V<\/p>\n
 as {ha iimitatien aspect is;\n<\/p>\n
V V . ::on5e1n\u00e9\u00a7,”Ei1e sale deed is cf the year 19′? 1., but \u20ac116<\/p>\n
‘ “..\u00a7va\u00a7\ufb011sd in the yczar 13995 alums: after 24 years<\/p>\n
-‘   iherefare the ‘ma: semi has held that the:<\/p>\n
% ‘decimation saught: far by 11115 plaintiff is beggmd the<\/p>\n
A iimitaiian period prescrziljaci by law. This fm\ufb01i\ufb01g of<\/p>\n
the caurts beimv 3159 is in cansanance with the<\/p>\n
}<\/p>\n
s-=<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008 Author: V.Jagannathan IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT . Dated: This the 2631 day of ~ _ E4 ‘V BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE’-.AV.\u00a7IA(}AI\u00a7f\u20ac\/\u00a7’FE;IAAN ” ” REGULAR sEc0ND’AEEEAL N’o.v=1\u00a775[‘:2oD\u00a7 ABDUL RAHIM sABr s\/0 KULMI KHASIM SAB ., AGED ABGIJT EQYRS, _ R\/O OPP.”MAHA:DEVA”RICE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAbdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-23T20:24:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-23T20:24:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1052,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-23T20:24:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-23T20:24:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-23T20:24:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008"},"wordCount":1052,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008","name":"Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-23T20:24:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/abdul-rahim-sab-vs-tontadaradyappa-on-26-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Abdul Rahim Sab vs Tontadaradyappa on 26 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7651"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7651\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}