{"id":773,"date":"2009-07-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-12-14T03:42:58","modified_gmt":"2018-12-13T22:12:58","slug":"akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.K.Patil And H.Billappa<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT <\/p>\n
DATED THIS THE 15?” DAY 05-” JULY,  “;  H<\/p>\n
: PRESENT:<\/p>\n
‘rue Howaus MR. Jusrncesm.    V  k<\/p>\n
ANS<\/p>\n
me HOWBLE MR. .susncE% n.%m:.m=A 1
\nM.F.A.No.s7e*2Q::_2og4 (Mu;     <\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
F3<\/p>\n
Cs}<\/p>\n
AKTHAR BEGAUM ._ V% _V
\nssvams,  <\/p>\n
wso LATE AREFF @ AR\u00a3FUi’.LA . _ V<\/p>\n
SHARRTF    1 a
\nmo KARlG.0’e’\u20acDANAK\u00bbDPPALU KQWr.’$\u00a7%%KA
\nHAssAN.; ;~_V. \u00ab =_ _A. ‘ ”\n<\/p>\n
F:_EENA_KAi..!$ER  _ ;\n<\/p>\n
MAJOR, we  Asa\ufb01-fTA;@—At:<:Fuu_A
\nSHARWF "\n<\/p>\n
RIO :<ARmowaAN.axoPPALu KQWSHMA
\nHassma – V   <\/p>\n
. SALMA Kaissaa _
\nV. 'AGETD1–? mans," """ "\n<\/p>\n
Di(3.La3tTE’ ARIFF Q ARIFULLA<\/p>\n
  s:4.Am:=’F. ‘<\/p>\n
1:29 “KARiG0sA?DANAKOPPALU xowsazxa<\/p>\n
‘ –..;HAmA:~.:.\n<\/p>\n
.. vL_:;’;u.=s.:a;LA SHARIFF @ vusurrr<\/p>\n
’36 YEARS, \u20ac40 LATE ARSFF @ AFRFULLA
\nSHERIFF
\nRIO KARIGGNDANAKOPPALU KOWSHIKA<\/p>\n
V  KHASSAN,
\nvoussusunm SHARIFF @ mums<\/p>\n
15 YEARS, SIC} LATE ARFF Q AWFULLA
\nSHARE-‘~’
\nRIG KARiG$Ni3ANAKOPF’ALU KOW$HiKA<\/p>\n
E-lA$SAN,<\/p>\n
6 AMEER SAB @ ABDUL SHARIFF
\n68 YEARS, SIG MI-ZERA SHARSFF
\nRIO KARIGOWDANAKOPPALU KOWSI-RKA
\nHASSAN,<\/p>\n
‘: MEKARUNNISSA __  ,  V V
\n53 was, we) AMBER SAB @ Aaautss-LARK-*:-=
\nmo KARIGOWDANAKOPPALU Kowsnw. ‘
\nHASSAN,   “T A. -T<\/p>\n
.    ‘ ‘ ”  Ar?:=\u00a5\u00a3i:;,;.k\u00e9,\u00a7\u00a75rs  u
\n(By Sri ; K v NARASIMHAN . Aovocaf\u00e9za: \u00bb ‘ ‘ ‘
\nANS: VV<\/p>\n
1 MARIYAKUTTY   ‘ _  .\n<\/p>\n
WIOMPKARIYAKOSE — V  i
\nmmea ANM PAUNDNI-AND 905-‘:
\nBELTHANGADIEK
\nowreereor M.\u00a7;HiNDRAJEEP
\nNOKA_21Mu43\u00a74_-.’_ ~ ” ~,   .<\/p>\n
2 JGSEPH K:mnm;Am’Ew—.\n<\/p>\n
we Mam:-fw   _ —\n<\/p>\n
mATH:–:ww’oARpE\u00a7.   ‘
\nNELLUR. KEARAJE
\nSULQYADK   ,
\nowNaP:_oF.MAH:NL*RA’JEE:=<\/p>\n
_-.KA21M=i3.;84’~* ‘-\n<\/p>\n
 ‘~  _ 3   UMlTEDAI’NDiA–~:NSURANCE Co LTD<\/p>\n
. ‘ BRANCHOFFICE
\n .. PUTTUR  .,<\/p>\n
  ‘ REi~’?._B’v’ ena\ufb01m MANAGER<\/p>\n
_ _ . _  RESP”-‘ONDENTS
\n(By 5}: : arixa\u00e9uwaseaa, ADVOCATE FOR R1 ;<\/p>\n
~ M  : .-  ‘  GANGAGHAR SANGOLLI. ADVOCATE FOR R3;
\n‘ ‘ A ”  ‘R2 .T saavam<\/p>\n
hii\ufb01<\/p>\n
T1433 MFA \u00a38 FILED U38 ‘!?3{‘!} GF NW ACT AGNNST THE<\/p>\n
 V  ‘*’J{}DGMENT AND AWARD DATE-‘.D:22.6.94 PASE-EED IN MVC N0.2022\ufb0231 {OLD
\n N0.M.V.C.665i01} ON THE FSLE CF THE ABEL CIWL JUDGE {SRDN} AND<\/p>\n
ADDL. MAST, Hassm, F->ARTLY ALLOWING THE CLASM PETtT!\u20ac3 \u00a7fFOR
\ncompeusanon AND seems ENHANCEMENT 0.: coMPENsAT:QN\u00ab;.._  _<\/p>\n
mes MFA comma on ma HEARM; THIS DAY, _r3_:;i'<; '#57-eji,f' ;3.__, <\/p>\n
DELWERED THE FOLLOWING:  ' _
\nJUDGME\ufb01I\ufb02   <\/p>\n
This appeal arises out of  <\/p>\n
dated 26"' June 2004 '(am  A<\/p>\n
mess\/2001) on the \ufb01ig c:f..iti*1:;;ig*=.\u00a7\u00e9':*:1\ufb02ed Acmaaha: Civil
\nJudge (Senior Division) any;%Agwns\u00a2\u00a2ai%T%L%kM.A.c.T. Hassan<\/p>\n
('ciairns Trib:sn\u00e9;!f%:i1'for*::A.1br\u00e9\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7fy)';\u00ab.x\u00a7$\u00a7\u00a7i-t\ufb01gi\ufb01round that, the<\/p>\n
appeiijsxrit\u00e9s'   1e1\u00e9\u00a7i\u00e9'nr:%ment of compensation
\nunder {\u00a33 and 'loas of estate'.<\/p>\n
5 2. _ T\ufb01\u00e9  kcase are mat, one Sri. Ariff @<\/p>\n
. V.   the accident that occurred on 11"<\/p>\n
 x\u00e9if\ufb01n he was have-\ufb01ling in a Mahindm Jeep<\/p>\n
 _ be\u00e9ring-._'NcL \u00a5(Fs-211M-4384 along wi\ufb02m his friend by name<\/p>\n
.. at about 3 PM an B.M.I-'wad near<\/p>\n
  (1'–'h i'kl-ianayakana Haiti within the iimits of Rural Police<\/p>\n
% m\u00e9pta\ufb01on, Saklashpura. gm said jaep was driven by its<\/p>\n
driver in a rash and negligent mannar wi\ufb02'ioutg\u00bb"'g–iving<\/p>\n
importance to safety and dashed against the <\/p>\n
side {rm as a result of which, the K<\/p>\n
grievous injuries to his head <\/p>\n
was shifted to the Hosp\ufb02gl   <\/p>\n
succumbed to the injuries   iiiaimams
\nappellants as the iegaVi;::y.;"\u00a2':;,pj\u00a2f\u00a7.,'–'\u00a2': have filed ihe
\nciaim petition  lakhs
\nwith interesit\ufb01 of death cf
\nsn'.Anruiaasha\u00a7:ri;   petition had come up
\nbefore   22'" June 2004 and the<\/p>\n
exam. TfiBu.naE,VV:aft\u00e9i*._i'\ufb01*i\ufb01\u00a7rough evaiuation en' the entire<\/p>\n
  _reci57rti""'and after considering the oral and<\/p>\n
 \u00e9fiiierice and ether materiai on file, taking<\/p>\n
 \ufb01we status cf \ufb02ue deceased and the<\/p>\n
:;qu;ce"  income, has awarded in aii, a sum of<\/p>\n
4 VA   with intarmt at 6% per annum from the date<\/p>\n
 ':'_4:"af\u00ab\u00abi3etition till the date of reaiizatien. The appellants are<\/p>\n
\/nw<\/p>\n
before this court we the ground that, the oonzperissation<\/p>\n
awarded under the heads loss of<\/p>\n
estate are inadequate.\n<\/p>\n
3. The submission of <\/p>\n
appellants at the outset is that?  <\/p>\n
erred in taking the age’ of the   solely
\non the basis of the   \ufb01:i=:’:l\u00a7:fi:rV’ve:t_vappallant in the
\ncross examinati;n__  lplzl\ufb01\u00e9llllaged 45 years
\nat \ufb01le w\ufb01mmed that in the
\nclaim   Morten: report, the
\nage   “as 38 years and therefore,
\nthe C’lain1\u00a7*–.4TribtV;x::f;;a\ufb01’l  ie have talcem the age of the<\/p>\n
 v   as 33″yea:’sh1stead cl’ 45 years. Fur\ufb01wer, in the<\/p>\n
   \ufb01ae age of me daceased is speci\ufb01cally<\/p>\n
  years. Therefore, if we age of the<\/p>\n
 is taken as 38 yaars, then, me appropriate<\/p>\n
‘   F\u00e9f;’:aslt’.ii,’;5siia’ would be ’15’. Fur\ufb01war, he submitted that, the<\/p>\n
  ..’u.1\u00e9aI11e of the deceased ought to have been taken at<\/p>\n
%”‘———~=–\u00ab<\/p>\n
Rs.-4,00Dl~ per mound”: instead of Rs.3,000l– par rimnm.<\/p>\n
Accordingiy, the impugned judgment and award\u00e9.’<\/p>\n
ta be modi\ufb01ed and the appellants   .,<\/p>\n
enhancement of cmrpensatiidn   ;<\/p>\n
dependency. _  V a<\/p>\n
4. Further, he
\ntowards loss of   jand avpeuants
\nare entitied tp’   some of \ufb01me
\nappelianisi.  V   iddtireiy dependent.
\nTherefcrm,  \ufb01oempensation needs to
\nbe  disc-\n<\/p>\n
  ma\ufb01a, Vie-arned counsel for Insurance<\/p>\n
  inter x\u00a7\u00a3T\u00a5\u00e9i’,”‘t$ontended and submitted that, the<\/p>\n
  and award passed by the Claims<\/p>\n
TrAitsa.’v1na,!;’i;\u00a7. and pmper and interference by \ufb02xis Court<\/p>\n
 ‘abie since the same is dad after<\/p>\n
   the oral and documentary avidence and otha<\/p>\n
\/4%<\/p>\n
matmial available on \ufb01le and also on \ufb01ne basigs<\/p>\n
admission by the first appeilant in her cross  <\/p>\n
6. After hearing the learnedbpwrasei’ ~ <\/p>\n
and after careful perusal of th e; jtgaggn\u00e9ni *<\/p>\n
passed by the Ciaims T\ufb01h\ufb01\ufb01ai.   :on.IyV <\/p>\n
arise for our considera\ufb01on    _
\nWhether the ATii!:fii:jaI.::’A’V5$A~justifed in
\nawarding _.a~,z:_prop\ufb01’a{\u00e9j”: ta wards
\n{ass of   i\u00e9sfate ?\n<\/p>\n
   original records made
\navailabl\u00e9’,   age of the deceased is<\/p>\n
shoygh as 33% margin tn; ciaim petition filed by claimants<\/p>\n
   2001 as wen as in the Ratian Card<\/p>\n
    Tribunai ought ta have taken the<\/p>\n
V   \ufb02ue deceaaed as 38 years instead of 45<\/p>\n
.   the basis of the mere wmissior: made by first<\/p>\n
 a@mI\u00a7am in her cross examinatian, contrary to: the<\/p>\n
 ,  reievant ctinching documentary evidence availabie an<\/p>\n
record. Therefare, there was no justi\ufb01catktan fqf \ufb01ne<\/p>\n
Claims Tribunai for taking \ufb02ue age of <\/p>\n
years at the time of accident. Therefore,   <\/p>\n
canside.-red opinion that it is wouid’A’b’e’   to<\/p>\n
take we age of the   <\/p>\n
accident on me basis of    V<\/p>\n
available on rmci   a\ufb01xa\ufb01vriculturist
\nby profession and   to the whole
\nsate deazeafs,    that true
\nmmw\ufb01r   around Rs.50,Gm to
\n  an income of Rs.10,00GI-\n<\/p>\n
per  have not produced any<\/p>\n
 mph tax remrns in support af me<\/p>\n
  ‘V: View the occupation of ma <\/p>\n
 _ as the records mat the decaasad W33 an<\/p>\n
‘   cum busmm2=zm’ an and sum am dining miik<\/p>\n
  busznm, we deem it just and prom ta me the<\/p>\n
{  k.cm of the deceased at Rs.4,000l- per nmmth and er<\/p>\n
\/\u00ab.1,<\/p>\n
w<\/p>\n
Rs\u00a21,mOI- is deducted frcm the same <\/p>\n
personal expenses having ragard to the   _<\/p>\n
dependents, \ufb02ue income per mont\ufb01  ‘~ <\/p>\n
and using the appropriate    <\/p>\n
Rs.5,4o,eco;- (i.e.3,000x12kV1S}.,V_ Ao\ufb01m-di%hg@Iy%;\u00ab?J&v\u00a2e% hoid <\/p>\n
that the appellants ate, –a’su_m  R$.5E40,000I–
\ntowards loss of depen\u00a71;en\u00a2;\u00ab Rs.3,12,000l-\n<\/p>\n
awarded by    ..\n<\/p>\n
7.    he Tribuna! has
\n  into consideration \ufb02ue
\n   and having regard to the<\/p>\n
 we    :a:nd proper to award addi\ufb01onal<\/p>\n
  of estate to maet \ufb01re ends of<\/p>\n
 3.j}n1iae light of \ufb02ue facts am circumstances of the<\/p>\n
A as stated above, the appeal rm by appellants is<\/p>\n
  g;;\u00a2u2\u00a7d in pan.\n<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
The impugned judgment and award passed by the<\/p>\n
Claims Tribunal dated 22″” June  in<\/p>\n
M.V_C.No.2022I2001 (ow No.665l2001) is <\/p>\n
awarding a sum of Rs.5,40,mO!-  srnf ” = <\/p>\n
towards loss of dependencyi’-._  <\/p>\n
Rs.2,28,000I-) and a sumV__vb{  Rs;1\u00a2,am:~\u00a3m:eaa dfdri’<\/p>\n
Rs.5,000l- (enhancemgnt ‘R_s;’5,00.0I’-‘fr  loss
\nof estate with interat ‘ ‘a”it    “pg: annum frdm
\nthe date of  till \u20ac15;dd\u00a7:.edd\u00a2rd%drea%tazaa;\u00a2n.<\/p>\n
 is directed to
\n  a period of eight weeks<\/p>\n
fro:nA.tc>da)’\ufb02”~~  V.  A<\/p>\n
  Q  of. tl1e”1V\u00e9rih\u00e9hced amount with accrued interest,<\/p>\n
   be deposited in the Fixed Deposit for a<\/p>\n
p\u00e9\ufb01nd   years in any Nationaiizedlscheduled Bank<\/p>\n
‘ H ” ‘T  to draw quartaiy interest.<\/p>\n
\/Znwwd.\n<\/p>\n
Sa far was the commnsation awardw under athferj.<\/p>\n
heads is concerned, \ufb01me same are just and   _<\/p>\n
does not cam for interference.<\/p>\n
Draw up the award accordingly.7.__  3 <\/p>\n
 1  <\/span><\/p>\n
BMW<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil And H.Billappa N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 15?” DAY 05-” JULY, “; H : PRESENT: ‘rue Howaus MR. Jusrncesm. V k ANS me HOWBLE MR. .susncE% n.%m:.m=A 1 M.F.A.No.s7e*2Q::_2og4 (Mu; BETWEEN: 1 F3 Cs} AKTHAR BEGAUM ._ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAkthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-13T22:12:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-13T22:12:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1404,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-13T22:12:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-13T22:12:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-13T22:12:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009"},"wordCount":1404,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009","name":"Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-13T22:12:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/akthar-begaum-vs-mariyakutty-on-15-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Akthar Begaum vs Mariyakutty on 15 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/773\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}