{"id":77222,"date":"2008-12-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008"},"modified":"2016-09-21T06:42:07","modified_gmt":"2016-09-21T01:12:07","slug":"ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Ramappa S\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ramappa S\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
k .2:’s_.m:”.:u\\{Ar:-DA’,
\n” CRLv\u00a3A’.’NO.i?E\u00a7\u00e9V3Al’i2.C}fi\u00a53′  V’<\/p>\n
BEIWEEN:<\/p>\n
\nRatmappa, fjadaigig
\nAge abQ1}VtT66″y_\u00e9af:~g_    ‘ ‘
\nOccu;3:atjon:A  4G0V\u20acIjI’iInC13.t Servant,<\/p>\n
‘I’a}uka ;_ H1i1ng11:id’,:”-\u00a3}i3\u00a7: ‘Bagamot. .. APPELLANT<\/p>\n
(By Sri V; M.’_Sh eeIva\ufb011″;.’ Agiizp\u00e9atc)<\/p>\n
A ‘ ‘ V _ _  1.* The x\ufb01~dmin.\u00a7si3ative O\ufb01cer,<\/p>\n
 V  2:-1id._ Sessions Court,<\/p>\n
2. ‘.’:?’.$’1cait:’-. ().f K\u00e9xnataka,
\nRepmsantczi by its Special Puhiic<\/p>\n
”  AA Pms\u00e9cutor, High Court of Karnataka,
\n” _ _Ci;-xzuit Bench, Dhaxwad. …i32ESPONDEN’I’S<\/p>\n
  (\u00e9sy Sri P.H.Gotkhindi, HCGP)<\/p>\n
* iris<\/p>\n
This appeal is \ufb01led under Section 341 cue…
\nto set-aside the order dated 30.3.2007′ passed.~;i,5,  it<\/p>\n
Bagalkot directing the 1″ Civil Judge (S1*.’D’1:i*.): v'{;JM_, i” V<\/p>\n
Bagalkot, for gving false evidence’ agamgtti’*rhe.i%appen@:.tiA
\nCrl.Misc.No.35\/ 2007 and the  dategi
\nfiled in C.C.No.3{}.2007 on thefiied of iP:1._{<::v.\u00a7Ii :J:1'cige"'(~Sr'\u00b0. any i
\nand CJM, Bagaikot, against    such
\nother reliefs as deemed   ef the case.
\nThis appeal comii3.g..t}13..    clay, the Court<\/p>\n
delivered the foiiaygreingz  t .\n<\/p>\n
(5i>jeetiensViVt<;i'IA{I;2O0t3—\ufb01iedt.<\/p>\n
X _}rIea1'\u20aci."  the f\ufb01etiizlstance, petitioner] appellant had<\/p>\n
 V'   i.,:o=:vision  against the impugned order and<\/p>\n
i  __ sii;b$eqtie:1t1_<\/p>\n
Ema.\n<\/p>\n
re;fg?lise\u00e9 that he should have \ufb01led 21 Criminal<\/p>\n
A
\nappeai. Themjtfere, he withdrew the zevision petaitjon and \ufb01le\u00e9<\/p>\n
iV._t11e  appeal. Thus, mti\ufb01onerl appeiiant was<\/p>\n
“if “_p1eeeeuti:ng the petition] appeal under bona\ufb01de immession.<\/p>\n
i  Tgaking this fact into ecnsicleration, the deiay in \ufb01ling the<\/p>\n
,, appeal is condoned. N V g tw_<\/p>\n
2. Appellaxzt was the complainant <\/p>\n
No.1\/2004 on the \ufb01le of Special Jtgdge   <\/p>\n
trial, complainant turned hostile \u00e9aqlxd igsve e’e\/zjch\ufb01lejtice <\/p>\n
to averments of first infonzaajjon Vlogllgedl I:-zyl’   ;<\/p>\n
conclusion of trial, the   en opinion
\nthat appellant has #33)’  Wideilce
\ncontraxy to the eontente  lodged by him.
\nThe leareed   appellant to show
\ncause as tci  r for an offence of<\/p>\n
3; _ ‘i’1}en:fora:f qa _W’:.*it\u00a7_\u00a2n complaint ,\\ by the Chief
\nAdministra\ufb01ve ‘vO\ufb01i’eer’–._of  the District Court, Bagalkat was<\/p>\n
 u  ma,\u00a7i’t33:.o\u00a7rer te C..ll\u00a7’M….{;ourt at Bagalkot on the basis of which<\/p>\n
_ ‘\\;a.\u00ab,=%\u00a7=v\u00a7<\/p>\n
  -issued to the complainant for an offence<\/p>\n
–}i\ufb01’der Section 193 I.P.C. The appellant has<\/p>\n
‘V   zftlashjng the pmceedings.\n<\/p>\n
H =   The learned Counsel for appellant has made<\/p>\n
‘?\n<\/p>\n
V’ we owmg su mlssxons am’ <\/p>\n
the first information. it is aiso not in dispuie  <\/p>\n
course of evidence, he had disowned the.’avei.r:\u00a7r;e1i\u00e9ts of ihe <\/p>\n
f.1’St informa\ufb01on. Therefore, the,’  sh\u00e9owf-eo,_ea:;se
\nnotice are su\ufb01cient to appr;-:.is4_e the”   ;
\nofoifence committed by him.   V ‘V V’ 1<\/p>\n
17. The learned   has relied on the
\njudgment reported in A32 j1973js_c:  ‘to contend, the
\nrelevant   iieitness in regard to
\nwhich he gig \u00abiigieeueegi    perjury shouid be
\nspecifieally  \u00e9znnexed to Show cause notice<\/p>\n
to enabie the iacciiseadiito  the change.<\/p>\n
 the  on hand, appellant was the \ufb01rst<\/p>\n
  Case No.1 \/ 2004. In the show cause notice,<\/p>\n
it’ie”elea_f1y.V-iisfeied, appellant has given evidence giving a go\u00bb<\/p>\n
\u00abV by   of \ufb01xst information. Therefore, no prejudice<\/p>\n
N ‘A   caused to appellant. In the circumstances, what<\/p>\n
   heki in the aforesaid decision is not applicable to<\/p>\n
   case.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
9. The submission of the learned Counsel <\/p>\n
that the learned trial Judge should have rormg\u00e9\u00e9   <\/p>\n
that appe\ufb02ant had intentionally   \ufb01hae \ufb01o<\/p>\n
basis. The inten\ufb01on of appc\ufb02axi\ufb01   . <\/p>\n
conduct. His intention was \u20aco~.\u00a7\u00e9tve theV’agc’u.ge\u00a23,.  i’c\u00e9’11’ned <\/p>\n
Sessions Judge at the. .conc111s\u00e9o\ufb01–.of-. trial, ” has  an
\nopinion that appellant  n false evidence<\/p>\n
‘\u00a7to save the accused.\n<\/p>\n
wpellam has not   ‘punishable under
\nSastbn 193 I.P.C.   any merit in the
\n Accoxy\ufb01\ufb01giki ihc  is ‘iriismiwed at the stag of<\/p>\n
admgsioig. ‘ ~. , 1
\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ramappa S\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008 Author: N.Ananda k .2:’s_.m:”.:u\\{Ar:-DA’, ” CRLv\u00a3A’.’NO.i?E\u00a7\u00e9V3Al’i2.C}fi\u00a53′ V’ BEIWEEN: Ratmappa, fjadaigig Age abQ1}VtT66″y_\u00e9af:~g_ ‘ ‘ Occu;3:atjon:A 4G0V\u20acIjI’iInC13.t Servant, ‘I’a}uka ;_ H1i1ng11:id’,:”-\u00a3}i3\u00a7: ‘Bagamot. .. APPELLANT (By Sri V; M.’_Sh eeIva\ufb011″;.’ Agiizp\u00e9atc) A ‘ ‘ V _ _ 1.* The x\ufb01~dmin.\u00a7si3ative O\ufb01cer, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77222","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRamappa S\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramappa S\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-21T01:12:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramappa S\\\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-21T01:12:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":678,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Ramappa S\\\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-21T01:12:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramappa S\\\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramappa S\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramappa S\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-21T01:12:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramappa S\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-21T01:12:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008"},"wordCount":678,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008","name":"Ramappa S\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-21T01:12:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramappa-so-hanamappa-gadagi-vs-the-chief-administrative-officer-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramappa S\/O Hanamappa Gadagi vs The Chief Administrative Officer on 11 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77222","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77222"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77222\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77222"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}