{"id":7690,"date":"2011-07-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011"},"modified":"2017-02-24T00:54:26","modified_gmt":"2017-02-23T19:24:26","slug":"ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                     at\n                                                  New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                         File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000985\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a08,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a08,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n\n\n           Appellant\n\n           Ms.\u00a0Veena\u00a0Dhiman\n           W\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Kartar\u00a0Chand\u00a0Dhiman,\n           V&amp;\u00a0PO\u00a0Chahri\u00a0Via\u00a0Nagrota\u00a0Bhawan,\n           Tehsil\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Distt.\u00a0Kangra,\u00a0\n           Himachal\u00a0Pradesh\n\n           The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present.\n           \u00a0\n           Respondents\n\n           Northern\u00a0Railway\n           Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager\n           Ferozpur\u00a0Division\n           Ferozpur\n\n\n\n           Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0Nathu\u00a0Ram,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0DMM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Harish\u00a0Katoch,\u00a0ADEN\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Ganga\u00a0Prasad,\u00a0SSE\n\n\n\n                         Information\u00a0Commissioner         :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                              at\n                                                     New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                           File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000985\n\n\n                                                           ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0through\u00a0her\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a0nil,\u00a0filed\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Ferozpur,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       wanted\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0his\u00a0\u00a0TA\u00a0journals,\u00a0Muster\u00a0Sheet,\u00a0duty\u00a0passes,\u00a0position\u00a0of\u00a0encroachment\u00a0on\u00a0Rly\u00a0land\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       by \u00a0 outsiders, \u00a0 log \u00a0 book, \u00a0 post \u00a0 based \u00a0 reservation \u00a0 roster \u00a0 register \u00a0 etc.) \u00a0 The \u00a0 PIO, \u00a0 on \u00a0 04.02.2010,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       requested\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0to\u00a0deposit\u00a0the\u00a0requisite\u00a0fee\u00a0for\u00a0transmitting\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       27.02.2010,\u00a0wrote\u00a0back\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0requesting\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0be\u00a0delivered\u00a0at\u00a0her\u00a0home\u00a0through\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       messenger\u00a0as\u00a0she\u00a0is\u00a0unable\u00a0to\u00a0go\u00a0to\u00a0Pathankot\u00a0to\u00a0collect\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0She\u00a0also\u00a0requested\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       amount\u00a0 to\u00a0 be\u00a0 paid\u00a0 by\u00a0 her\u00a0 may\u00a0also\u00a0be\u00a0intimated\u00a0to\u00a0her.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0PIO,\u00a0accordingly,\u00a0on\u00a003.05.2010,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0the\u00a0break\u00adup\u00a0of\u00a0amount\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0paid\u00a0by\u00a0her\u00a0which\u00a0included\u00a0the\u00a0TA,\u00a02\u00a0days\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       salary\u00a0etc.\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0messenger.\u00a0Thereafter,\u00a0on\u00a004.08.2010,\u00a0Assistant\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Engineer,\u00a0wrote\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Applicant\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0may\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0records,\u00a0barring\u00a0those\u00a0which\u00a0related\u00a0to\u00a0commercial\u00a0confidence\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a03rd\u00adparty,\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Pathankot\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0authority.\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0thereafter,\u00a0filed\u00a0her\u00a01 st\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>       appeal\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0on\u00a019.10.2010\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0AA\u00a0had\u00a0apparently\u00a0not\u00a0decided.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Appellant, \u00a0 filed \u00a0 the \u00a0 present \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 on \u00a0 21.03.2011 \u00a0 requesting \u00a0 for \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0information.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>\nDecision<\/p>\n<p>2.     Contrary\u00a0to\u00a0what\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0have\u00a0stated\u00a0in\u00a0their\u00a0replies,\u00a0I\u00a0see\u00a0nothing\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       information \u00a0 which \u00a0 would \u00a0 attract \u00a0 the \u00a0 exemption \u00a0 under \u00a0 Section \u00a0 8(1)(j) \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 RTI\u00adAct. \u00a0 However,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       considering\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents&#8217;\u00a0submission\u00a0made\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       items \u00a0 g \u00a0 &amp; \u00a0 h \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant&#8217;s \u00a0 RTI\u00adapplication \u00a0 is \u00a0 not \u00a0 available \u00a0 with \u00a0 them, \u00a0 I \u00a0 hereby \u00a0 direct \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Respondents\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0remaining\u00a0points\u00a0viz.,\u00a0(a)\u00a0to\u00a0(f)\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       and\u00a0(i)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant&#8217;s\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication.\u00a0Time\u00ad\u00a0within\u00a01\u00a0week\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p> 3.       It\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0has\u00a0taken\u00a0different\u00a0positions\u00a0at\u00a0different\u00a0levels\u00a0while\u00a0responding\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         present\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0entirely\u00a0not\u00a0acceptable.\u00a0It\u00a0is,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0directed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0should\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         show\u00a0cause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0penalty\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a020(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00ad\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0on\u00a0him\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         apparently \u00a0 obstructing \u00a0 the \u00a0 transmission \u00a0 of \u00a0 information \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant, \u00a0 by \u00a0 misleading \u00a0 her \u00a0 with\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         confusing\u00a0\u00a0replies.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0explain\u00a0why\u00a0he\u00a0failed\u00a0to\u00a0discharge\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         obligation \u00a0 under \u00a0 Section \u00a0 19(6) \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 RTI\u00adAct. \u00a0 Replies \u00a0 to \u00a0 both \u00a0 the \u00a0 notices \u00a0 should \u00a0 reach \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                    \u00a0            \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<br \/>\n         Commission\u00a0by\u00a001.08.2011.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                         \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                 Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Ms.\u00a0Veena\u00a0Dhiman<br \/>\n         W\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Kartar\u00a0Chand\u00a0Dhiman,<br \/>\n         V&amp;\u00a0PO\u00a0Chahri\u00a0Via\u00a0Nagrota\u00a0Bhawan,<br \/>\n         Tehsil\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Distt.\u00a0Kangra,\u00a0<br \/>\n         Himachal\u00a0Pradesh<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n         Northern\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n         Ferozpur\u00a0Division<br \/>\n         Ferozpur<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n         Northern\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager<br \/>\n         Ferozpur\u00a0Division<br \/>\n           Ferozpur<\/p>\n<p>4.        Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n<p>Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Appellant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0(1)\u00a0<br \/>\ncopy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply,\u00a0(3)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0(4)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(5)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0considers\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ncomplaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Appellant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000985 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a08,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0July\u00a08,\u00a02011 Parties: Appellant Ms.\u00a0Veena\u00a0Dhiman W\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Kartar\u00a0Chand\u00a0Dhiman, V&amp;\u00a0PO\u00a0Chahri\u00a0Via\u00a0Nagrota\u00a0Bhawan, Tehsil\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Distt.\u00a0Kangra,\u00a0 Himachal\u00a0Pradesh The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present. \u00a0 Respondents Northern\u00a0Railway Office\u00a0of\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager Ferozpur\u00a0Division Ferozpur Represented\u00a0by:\u00a0Shri\u00a0Nathu\u00a0Ram,\u00a0Sr.\u00a0DMM,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Harish\u00a0Katoch,\u00a0ADEN\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Ganga\u00a0Prasad,\u00a0SSE Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000985 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant,\u00a0through\u00a0her\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication\u00a0dated\u00a0nil,\u00a0filed\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Northern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Ferozpur,\u00a0 wanted\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0\u00a0his\u00a0\u00a0TA\u00a0journals,\u00a0Muster\u00a0Sheet,\u00a0duty\u00a0passes,\u00a0position\u00a0of\u00a0encroachment\u00a0on\u00a0Rly\u00a0land\u00a0 by \u00a0 outsiders, \u00a0 log \u00a0 book, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7690","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-23T19:24:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-23T19:24:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":581,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-23T19:24:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-23T19:24:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-23T19:24:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011"},"wordCount":581,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011","name":"Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-23T19:24:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-veena-dhiman-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-8-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ms.Veena Dhiman vs Ministry Of Railways on 8 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7690","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7690"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7690\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}