{"id":77946,"date":"2009-11-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009"},"modified":"2018-06-03T15:05:09","modified_gmt":"2018-06-03T09:35:09","slug":"smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
RSA No.72')\/2007\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT 01+\" KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT D1-IARWAD\nDATED THIS THE 19TH DAY 05' NOVEMBER, 2009\nBEFORE '\nTHE HoN'BLE 1v:R.JUsT1cE B.s.PAT1L=\nREGULAR SECOND APPEAMIQ.72\u00a79}'2be?j   \n\nBetween: V ' '\nSM'I'.POOJAR ERAMMA\n\nW\/O GURUPADAPPA\n\nAGED ABOUT 48 YEJAEQR, \n\nRESIMNG AT WARD I\\\u00a7(.J;\\_r'l'i__\n\nCHAPPARADAHALLI  A\n\nANANTASAYANAGUDI -- _ . * \nHosPE'1'--5s3 201._---_  \" ; APPELLANT\n\n(By Sri.$V.V.S'1_'1TAai;e'i;_1-i_,&V Adv  ' \nAnd: A\n\nSR1.MA_LLl sH'1'vAPPA'\u00ab\n\n _ S\/O BASAPPA MALL:\n\n AB.:1-MT .50 TEAM'\n\n REsI.Dmg'; vAT,Ti~MMANA.wRA\n\n'QA'\"L>,AG--, _( 'zA_}f)vAG_E\u00a7EST]~<E{jf'1'.  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
‘   (B5iAdv)<\/p>\n
Thisappeal is rm; under Section $00 of cpc against the<\/p>\n
 – “judgment. and d\u20acCI'(‘{.’ dated 24.02.2007 passed in
\n‘  “R’,A,._Ne’;_\u00ab92,*’2006 on the \ufb02it: of the Addl. Civil Judge (S1”.D1’a.),
\n._’_HCspef, dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment
\n  and decree cit.12..07.2U(…)\u20ac; passed in O.$.1\\E0.\u00a7.50\/O5 on the fiie
\n V’0’f’the Prl. CiVi1Judge (\\.\u00a7r.If.)1″:.), 81, JMFC, Hospet.<\/p>\n
RS\/\u00ab\\ No.729\/2007<\/p>\n
This appeal eerning: on for admission, this day, the Court
\ndelivered the following:\n<\/p>\n
J UDGIVIENT<\/p>\n
1. ln this second aippeal, the appellant is <\/p>\n
judgment and decree passed by the learned 1′-_’.–i’;i'(ll..:ii\ufb02i\ufb01ilidudge <\/p>\n
(Sr.[)n.), Hospet, dismissing R.A.92\/:2_VOO,6.sail1d2eenfirrning_. <\/p>\n
dismissal of the suit {).S.N0.]W:’>0__.\/OS llilvel\u00e9l <\/p>\n
herein.\n<\/p>\n
2. The plaintif\ufb01appcll’ai__n’t._filed -\u00ab._\u00a7:.),_S’;N0.150\/05 seeking
\nperrnane-nt injunction ;:.i;;;z:lin_s_ti’ t.hei.ldel’en–‘tiaiit\u00e9respondent herein<\/p>\n
in respeel of  l1lii~\u00a7.V)’I”L_}:\u00a3:).fi3’I’_iZy bearing No.229 measuring 40 ft
\nX 20 ft situated  of Hospet town. E1: was her<\/p>\n
contention that she 1-3’;-l::;_ ipuf in possession of the shed as a<\/p>\n
__lessee aamonthilye V1″(“.l’%I\u00a3:1l of R3125\/~ xvhieh later came to be<\/p>\n
 in’e;\u00a26\u00a3-ii1is:%cl  The plaintiff asserted that she was<\/p>\n
pay’l1}gl the”rer:tsa.te_:..th(> aiefendant from time to time by sending<\/p>\n
money-9’erc\u00a7er\u00e9f.’j_ ..5’It wzis also urged than the defendant had<\/p>\n
\u00abassured her {hat in ee:1:~;g: he were to deeiric: to sell the property,<\/p>\n
l  avoiuld  first pr<1rl'm"{\u00ab:n<:e to the plaintiil. Alleging that the<\/p>\n
RSA No.72')\/2007<\/p>\n
'…:\n<\/p>\n
defendant was trying; ‘zio dispossess ll(“T by using force she<\/p>\n
approaehtrd the court 3\u00a7t.’Cl{ll’l\u00a7__{ perrrianeiit. injunction.<\/p>\n
3. The defendant ntsisted the suit contending <\/p>\n
the plaintiff was a trcss~passc:i’. He asserted th”at_l itjwaislthel V’<\/p>\n
defendant who was rcsiciing in the su’it”s’c:hed’ule_vproperty-iandg<\/p>\n
as he was transferred to Gadag, taldngotirl’.-due ad\\’ar1tageiiQ_f”‘hiVs’._<\/p>\n
absence and without any ri;_\u00a7h-t._*o_r interest-._(5ver—-. the suit’<\/p>\n
property, the dei’end;mt;.–. had V.i-tr’e.s_s~;:’5assed lii’1’ito.\/the suit<\/p>\n
property.\n<\/p>\n
4. On the basVis–.of’—:._l’ic \ufb01respeiotiveiitzontrenfions, the trial court<\/p>\n
framed rziecessan\/V..iss:ies,ir1.r:ltiding the issue as regards the<\/p>\n
alleged relationshipoi’i:la1″rdic’grtl.and tenant between the plaintiff<\/p>\n
and the.defend’ani. e.mi;’i aiootit the lawful possession of the suit<\/p>\n
li’proper.t’.j}- by the \u00a7:)i\u20ac\\’i.’];.iVi.’\u00a3’f.’f-.’V The plaintiff examined herself and<\/p>\n
ltwo”;:.>’itiirz_s’ses; f[‘_lic_: (l(“ii(?1’}d\u20ac}11l. also exmiiined himself as DW\u00abl<\/p>\n
and one 1″1’1QF\u20acii”‘\\\u00ab*t:*i{1”:t*SSt<\/p>\n
  on VvEif(_l3}’)I”(‘3Cl&i?.’l(.)l”l of the oral and documentary evidence,<\/p>\n
  thevetrii\u00e9itl Court r”ec’:c)r’dr*c.i a fiizding that the plaintiff failed to<\/p>\n
 -\ufb02elstaibl\u00e9sh the relat.io1’2.sl’ii_p of landlord and tenant. It also found<\/p>\n
RSA No.72′?\/2007<\/p>\n
that no material was }’)I’0dLi(IC?{l to Show that any rents were
\npaid. It recorded at specific finding that the plaintiff was a<\/p>\n
tresswpasser and was not in lawfui possession of the\ufb02sult<\/p>\n
premises and hence was not entitled for a decree  ‘<\/p>\n
injunction. The appellate court upon re-appreclialtionV..olf V’<\/p>\n
evidence on record has concurred wit%’1’Ath’e\u00ab fin’din_gs_lof_thetrial’;<\/p>\n
court and has acc()1′{li1’c1;.;ly dismissed thsj alppzeal.   *\n<\/p>\n
6. Learned couns:-ti for me “a,o’pell;1nt  the<\/p>\n
\ufb01ndings recorded by \u00a7.,>oL\u00a7rl\u00b0 the g:oii1″ts:’*l\u00a7e’lo.w holding’llthat the<\/p>\n
plaintiff was a tress–;o2.-zsserlandd  ;sl’1(;Al to establish the<\/p>\n
relationship of la.;'”z.:llo:gl  tcn;an4tA”i.s’_–zmsustalnable from the<\/p>\n
evidence on record.”  la?so~clo”;’1tends that even assuming that<\/p>\n
the plaintlffl”vvasvv a _%1l’\u00e9;:’SS~.f5’g:1E’sS’%t31″ sinee she was in settled<\/p>\n
__possessf.lon’of the }.}iT(fE1ilS\u20acj’S, slur was untitled for protection of<\/p>\n
Akhet’possess\u00e9on\u00e9tas she muld only be dispossessed by following<\/p>\n
the  pfooe~vS_s  V1″-Qm;\n<\/p>\n
_7. Ravi-rig’reareftlllj.’ considered the contentions of the<\/p>\n
 counsel for the appellant and in the Eight of the<\/p>\n
concurrent \ufb01ndings 1″(“(“,0I’dC’Cl lvjv” both the courts below, I find<\/p>\n
RSA No.729\/2007<\/p>\n
that no substantia} question of law arises for consideration in<\/p>\n
this second appez-1}. The findings recorded regarding the-<\/p>\n
absence of any relationship of Eandiord and tenant is based on<\/p>\n
appreciation of eVic:1e::insh_ip\u00ab\u00a2 of; 1ain’d1_c>rVd”‘and’1<\/p>\n
tenant between the pi\u00e9..\u00a3i1’i[iff and the’det’eVndaint_g A’i”hi’~s<\/p>\n
cannot embark upon rtvapprce.iatioh\u00bbof evid.enee  exercise of<\/p>\n
powers u \/ s 100 CPC3.\n<\/p>\n
8. As regards the m.her…c::omen_tio;a ‘t’t1rged,1~s’umng that the<\/p>\n
plaintiff who. i”:’:::;;.Saettiedipo’sse.s:sion though as a tress–<\/p>\n
passer, itlhasito heifheld, th-.at”‘–even here also both the courts<\/p>\n
have found tihsatiias the \u20aci.5:tent_ia:11′, was irarzsferred to Gadag and<\/p>\n
__Was  istayingi’ia–!…’l-iospet taking undtle advantage of the<\/p>\n
i’~.abise1a,c_e  Vthe:’defen{::iz.mt, the plaintiff had tress–passed into<\/p>\n
theshed conj’s.:ru~:\u00a7t’:irc.t m”: the suit schedule property. Therefore,<\/p>\n
in thei”‘wa1;:eo!'”such l’indi1’1gs, is is not open for the plaintiff to<\/p>\n
“‘*.i’eonteri_d that she was in settled poswssion of the premises.<\/p>\n
fherefoiie, in the Eight of them: factuni findings by both the<\/p>\n
RS\/\\ No.729\/2667<\/p>\n
COL1I’tS, the second 2.\u00ab1ppc*e:1\u00a7 cannm be <.-~1'1Lertain<:rd. Hence, the <\/p>\n
same is dismissed. S\/an<\/p>\n
Jm\/–\n<\/p>\n
IUDGEf?f 7*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009 Author: B.S.Patil RSA No.72′)\/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT 01+” KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT D1-IARWAD DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY 05′ NOVEMBER, 2009 BEFORE ‘ THE HoN’BLE 1v:R.JUsT1cE B.s.PAT1L= REGULAR SECOND APPEAMIQ.72\u00a79}’2be?j Between: V ‘ ‘ SM’I’.POOJAR ERAMMA W\/O GURUPADAPPA AGED ABOUT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-77946","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-03T09:35:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-03T09:35:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":976,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-03T09:35:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-03T09:35:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-03T09:35:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009"},"wordCount":976,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009","name":"Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-03T09:35:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-poojar-eramma-vs-sri-malli-shivappa-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Poojar Eramma vs Sri Malli Shivappa on 19 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77946","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77946"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77946\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77946"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77946"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77946"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}