{"id":76566,"date":"2009-03-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009"},"modified":"2019-03-07T23:38:53","modified_gmt":"2019-03-07T18:08:53","slug":"nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009<\/div>\n
RSA No.1162 of 1992                                         1\n\n\n      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                     CHANDIGARH\n\n\n\n                                    RSA No.1162 of 1992\n                                    Date of Decision: 9.3.2009\n\n\n\nNand Singh alias Naranjan Singh                       ..Appellant\n\n                       Vs.\n\nNatha Ram (dead through L.Rs.)                        ..Respondents\n\n\n\n\nCoram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vinod K.Sharma\n\n\n\n\nPresent:   Mr.A.K.Chopra, Sr. Advocate, with\n           Mr.Rajnish Chauhan, Advocate,\n           for the appellant.\n\n           Mr.S.K.Singla, Advocate,\n           for the respondents.\n\n                       ---\n\n      1.   Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may\n           be allowed to see the judgment?\n\n      2.    To be referred to the Reporters or not?\n\n      3.    Whether the judgment should be reported in\n            Digest?\n\n                              ---\n\nVinod K.Sharma,J. (Oral)\n<\/pre>\n
           Plaintiff\/Appellant brought    a suit for declaration that the<\/p>\n
plaintiff is in possession of 11 kanals 4 marlas of land as owner with
\n RSA No.1162 of 1992                                             2<\/span><\/p>\n
consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant from<\/p>\n
dispossessing him from the suit land or from alienating the same.<\/p>\n
            It was claimed by the plaintiff\/appellant that he was owner in<\/p>\n
possession of the suit land and has been         sowing different crops, the<\/p>\n
defendant\/respondent was threatening to dispossess the plaintiff from the<\/p>\n
land in dispute and also wanted to alienate the same though he has no such<\/p>\n
right. The plaintiff claimed that on inquiry it was revealed that the defendant<\/p>\n
purchased the suit land from the plaintiff and mutation stood sanctioned in<\/p>\n
his favour. Plaintiff also claimed that if any sale deed is proved the same is<\/p>\n
the result of fraud and misrepresentation, undue influence and, therefore,<\/p>\n
not binding on him. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant had already<\/p>\n
filed a suit in the court of Sub Judge, Nakodar on the basis of alleged<\/p>\n
fictitious sale deed which was dismissed on 29.11.1966 and the appeal filed<\/p>\n
by the defendant was dismissed by the learned Additional District Judge,<\/p>\n
Jalandhar on 27.1.1970. It was also claimed that in the suit filed by the<\/p>\n
defendant-respondent it was held that the plaintiff was not the owner of the<\/p>\n
suit land nor was in possession of the same.\n<\/p>\n
            On notice the defendant appeared and filed written statement<\/p>\n
controverting the material facts and stated that the plaintiff was neither<\/p>\n
owner nor in possession of the suit land and therefore, the suit was not<\/p>\n
maintainable. The land in suit was said to be owned by the defendant and<\/p>\n
one Lachhu who has been in possession of the land in dispute as a tenant<\/p>\n
under the defendant. It was also pleaded that the plaintiff\/appellant is<\/p>\n
estopped from filing the present suit against the defendant. Locus standi of<\/p>\n
the plaintiff to maintain the suit was also challenged. It was also claimed
\n RSA No.1162 of 1992                                                3<\/span><\/p>\n
that the claim of the defendant was not barred by principle of res judicata<\/p>\n
because the mistake was of the consolidation authorities which has been<\/p>\n
later on rectified.\n<\/p>\n
               On the pleadings of the parties learned trial court was pleased<\/p>\n
to frame the following issues:-\n<\/p>\n
               1.     Whether the plaintiff is owner of the land? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
               2.     Whether the land is in possession of Lachhu as tenant<\/p>\n
                      under the plaintiff? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
               3.     Whether the defendant has purchased the suit land from<\/p>\n
                      the plaintiff? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
               4.     Relief.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
               Issues No.1 to 3 were taken up together, wherein learned trial<\/p>\n
court was pleased to hold that the stand taken by the plaintiff\/appellant was<\/p>\n
that he is owner of the suit land and is in possession of the same. It was also<\/p>\n
held that he has not sold the suit land to the defendant. In support thereof<\/p>\n
reliance was placed on the copy of Jamabandi Ex.P.1 in which the plaintiff<\/p>\n
was shown to be owner in possession of the suit land. Learned trial court<\/p>\n
however, observed that in the Jamabandi there is a red entry regarding the<\/p>\n
sale by the plaintiff to the defendant of Khasra No.50\/20\/2 (1-14) and<\/p>\n
56\/3\/2(3-12) and 4\/1 (1-10). Copy of judgment passed by Shri R.L.Garg,<\/p>\n
Additional District Judge was also placed on record showing the dismissal<\/p>\n
of   appeal.          In   the   said   appeal   findings   were   against   the<\/p>\n
defendant\/respondent, regarding the sale of land qua two numbers.<\/p>\n
               The defendant\/respondent had taken a stand that he is owner in<\/p>\n
possession of the suit land in pursuance to the purchase. Learned trial court,
\n RSA No.1162 of 1992                                            4<\/span><\/p>\n
therefore, on the the basis of evidence brought on record was pleased to<\/p>\n
record the following findings:-\n<\/p>\n
             ”      I have compared the khasra numbers given in the decree<\/p>\n
             sheet. Ex.P.8 with that of suit land. These khasra numbers does<\/p>\n
             not tally with the khasra numbers given in the suit land. The<\/p>\n
             khasra numbers given in decree sheet Ex.P.8 are number as<\/p>\n
             given of 50\/25 (6-2), 21(7-12) and 22 (8-11). The evidence of<\/p>\n
             the plaintiff specially revenue record i.e. jamabandies relied<\/p>\n
             upon by the plaintiff itself goes against the plaintiff. The<\/p>\n
             plaintiff as per jamabandies is only proved to be the owner of<\/p>\n
             4-8 malras out of khasra No.50\/20. As regarding possession<\/p>\n
             over the suit land I find that khasra girdawari Ex.P.3, P.4 and<\/p>\n
             P.10 shows that plaintiff is in possession of suit land through<\/p>\n
             Lachhu. There is no other document to show possession of the<\/p>\n
             defendant over the suit land. Therefore, from the evidence I<\/p>\n
             hold this issue accordingly declaring plaintiff as owner of 4k -8<\/p>\n
             mls out of khasra No.50\/\/20 (6-2) only out of suit land and<\/p>\n
             plaintiff is proved in possession of suit land through Lachhu. I<\/p>\n
             hold these issues accordingly.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
             Thus, in view of the findings recorded above the suit of the<\/p>\n
plaintiff for declaration was decreed qua 4 kanals 8 marlas of land out of<\/p>\n
Khasra No. 50\/\/20 (6-2); for remaining land injunction was granted in<\/p>\n
favour of plaintiff\/appellant.\n<\/p>\n
             In the appeal judgment and decree passed by the learned trial<\/p>\n
court stands affirmed.\n<\/p>\n
 RSA No.1162 of 1992                                              5<\/span><\/p>\n
              Learned senior counsel for the appellant raised the following<\/p>\n
substantial questions of law for consideration in this appeal:<\/p>\n
              1.      Whether the judgment and decree passed by the learned<\/p>\n
                      courts below      are the outcome of misreading of<\/p>\n
                      documents Ex.P.1 and P.2 and the statement of Patwari<\/p>\n
                      who appeared as DW 1 in support of the entry in the<\/p>\n
                      remarks column?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
              2.      Whether the entries in the remarks column in the absence<\/p>\n
                      of sale deed are liable to be ignored?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
              3.      Whether the defendant\/respondent has failed to prove the<\/p>\n
                      alleged     sale deed in his favour by leading cogent<\/p>\n
                      evidence?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
              In support of the substantial questions of law learned senior<\/p>\n
counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant contends that the judgments<\/p>\n
and decree of the learned courts below vide which relief of declaration qua<\/p>\n
6 kanals 6 marlas of land has been declined to the plaintiff\/appellant cannot<\/p>\n
be sustained as the findings are the outcome of misreading of document<\/p>\n
Exs.P.1 and P.2 on record.\n<\/p>\n
              The contention of the learned senior counsel is that Exs.P.1<\/p>\n
and P.2 i.e. Jamabandis clearly show that the plaintiff\/appellant was owner<\/p>\n
in possession of the suit land and that red ink entry which is the basis for<\/p>\n
non-suiting        the plaintiff\/appellant was not supported by DW 1 while<\/p>\n
appearing in the witness box.\n<\/p>\n
              Learned senior counsel contends that DW 1 admitted that while<\/p>\n
making red entry qua the sale deed the defendant\/ respondent had not
\n RSA No.1162 of 1992                                              6<\/span><\/p>\n
produced any sale deed nor any sale deed was on record.<\/p>\n
             However, on consideration of the matter, I find no force in the<\/p>\n
contentions raised by the learned senior counsel.\n<\/p>\n
             Exs. P.1 and P.2 are the documents on the basis of which the<\/p>\n
plaintiff sought to be declared as owner in possession of the property in<\/p>\n
dispute. In the suit he nowhere challenged the entries made in red ink in<\/p>\n
the jamabandis i.e. the very basis of suit.\n<\/p>\n
             Furthermore, in the present case it may be noticed that there<\/p>\n
was a dispute inter se between the parties prior to the filing of the suit<\/p>\n
which was filed by the defendant\/respondent in which he had claimed<\/p>\n
possession on the basis of sale deed. Though the defendant\/respondent had<\/p>\n
failed in the said suit for want of connecting the land in dispute with the<\/p>\n
sale deed, however, sale deed was upheld, which showed that plaintiff had<\/p>\n
sold land in favour of defendant\/respondent.\n<\/p>\n
             It is also not in dispute that mutation was sanctioned in favour<\/p>\n
of the defendant-respondent which was produced on record as Ex.D.2 and<\/p>\n
appeal filed by the plaintiff\/appellant against the said decision also failed.<\/p>\n
             The plaintiff for the reasons best known to him chose not to<\/p>\n
challenge the orders passed by the revenue courts and filed            suit for<\/p>\n
declaration on the basis of ownership by ignoring the revenue record.<\/p>\n
             The contention of the learned senior counsel that remarks in<\/p>\n
the column were liable to be ignored for want of evidence in support thereof<\/p>\n
also cannot be sustained – firstly for the reason that Ex.P.7 was produced by<\/p>\n
the plaintiff\/appellant himself i.e. the previous judgment inter se between<\/p>\n
the parties wherein it was shown that part of the land was sold by the
\n RSA No.1162 of 1992                                              7<\/span><\/p>\n
plaintiff\/appellant in favour of the defendant-respondent and red ink entries<\/p>\n
in the Jamabandi further find support from mutation Ex.D.2 brought on<\/p>\n
record.\n<\/p>\n
             Therefore, no error can be found with the orders passed by the<\/p>\n
learned courts below holding that the plaintiff has failed to        prove his<\/p>\n
ownership qua 6 kanals 6 marals of land qua which red ink entry was made<\/p>\n
in the revenue record.\n<\/p>\n
             The plaintiff was to stand on his own legs and merely because<\/p>\n
the defendant\/respondent had failed to produce the sale deed on record or<\/p>\n
to prove the same, cannot be a ground to decree the suit in favour of the<\/p>\n
plaintiff in view of the judgment Ex.P.7 on record. The learned courts<\/p>\n
below, thus, in the facts and circumstances of the case rightly granted<\/p>\n
injunction in favour of the plaintiff qua the whole land by declaring him to<\/p>\n
be owner of 4 kanals 8 marlas of land qua which there was evidence of<\/p>\n
ownership.\n<\/p>\n
             The substantial questions of law are answered against the<\/p>\n
appellant\/plaintiff and in favour of the defendant\/respondent.<\/p>\n
             The appeal is, consequently, ordered to be dismissed but with<\/p>\n
no order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n
9.03.2009                                         (Vinod K.Sharma)\nrp                                                     Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009 RSA No.1162 of 1992 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1162 of 1992 Date of Decision: 9.3.2009 Nand Singh alias Naranjan Singh ..Appellant Vs. Natha Ram (dead through L.Rs.) ..Respondents Coram: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-76566","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-07T18:08:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-07T18:08:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1606,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-07T18:08:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-07T18:08:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-07T18:08:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009"},"wordCount":1606,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009","name":"Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-07T18:08:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nand-singh-alias-naranjan-singh-vs-natha-ram-dead-through-l-rs-on-9-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Nand Singh Alias Naranjan Singh vs Natha Ram (Dead Through L.Rs.) on 9 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76566","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76566"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76566\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76566"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76566"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76566"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}