{"id":7664,"date":"2008-11-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008"},"modified":"2014-07-29T07:28:38","modified_gmt":"2014-07-29T01:58:38","slug":"k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 16514 of 2008(N)\n\n\n1. K. VIASINI AMMA, D\/O. MEENAKSHI AMMA,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. K. SARASWATHY AMMA, D\/O. MEENAKSHI\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. TNE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE\n\n3. PURUSHOTHAMAN, S\/O. PAPU, MADATHI\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.P.RAMNATH\n\n                For Respondent  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n Dated :04\/11\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                         R. BASANT, J.\n           -------------------------------------------------\n               W.P.(c) No. 16514 of 2008-N\n           -------------------------------------------------\n         Dated this the 4th day of November, 2008\n\n                           JUDMGNET\n\n\n\n      The grievance of the petitioners is that the proceedings\n\nunder the Code of Criminal Procedure is being vexatiously\n\ninitiated by the 1st respondent i.e., the Sub Divisional\n\nMagistrate (described as the Revenue Divisional Officer).\n\n      2. The learned Public Prosecutor was directed to take\n\ninstructions. A statement has been filed by the 1st respondent.\n\nThe 1st respondent in the statement makes a categoric\n\nadmission that there is no intention whatsoever to initiate any\n\nproceedings against the petitioners. It is submitted that there\n\nwas strain in the relationship between the parties and the 1st\n\nrespondent as a revenue official had only made a bona fide\n\nattempt to explore the possibilities of a settlement. If there be\n\nno settlement, that is the end of the matter               and the 1st\n\nW.P.(c) No. 16514 of 2008-N\n                                -: 2 :-\n\nrespondent does not want to take any further steps, it is\n\nadmitted categorically in the statement dated 23\/7\/08.\n\n      3. In the light of the stand taken by the 1st respondent, I\n\nam satisfied that no further directions are necessary in this writ\n\npetition. This writ petition is accordingly dismissed as\n\nunnecessary.\n\n\n\n                                                     Sd\/-\n                                         (R. BASANT, JUDGE)\n\n\nNan\/\n\n\n                \/\/true copy\/\/\n\n                                        P.S. to Judge\n\n\n? IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\n+WP(C).No. 30018 of 2008(W)\n\n\n#1. RAVEENDRAN, S\/O SREEDHARAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n$1. STATE OF KERLA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,\n\n3. THE ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER,\n\n!                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.V.THAMBAN\n\n^                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\n*Coram\n The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n% Dated :04\/11\/2008\n\n: O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>                         R. BASANT, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>           &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-\n<\/p>\n<p>               W.P.(c) No. 30018 of 2008-W\n<\/p>\n<p>           &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br \/>\n         Dated this the 4th day of November, 2008<\/p>\n<p>                           JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>      The petitioner is the owner of a motorcycle which has<\/p>\n<p>been seized on the allegation that it was used for the<\/p>\n<p>transportation of 3.95 litres of IMFL. A glass tumbler as well<\/p>\n<p>as a bottle of water were also allegedly             seized from the<\/p>\n<p>vehicle. The seizure took place in the night of 19\/1\/08. The<\/p>\n<p>vehicle was produced before the learned Magistrate.             The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner applied for the release of the vehicle.              That<\/p>\n<p>application stands rejected by the impugned order on the<\/p>\n<p>ground that the proceedings under Sec.67B of the Kerala<\/p>\n<p>Abkari Act are contemplated.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.  The petitioner has come to this Court with the<\/p>\n<p>grievance that his vehicle is being exposed unnecessarily to<\/p>\n<p>sun and rain in the custody of the officials and that the same is<\/p>\n<p> W.P.(c) No. 30018 of 2008-W<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                              -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>forced to endure damage and deterioration.      It is prayed that<\/p>\n<p>subject to appropriate conditions under Sec.451 or Sec.457<\/p>\n<p>Cr.P.C. and if not by invoking the jurisdiction under Art.226 of<\/p>\n<p>the Constitution, the vehicle may be directed to be released to<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner it having already remained in custody from<\/p>\n<p>19\/1\/08.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. Notice was given to the learned Public Prosecutor. The<\/p>\n<p>learned Public Prosecutor      reports that the Excise official<\/p>\n<p>concerned has been given delivery of the vehicle only on 3\/11\/08.<\/p>\n<p>in these circumstances, some further time will certainly be<\/p>\n<p>required to complete the proceedings under Sec.67B of the<\/p>\n<p>Abkari Act. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that subuject<\/p>\n<p>to appropriate conditions which shall protect and safeguard the<\/p>\n<p>interests of the State, the vehicle can be released to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner; but the learned Public Prosecutor insist that bank<\/p>\n<p>guarantee may be insisted for such release.<\/p>\n<p>      4. I have considered all the relevant inputs. I have taken<\/p>\n<p>note of the period during which the vehicle has remained in<\/p>\n<p>custody.    I have taken note of the stage of the proceedings<\/p>\n<p>under Sec.67B of the Abkari Act. I have further taken note of the<\/p>\n<p>nature of the allegations levelled regarding the use of the<\/p>\n<p>vehicle. Having considered all the relevant circumstances, I am<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(c) No. 30018 of 2008-W<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>satisfied that the vehicle can now be directed to be released to<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner subject to appropriate terms and conditions.<\/p>\n<p>Considering all the circumstances, I am not persuaded to agree<\/p>\n<p>that it is necessary in a case like the instant one to insist on<\/p>\n<p>production of bank guarantee.           Appropriate other safeguards<\/p>\n<p>can be insisted.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5. In the result:\n<\/p>\n<p>      (a) This writ petition is allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      (b) The impugned order is set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>      (c) The vehicle shall be released to the petitioner on the<\/p>\n<p>following terms and conditions&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>      (i) The petitioner shall produce before the learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate all the documents to show that he is the owner<\/p>\n<p>entitled to possession of the vehicle.<\/p>\n<p>      (ii) The petitioner shall execute a bond for the value of the<\/p>\n<p>vehicle to be determined by the learned Magistrate provisionally<\/p>\n<p>with two solvent sureties each for the like to the satisfaction of<\/p>\n<p>the learned Magistrate.\n<\/p>\n<p>      (iii) In such bond to be executed by the petitioner, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner shall undertake to produce the vehicle as and when<\/p>\n<p>directed before the learned Magistrate or the authority under<\/p>\n<p>Sec.67B of the Abkari Act if and after an order of confiscation is<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(c) No. 30018 of 2008-W<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>passed.\n<\/p>\n<p>     (iv) If the above conditions are satisfied by the petitioner,<\/p>\n<p>the learned Magistrate shall issue an order of release and ther<\/p>\n<p>upon the vehicle shall be released to the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>whosesoever the custody of the vehicle be.<\/p>\n<p>     6. Issue a copy of this judgment to the learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner forthwith.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                     Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>\n                                         (R. BASANT, JUDGE)<\/p>\n<p>Nan\/<\/p>\n<p>                \/\/true copy\/\/<\/p>\n<p>                                        P.S. to Judge<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(c) No. 30018 of 2008-W<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                        -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 16514 of 2008(N) 1. K. VIASINI AMMA, D\/O. MEENAKSHI AMMA, &#8230; Petitioner 2. K. SARASWATHY AMMA, D\/O. MEENAKSHI Vs 1. TNE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE STATE OF KERALA, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-29T01:58:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-29T01:58:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":659,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008\",\"name\":\"K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-29T01:58:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-29T01:58:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-29T01:58:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008"},"wordCount":659,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008","name":"K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-29T01:58:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-viasini-amma-vs-tne-revenue-divisional-officer-on-4-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K. Viasini Amma vs Tne Revenue Divisional Officer on 4 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7664"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7664\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}